Re: [fossil-users] How can I determine if a repository has actually changed?

Sorry, the "$2" needs to be a "$1" -- that was a finger-flub on my part On 03/22/2012 09:13 AM, Ron Aaron wrote: > OK, I've come up with a small bash script to get an 'id' which I can use > to detect changes in a repo. Save the following to "fossili

Re: [fossil-users] How can I determine if a repository has actually changed?

OK, I've come up with a small bash script to get an 'id' which I can use to detect changes in a repo. Save the following to "fossilid" and make it executable: if [ ! -f "$1" ] then echo "fossilid needs the name of the repository to 'id'" exit 1 fi configsha=`fossil config export all -R $

Re: [fossil-users] How can I determine if a repository has actually changed?

On 03/21/2012 09:18 PM, Leo Razoumov wrote: > Poor man's way of figuring it out is to capture the output from fossil > pull (or fossil push) command, parse it and if all numbers of > transfered artifacts and deltas are zero than nothing changed. That will not work in this case, because I do not do

Re: [fossil-users] How can I determine if a repository has actually changed?

On 03/21/2012 08:06 PM, Leo Razoumov wrote: > True, but does not help if your file is encrypted. You change a single > byte of your plain-text-file and your encrypted version changes > entirely. Precisely so. And I don't want to encrypt and synch the file, unless it has changed in a meaningful wa

Re: [fossil-users] How can I determine if a repository has actually changed?

Certainly I could, but that means that my fsl files are put there as-is, and I want them encrypted before putting up there. It also means that the fsl files will always be synched, even if nothing actually changes, which is what I want to avoid. On 03/21/2012 06:32 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > You

[fossil-users] How can I determine if a repository has actually changed?

I've got a bunch of Fossil repositories which I back up by doing: fossil pull fossil config pull all I am now also encrypting the repos after backing up, and putting the encrypted files on "Ubuntu One" for off-site failsafe backup. The problem I am trying to solve is that I do NOT want to "sync

Re: [fossil-users] copy configuration from repo to repo?

On 03/20/2012 12:19 PM, ST wrote: > Hi, > 1) I've just configured my first fossil repo and now would like to copy > this configuration to other projects. Is it possible? Hello - It is simple: do "fossil help config" for all the options, but you basically want "fossil config export" and "fossil co

Re: [fossil-users] In-line versus side-by-side diffs

If you could align the two columns so they were vertically aligned on the left sides, it would be easier to view. I do like the new changes, though (while also liking the unified diff in other ... em ... contexts) On 02/07/2012 06:26 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > A lot of people have been telling me

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil is Awesome

On 10/26/2011 11:15 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > > imagine what we could do for version, file/dir, and diff browsing with > something like: > > http://mbostock.github.com/d3/talk/20111018/#8 > I think that things of that nature would be computationally intensive, and better suited to a separate uti

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil is Awesome

On 10/26/2011 10:59 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > I strongly disagree. > First, please don't fix what's not broken. Agree 100% > P.S. > I'm one of those crazy folks who usually has NoScript turned on except > for the intranet sites, so yes, I'm biased. > Yes, so am I ...

Re: [fossil-users] Veracity

Ah, thank you. Now I understand. And it looks to me like a big headache waiting to happen. Relying on people following "intentions" of the software is not very robust. On 10/19/2011 02:55 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:52:41PM +0200, Ron Aaron

Re: [fossil-users] Veracity

And furthermore, how exactly do "locks" work in a distributed SCM context? (that was my 2 NIS) On 10/19/2011 02:50 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > My 0.02€: in some 16 years of using source control, i have never once > had a use for (and sometimes been hindered by) locks. IMO anyone who > _thinks_ th

[fossil-users] fossil asks to confirm accept of self-signed cert on 'config pull'

As I reported here: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=fc825dcf52 I'm trying to understand why a normal "pull" works fine (without asking me to accept the cert again), but "config pull" always asks to accept the cert. I am failing to understand it ... This has become a relatively big

Re: [fossil-users] any interest in integrating jimtcl w/ fossil?

On 09/20/2011 07:07 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > > Not that I ever had any need to touch either th1 or jimtcl, but I'd > like to ask an obligatory question: what are the current th1's > shortcomings so that replacing it with something else is needed? > An excellent question... __

Re: [fossil-users] Has any fossil user ever experienced a SHA1 collision?

