Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-11 Thread Jeff Turner
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:15:33PM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:

...
[On why http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/sites/xml-fop/ wasn't updating]
...
>  [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.InternalError: Can't 
> connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as the value of the DISPLAY 
> variable.

I added a DISPLAY pointing to Xvfb, and it seems to be updating properly
now.  If anyone notices a 'Last published' date at the bottom of a page
older than 1 hour (GMT) please let me know.


--Jeff

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: src/documentation/README

2002-12-11 Thread Victor Mote
Jeff Turner wrote:

> Forrest is in the same boat as FOP when it comes to site updates.  AFAIK,
> there are no docs, but the process is:
>
>  - Committers commit generated docs to xml-site/targets/{project}
>  - Every X hours, a script updates /www/xml.apache.org/ or wherever on
>the live site, from CVS.
>
> Pretty messy, but this CVS-based site update system has some virtues:
>
>  - it is pull-based, so fewer security risks

Pull wouldn't require CVS.

>  - site contents can be reverted easily without an admin having to figure
>out how the doc generation tool works.

This makes sense.

>  - it's there and it works
>
> Discussions for creating a better site update system should probably be
> held on general@xml, since it affects all projects, or forrest-dev, since
> people there are particularly interested, and Steven has talked with Sam
> about it before.

I have no problem with xml-site/targets/{project} or the CVS-based system
(except for the binary PDF issue mentioned before, which may be
unavoidable). What is a little frustrating is that it seems like we are only
a short script (checkout, copy -r, commit) away from being able to use the
builds that are being done on icarus (or another apache machine) to update
xml-site/targets/{project}, instead of having to do the documentation builds
locally. Is there some reason why we can't just do a copy here?

Victor Mote


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-11 Thread Peter B. West
Christian Geisert wrote:

Peter B. West wrote:


You need a local forrest installation, see 
http://xml.apache.org/forrest/your-project.html#N10036

Christian,

Thanks.  I have set one up, but I was confused about automated updates.

Peter
--
Peter B. West  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
"Lord, to whom shall we go?"


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-11 Thread Christian Geisert
Peter B. West wrote:

Jeff Turner wrote:


Forrest is in the same boat as FOP when it comes to site updates.  AFAIK,
there are no docs, but the process is:

 - Committers commit generated docs to xml-site/targets/{project}


Generated by what?  Forrestbot?  Where?  Is the login that appears at 

You need a local forrest installation, see 
http://xml.apache.org/forrest/your-project.html#N10036

Christian


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-11 Thread Peter B. West
Jeff Turner wrote:

On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:24:34PM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:



Forrestbot?



Forrestbot is a glorified Ant script which automates the process of
checking out a site's contents from CVS, building the docs and uploading
the docs somewhere.  It currently has no official role in the
getting-HTML-onto-Apache process.



Where?  Is the login that appears at forrestbot.cocoondev.org my
cvs.apache.org logname and passwd?  The login transaction is not
secure.



forrestbot.cocoondev.org currently plays no role in the process of
checking HTML into xml-site.  It could in future, but not yet.

The username/password is forrest-dev/forrest-dev.  Logging in simply
allows you to trigger a refresh of forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop.



From the point above, this process is just like the previous one.  I 
have a checkout on my system of xml-site/targets/fop for just this 
purpose.  The only difference was that I would perform a cvs update of 
the FOP site manually, on xml.apache.org, after committing the changes. 
So where does forrestbot come in?


It doesn't :)  Sorry if I implied it did by posting that URL in the
middle of the discussion.

However, if no-one comes up with a better mechanism for updating the live
site than xml-site/targets/*, then I will enable the commit-to-Apache-CVS
button, and forrestbot.cocoondev.org will be useful as more than just a
staging server.


Jeff,

Thanks for the clarifications.  We're all stumbling towards a solution, 
it seems.

Peter
--
Peter B. West  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
"Lord, to whom shall we go?"


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-11 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi


Keiron Liddle wrote:

On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 19:17, Victor Mote wrote:


OK, I see now that I misunderstood your "Sorry, yes" answer to Keiron. If
http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop should be reflecting changes no
more than an hour old made to xml-fop/src/documentation, then it is not
working. I just looked for changes that were made about 24 hours ago, and
they are not there. Also, as I mentioned, it shows a publish date of 12-7.
So I suspect that something is not working. We have one document with a
non-standard DTD (my fault, in fact that is what I am trying to work on)
that might be messing up the flow. How do I go about troubleshooting this?



