Re: [fossil-users] What should email notifications look like?

On 2018-06-22 20:40, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: [---] > BTW, the main mercurial list uses the following mail format for "batch" > changes: > > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2018-June/117551.html This is highly machine parse-friendly. I like it a lot. -- Kind

Re: [fossil-users] Rumor: Microsoft has acquired github

in my timezone, but the news outlets don't seem to care > about non-US timezones :/. Someone on twitter jested: "Sign in with your Office 365 account to access github.". I think there are a lot of people a gritting their teeth over that joke right now. -- Kind Regards, Jan Dani

Re: [fossil-users] Rumor: Microsoft has acquired github

On 2018-06-04 00:35, Stephan Beal wrote: [---] > It does kind of make sense: the global leader in creating > market-leading-yet-unusable software acquires one more piece of > market-leading-yet-unusable software. This appeals to my sense of order. :) -- Kind Regards, Jan D

Re: [fossil-users] "malformed database schema"

On 2018-04-11 00:17, Stephan Beal wrote: > i suspect that the old sqlite version has something to do with this. Try > using "fossil sqlite" instead of sqlite3. D'oh! Of course it is; I knew you were right before even trying. Thanks! -- Kind Regards

[fossil-users] "malformed database schema"

the same state. Browsing the source online repo seems to work fine, so I'm assuming it's a local problem -- but how can it end up in this state? I did no more than clone it. -- Kind Regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@li

Re: [fossil-users] Cannot clone repository over SSL

e's even a page for it on fossil's wiki. You could start by comparing that to your configuration. (That said, I haven't actually followed that guide; I don't recall if it was for SSL, and nor do I know if cloning works through it). -- Kind regards, Jan Daniels

Re: [fossil-users] How do I report a problem on the Fossil Web site?

with regards to client certificates/keys. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] SSL on Mac

the original idea of using statically-linked libraries for the pre-built binaries. That way when Apple decide to eliminate the dynamic libraries as well (not that I think they can do that any time soon) the monolithic fossil binary will continue to work. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson

Re: [fossil-users] SSL on Mac

-C) library instead. The dynamic OpenSSL libraries remain in the system for compatibility, but they no longer include the headers -- so when you build fossil on new:ish Macs (read: XCode), build systems tend to find non-system instances of OpenSSL and use them instead. -- Kind rega

Re: [fossil-users] GitLab v. Fossil. Was: Eric Raymond (a.k.a. ESR) has published an SCM

appens, this tool X was a desktop application for the local checkout, which - in my mind - kind of defeated the purpose). Maybe this is tangentially related to the cathedral vs bazaar discussion; with Fossil, you typically have a central point where "all" the us

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed roadmap for Fossil 2.0

uch plans (not for 2.0, 2.1 or beyond). There's a separate project which is designed to accomplish what you're looking for: http://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/repos/libfossil -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossi

Re: [fossil-users] Git just got shallow and sparse clones

On 2017-02-04 14:07, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:00:54 -0700 > Warren Young wrote: > >> https://developers.slashdot.org/story/17/02/03/1427213/microsoft-introduces-gvfs-git-virtual-file-system > > Care to elaborate a bit? [---] Granted, I just

Re: [fossil-users] tags manifest

On 05/08/16 02:51, Ross Berteig wrote: [---] > I just created test cases for fossil set manifest that verify that the > files manifest, manifest.uuid, and manifest.tags appear and disappear as > the setting is changed. I did not verify that any of the files have the > right content. Many

Re: [fossil-users] tags manifest

On 04/08/16 20:44, Warren Young wrote: >> That's one of the things I realized after a few >> failures -- whatever scheme you come up with, it has its limitations. > > That’s part of what I mean, but I’m not just talking about simple > limitations. The second and third applications of the code

