I would agree with the last statement about a high performance commercial
all Java FO-PDF. However, there is really no need. Would anybody be
interested in working on FOP with payment leaving the licensing as is?
This way everybody can benefit. Anybody with experience interested?
Patrick
2:39 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary
tool s propose
From: Matt Savino
To: Bob Leif
Sounds great. Tell me where I can get a good Ada app-server and a
Java-Ada
translator for all the existing code--and I'll run it by the corporate
Patrick,
If I read you right, I think the answer to that would be a resounding
cry of Yes all round. You will certainly get one from me. What did you
have in mind?
Peter
Patrick Lanphier wrote:
I would agree with the last statement about a high performance commercial
all Java FO-PDF. However,
(Exception e)
{
// handle exception
}
finally
{
addThreadCount(-1);
}
}
HTH,
Scott
- Original Message -
From: Carter, Will [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 5:50 PM
Subject: RE: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 09:08 pm, you wrote:
I would agree with the last statement about a high performance commercial
all Java FO-PDF. However, there is really no need. Would anybody be
interested in working on FOP with payment leaving the licensing as is?
This way everybody can benefit.
how do you get the server to queue other requests?
will
-Original Message-
From: Scott Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:29 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary
tool s propose
The short answer
Are there any companies out there developing products base on FOP? Just
curious.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lanphier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary tools
model than what most proprietary
tool s propose
Are there any companies out there developing products base on FOP? Just
curious.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lanphier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why is FO(P
Are there any companies out there developing products base on FOP? Just
curious.
I've been looking at using FOP to get print versions of content from a
number of web apps but I'm finding it too unstable at the moment to
really offer as a solution. Coupled with the rather large resource
J.Pietschmann wrote:
The last major update to FOP made changes that rendered earlier .fo
files useless without some tweaks. The work involved in ensuring all
the .fo files are still working everytime FOP is updated would be a
bit of a nightmare.
The problem with the last change you seem to
?
thanks,
will carter
http://www.envestnetpmc.com
-Original Message-
From: Savino, Matt C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:01 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary
tool s propose
We're using FOP in a production
is a proprietary language
owned by SUN.
-Original Message-
From: Savino, Matt C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 2:01 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary
tool s propose
We're using FOP in a production environment
]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 5:29 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary
tool s propose
This one has got me scared...
I am in the process of working out an embedded (servlet) FOP
solution for
some financial reporting
-
From: Carter, Will [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 5:29 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most
proprietary
tool s propose
This one has got me scared...
I am in the process of working out an embedded
30, 2002 2:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary
tool s propose
From: Bob Leif
To: Matt Savino
It sounds like you need the performance of an efficient compiled
language that performs wherever possible its inheritance
model than what most proprietary
tool s propose
Thanks Scott. Can you share a little more detail on how you queue the
reports?
Matt Savino
Carter, Will wrote:
I am in the process of working out an embedded (servlet) FOP solution for
some financial reporting. The generated pdfs are probably around 20 pages..
does anyone have any info about memory requirements or problems I will run
into with multiple concurrent users?
The memory
, April 30, 2002 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary
tool s propose
Carter, Will wrote:
I am in the process of working out an embedded (servlet)
FOP solution for
some financial reporting. The generated pdfs are probably
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary
tool s propose
Each request comes into the servlet on a separate Java Thread. I keep track
of the number of reports currently being generated and Thread.sleep(1000)
the queued threads. Every second or so
Savino, Matt C wrote:
Our application absolutely requires tables spanning mulitple pages. Are we
trying to fit a square peg into a round hole incorporating FOP into a
reporting app as opposed to book publishing?
I didn't say you can't use tables spanning multiple
pages. I said, if you are running
20 matches
Mail list logo