Judging by the log it might be a DISPLAY problem.

The compliance doc should only cause a broken link.

Who is in charge of the cocoondev site, could they work out what the
problem is?


forwarding to forrest.

Here is the relevant part of the last log:


 [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.InternalError: Can't 
connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as the value of the DISPLAY 
variable.


--
Nicola Ken Barozzi   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-11 Thread Jeff Turner
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:24:34PM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
> Jeff Turner wrote:
> >
> >Forrest is in the same boat as FOP when it comes to site updates.  AFAIK,
> >there are no docs, but the process is:
> >
> > - Committers commit generated docs to xml-site/targets/{project}
> 
> Generated by what?

By Forrest, usually by hand.  I update the Forrest site with:

jeff@expresso:~/xml-forrest$ forrest
... wait for Forrest to finish ...
jeff@expresso:~/xml-forrest$ cp -rp build/site/* ../../../xml-site/targets/forrest
jeff@expresso:~/xml-forrest$ cd ../xml-site/targets/forrest
jeff@expresso:~/xml-site/targets/forrest$ cvs update
... Check for files that need to be 'cvs add'ed ...
jeff@expresso:~/xml-site/targets/forrest$ cvs commit


> Forrestbot?

Forrestbot is a glorified Ant script which automates the process of
checking out a site's contents from CVS, building the docs and uploading
the docs somewhere.  It currently has no official role in the
getting-HTML-onto-Apache process.

> Where?  Is the login that appears at forrestbot.cocoondev.org my
> cvs.apache.org logname and passwd?  The login transaction is not
> secure.

forrestbot.cocoondev.org currently plays no role in the process of
checking HTML into xml-site.  It could in future, but not yet.

The username/password is forrest-dev/forrest-dev.  Logging in simply
allows you to trigger a refresh of forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop.

> From the point above, this process is just like the previous one.  I 
> have a checkout on my system of xml-site/targets/fop for just this 
> purpose.  The only difference was that I would perform a cvs update of 
> the FOP site manually, on xml.apache.org, after committing the changes. 
>  So where does forrestbot come in?

It doesn't :)  Sorry if I implied it did by posting that URL in the
middle of the discussion.

However, if no-one comes up with a better mechanism for updating the live
site than xml-site/targets/*, then I will enable the commit-to-Apache-CVS
button, and forrestbot.cocoondev.org will be useful as more than just a
staging server.


--Jeff

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-11 Thread Peter B. West
Keiron Liddle wrote:

On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 19:17, Victor Mote wrote:


OK, I see now that I misunderstood your "Sorry, yes" answer to Keiron. If
http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop should be reflecting changes no
more than an hour old made to xml-fop/src/documentation, then it is not
working. I just looked for changes that were made about 24 hours ago, and
they are not there. Also, as I mentioned, it shows a publish date of 12-7.
So I suspect that something is not working. We have one document with a
non-standard DTD (my fault, in fact that is what I am trying to work on)
that might be messing up the flow. How do I go about troubleshooting this?



Judging by the log it might be a DISPLAY problem.

The compliance doc should only cause a broken link.

Who is in charge of the cocoondev site, could they work out what the
problem is?



I think Sam Ruby has a script which automatically updates the live site
to the contents of xml-site/targets/*.


Should I contact him directly? Also, I still don't know whether
xml-site/targets/fop is my final destination. What is best practices for
this process? If this is documented somewhere, please excuse me -- I haven't
found it yet. Also, I realize that this conversation might be better on
forrest-dev. I asked on this list because I think Keiron has already figured
most of this out & I am trying to leverage off of that. Thanks very much for
your help.



Haven't figured out all of it.
There is no real documentation for the old process, currently we are
only really replacing the doc generation process.


Keiron, Victor,

I'm still floundering around here, but when I found 'catalog' in 
.../documentation/resources/schema, and the dtd in .../schema/dtd, I 
began to see a ray of light.  It seems to me that such a setup should be 
used for all of the DOCTYPE delcarations in the documentation tree.  At 
the moment we are relying on the system identifier component of the 
DOCTYPE declaration, and that is indicating a CVS retrieval - some from 
the xml-forrest base, some from xml-cocoon2, last time I looked.

