Hi,
Thanks a lot for suggestions. It seems that I have increased JAVA heap
space, by specifying -Xmx1000m (I have 2Gb) , although I am not sure how
much I should really allocate for running compilation of large docs.
The question that remained unclear is that while FOP 0.94 doesn't complain
on the fonts, FOP 0.95 generates the following error message:
WARNING: Font 'Symbol,normal,700' not found. Substituting with
'Symbol,normal,400'.
Jun 2, 2009 2:14:25 PM org.apache.fop.fonts.FontInfo notifyFontReplacement
WARNING: Font 'ZapfDingbats,normal,700' not found. Substituting with
'ZapfDingbats,normal,400'.
Jun 2, 2009 2:14:31 PM org.apache.fop.hyphenation.Hyphenator
getHyphenationTree
I don't understand why FOP 0.94 did not have such a problem, while FOP 0.95
does. I checked on my Linux Debian system - it does have the Symbol font in
/usr/share/cups/fonts/. For Zapfdinbats I found the following file:
/usr/lib/openoffice/share/psprint/fontmetric/ZapfDingbats.afm. I think
that's just a metric file for the font. So, I put the following in FOP's
conf file:
<font-triplet name="Symbol" style="normal" weight="700"/>
<font-triplet name="ZapfDingbats" style="normal" weight="700"/>
<font-triplet name="ZapfDingbats" style="italic" weight="700"/>
<font-triplet name="ZapfDingbats" style="italic" weight="400"/>
And guess what, the warning disappeared. The question is whether it really
solved the problem - whether FOP really identified these fonts. For example,
I don't have ZapfDingbats font - just its metric?!
Thanks for your in put in advance!!!
Regards,
Nancy
Pascal Sancho wrote:
>
> nancy_b a écrit :
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I decided to move to FOP 0.95 (previously used FOP 0.94). When compiling
>> a
>> large PDF doc (more than 200 pages) the following error occurs:
>>
>> FOP Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap
>> space
>>
>> What is really frustrating and annoying is that FOP 0.94 did not have
>> such a
>> problem. Could you please explain why the new FOP version has this
>> problem.
>> We usually expect improvements in the newer versions... ;-(
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>> Nancy
>>
> Hi,
> There is a lot of improvment in FOP 0.95 that can explain a /light/
> increase of memory consumption (new image support, better font hanfling,
> etc.)
> Perhaps the memory allocated to FOP was /just/ enough with 0.94 version,
> but not with 0.95 version.
> You should 1st increase the max memory allocation to the JVM.
> Also check this link:
> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/running.html#memory.
>
> Pascal
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FOP-0.95-fails-to-compile-large-PDF-files---java-heap-space-tp23816647p23847701.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