Re: [fossil-users] tags manifest

On 04/08/16 00:08, Warren Young wrote: >> This means that the same >> information is available in two different places > > Only two? Aren’t you the lucky one. :) Not that lucky, unfortunately. :( That was mostly referring to cases such as sqlite and even fossil itself. In our case it

[fossil-users] tags manifest

Hello, Since I've finally got a few days off, I've done some updates to the jan-manifest-tags; merge with trunk, made some bugfixes, and thought I'd reintroduce the branch (since it's been a while). The basic idea is the following: It's common practice for projects to tag new release

Re: [fossil-users] backing up repo to cloud service

On 02/05/16 22:17, Steve Schow wrote: > I wish to include my fossil repos in backup to cloud backup service. > > what is the best approach for doing this? if a fossil operation is in the > middle of trying to do something when the automated cloud backup daemon > decides to backup the repo

Re: [fossil-users] Getting time of last repository change

On 11/04/16 17:17, Stephan Beal wrote: [---] >>Is there a timestamp for when artifacts where locally added to the >> repository? (I'm not overly concerned with configuration changes and >> such; it's detecting checkins, tickets and other artifact changes that's >> important). > > rcvfrom

[fossil-users] Getting time of last repository change

Hello, Short version: What's the best way to determine if a repository has changed? I have two systems which are sync'd in a cronjob. On one of the systems I run a cronjob which should take action only if the repository was changed. Before there were two systems I simply used mtime on

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 97, Issue 2

On 02/02/16 23:19, Martin Vahi wrote: [---] > Thank You for the comparison. What regards to > Your statement that "e-mail refuses to go away", then > my answer is that the majority of the population on > planet Earth does not consist of software developers > or old-school communications

[fossil-users] Recent breakage on Mac OS X

Hello, This started happening recently: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "_compress", referenced from: _blob_compress in blob.o _sqlcmd_compress in sqlcmd.o (maybe you meant: _blob_compress2, _test_cycle_compress , _compress2_cmd ,

Re: [fossil-users] slightly hacked Blitz skin

On 21/01/16 19:17, Stephan Beal wrote: > i recently started using the Blitz skin on all my repos, but > fixed-/max-width pages annoy me to no end, so it go hacked every so > slightly to remove the max width. For anyone interested, here it is: > >

Re: [fossil-users] There is a spammer listening to this mailing list

On 17/01/16 06:53, Yannick Duchêne wrote: > I received a spam from `nella_br...@expertisetour.xyz` with subject “RE: > [fossil-users] What does the Older button's intended to do in the web UI?”. > So it appears a spammer subscribed to this mailing list, intercepts messages > and replies to it,

Re: [fossil-users] fossil sync doesn't sync

On 09/01/16 01:15, bch wrote: > Just talked to Joerg off-list (who indicated that he updated fossil > to latest on his server), and: > > $ fossil pull -verily > > Pull done, sent: 5064 received: 49107978 ip: 85.214.214.108 > > $ fossil timeline > === 2015-05-30 === > 14:42:26 [0bb26b5ab6]

Re: [fossil-users] Versions & manifests

On 05/01/16 09:14, Steve Stefanovich wrote: [---] >>Is this not sufficient for your needs? I'm not completely opposed to >> implementing what you're asking for, but if it can already be done without >> adding a "within a checkout" special case, I would prefer to leave it as it >> is. > > I

Re: [fossil-users] Versions & manifests

On 04/01/16 08:18, Steve Stefanovich wrote: > Would it be too difficult to put the branch tag (i.e the tag with asterisk > from 'fossil br li' output) in the first line of manifest.tags? It probably wouldn't, but I've been trying to keep the code agnostic with regards to being used in a

Re: [fossil-users] Versions & manifests

On 01/01/16 18:43, Jan Danielsson wrote: [---] >Optimally the tagged version _is_ the source version. [...] I'm home sick, so I started working on this in the branch jan-manifest-tags. I'd like some feedback on the settings semantics. What I want to accomplish is that any exist