On 09/15/2011 05:34 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Using the "birthday paradox", I calculated last year that for the > SQLite repository, if it continues to change and evolve at the same > rate it has for the previous 10 years, will encounter its first SHA1 > collision in approximately 3.6e20 years

[fossil-users] Problem after 'make clean'

After doing 'make clean', './configure' complains that 'Makefile.in' doesn't exist (and indeed it doesn't) ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] MD5 and SHA1 from OpenSSL

Not so fast! :) It seems that the current code is faster than openssl on intel (well, on linux anyway). But it is slower on AMD chips, whether 32 or 64 bit os. That is something which is easily detectable, although I don't know if I have the patience to try to figure out what is going on to make

Re: [fossil-users] MD5 and SHA1 from OpenSSL

Maybe it depends on your specific hardware, but on linux32 (i3 core2) I get (kubuntu11-04.iso) : openssl sha1 : 3.823 fossil sha1sum : 3.660 (old fossil: 4.936) On linux64 (amd athlon X2, using a 600M data file): openssl sha1 : 2.504 fossil sha1sum : 3.202 (old fossil: 4.211) (these are "best ti

Re: [fossil-users] Soapbox: man, i love fossil...

On 08/16/2011 06:48 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Every now and then i'm using a tool which i just happen to use all the > time ... Fossil, of course, is one of those. ... > Fossil, on the other hand, is (again, in my experience) as solid and > easy-to-use as it gets. And I would like to second Stepha

Re: [fossil-users] commit command seems to be slow

On 08/05/2011 11:38 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > If find this a bit misleading. If I said "fossil settings mtime-changes > enabled", I'd like it to tell me: "please say on or off" (or whatever single > agreement we come up with). I don't mind any of the names, but I'd like ot be > one pair

[fossil-users] What is the logic of not moving the actual files when doing 'fossil mv'?

I'm trying to understand why it would be a good thing to do what fossil currently does. When I do "fossil mv x y", it "marks" the files as renamed. But then I can easily get in a state where fossil is confused (happened just today in fact), if I don't copy the "x" to "y". What is the reason "fos

[fossil-users] Add "file:" URL type to "openHyperlink()"

Is there any particular reason the "file://" URL type is not parsed in "openHyperlink()" ? It would be useful for me, though I can work around its absence... thanks! Ron ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Code & diff highlighting in fossil, a tutorial -- how to turn it off for selected sections?

Hi, Tomek - The footer code you have highlights everything marked as "pre" or "verbatim" etc. However, it does not take into account any class information. For example, from the highlight.js docs (http://softwaremaniacs.org/soft/highlight/en/description/) I expect to be able to do: ... But

Re: [fossil-users] Code & diff highlighting in fossil, a tutorial

Only one change I would suggest: add "Ubuntu" and "Verdana" to the front of the font list; then people who have those fonts installed will have a nicer display experience ... On 06/24/2011 05:22 PM, Tomek Kott wrote: > Thanks to a comment by Ivan (dev of highlight.js), I was able to > simplify th

Re: [fossil-users] Code & diff highlighting in fossil, a tutorial

Absolutely awesome, thank you Tomek! On 06/23/2011 11:12 PM, Tomek Kott wrote: > Hi fossil users! > > In a previous post > and > associated email > > on the

Re: [fossil-users] Possibility of "nicer" diffs?

Hi, Rene - I tried the instructions here: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki?name=Cookbook#HighlightDiff But have not got it to work; perhaps the instructions aren't quite correct, I haven't looked into it yet. On 06/22/2011 05:30 PM, Rene wrote: > >> in the fossil wiki does not work for me,

Re: [fossil-users] Possibility of "nicer" diffs?

On 06/22/2011 02:18 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > fossil setting --global diff-command EXTERNAL-DIFF-PROGRAM That works when doing a 'diff' from the command-line, but not when using "fossil ui" and clicking a diff link. Is there a way to hook the diff link? __

Re: [fossil-users] Possibility of "nicer" diffs?

On 06/22/2011 10:59 AM, paolo lulli wrote: > > I'm going crazy trying to overcome the command-line-phobia of my > coworkers; please, anything you can do to help me would be appreciated! > > I learned how to co-exist with that. I don't think there is a way to > defeat it. With the coworke

[fossil-users] Possibility of "nicer" diffs?