These can (probably will) get out of sync. The dtd should be the one 
used when the document was last modified, shouldn't it?  It seems to me 
there is a case for including the schema subtree, including catalog 
file(s) and the dtd subdirectory, in the src/build tree, and maintaining 
the synchronization locally.

Peter
--
Peter B. West  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
"Lord, to whom shall we go?"


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-11 Thread Peter B. West
Jeff Turner wrote:


Forrest is in the same boat as FOP when it comes to site updates.  AFAIK,
there are no docs, but the process is:

 - Committers commit generated docs to xml-site/targets/{project}


Generated by what?  Forrestbot?  Where?  Is the login that appears at 
forrestbot.cocoondev.org my cvs.apache.org logname and passwd?  The 
login transaction is not secure.

From the point above, this process is just like the previous one.  I 
have a checkout on my system of xml-site/targets/fop for just this 
purpose.  The only difference was that I would perform a cvs update of 
the FOP site manually, on xml.apache.org, after committing the changes. 
 So where does forrestbot come in?

 - Every X hours, a script updates /www/xml.apache.org/ or wherever on
   the live site, from CVS.

Pretty messy, but this CVS-based site update system has some virtues:

 - it is pull-based, so fewer security risks
 - site contents can be reverted easily without an admin having to figure
   out how the doc generation tool works.
 - it's there and it works



Peter
--
Peter B. West  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
"Lord, to whom shall we go?"


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-11 Thread Jeff Turner
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:17:25AM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
...
> > > > See http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop
...
> OK, I see now that I misunderstood your "Sorry, yes" answer to Keiron. If
> http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop should be reflecting changes no
> more than an hour old made to xml-fop/src/documentation, then it is not
> working.

Hmm yes, something went wrong.  It seems to be working now, but I'll keep
an eye on it.  The 'last published' in the footer is the best indicator
of currency.

> > I think Sam Ruby has a script which automatically updates the live site
> > to the contents of xml-site/targets/*.
> 
> Should I contact him directly? Also, I still don't know whether
> xml-site/targets/fop is my final destination. What is best practices for
> this process? If this is documented somewhere, please excuse me -- I haven't
> found it yet. Also, I realize that this conversation might be better on
> forrest-dev. I asked on this list because I think Keiron has already figured
> most of this out & I am trying to leverage off of that. Thanks very much for
> your help.

Forrest is in the same boat as FOP when it comes to site updates.  AFAIK,
there are no docs, but the process is:

 - Committers commit generated docs to xml-site/targets/{project}
 - Every X hours, a script updates /www/xml.apache.org/ or wherever on
   the live site, from CVS.

Pretty messy, but this CVS-based site update system has some virtues:

 - it is pull-based, so fewer security risks
 - site contents can be reverted easily without an admin having to figure
   out how the doc generation tool works.
 - it's there and it works

Discussions for creating a better site update system should probably be
held on general@xml, since it affects all projects, or forrest-dev, since
people there are particularly interested, and Steven has talked with Sam
about it before.


--Jeff

> Victor Mote
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: src/documentation/README

2002-12-11 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 19:17, Victor Mote wrote:
> OK, I see now that I misunderstood your "Sorry, yes" answer to Keiron. If
> http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop should be reflecting changes no
> more than an hour old made to xml-fop/src/documentation, then it is not
> working. I just looked for changes that were made about 24 hours ago, and
> they are not there. Also, as I mentioned, it shows a publish date of 12-7.
> So I suspect that something is not working. We have one document with a
> non-standard DTD (my fault, in fact that is what I am trying to work on)
> that might be messing up the flow. How do I go about troubleshooting this?

Judging by the log it might be a DISPLAY problem.

The compliance doc should only cause a broken link.

Who is in charge of the cocoondev site, could they work out what the
problem is?

> > I think Sam Ruby has a script which automatically updates the live site
> > to the contents of xml-site/targets/*.
> 
> Should I contact him directly? Also, I still don't know whether
> xml-site/targets/fop is my final destination. What is best practices for
> this process? If this is documented somewhere, please excuse me -- I haven't
> found it yet. Also, I realize that this conversation might be better on
> forrest-dev. I asked on this list because I think Keiron has already figured
> most of this out & I am trying to leverage off of that. Thanks very much for
> your help.