Re: [fossil-users] fossil sync doesn't sync

On 04/01/16 02:02, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 1/3/16, bch wrote: >> Indeed. I thought maybe the \n of the checkin-card (is this the right >> characterization ?) bug/fix might fix what I've been experiencing, so >> I updated to the latest. I'm nearly always running the tip of

Re: [fossil-users] Versions & manifests

Hello, drh and sgbeal brought up the following points: 1) Make sure an existing [managed] manifest.tags isn't overwritten. 2) fossil add needs to be made manifest.tags-aware. 3) Tarballs and zips need to be made manifest.tags-aware. 4) fossil clean needs to be made

[fossil-users] Versions & manifests

Hello, I have build systems which use the commit id from the manifest to embed the commit artifact id in the binary. I also, in most projects, have an ordinal version number which is loosely coupled between the repository and the build system/source in the sense that I can forget to update

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On 03/11/15 00:38, Scott Robison wrote: >>> On 11/2/15, Jan Danielsson <jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Supporting symlinks on Windows would currently be a little mess. >>> >>> What if we just say that symlinks don't work on W

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On 03/11/15 00:00, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 2, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: >> >> On 11/2/15, Jan Danielsson <jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Supporting symlinks on Windows would currently be a little mess.

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On 02/11/15 23:23, Warren Young wrote: >> Windows will ultimately get decent symlink support. > > I doubt it. Microsoft has tried to take a bite of that apple twice, and > screwed it up both times. > > First there was the Windows 95 *.lnk file feature, which is basically only a > symlink to

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil server

On 01/11/15 13:30, Damien Sykes-Pendleton wrote: > I’m running Windows. I’m not personally running anything on port 80, though I > get a blank web page (as opposed to a 404 or problem loading error) when I > visit localhost. I forget the name of the tool, but in there's a nifty tool for

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

On 31/10/15 06:27, Michal Suchanek wrote: [---] >> (For instance, my recent thread about how to clip off a a branch via the >> command line when the UI can’t do it because it was created empty, something >> Fossil can’t do, but which apparently CVS or SVN can, so it got into my >> Fossil tree

Re: [fossil-users] Self Signed Certificates

On 16/08/15 19:56, Saul Hazledine wrote: Hello, I have been using a self-signed certificate on my Fossil server for the last year and it just expired. I have replaced the expired self-signed certificate with a new/different self-signed certificate. I assume you aren't using client

Re: [fossil-users] Any interest in testing/merging check-in-edit branch?

On 18/07/15 17:09, Scott Robison wrote: Still on phone. Instead of -euser how about -author? Instinctively seems less clumsy but it's just a knee-jerk reaction to -euser which seems both long and short simultaneously. :) I agree x 2. -- Kind Regards, Jan

Re: [fossil-users] SQLITE_BUSY ?

On 17/06/15 11:38, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: [---] Sadly, a plain pull is not 100% read-only, so WAL doesn't help avoiding such problems. Out of curiosity; why aren't pulls 100% read-only on the server? -- Kind Regards, Jan ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] NOT_A_FILE problem

On 05/06/15 13:08, jim Schimpf wrote: [---] EDITED Docs/HayJam.pdf NOT_A_FILE Docs/images/Detector.graffle EDITED Docs/images/Detector.png So I then did a fossil rm of this file and did an OS rm and removed if from the directory. put it back in the directory and fossil added it

Re: [fossil-users] trunk closed??