I'm trying to get fossil adopted in my company; and one of the "problems" is the spartan nature of the diffs (in the GUI). It would be excellent if there were another option similar to 'gdiff' which could be enable to make the "diff" link open an external diff program with the correct data. My gu

[fossil-users] An "ease of use" issue

I've noticed that if I remove a file from a working-set without informing fossil about it, then fossil fails when I try to commit (other changes in the set). That's fine, but it gives an obscure message: fossil: no such file: somefile fossil: SQLITE_BUSY: statement aborts at 2: [ROLLBACK]

Re: [fossil-users] fossil "out of memory" on rebuild

OK, I've made another pass and am getting different results. This leads me to believe that what I am seeing is a function of my runtime environment, and not due to the specific builds. My theory is that the old builds are *just* enough smaller that -- most of the time -- they work with this weird

Re: [fossil-users] fossil "out of memory" on rebuild

It turns out I mistakenly type 'bad' instead of 'good' at some point. After redoing the bisect I have this result: 5fc36e2faabf13e9c2c8 2010-01-13 09:58:09 BAD CURRENT cf3809cc71ffc9557bd6 2010-01-13 09:35:46 GOOD I manually updated to each of these versions, and verified that in fact the one i

Re: [fossil-users] fossil "out of memory" on rebuild

> > What version of Fossil was able to rebuild this repo? Can you bisect > and figure out when it broke? I haven't looked at what broke, but for the first time I used the 'bisect' command -- and wow, what a great tool! Here is the output: 14253e9b3336a6292432 2010-01-09 18:32:28 BAD 6069602ab

Re: [fossil-users] fossil "out of memory" on rebuild

Hi -- > Do you really have 58MB artifacts in your repository, or is the size > parameter going goofy on us here? Repository Size:62579712 bytes Number Of Artifacts:2477 (stored as 43 full text and 2434 delta blobs) Uncompressed Artifact Size: 11817116 bytes average, 59646559 bytes

Re: [fossil-users] fossil "out of memory" on rebuild

Here's the backtrace: Starting program: /home/ron/proj/fossil/fossil rebuild -R rw 14.4% complete... Breakpoint 2, fossil_malloc (n=58019464) at ./bld/main_.c:410 410 fossil_panic("out of memory"); (gdb) bt #0 fossil_malloc (n=58019464) at ./bld/main_.c:410 #1 0x0804c5b3 in blob

Re: [fossil-users] fossil "out of memory" on rebuild

On 05/12/2011 03:03 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > it's just a wild guess, but does > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/ci/6b382b0818 help any? Sorry, no it doesn't. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8

Re: [fossil-users] fossil "out of memory" on rebuild

On 05/12/2011 02:59 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Can you run the rebuild in a debugger and give me a clue as to where it > is running out of memory? Yes, I'll try to do that tonight. Thanks, Ron ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-

[fossil-users] fossil "out of memory" on rebuild

I just upgraded to the latest (dcc68b46b2) version of fossil, and dutifully did "fossil rebuild" on all my repos. Everything was fine, but for one repo where I get "out of memory" and fossil cannot rebuild this particular repo. I also tried "fossil deconstruct" followed by "reconstruct", with the

Re: [fossil-users] How can I get the Fossil CSS to show RTL text properly?

Turns out it was my mistake. After looking at the source of the created HTML page, I could see my 'class' declarations coming through (they do not get stripped out, as a perusal of the wikiformat.c source shows). Rather, I had neglected to "refresh" the browser so the new CSS got pulled down. So

Re: [fossil-users] How can I get the Fossil CSS to show RTL text properly?

PM, Joshua Paine wrote: > On 4/22/2011 2:05 AM, Ron Aaron wrote: >> When I try to add a ".hebrew" style (or "div.hebrew" or "p.hebrew"), the >> style does not seem to take effect when I type in for example:> style=hebrew> some hebrew (nor for

[fossil-users] How can I get the Fossil CSS to show RTL text properly?

Hi all - I've got a site where I want to be able to have text in both English and Hebrew. Hebrew paragraphs should be styled as "direction: rtl; text-align: right;". When I try to add a ".hebrew" style (or "div.hebrew" or "p.hebrew"), the style does not seem to take effect when I type in for e

[fossil-users] Odd behavior for 'default user'

I have a developer helping me on a project. He clones my repo using his user name. Then, when he does a push, I see the commit as 'User' instead of his user name. He's on Windows, which is probably why it's 'User' instead of something more useful. It seems to me that the 'default user' should b

Re: [fossil-users] File dates

On 03/28/2011 08:17 PM, Volodya Savastiouk wrote: > Does anybody else feel this is a useful feature/option? I do, yes. > thanks for fossil, I love it! > Me too! ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.or

Re: [fossil-users] New features in Fossil - please test them out...

