Re: Log4j Woes

in the MY_JVM_VARS variable. The problem with this would be when an update changes the /usr/bin/fop. You might want to copy this script into ~/ somewhere and run that instead, merging any potential future changes to fop when thy occur. Pete On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:34 PM, nancy_b nancy_br

Re: Log4j Woes

is preferred. Other java applications using log4j would want different config. Also you should not have to modify /usr/share/java since it is managed by Debian. I hope this works for you Pete On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, nancy_b nancy_br...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Pete, Thanks a lot

Re: Log4j Woes

Hi Peter. That's OK. Thank you for trying to help me anyway!!! What drives me crazy is that I don't get why I did not have such a problem in my older Linux Best wishes, nancy nancy_b wrote: Hi Folks! I use FOP 0.95 to compile PDF documents from DocBook sources on my Linux Debian

Re: Log4j Woes

! Pete On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:33 AM, nancy_b nancy_br...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi dear Peter, Thank you for your prompt response!!! --First put the log4j jar in fop's lib directory I don't have such a directory. I do have 1) /usr/bin/fop (where fop is the script) 2) /usr/share/java/fop-0.95

Re: Log4j Woes

(replace log4j.xml with the actual name of your configuration file). HTH, Julian 2010/5/25 nancy_b nancy_br...@yahoo.com: From http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/HowTo/SetupLog4JLogging: Set the following system property when you start the JVM: -Dlog4j.configuration=file:///C:/Dev/FOP

Log4j Woes

Hi Folks! I use FOP 0.95 to compile PDF documents from DocBook sources on my Linux Debian machine. After upgrading my Debian to v5.2, I get the following log4j-related problem: fop -c /home/cozy/doc/xsl/myconf.xml -fo \ user_manual.fo -pdf user_manual.pdf log4j:WARN No appenders

Re: Log4j Woes

, but it should not matter as you refer to it explicitly with the LOG4J_OPTS system variable. Also, is the log4j.jar on your classpath too? I hope this helps, Pete On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:25 PM, nancy_b nancy_br...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Folks! I use FOP 0.95 to compile PDF documents

compiling a book without the chapter level

Hi all, I need to compile a book-like document without using the chapter levels. I use bridgehead tags only to avoid creating a TOC. However, the compiler fails to produce a PDF complaining on the missing fo:child elements (as expected).] Is it possible to compile a book without using chapters?

FOP 0.96

Hi folks, When is the next FOP version going to be released :clap:? Thanks in advance! Nancy -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FOP-0.96-tp26160072p26160072.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Small-Caps support in FOP 0.95

Nancy, nancy_b wrote: Hi all, My environment: Docbook stylesheets, XSLTPROC, FOP 0.95 I would like to produce some headings in allcaps. So I've added the following in my customization layer: xsl:template match=emphas...@role = 'smallcaps'] fo:inline font-variant=small-caps xsl:apply

Small-Caps support in FOP 0.95

Hi all, My environment: Docbook stylesheets, XSLTPROC, FOP 0.95 I would like to produce some headings in allcaps. So I've added the following in my customization layer: xsl:template match=emphas...@role = 'smallcaps'] fo:inline font-variant=small-caps xsl:apply-templates/ /fo:inline

background images in RTF - compilation failure

Hi Folks, I have a document (in A5 format) that can be flawlessly compiled in PDF format, but fails in RTF. It seems that FOP cannot handle background images in fo:block elements when creating an RTF file. The following API in my print.xsl has caused this problem: xsl:param name=chap.label.path

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

path every time, but this is really getting off-topic for this list. If you don’t know how to do you may want to ask some local Linux guru for help. HTH, Vincent nancy_b wrote: Hi Chris, Thanks for your valuable comments! Do I have to rename the new files with the names

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(Unknown Source) Of course, I can't compile either. Please, advise!!! Thanks a lot in advance! Nancy Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: On 07 Jun 2009, at 14:05, nancy_b wrote: Hi Nancy Looking forward to getting the all new fop.jar.:jumping: You mean you haven't received it? I sent

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

thread please? Why are the Symbol and Zapfdiongbat fonts unavailable in italic/bold version? Thank you a lot in advance for building fop.jar for me. You are so kind! :clap: My best wishes, Nancy Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: On 04 Jun 2009, at 17:01, nancy_b wrote: Hi Nancy It seems

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

: On 07 Jun 2009, at 12:45, nancy_b wrote: Hi Nancy, Could I ask the last question in this long thread please? Why are the Symbol and Zapfdiongbat fonts unavailable in italic/bold version? Hmm... To be honest, I don't know the precise reason. On the other hand, I just played with some other