On 29/05/15 22:15, Matt Welland wrote: We emphatically do NOT want Fossil second-guessing what branch you want to be on when you do fossil update without an argument. Whatever option you decide - either way you are second guessing the users intent. 1. Current behavior is really, really

Re: [fossil-users] New skin: Blitz

On 13/03/15 19:11, James Moger wrote: [---] Blitz has two variants (with logo without logo). It includes an alternative Ticket page layout and several image resources which may be of use to other skins. Would you be willing to change the upper-case 'A-F' in hex digits to lower-case in the

Re: [fossil-users] Google code shutting down

On 13/03/15 20:55, Richard Hipp wrote: Few organizations have the problem that the full power of Git solves. And yet many organizations voluntarily take on the problems that come with using Git. Weird. One shouldn't underestimate the power of because everyone else does it. -- Kind

Re: [fossil-users] New skin: Blitz

On 13/03/15 19:11, James Moger wrote: Hello Fossil community, [---] This just became my new favorite skin. Thank you for submitting this. -- Kind Regards, Jan ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] RFC regarding short UUID for some command line use.

On 08/03/15 06:48, Andy Bradford wrote: There have recently been some changes to make short UUIDs more prominent, however, I think that new checkins should still display the full UUID: [---] Thoughts? None other than a simple I agree. /Jan

Re: [fossil-users] Justification for two-step mv and rm

On 06/03/15 15:10, Jan Nijtmans wrote: [---] fossil rename already exists as alias to fossil mv, so I suggest to add fossil forget as alias to fossil rm. Then later the behavior of fossil rm/mv can be modified, while forget/rename will continue to behave as rm/mv do now. Any objections

Re: [fossil-users] Old problem not entirely gone?

On 02/02/15 23:23, Warren Young wrote: The annoying thing is that when it fails, it wipes away whatever progress it has made. Yes, well, that’s the nature of transactional DB updates: all or nothing. Implied: There's only one way to use transactions when performing initial

[fossil-users] Old problem not entirely gone?

Hello, I used to have major difficulties cloning huge repositories. (See http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/pipermail/fossil-users/2014-May/016234.html). In that thread the commit http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/b4dffdac5e706980d911a0e672526ad461ec0640 was brought up as a

[fossil-users] Breaking out of fossil ui leaves files

Hello, I just noticed something which I can't recall seeing before. I started fossil ui on a repository (-R foo.fossil), and when I hit ctrl-c, it terminated as expected, but it left the corresponding -shm and -wal files. I'm pretty sure I have used fossil ui on wal'd fossil repository

Re: [fossil-users] Breaking out of fossil ui leaves files

On 17/10/14 20:01, Jan Danielsson wrote: [.. -wal -shm remain after ctrl-c:ing out of fossil ui ..] A quick grep through the source leads me to believe that there is no registered signal handler to handle SIGINT apart from when an sqlite shell is started. Which leaves me slightly surprised

Re: [fossil-users] Horror story about git - Forever Alone

On 25/09/14 13:18, Matt Wellans wrote: I suspect fossil would slow down faster than git in that scenario but I'd also argue that because fossil is easier to understand that scenario is a little less likely to happen. Let's all be honest here; this a unique case where you'd _want_ it to

Re: [fossil-users] SSL issue on Mac OS/X?

On 12/06/14 18:06, Ron Aaron wrote: OK, my second fossil question in one day: I recently moved my repo from standard http to https (behind Apache) My linux machines had no problem with the change over. But the OS/X machine cannot connect to my repo. I get: SSL: cannot connect to host

Re: [fossil-users] SSL issue on Mac OS/X?

On 12/06/14 20:29, Ron Aaron wrote: Nope, no proxy. And I can connect from my linux clients just fine. I tend to think it's related to the certificates. openssl in Mac OS X is very old, so if you're using EC, RSA/PSS or something of the sort it could be an issue. -- Kind Regards, Jan

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

On 02/05/14 19:57, Andy Bradford wrote: Artifacts sent: 0 received: 895 Error: Database error: database is locked: {UPDATE event SET mtime=(SELECT m1 FROM time_fudge WHERE mid=objid) WHERE objid IN (SELECT mid FROM time_fudge);} #key_3_2 [...] As you say, it is highly reproducible, but

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil process hanging on sync to remote server?