On 02/28/2011 06:15 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > I disagree, it can be very unwanted if you have a large repository. > E.g. it might require schedulung downtime or extra disk space etc. > > Ah, well; that is a good point. ___ fossil-users mailing li

Re: [fossil-users] New features in Fossil - please test them out...

On 02/28/2011 05:09 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > There have been a lot of changes to the Fossil sources over the past > week. If you are able, please compile the latest Fossil from sources > and give it a try. Let me know if you encounter any problems. Not something about this latest build specific

[fossil-users] Restricting trunk checkins

One feature "missing" from Fossil is a way to restrict checkins on the 'trunk' (or other branch) to certain people. This is necessary in a group where the methodology is for a "gatekeeper" to approve integration into the main line of development. Has there been any thought along those lines? I

Re: [fossil-users] "time skew" message now appearing

> Fossil thinks that the timestamp on the message it received back from the > server is 67.1 seconds off from its own system clock. If your clocks are > synchronized, and the message is only taking a few milliseconds to travel > your network, then this should not be happening. Very odd. I reboot

Re: [fossil-users] "time skew" message now appearing

> As of http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/722d7cac97 Fossil records the > check-in time to the nearest millisecond. This should solve your problem > for now -- until you try your script on a machine that is so fast that it > can do two commits within the same millisecond... I'm just doing an

Re: [fossil-users] "time skew" message now appearing

> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Ron Aaron wrote: > > I'm now getting "time skew... server time differs by 62.0 seconds" > > whenever I > > update (the exact time varies). > > Is it taking 60 seconds to sync? no - just a sec __

[fossil-users] "time skew" message now appearing

I'm now getting "time skew... server time differs by 62.0 seconds" whenever I update (the exact time varies). But... the server I'm connecting to and the machine I am running from are within one second of each other! This only started to happen recently, but I don't know exactly which version.

Re: [fossil-users] Post-commit hook

> I mange my web site using Fossil. I have a repository on the server as well > as a working copy there. I do the same. But rather than rely on a post-commit hook, I rely on a bash script which: pushes my changes to the server logs in to the server and 'updates' the site (the DocumentRoot) runs

[fossil-users] Integrating forum software w/ fossil?

Here's an odd query: has anyone tried to integrate forum (like phpbb or something) functionality with fossil? It would be *very* nice if one could have forums w/ threads etc held inside a fossil repo. But barring that, it would also be nice if one could simply use the authentication from a fos

[fossil-users] Enhancements to "fossil ui"

Although I applaud efforts such as "Jurassic", forcing my coworkers to download the JRE, etc, is something which will meet a lot of opposition. It seems that the UI as it is, is quite powerful. The main things not available (or not easily available) for ordinary work seem to be: * Adding a

[fossil-users] How can I get the list of 'developers' in TH code?

I would like to make the 'assigned to' field in my ticket edit page load from the user list. Ideally just from the actual developers. Right now I manually code the individuals allowed, but that is a maintenance nightmare. Is there any TH code to do what I want? I couldn't find anything in the

Re: [fossil-users] fossil: bad object id: 0

On Tuesday 23 November 2010 12:06:51 Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > Ah, I thought I was in an open branch. This happens only when updating > (fossil update), being in a closed branch. Nevertheless, it's an unexpected result. The message given should be more informative. -- For privacy, my G

Re: [fossil-users] keeping /etc with fossil

On Sunday 14 November 2010 09:52:53 Gour wrote: > Hello! > > I'm more than happy with Fossil and would like to extend its usage to > something I'm thinking for quite a long time about and which was not > convenient with other DVCS-es...it is keeping /etc under control. > > Has anyone tried it? Ho

Re: [fossil-users] Is there any mechanism for determining page 'hits' in fossil?

On Thursday 11 November 2010 19:05:47 Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Ron Aaron wrote: > > > > > > > ...The PHP script uses "fossil wiki export" to get a page which lists > > "valid" files. If the requested file is no

Re: [fossil-users] Is there any mechanism for determining page 'hits' in fossil?