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

... Regards, Nancy Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: On 03 Jun 2009, at 15:29, nancy_b wrote: Hi Nancy, Vincent, First of all, thank you a lot for your explanations!!! ...the reason was to make the Jeuclid plug-in work more out of the box... Well, actually, the change mentioned by Vincent

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

of the Zapfdingbats symbol (in the above example, the phone symbol). Thanks in advance! Nancy Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: On 04 Jun 2009, at 10:15, nancy_b wrote: Hi Nancy Thanks for your explanations. I think my version of FOP 0.95 does insert Symbol and Zapfdingbats into the font-family

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

=normal font- style=normal#x260E;/fo:wrapper ... I thought If you would specify 'font-family=AnyOtherFont,ZapfDingbats', then 0.95 will try only the AnyOtherFont family, as it specified first in the list. Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: On 04 Jun 2009, at 13:17, nancy_b wrote: Hi Nancy

Re: ZapfDingbats font issues [was: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space]

file resulting from the XSLT transformation. Then we can have a look at it and figure out what’s wrong. Thanks, Vincent nancy_b wrote: Hi Andreas, Thanks for your response! So if I install FOP 0.95 from trunk, will it still issue the warnings? I don't understand what you mean

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

... And nothing happened - I still get #. I am close to tears ;-(. Best regards, Nancy Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: On 04 Jun 2009, at 14:33, nancy_b wrote: Hi Nancy So you mean that if Symbol is the first font, FOP will pick it up, fail to produce the phone symbol, and won't fall back

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

Hi Pascal, I indeed used #x260E; - just made a mistake when writing this message - sorry for that! :-) Regards, nancy Pascal Sancho wrote: nancy_b a écrit : Hi Andreas, I thought that it's enough to put the ZapfDingBat's hexadecimal code for the symbol in my XML file (#x206E

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

changed in the output -- still this darn #. Best regards, nancy Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: On 04 Jun 2009, at 15:07, nancy_b wrote: Hi Nancy Thanks for your patience! :-) No problem. 1) In my customization area, I added: xsl:param name=symbol.font.familyZapfDingbats/xsl:param

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

wrote: On 04 Jun 2009, at 15:30, nancy_b wrote: Hi Nancy Entering font triplets soothes FOP's pain - no warnings are generated :-) By the way, if you don't specify embed-url, how FOP knows where this file is located? It's not in the standard /fonts folder. That's what I'm wondering

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

- whether FOP really identified these fonts. For example, I don't have ZapfDingbats font - just its metric?! Thanks for your in put in advance!!! Regards, Nancy Pascal Sancho wrote: nancy_b a écrit : Hi folks, I decided to move to FOP 0.95 (previously used FOP 0.94). When compiling

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

Thanks for suggestions! Kindaian wrote: In my case, i had to change it to the max that the machine would accept... somewhere around 1024m... [but it was on windows and on a 32bit environment... on 64 bits - both os and java - this issues are largelly overcome by the ability to

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

! nancy Vincent Hennebert-2 wrote: Hi Nancy, nancy_b wrote: Hi, Thanks a lot for suggestions. It seems that I have increased JAVA heap space, by specifying -Xmx1000m (I have 2Gb) , although I am not sure how much I should really allocate for running compilation of large docs

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

: nancy_b a écrit : Hi folks, I decided to move to FOP 0.95 (previously used FOP 0.94). When compiling a large PDF doc (more than 200 pages) the following error occurs: FOP Exception in thread main java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space What is really frustrating and annoying is that FOP

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

Hi Pascal, thanks for your suggestions. I am using Debian Linux, so I don't have FOP.BAT on my system. Do you have any ideas where I should enter it on Linux? Thanks in advance! Nancy Pascal Sancho wrote: nancy_b a écrit : Hi dear Pascal, Thank you for your response. I can't see any

Re: FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

Hi Tobias, Thanks for your valuable input. How can I split the file? Yes, I create a .fo file first. Thanks in advance! Nancy Tobias Anstett [k15t.com] wrote: Hi Nancy, I decided to move to FOP 0.95 (previously used FOP 0.94). When compiling a large PDF doc (more than 200 pages) the

FOP 0.95 fails to compile large PDF files - java heap space

Hi folks, I decided to move to FOP 0.95 (previously used FOP 0.94). When compiling a large PDF doc (more than 200 pages) the following error occurs: FOP Exception in thread main java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space What is really frustrating and annoying is that FOP 0.94 did not have