On 10/05/14 10:53, Gerald Gutierrez wrote: [---] pContent=unavailable, N=unavailable) + 50 at http_ssl.c:399 396 size_t got; 397 size_t total = 0; 398 while( N0 ){ - 399 got = BIO_read(iBio, pContent, N); 400 if( got=0 ) break; 401 total += got; 402

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

On 18/04/14 17:52, Matt Welland wrote: Just FYI, I'm seeing this kind of message quite often. This is due to overlapping clone operations on large fossils on relatively slow disk. [---] Artifacts sent: 0 received: 895 Error: Database error: database is locked: {UPDATE event SET mtime=(SELECT

[fossil-users] https-over-proxy

Hello, I did some work to get https-over-proxy working because both a friend and I both needed it, and there was a ticket requesting the feature. Now the place where my friend works no longer uses proxies for outgoing traffic, so he no longer needs it, and I very rarely use it. So, the

Re: [fossil-users] https proxy tunnel

On 28/10/13 13:39, Jan Nijtmans wrote: [---] Conclusion: your branch works fine as long as the password is not taken from the (https) url. I hope this feedback is useful to you. Yes, very useful. We only use client certificates, and apache is set up to set REMOTE_USER from the client

[fossil-users] https proxy tunnel

Hello, The jan-httpsproxytunnel branch has been tested on NetBSD, Mac OS X, Linux and Windows against three different proxies, at two very different environments, and it is working well. Feedback from people more accustomed to the world of http proxies would be appreciated. /Jan

Re: [fossil-users] http-proxy + https

, Jan Danielsson signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Control artifact types [Was: Minor new feature: comments when closing/re-opening]

On 08/23/13 18:10, Stephan Beal wrote: THANK YOU Mark - i wasn't paying attention. Jan, i'll send you the NEW password off-list. For a short moment there I thought This has to be the most trusting community EVER!. :) -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson

Re: [fossil-users] How to ignore UNIX executables?

On 8/15/13 3:23 PM, John Long wrote: Hi, is it possible to ignore UNIX executables? I want to do an addr on a directory tree but I don't know how to tell fossil not to track the binaries since they have no naming pattern. Until now I've been living with it but it is very annoying and time for

Re: [fossil-users] self-hosted Fossil for a team

On 8/11/13 2:07 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: So . . . let's say I have a server (running FreeBSD, and I'll probably be setting this up in a jail) and a router that can forward ports (already has SSH forwarded to this server). For argument's sake, let's say we're confined to only one port per

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

On 7/25/13 2:05 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: [---] grep tells me that there are 33 instances of the __CYGWIN__ macro in Fossil, in 8 different files. So if you use sed to change them all to __CYGWIN_OFF_ (or something else harmless) and then do ./configure; make, does it work? (I don't

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

On 7/25/13 2:10 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: Move to banish __CYGWIN__ from both Fossil and SQLite sources. Do I have a second? Seconded. /Jan ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Side-by-side diff improvement

/fdiff?v1=98aec3c55155011bv2=d74d0c320c455abdsbs=1(you can click anywhere inside a diff and use the left/right arrow keys to scroll) I instantly can't live without it. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [fossil-users] Did you know that Fossil could do...

On 5/28/13 3:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for Fossil, you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff between those two nodes? I knew about it. When I read the first paragraph I was afraid you were about to suggest

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

for it), which should be somewhere in your Start-menu (under the Visual Studio folder). It'll set up the environment, and you'll be able to build fossil. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

On 12/31/12 11:17, Nico Williams wrote: [---] But I feel I must at least address this insinuation that I was trolling. It's obvious that you aren't trolling. You don't have to defend yourself against such nonsense. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

first try project, since it *definitely* solves one issue, and _may_ solve another one. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

it had scalability issues (which were even worse), so it's not an exclusive fossil-problem. (git isn't affected by this though, but it's noteworthy that the NetBSD project on github is (was?) imported from the fossil NetBSD repository). -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