Haven't figured out all of it.
There is no real documentation for the old process, currently we are
only really replacing the doc generation process.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-10 Thread Peter B. West
Victor Mote wrote:

Jeff Turner wrote:



On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:


Jeff Turner wrote:



See http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop

Updated every hour with the latest Forrest and FOP source.


I am really not yet following what is going on here. I


understand the flow


of files into xml-site/targets/fop. I assume that the link


above is showing


an hourly update of those contents (the xml-site/targets/fop is


cvs, so it


is getting checked out on a server somewhere).


No, it is checking out xml-fop/src/documentation from CVS and building
that with the latest Forrest.  What you see there has no relation to
what's in xml-site/targets/fop



OK, I see now that I misunderstood your "Sorry, yes" answer to Keiron. If
http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop should be reflecting changes no
more than an hour old made to xml-fop/src/documentation, then it is not
working. I just looked for changes that were made about 24 hours ago, and
they are not there. Also, as I mentioned, it shows a publish date of 12-7.
So I suspect that something is not working. We have one document with a
non-standard DTD (my fault, in fact that is what I am trying to work on)
that might be messing up the flow. How do I go about troubleshooting this?



I think Sam Ruby has a script which automatically updates the live site
to the contents of xml-site/targets/*.



Should I contact him directly? Also, I still don't know whether
xml-site/targets/fop is my final destination. What is best practices for
this process? If this is documented somewhere, please excuse me -- I haven't
found it yet. Also, I realize that this conversation might be better on
forrest-dev. I asked on this list because I think Keiron has already figured
most of this out & I am trying to leverage off of that. Thanks very much for
your help.


Victor, Jeff,

Please keep this conversation here.  I, too, am finding this process 
very confusing, but all of the committers need to be aware of the way 
the FOP web-site updates work, and we can't do that if the conversation 
disappears.

Peter
--
Peter B. West  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
"Lord, to whom shall we go?"


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: src/documentation/README

2002-12-10 Thread Victor Mote
Jeff Turner wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
> > Jeff Turner wrote:
> >
> > > See http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop
> > >
> > > Updated every hour with the latest Forrest and FOP source.
> >
> > I am really not yet following what is going on here. I
> understand the flow
> > of files into xml-site/targets/fop. I assume that the link
> above is showing
> > an hourly update of those contents (the xml-site/targets/fop is
> cvs, so it
> > is getting checked out on a server somewhere).
>
> No, it is checking out xml-fop/src/documentation from CVS and building
> that with the latest Forrest.  What you see there has no relation to
> what's in xml-site/targets/fop

OK, I see now that I misunderstood your "Sorry, yes" answer to Keiron. If
http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop should be reflecting changes no
more than an hour old made to xml-fop/src/documentation, then it is not
working. I just looked for changes that were made about 24 hours ago, and
they are not there. Also, as I mentioned, it shows a publish date of 12-7.
So I suspect that something is not working. We have one document with a
non-standard DTD (my fault, in fact that is what I am trying to work on)
that might be messing up the flow. How do I go about troubleshooting this?

> I think Sam Ruby has a script which automatically updates the live site
> to the contents of xml-site/targets/*.

Should I contact him directly? Also, I still don't know whether
xml-site/targets/fop is my final destination. What is best practices for
this process? If this is documented somewhere, please excuse me -- I haven't
found it yet. Also, I realize that this conversation might be better on
forrest-dev. I asked on this list because I think Keiron has already figured
most of this out & I am trying to leverage off of that. Thanks very much for
your help.

Victor Mote




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-10 Thread Jeff Turner
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
> Jeff Turner wrote:
> 
> > See http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop
> >
> > Updated every hour with the latest Forrest and FOP source.
> 
> I am really not yet following what is going on here. I understand the flow
> of files into xml-site/targets/fop. I assume that the link above is showing
> an hourly update of those contents (the xml-site/targets/fop is cvs, so it
> is getting checked out on a server somewhere).

No, it is checking out xml-fop/src/documentation from CVS and building
that with the latest Forrest.  What you see there has no relation to
what's in xml-site/targets/fop

> the same. Am I missing something here? Most importantly, if I check
> files into xml-site/targets/fop, what steps, if any, do I need to take
> to get them visible at xml.apache.org/fop?

I think Sam Ruby has a script which automatically updates the live site
to the contents of xml-site/targets/*.


