Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi,
When I am logged in in the bug database, I must continually renew my
login. I use Mozilla Firebird 0.6 and Mozilla 1.4 on Linux. Cookies
are enabled. I have a cookie from nagoya, called BUGLIST.
I just tried it and it works for me (Mozilla 1.5/Linux)
But I remember having
Manjush G. Menon wrote:
I have an XML data with several paragraphs with newlines.
but the generated PDF doesnt preserve it.
How will i do it?
http://xml.apache.org/fop/fo.html#fo-preformat
or wrap each paragraph in an extra block
Christian
David Rosenstein schrieb:
Hi all-
when i run fop through my java code and generate a pdf i am apparently using
a different sax parser than if i run it from the command line out of the jar
Different CLASSPATH or different JDK?
[..]
some how the two different parsers parse the xml in a different way
Chris Bowditch schrieb:
Glen,
Mark says in his original post that it does work fine from command line.
I agree that the Error about failed element mapping is masking the true
cause of the problem. Since the failure occurs when adding the
SVGElement, then a good guess at the true cause is
Christoph Rupp schrieb:
Dear list,
i am desperately trying to install and use my own truetype-font, but i
always get error messages...
[..]
Whenever i start fop, i get the following messages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/fop/fop-0.20.5 !fop
fop.sh -c conf/userconfig.xml main.fo -awt
Run FOP with the -d
Victor Mote schrieb:
[..]
I'm glad your problem is solved, but this means our documentation (and my
understanding of what is going in with the AWT renderer) is wrong. It will
be a few days at least before I can get to it, but I'll try to find out what
is going on there get it documented
J.Pietschmann schrieb:
Howard Ungar wrote:
Configuration.put(baseDir,c:/temp/pdfImages);
I tried this and got the same error:
Error while creating area : Error while recovering Image Informations
(file:/pdfBill.jpg) : \pdfBill.jpg
Hm. Another attempt:
Sander, Stefan schrieb:
Hey there,
can anyone share some insight on when version 0.20.5 will be relased?
Planed: last week
But it should happen this weekend.
What is the status of the licensing issues?
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?action=historyid=FOPAudits/March2003
Christian
Schmidt Soren schrieb:
Hello,
First of all: FOP is great, thank you developpers!
You're welcome!
My question:
The binary version is compiled using JDK 1.3 or JDK 1.4?
JDK1.3
I am asking this question because I normally use the binary versions but
now I am reading in the chapter PDF encryption of
Hi all,
the third Release Candidate for 0.20.5 is finally available at
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/xml/fop for downloading.
[The difference between 0.20.5rc3a and 0.20.5rc3 - which was
available for a short period of time - is a bugfix for
text-alignment in the AWT renderer]
The changes
Todtenhaupt, Susann wrote:
Hello!
There're several values for the attribute border-style when designing a
table-cell with xsl:fo. For example dotted, dashed etc. but it doesn't work.
There's no aftereffect if this is setted...
fo:table-cell border-width=0.5mm border-style=dotted
Marcus Andersson wrote:
Hello
First of all: I am using FOP-0.20.4 under jdk1.4.1.
When I insert external-graphics that are in the gif and png formats everything
works nice but when I try to include a jpg it just renders a black rectangle.
Why? I have looked in the faqs and some other places
Labeaux Schiek wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use XSL-FO to generate PDF Forms in my application.
How do I create a check box in my PDF.
see http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#fo_special_symbols
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi all,
the second Release Candidate for 0.20.5 is finally available at
http://www.apache.org/dist/xml/fop for downloading and testing.
(New download location - please use a mirror if possible)
It is planed to make the actual release on on february the 28th
if no serious bugs show up.
The changes
Christian Geisert wrote:
Christian Geisert wrote:
J.Pietschmann wrote:
[..]
Hm. Maybe there is something wrong with the precompiled version of
FOP.
FOP 0.20.5rc should work with either Jimi or JAI without recompiling.
Just tried it and it doesn't work. Will have a closer look at it.