. not that this would matter for 99.9% of all projects. Definitely true. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

, we'd have four. I vote no, and again reaffirm my vote for the suggestion drh wrote last night (local time). -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

) and then decide to stop tracking the files and issue 'fossil rm' assuming the files are left alone on disk and only then discover they were not). the transition period should guarantee that this will not evelove into a real-world problem I'd say. *nods in major agreement* -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

of it.. How come all these points you listed aren't issues with other source management systems which have real rm/mv? -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

be having these .. er, but reverse, discussions. Probably worth considering. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

On 12/14/12 00:23, Richard Hipp wrote: But, should there be an opt-in option to also make the disk changes? Yes -- definitely. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

is or should do. Done with this thread. Keep it classy, detractors. 100% agree. I must say, I'm not quite as fond of the fossil community as I once was. I have no interest in being insulted further. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users

[fossil-users] Obvious solution to the rm/mv problem?

/rm - change to principle of least surprise move/remove - behaves like current mv/rm That way we all get what we want .. no? -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

definitions which are relevant to the mv/rm issues and we can judge that information directly. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [fossil-users] Obvious solution to the rm/mv problem?

like fossil rm -f I vote Yes to all the above. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the real thing?

) behavior is kept in 2.0. Sorry if this came out as a rant; it's not directed at anyone personally, but like I said, I battled fossil rm/mv recently and I'm still not completely over it. No flame-bait intended. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil

[fossil-users] click timeline to diff

Hey, I know it's only a short-cut for something which we could do before. But I love this new feature; it's one of those I didn't know how much I wanted it until I started using it, and now I won't be able to live without it. Fantastic feature! -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

? -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Support for Win9x?

last win95-compatible version so anyone so inclined can dig it up easily, just in case? -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http

Re: [fossil-users] The future of markdown-in-fossil

seen so far. And even if we get a nice WYSIWYG editor for the web interface (in theory rendering the stored format irrelevant), I'll still be sitting writing wiki documents on the train in plain old vim, because there really isn't any other option. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson signature.asc

Re: [fossil-users] feature proposal: explicitly public branches

. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Building fossil on Solaris

want to redo it all, which is why I'm looking for a more automatic solution. :) -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup build issues

the dynamic configure/build issues, and then possibly revisit static linking? The dynamic linking works, but unfortunately on these particular systems I want static linking. :) -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup build issues

I got what I wanted. And if anyone else needs/wants it, the information is easily found via a web search. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman

[fossil-users] autosetup build issues

that static linking be used. At the same time, the way I look at it, the project should build and run on standard OS installations, with as few separate dependencies as possible. Input is welcome. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing

Re: [fossil-users] Building fossil on Solaris

, but it didn't, so I assume it's the build system I don't understand). Any help is appreciated. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil

[fossil-users] Building fossil on Solaris

. You will probably need to create one. $ ls auto.def configure The system is (correctly) being identified as: Host System...sparc-sun-solaris2.9 Build System...sparc-sun-solaris2.9 Which are the usual suspects when Makefile.in doesn't get created? -- Kind regards, Jan

Re: [fossil-users] Building fossil on Solaris

, I know Solaris technically does it right, and I respect that, but it's getting a little old running into this problem every five-six months or so). Thanks! -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Retro side-by-side diffs

), the retro sbsdiff works for both console and displaying it in a pre html-section. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Retro side-by-side diffs

points aside, I strongly support the idea of unifying the two, so overall I'm for the retro sbsdiff. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [fossil-users] Retro side-by-side diffs

, then I see no reason the same couldn't be done for side-by-side diffs. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Retro side-by-side diffs

it myself, but I'm sorry to say my javascript-fu is so weak that I wouldn't even be able to assist anyone wanting to take on the project). -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] fossil and SSL

temporarily starts a server? If that's the case, then the answer is no. -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi

  1   2   >