RTF doc. compilation failure

Hi folks, I have a document (in A5 format) that can be flawlessly compiled in PDF format, but fails in RTF. It seems that FOP cannot handle background images in fo:block elements when creating an RTF file. The following API in my print.xsl has caused this problem: xsl:param name=chap.label.path

WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back to proportional-column-width(1)

Hi folks, I still can't understand what causes the following warning messages to appear when I compile PDF docs using XSLTROC and FOP 0.94 in Debian Linux. WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back to proportional-column-width(1) Apr 22, 2009 6:52:01 PM

Page Numbering wooes (FOP to PDF)

Hi folks, Currently, I am struggling with Docbook's page numbering mechanism. My PDF document (created using XSLTPROC and FOP 0.94) has a front coverpage that basically is a customized titlepage-first page. After the coverpage comes a legal notice, TOC and a Part. Here are the problems I have:

Changing page numbers into their Dingbat counterparts

Hi guys, I am using FOP 0.94. My current hot issue is changing the page number format. I would like to change the regular numbers to their Dingbat counterparts. For example, I would like to change 1 to this number in a white/black circle, which is in Unicode is x#2780;. So I've customized the

Re: Background image as a footer separator

Hi Andreas, Thanks for your response! The problem with fo-external-graphic is that it does not work as a background for a text that is placed in the footer. ;-( So frustrating... Best wishes, Nancy Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: On Oct 5, 2008, at 15:42, nancy_b wrote: Hi I am trying

Re: Adding an icon before a chapter/section title

I can pass the variable icon value (in this case advanced) to my chapter template. Thanks in advance! Nancy nancy_b wrote: Hi guys, Using Docbook XML/XSL and FOP 0.94 on Linux Debian. Has any of you tried to add an icon before a chapter/section title? Asked the same question

Background image as a footer separator

Hi guys, I am trying to put an image as a footer separator. But the problem is that it does not cover the whole page width (not including the margins of course). Could you please advise me what I do wrong? Here is the code: xsl:param name=footer.path select='../scripts/images/footer.png'/

Adding an icon before a chapter/section title

Hi guys, Using Docbook XML/XSL and FOP 0.94 on Linux Debian. Has any of you tried to add an icon before a chapter/section title? Asked the same question on the Docbook forum, but no answer. Thank you all in advance! Nancy -- View this message in context:

Re: Adding Verdana font in Linux and registering it with FOP 0.94

Thank you for your help!!! I appreciate it a lot! Best regards, Nancy Alias John Brown wrote: nancy_b nancy_brndt at yahoo.com writes: Hi John, Thanks for your response! Unfortunately, the auto-detect capability did not work for me. By the way, where is the main configuration

Re: Adding Verdana font in Linux and registering it with FOP 0.94

Hi John, Thanks for your response! Unfortunately, the auto-detect capability did not work for me. By the way, where is the main configuration file that FOP uses to process default fonts and other parameters? Thanks in advance! Nancy Alias John Brown wrote: Nancy Brandt wrote: Hi dear

RE: Adding Verdana font in Linux and registering it with FOP 0.94

Hi dear John, You always try to help me :-) Well, when I run '$ locate fop.jar' for example, I get the following results: /home/nancy/fop-0.94/build/fop.jar /usr/bin/build/fop.jar /usr/share/java/fop.jar I've tried to use the files located in the 'lib' directory (those with version number),

Re: Adding Verdana font in Linux and registering it with FOP 0.94

nancy_b wrote: Hi guys, I am working in Debian Linux. I would like to change the default body font to Verdana. As Bob Stayton writes in his book about Docbook XML, I should run the following command after locating the needed font: # java -cp /home/nancy/fop-0.94/build/fop.jar

Re: Adding Verdana font in Linux and registering it with FOP 0.94

nancy_b wrote: nancy_b wrote: Hi guys, I am working in Debian Linux. I would like to change the default body font to Verdana. As Bob Stayton writes in his book about Docbook XML, I should run the following command after locating the needed font: # java -cp /home/nancy/fop

table header appears more than once

Hi guys, I am using XSLTPROC and FOP 0.94. I have the following problem with my table headers: When there is a page break the table header appears once again on the new page and then the rest of the rows. How do I make the table header appear only once? Thanks in advance! Nancy -- View this

Re: table header appears more than once

Hi dear Andreas, Thanks for your response! Is it possible to specify this via XSL stylesheet customization? Best wishes, Nancy nancy_b wrote: Hi guys, I am using XSLTPROC and FOP 0.94. I have the following problem with my table headers: When there is a page break the table header