On Thursday 11 November 2010 17:14:29 Joshua Paine wrote: > There's a race condition where the download count > may not increment correctly if two or more people download at > approximately the same time Right; that's a reason I entered a feature request for a wiki 'append' command, since then

Re: [fossil-users] Is there any mechanism for determining page 'hits' in fossil?

On Wednesday 10 November 2010 18:56:38 Ron Aaron wrote: > I would be interested in having some way to track when people download > files via my fossil-based site. Is there any mechanism to do this right > now? Since there isn't a way to do this directly, my link inside the fos

[fossil-users] Is there any mechanism for determining page 'hits' in fossil?

I would be interested in having some way to track when people download files via my fossil-based site. Is there any mechanism to do this right now? -- Sending me something private? Use my GPG public key: AD29415D ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-u

Re: [fossil-users] Possible to export revision history?

On Wednesday 10 November 2010 03:52:11 Richard Hipp wrote: > > These two new commands (import and export) are early prototypes. They > surely still contain bugs and lack needed features. But I think they > provide a good start toward an import/export capability for Fossil. Excellent! Any thou

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion for the 'ticket' command

On Saturday 06 November 2010 21:07:20 Wolfgang wrote: > I added the -R option to the ticket command. > Thank you! -- Sending me something private? Use my GPG public key: AD29415D ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://

[fossil-users] Suggestion for the 'ticket' command

Is there a reason why it has to be in a valid fossil checkout? It would be convenient if it were possible to specify "-R my.fossil", as can be done with a number of other commands. -- For privacy, my GPG key signature is: AD29415D ___ fossil-users mai

Re: [fossil-users] How to change 'binary' to non-binary?

On Tuesday 19 October 2010 15:52:48 Richard Hipp wrote: > The diff limitation only comes up when you try to merge. You must be doing > something more than backing things up. Ah, no; it was my mistake. I thought my fossil repo was growing too quickly (as in, simply putting the new version of th

Re: [fossil-users] How to change 'binary' to non-binary?

On Tuesday 19 October 2010 14:47:36 Richard Hipp wrote: > Fossil considers files to be "binary" if they contain the character '\000' > if they contain one or more lines that are longer than 8192 bytes. > > Fossil is unable to do a line-by-line diff of files that are "binary" > (according to the di

[fossil-users] How to change 'binary' to non-binary?

Fossil decided that a particular SQL file is binary, and I can't figure out how to change its mind. Is there a way to tell fossil to stop treating a file as binary? -- Sending me something private? Use my GPG public key: AD29415D ___ fossil-users mail

[fossil-users] ssh:// sync method not working now?

As of the latest version, it looks like "fossil clone ssh://..." is no longer working. I did have it working at the end of August ... did something change? -- Sending me something private? Use my GPG public key: AD29415D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [fossil-users] Updated: Enhancement: ssh:// sync method

On Saturday 28 August 2010 00:02:27 Richard Hipp wrote: > The ssh:// code in the Fossil self-hosting repository is now reasonably > complete, I believe. It now works correctly on unix and windows. Please > try it out. Once I get 4 or 5 "works for me!" replies, I'll do a new > (3) fossil clone

Re: [fossil-users] ssh:// sync method -- how to specify remote 'fossil'?

On Thursday 26 August 2010 16:42:32 you wrote: > Fossil version (http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/90f40cd368) lets you specify > an alternative executable name as a query parameter on the URL: > > fossil clone http://login@ > restrictive-host.com/repo.fossil?fossil=/home/me/bin/fossil clone.foss

Re: [fossil-users] ssh:// sync method -- how to specify remote port?

A different repo, not using the default port 22: When I try 'fossil clone ssh://m...@server:port/path-to-repo local-repo' I get "could not resolve hostname server:port: Name or service unknown When I manually log in from ssh it works fine (using -Pport) -- For privacy, my GPG key signature is

[fossil-users] ssh:// sync method -- how to specify remote 'fossil'?

I've got a fossil repo running on a shared virtual server. The hosting company has locked sshd so the 'PATH' is only /bin and /usr/bin, which are not writable for my user. So when the ssh: tries to connect, it tries to launch 'fossil', which will not work. I need to be able to say something l

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: ssh:// sync method

On Wednesday 25 August 2010 23:25:03 Richard Hipp wrote: > The latest version of Fossil (in the self-hosting Fossil repository - not > the precompiled binaries which are a little too old) supports a new method > of pushing, pulling, cloning, and syncing using SSH. Examples: > > fossil clone

[fossil-users] Can an option to "keep-branch" be added for "update" ?