This is now
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Rich Gibson wrote:
I've figured out how to link to a file that contains a gif or jpg image,
but not a png.
...
Exception on thread 'main' java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
javax/media/jai/PlanarImage
I assume that I have the wrong version of jimi, or I did something wrong
:-)
Christian Geisert wrote:
J.Pietschmann wrote:
[..]
Hm. Maybe there is something wrong with the precompiled version of
FOP.
FOP 0.20.5rc should work with either Jimi or JAI without recompiling.
Just tried it and it doesn't work. Will have a closer look at it.
Christian
Evraire, Jonathan wrote:
Hi,
I need to provide my client with a sample of the different levels of bold
achievable with xslfo. To do so, I created a very simple table, each row
having a different font-weight ranging from 100 to 900. Unfortunately, I
only ever see two different bold levels
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
[..]
My documents include figures in png and or pdf formats.
Both formats should be supported by fop, shouldn't they ?
For PNGs you need to install Jimi or JAI (see release notes!).
PDF figures don't work - you could use SVG instead.
Christian
Hi all,
the Release Candidate for 0.20.5 is finally available at
http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop for downloading and testing.
It is planed to make the actual release in about two weeks
if no serious bugs show up.
Changes since 0.20.4 include:
- Fixed link hotspot positioning
- Fixed multi-threading
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to run FOP 0.20.4 on an IBM OS/390 mainframe, running under Unix
System Services. I also use Saxon as the XML parser and XSL transformer.
I get this error:
[..]
I remember that when 0.20.4 came out, one of the changes was that it now
works on EBCIDC
Howard Miller wrote:
Thanks,
but. I'm not sure where you are pointing me to for these files. Please
excuse my obvious ignorance.
It's only in the source release.
If you don't want to download then you can find it here:
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Usually other mailing lists have this info appended to teh messages
automatically, maybe it could help a bit.
I know, but how can we get it in the list? The question was raised twice
at fop-dev, I even mailed to fop-user-owner, but this list still
Andy Joslin wrote:
Hi All
I was wondering if there was a standard workaround for the problem of
the fo:basic-link hotspot displaying in the wrong position (approx 2-3cm
above where the link should be).
There's no standard workaround it depends on your document.
Maybe avoiding padding helps..
I'm
Scherler, Thorsten wrote:
Hi Markus,
I found this page (combined with what u have written):
http://xml.apache.org/fop/fonts.html
[..]
This font contains no embedding license restrictions
Then I did:
Register the fonts within FOP
Edit conf/userconfig.xml and add entries for the font if the fonts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello with all!
I have a servlet in which I send a PDF to the navigator while
writing
HttpServletResponse.setContentType(application/pdf );
HttpServletResponse.setHeader(Content-Disposition,attachment;
filename=Report.pdf );
And the navigator twice opens the page of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello,
I am trying to upgrade from FOP 0.20.1 0.20.3. As per the release notes,
changing master-name properties to master-reference eliminated some
errors.
You did change to much .. read again ;-)
(or see below)
I running FOP in a servlet environment on WebSphere 3.5.3,
Hi all,
the Release Candidate for 0.20.4 is available at
http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop for downloading and testing.
It is planed to make the actual release in about a week (or two?)
if no serious bugs show up.
Changes since 0.20.3 include:
- Support for background-image
- FOP should now work with
Cyril Rognon schrieb:
Hi Ronald,
I think this was an error in the former FOP version. If you use unicode
values of the needed character everything works perfectly with 0.20.3RC
or 0.20.3...
Yes, just have a look at docs/examples/fo/fonts.fo
Christian
Ramon Maria Gallart schrieb:
Hi all! I want to learn how to use FOP well and all the relatied
technology behind it (from xml to xsl to fo, etc...). Does anyone of you
know where can i find practical examples on how to create documents
using xml, transform'em with xsl and then create pdfs
L'eau wrote:
Ok, so I had the time to download an old FOP version, and was
glad to see it had a jimi-1.0.jar in it! It works to a degree. I
did this:
C:\xsl\buildFop list.fo list.pdf
Now I get the following error message now:
[ERROR]: Don't know what to do with
.and that's it. It doesn't even
Scott Moore wrote:
I've been using the following construct to create a bullet in PDF:
fo:block font-family=ZapfDingbats font-size=7ptl/fo:block
It's worked in 0.20.1, 0.20.2, 0.20.3rc but it doesn't work in FOP 0.20.3.