--Jeff

> Thanks for clarifying this.
> 
> Victor Mote
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: src/documentation/README

2002-12-10 Thread Victor Mote
Jeff Turner wrote:

> See http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop
>
> Updated every hour with the latest Forrest and FOP source.

I am really not yet following what is going on here. I understand the flow
of files into xml-site/targets/fop. I assume that the link above is showing
an hourly update of those contents (the xml-site/targets/fop is cvs, so it
is getting checked out on a server somewhere). However, our published web
site http://xml.apache.org/fop indicates that it was published on 12-2
(actually at the moment it says 12-3, so maybe it is now displaying GMT
instead of PST), the forrestbot link above indicates that it was
published on 12-7. So it would appear that for some reason those two are not
the same. Am I missing something here? Most importantly, if I check files
into xml-site/targets/fop, what steps, if any, do I need to take to get them
visible at xml.apache.org/fop?

Thanks for clarifying this.

Victor Mote



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-10 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 05:45, Victor Mote wrote:
> I have been running this on the Apache machine. Is that OK? If successful,
> we can theoretically just add a cron job to publish periodically if we wish,
> until Forrest is ready to do its magic for us.
> 
> When running forrest, I am getting the NoClassDefFoundError on
> java.awt.Rectangle, which I assume is Batik failing during pdf generation
> because of running in a headless environment. I did not find any of our
> solutions in our headless FAQ available on that machine. How have you been
> handling this? Or have you been running locally & then uploading the
> completed web site?

I was running it locally.

> I wonder if we still should have this under cvs control. It probably doesn't
> matter much for the html files, but the pdf files are binary, and cvs is
> basically keeping a full copy of each revision. For example, status.pdf is
> currently 8328 bytes, and status.pdf,v which contains 3 versions, is 27,769
> bytes. Since these are generated files now, we probably don't need an audit
> trail of them.

I agree, I suppose it depends on the way it will function. Cvs just
happens to be easy.

> Does committing the documents actually trigger something that immediately
> updates the web site, or is there some process that runs periodically that
> does that?

I think there is something that does update it (for certain projects) at
a certain time. I don't know if fop has it working.

> I am hoping, if this script works, that we can change our
> workflow as follows: If a reasonably good question comes up on the user list
> that can/should be addressed in our doc, the monitor (usually Joerg or Oleg)
> can change the doc, republish the web site, and post an answer that contains
> a link to the new doc, along with a comment that it was just updated. In
> this way, not only does the question get answered, but the doc is improved,
> for little more than the cost of answering it. This only works well if the
> doc can be republished almost at will. I'm hoping that the monitors would
> view this as an investment that should result in less questions on the user
> list (especially after our doc gets a reputation for being thorough), but,
> if not, I'll try to cull through the lists to update the doc myself. This
> would require a less-frequent update cycle -- once a day is probably plenty.

My hope too.

We could make the pdf's text (with the correct filter) but larger. One
option might also be to disable the creation date which obviously
changes each time.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-10 Thread Jeff Turner
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 05:26:48PM +0100, Keiron Liddle wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 11:56, Jeff Turner wrote:
> > See http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop
> > 
> > Updated every hour with the latest Forrest and FOP source.
> 
> You mean: and FOP that comes with Forrest.

Sorry, yes.  Latest FOP XML source.

--Jeff

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-10 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 11:56, Jeff Turner wrote:
> See http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop
> 
> Updated every hour with the latest Forrest and FOP source.

You mean: and FOP that comes with Forrest.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: src/documentation/README

2002-12-10 Thread Jeff Turner
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:45:06PM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
> Keiron and Nicola Ken (and anyone else who is interested):
> 
> I have the process of building the fop web site mostly scripted at
> /home/vmote/script/build-fop-website.bsh. I have a couple of
> problems/questions, which I will interject into the src/documentation/README
> doc contents below:
> 
> > The current procedure is:
> >
> > - checkout xml-forrest module
> > - run: build.sh(bat) dist
> > - follow instructions to set FORREST_HOME and path
> > - go to xml-fop directory
> > - run forrest(.bat)
> >
> > The documents will then be placed in build/site/
> 
> I have been running this on the Apache machine. Is that OK? If successful,
> we can theoretically just add a cron job to publish periodically if we wish,
> until Forrest is ready to do its magic for us.

See http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop

Updated every hour with the latest Forrest and FOP source.


--Jeff

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]