Re: table header appears more than once

Thank you anyway! :-) nancy_b wrote: Hi guys, I am using XSLTPROC and FOP 0.94. I have the following problem with my table headers: When there is a page break the table header appears once again on the new page and then the rest of the rows. How do I make the table header appear

Adding fo:block-container around title and subtitle of the titlepage

Please, please, help me! Nobody answers me on the docbook forum, and I so need it right now... I am trying to customize my_titlepage.xsl with the help of titlepage.templates.xml file which I will process with fo/titlepage.xsl. What I need to define in this XML file is a fo:block-container

Please help: section labels and other XML woes

Hi everybody! Could you please advise me on the following XSL issues? I am using XSLPROC and FOP 0.94 for compiling pdf documents, and I can't cope with two problems: 1) section labels have a dot at the end: for example: 2.2.4. Getting Started - I want to get rid of the dot after 4. 2) I

Re: FoP 0.94 bug

the new image package into FOP Trunk later today. That should improve the situation. However, I would still appreciate if you could send me the PNG that didn't work so I can make sure it will work with the new package. Thanks. On 31.12.2007 12:58:33 nancy_b wrote: Hi dear Jeremias! Any updates

FoP 0.94 bug

Hi guys, I upgraded to FOP 0.94, and now I can't compile a document that is compiled well with FOP 0.93. The following is the error message: Nov 8, 2007 1:57:22 PM org.apache.fop.image.ImageIOImage loadBitmap SEVERE: Error while loading image: LUT has improper length!

RE: Generating neat RTF documents with XSLTPROC and FOP

defined stuff. Hope that helps any... -Original Message- From: nancy_b [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 9:25 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: Generating neat RTF documents with XSLTPROC and FOP Thank you for the information, dear

formalpara problem in HTML

Hi guys, I have a weird problem with the content of formalpara items when I convert from Docbook XML to HTML with FOP 0.93. It seems that FOP cannot match formalpara to any corresponding element in HTML, so that its text appears with no formatting at all (e.x., no bold formalpara titles). When I

Re: formalpara problem in HTML

Well, formalpara items appear correctly in PDF which FOP generates out of XSLTPROC output, so I assume that FOP does not know any HTML element which corresponds to formalpara in XML. cbowditch wrote: nancy_b wrote: Hi guys, I have a weird problem with the content of formalpara items

RE: Generating neat RTF documents with XSLTPROC and FOP

- From: nancy_b [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 9:25 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: Generating neat RTF documents with XSLTPROC and FOP Thank you for the information, dear Jeremias! In http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/output.html#rtf

Re: Generating neat RTF documents with XSLTPROC and FOP

). Good luck, Adrian. nancy_b wrote: Thank you for the information, dear Jeremias! In http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/output.html#rtf it is recommended to use the Open Document Format. How can I transform my XML documents into this format? Regards, Nancy Jeremias Maerki-2

Re: Generating neat RTF documents with XSLTPROC and FOP

Jeremias Maerki On 01.10.2007 11:32:44 nancy_b wrote: Hello dear all! Is there any way to improve how the RTF documents look? Is the LookFeel controlled somehow by the XSL stylesheets? Is it possible to improve the documents by substituting the default Word template with a customized one

FOP 0.94 problem

Hi all! I have installed the new version of FOP, and our first date ended up with the following error message: Sep 24, 2007 10:24:30 AM org.apache.fop.image.ImageIOImage loadBitmap SEVERE: Error while loading image: LUT has improper length! java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: LUT has improper

Re: numbering programlisting/screen lines

Hi dear Chris! So you mean that this problem refers to some xsltproc issue... Thanks Nancy cbowditch wrote: nancy_b wrote: Hi dear Andreas! by the 'function' I mean the LineNumberring function. There is no such function in XSL-FO. The terms you are referring to, sound like docbook

numbering programlisting/screen lines

Hi all, unfortunately, FOP 0.93 does not compile numbering of programlisting/screen lines. It says: function not found. Are you aware of any workaround? Thanks in advance, Nancy -- View this message in context:

Re: specifying column width for tables

, but the warnings are still present. May be I need certain values to hide them? Regards, Nancy cbowditch wrote: nancy_b wrote: Yeap, exactly what I suggested: the problem is with list numbering starting after 10 (including 10). No space between number and list body. Please advise! You

Re: specifying column width for tables

these are translated into column-width properties. Patrick nancy_b wrote: Hi dear Patrick, That's what Bob Stayton writes: Here is how you specify column width values: 'colwidth' specifies the desired width of the relevant column. It can be either a fixed measure using one