I find it annoying that if a branch has been added to the repo by someone and I "update", fossil doesn't just update to the same branch I was on. I can see utility in informing me that new branches have been added since I last updated, but to *not* update and wait for me to specify the branch

[fossil-users] How best to control access to certain files or pages?

Is there any way to allow access (to links, for example) in general to everyone, but to restrict access to certain ones? This would be a useful feature for me -- of course, I can simply put the 'private' content in a separate repo, but that makes things more complex to manage. -- For privacy

Re: [fossil-users] ticket notifications

On Thursday 24 June 2010 21:28:15 Richard Hipp wrote: > There is nothing in principle that would prevent such functionality from > being added. But on the other hand, no such functionality currently exists. I'm happy using the RSS feed feature to get notifications when things change; I suppose i

Re: [fossil-users] Praise for fossil

On Monday 31 May 2010 23:17:25 James Bremner wrote: > reinventing the wheel? Has someone already done this, or is > there a fossil feature I have overlooked that makes a multi-project timeline > monitor easy or even redundant? Have you looked at using the RSS feed feature? -- Sending me som

Re: [fossil-users] On the wiki

On Sunday 16 May 2010 19:23:07 Jeremy Cowgar wrote: > Oh, one more thing I wanted to say Fossil is awesome with not just > it's integrated ticket and wiki system but it's integrated and > DISTRIBUTED ticket and wiki system. That's huge. Yes. > But, for all that, the lack of a complete w

[fossil-users] Is there a reason I cannot use "" in my wiki page?

I'm trying to do different layouts, and doing logic inside my page using TH script. But when I use the ... tags inside my page, I get no joy. Is it because I have 'use HTML' on? Does that prevent TH code in the wiki body from getting interpreted? I'm getting around the limitation by using T

Re: [fossil-users] ticket assignment

On Thursday 06 May 2010 04:18:20 zacht...@cis-partners.com wrote: > I have developed a simple patch to introduce ticket assignment. I have yet > to add an "assigned to" column in all places that may be necessary. Is this > something people would be interested in seeing included with the standar

Re: [fossil-users] Odd behavior difference: 'fossil server' vs cgi

On Thursday 29 April 2010 02:18:43 Richard Hipp wrote: > Is there a BOM at the beginning of your *.wiki file? That's a good question. As it turns out, there is, though I never have BOM enabled (which, by the way, points out a bug in the "flexwiki" ftplugin file in vim!). However, that does

[fossil-users] Odd behavior difference: 'fossil server' vs cgi

I have the repository, for which I have enabled "all html tags" (since it is a website, which you can see the beginnings of here: http://accord-sys.com/ ) On the online (e.g. cgi-based) site, there is a wiki hyperlink on the first page, which appears entirely correctly. However, after a sync (a

[fossil-users] Didn't someone mention working on a fossil GUI (like Tortoise)?

I seem to recall something like that, but can't find the reference. I'm interested in that, maybe in helping out. -- For privacy, my GPG key signature is: AD29415D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ fossil-users m

[fossil-users] difficulty with embedded wiki "title" tag

I have a "index.wiki" which starts: Manual whatever The "<" is the first character in the file. From what I see in "wikiformat.c", the page should then say "Manual" as its title. Instead, I see the literal "Manual" in the page. I think the "<" is getting escaped on commit or something... th

[fossil-users] latest compile warnings....

The new sqlite3.c has a potential issue caught by gcc: ./src/sqlite3.c: In function 'sqlite3BtreeBeginTrans': ./src/sqlite3.c:36166: warning: 'nPage' may be used uninitialized in this function ./src/sqlite3.c:36166: note: 'nPage' was declared here Looking at the code, nPage is initialized by th

Re: [fossil-users] three-way merge

On Monday 12 April 2010 19:52:37 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > Can anyone suggest a good 3-way graphical merger that I can use for > testing (Mac or Linux). 'kdiff3' or 'meld' are free BeyondCompare is not expensive -- Sending me something private? Use my GPG public key: AD29415D signature.asc

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil GUI for local source tree operations

On Monday 05 April 2010 22:34:52 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > Hence, Fossil has from the beginning supported the ability to PGP sign > check-ins. The PGP signature is optional. If a check-in is signed, > you know exactly who originally made that check-in. In situations > where it matters, simply a