Instead I get a pair of scissors. As a matter of fact, it looks like the
whole
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Are background-images implemented in Fop 0.20.3 ?
Not yet.
.. but someone is working on it, see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=101822791428295w=2
Christian
MARTIN Franck wrote:
Does anyone have an idea of when is to occur the next fop release and how
The next release (0.20.4), which will be a maintenance release without
much new functionality should be out in some weeks.
long is it going to take for fop to be full compliant w/ the W3
recommendation?
Sam Prokop wrote:
Hi, compiling fop-0.20.3 on win2k with java 1.4.0 i get the following
message
[..]
--
[echo] Compiling the sources
[javac] Compiling 328 source files to
C:\fop\src\fop-0.20.3\build\classes
[javac] Note: sun.tools.javac.Main has been deprecated.
[javac]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I have some difficulties running Fop and I´m trying to fix it for more than
a day now.
When I´m trying to start Fop from command line, it returns:
Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFound Error:
org/apache/avalon/framework/logger/loggable
This sounds like
Keen Tim wrote:
Christian,
I'm having problems with this (the third) and the second release
candidate for 0.20.3, but not the first. Follow my thread Trouble with
ZapfDingbats in fop-user for more info.
Perhaps you can advise me also.
There has been a change in in the font enconding from RC1 to
Hi all,
just in case someone hasn't noticed yet ;-)
FOP 0.20.3 is finally available at http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop
for downloading.
The main reason for this release is the conformance to the XSL-FO
Version 1.0 W3C Recommendation. Other changes include:
- support for CMYK and embedded ICC
Doh, sorry for the previous mail (don't know what happened..)
Hi all,
just in case someone hasn't noticed yet ;-)
FOP 0.20.3 is finally available at http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop
for downloading.
The main reason for this release is the conformance to the XSL-FO
Version 1.0 W3C Recommendation.
Savino, Matt C wrote:
So that's two new jar files, logging errors, no benchmarking output and
broken markers in .20.3. Looks like I'm going to have to live w/o
Hey you forgot removed PNG support ;-)
Which benchmarking output do you mean ? There is some info if you invoke
fop with the -d switch.
Meena wrote:
Hi,
I tried using fop0.20.3. But while using the batch file, i'm getting the
following error. What could be the reason?
Which OS are you using?
Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/fop/apps/Fop
regds
Meena
Christian
dav sem wrote:
Hi Community,
I have a question:
with FOP, Is possible to lock with a password
the PDF Document generated???
No.
Which part of API can permit this? or this
lock have to be performed by XSL:FO meta-language??
?
You will have to do some post-processing with other software.
Tanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Who is taking care of FOP bugzilla maintaining?
I asked the same question some time ago and got no answer.
The reason is probably that no active committer has permisson/knowledge
to do it.
0.17 is the newest FOP version that bugzilla knows. To
spare work for the bug
Kapar Tom (ZC) wrote:
Hi all,
is there any list with changes from 0.20.2?
Some (but not all) are mentioned in the CHANGES file. I hope to get
some time to add the rest.
Thanks
Tomas
Christian
Peter Chant wrote:
I have got segmentation faults trying to run fop. I tried to recompile
fop to see if this solved the problem, but it segmentation faulted
during the build.
I'm running linux, Slackware 8.0, JDK 1.3.1. The demo's that come with
Jdk run fine.
I have noted a comment about
Hi all,
the Release Candidate for 0.20.3 (Maintenance release) is finally
available at http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop for downloading and testing.
This version has been updated to XSL 1.0 Recommendation syntax and
requires (now officially) JDK 1.2 or better.
Christian
46 matches
Mail list logo