Re: overflowing the available area

carefully about the graphics dimensions. This could definitely be the reason you have this warning message. Regards, Patrick nancy_b wrote: Hi all, Another message that I can't get rid of is the following: Jul 24, 2007 1:47:39 PM org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.inline.LineLayoutManager

Re: specifying column width for tables

Yeap, exactly what I suggested: the problem is with list numbering starting after 10 (including 10). No space between number and list body. Please advise! My best regards, Nancy nancy_b wrote: Hi all, Well, I tried a workaround that Bob Stayton suggests: specifying a proportional column

Re: specifying column width for tables

. As far as I know they don't usually generate warning messages with FOP. By the way, are you using the fop1.extentions parameter? http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/fo/fop1.extensions.html Patrick nancy_b wrote: Dear Patrick! Well, you were absolutely right regarding

Re: table-layout warning message

Hi dear Andreas! I compile PDFs in Linux, so I do have .fo files. However, in this specific case, FOP does not specify the location of the problem in the .fo file. In the overflowing problem I do have the line specification, that's why I posted a snippet from the .fo file. Regards, Nancy

specifying column width for tables

Hi all, Well, I tried a workaround that Bob Stayton suggests: specifying a proportional column width for all of my tables. Then I compiled and guess what: the same annoying message is present: WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back to proportional-column-width(1)

Re: specifying column width for tables

an INFO message indicating that it is assuming width=100% Cheers, Patrick nancy_b wrote: Hi dear Patrick! I use the same FOP version as you have. By the way, what is the default width for tables? I see that you specified width=100mm? Regards, Nancy Patrick Paul wrote: Hi

Re: specifying column width for tables

wrong. Cheers, Patrick nancy_b wrote: So this is may be the problem: I specified colwidth and and not width of table? Regards, Nancy Patrick Paul wrote: The default width for tables is 100%. I just used 100mm as an example here. In any case it's better to specify the width even

Re: specifying column width for tables

at the end of this message. It uses proportional-column-width and I have no problems with FOP 0.93. Let us know if it works. Patrick nancy_b wrote: Hi all, Well, I tried a workaround that Bob Stayton suggests: specifying a proportional column width for all of my tables. Then I compiled

Re: overflowing the available area

Patrick Paul wrote: nancy_b wrote: Hi Nancy, I was reading your e-mail over and hadn't read carefully about the graphics dimensions. This could definitely be the reason you have this warning message. Patrick Hi all, Another message that I can't get rid of is the following: Jul 24

forcing max to min in LengthRange

Hello all! I can't get rid of the following warnings while I compile a PDF (XML Docbook, XSLTPROC, FOP 0.93): SEVERE: forcing max to min in LengthRange Jul 23, 2007 2:38:05 PM org.apache.fop.fo.properties.LengthRangeProperty checkConsistency Please advise! My best wishes and thanks in

overflowing the available area

Hi all, Another message that I can't get rid of is the following: Jul 24, 2007 1:47:39 PM org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.inline.LineLayoutManager$LineBreakingAlgorithm updateData2 WARNING: Line 1 of a paragraph overflows the available area. (fo:block, location: 11522/220) I opened the file.fo file

Re: forcing max to min in LengthRange

Thanks for the prompt response dear Andreas! As always, I really appreciate your help! I'll check my stylesheet now. Regards, Nancy Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Jul 23, 2007, at 13:43, Nancy Brandt wrote: Hi Nancy I can't get rid of the following warnings while I compile a PDF (XML

table-layout warning message

Last shot for today :-) For some reason, FOP complains about my tables: WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back to proportional-column-width(1) Jul 24, 2007 1:47:14 PM org.apache.fop.fo.flow.TableColumn bind WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified

Re: table-layout warning message

/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice5.html#section-N8624-Property-Value-Functions Hope that helps, Patrick nancy_b wrote: Last shot for today :-) For some reason, FOP complains about my tables: WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back to proportional-column-width(1

Re: table-layout warning message

For some reason fop does not specify where in the text it found this problem, so I don't have a snippet for that. I need some customization that says: if table-layout=fixed, use proportional column width... nancy_b wrote: Last shot for today :-) For some reason, FOP complains about my

Re: overflowing the available area

a look. Regars, Patrick nancy_b wrote: Hi all, Another message that I can't get rid of is the following: Jul 24, 2007 1:47:39 PM org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.inline.LineLayoutManager$LineBreakingAlgorithm updateData2 WARNING: Line 1 of a paragraph overflows the available area. (fo:block