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: commit a ticket

On Sunday 14 March 2010 18:53:09 Jeremy Cowgar wrote: >* Fixed [384938]. Blah Blah Blah >* Fixed [2939283]. Blah Blah Blah. > > Does everyone do the same or does everyone fix one bug per commit? > I try to make one checkin per fix (I'm a fan of checking in often as a means or cheap

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: commit a ticket

On Sunday 14 March 2010 02:32:32 Jacek Cała wrote: > Wouldn't be useful if this common case is simplified to only a single > operation: commit which closes a related ticket e.g. using a command like: > > fossil commit -t -m [-r ] Yeah, I can see where that would be nice to have. Why not enter

Re: [fossil-users] "fossilize" a fossil repository, tsp and other things

On Sunday 07 March 2010 18:30:18 pasqualinoferrentino-fos...@yahoo.it wrote: > fossil fossilize --before 2005 > > In this case fossil will take all the artifacts which exists before > 2005, it deconstructs them on disk, it compresses them using > "in-file-similarities", it creates a sort of sup

Re: [fossil-users] Look! A git import tool.

On Wednesday 03 March 2010 01:33:07 Brian Smith wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been playing with fossil for a few weeks now and I've come to > quite like it. > I was a tad disappointed that a git import tool hadn't been written > so, I went ahead and did that. Very cool! So... do you want to do somet

Re: [fossil-users] clearsign defaulting to off

On Tuesday 23 February 2010 18:16:59 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > I get the impression that I am perhaps the only person in the world > who cares about PGP signing their check-ins. So rather than burden > all other users with having to figure out PGP/GPG, what it is, how it > works, and why

Re: [fossil-users] "Not all tickets are problems"

On Wednesday 10 February 2010 10:37:51 Jacek Cała wrote: > For me tickets are ok and by default you have type 'Task' configured. > If you create a report that filters by this, isn't it enough? Actually, the default is: set type_choices { Code_Defect Build_Problem Documentation Feature_

[fossil-users] "Not all tickets are problems"

Concerning ticket [2b79f36e5a], I agree with the notion. However, I would take it a bit further and say "issues" rather than "tickets", throughout the product. I would also add a "Todo" type (well, I have in my own projects), as Fossil is an excellent way to keep track of meta-issues as well

[fossil-users] Why is the SSL code on a branch?

It looks to me like the SSL code is #ifdef'ed so that if it were merged into the main branch, it would not cause any problems. Also, there is very little difference between it an the main branch. Why is it separate? -- Sending me something private? Use my GPG public key: AD29415D signature.

Re: [fossil-users] New Timeline... Internal Server Error.

On Monday 08 February 2010 18:45:31 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > There are still some display problems, though, as can be seen at > around the 2010-01-24 entries of > http://www.fossil-scm.org/test/fossil/timeline?n=200&y=ci Works nicely on Konqueror on KDE4, as well. Now if we could just get

Re: [fossil-users] How to set-up multiple-repo CGI-based server?

On Wednesday 03 February 2010 16:50:03 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > With check-in http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/vinfo/49cffc0187 the > multi-repository feature of Fossil is enhanced in two ways: OK, that is even better than the script posted before! Perfect, really. > Setting up a Fossil se

Re: [fossil-users] How to set-up multiple-repo CGI-based server?

On Wednesday 03 February 2010 16:18:58 altufa...@mail.com wrote: > Look for document under 'Another solution to automatically serve multiple > repositories' title. Though this wasn't exactly what I wanted, it's actually better -- thanks! -- Sending me something private? Use my GPG public key:

Re: [fossil-users] How to set-up multiple-repo CGI-based server?

On Wednesday 03 February 2010 12:52:14 Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > The thread was > [fossil-users] Repository-dependant cookies No; I didn't see an answer to my issue there (if you see my specific issue addressed, please point out which post it was in, as I didn't see it). I cannot run Fossil

[fossil-users] How to set-up multiple-repo CGI-based server?

Hi all - At the moment, I'm serving a number of repositories from the same CGI-based Apache server, using a separate script for each repo. This works fine, of course. What I would like to do, is have "magic" happen so that I can simply put a new Fossil repo on the server, and have it availabl

Re: [fossil-users] Repository-dependant cookies

On Sunday 31 January 2010 05:21:13 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > Suppose we expanded this to allow multiple repositories to be named on > the command-line. So if you had a directory full of repositories, you > could do: > >fossil server *.fossil > > Suppose the names of the repositories

<    1   2   3   >