[fossil-users] Is it possible to add older code by date?

2014-02-01 Thread tonyp
Hi all, I would like to add older code (kept manually until now in ZIP files) to a fossil repository already containing some newer versions. Is there a way to add older versions manually, perhaps by specifying the date via a command switch, or by using the actual file dates for each of the fil

[fossil-users] Is it possible to keep original file dates where reverting / updating?

2014-03-23 Thread tonyp
Hi all, Like the subject says: Is it possible to restore the original file dates whenever reverting / updating to a given version? This is important for MAKE files to not consider a file updated and try to rebuild. TIA___ fossil-users mailing list fo

Re: [fossil-users] Is it possible to keep original file dates where reverting / updating?

2014-03-23 Thread tonyp
On the other hand, when updating to a previous version, you’re actually interested in getting a snapshot of how things were at that time, and if every restored file is given a ‘now’ timestamp, using MAKE is the equivalent of always using the –B option, which is not likely what you wanted to do.

[fossil-users] undo option unavailable even when nothing changed

2014-04-19 Thread tonyp
Example (where f = fossil): f rev f undo (OK) ... f rev f rev (NO CHANGES, apparently) f undo (nothing happens) This does not seem to be right. Because if by mistake you type “f rev” twice (not being sure if you’ve already done it) you lose the ability to undo. Thanks.

[fossil-users] Any direct way to see diff with previous changed version of a single file?

2014-04-19 Thread tonyp
Is there a direct way to see differences for a specific file from the last time this file actually changed, regardless of version? (where f = fossil) Something like: f diff file --from prev but where prev would refer to the previous changed version of this particular file, not just the previous

Re: [fossil-users] undo option unavailable even when nothing changed

2014-04-19 Thread tonyp
Fine, but I don’t think this would require a multi-level undo stack. A simple flag to indicate at the completion of any command if anything has changed (i.e., files written, deleted, or renamed) during its execution would be enough to decide whether to clear the one-level stack or leave it as i

Re: [fossil-users] Problem: Can't get diff against renamed file

2014-04-30 Thread tonyp
But there are some problems (This is fossil version 1.29 [003db810a2] 2014-04-30 18:02:45 UTC): fossil test-name-changes -R \db\some.fossil prev trunk Assertion failed: e>0, file ..\src\bag.c, line 122 Stephan Beal wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02 PM, j. van den hoff wrote: just a shor

Re: [fossil-users] Outside contribution feature

2014-06-05 Thread tonyp
Couldn’t this also be used to solve another problem, that of keeping separate repos for various projects that depend on (sometimes massive) common library files? Currently to deal with that I have to put all projects under the same repo, which is not ideal. The alternative, keeping multiple co

[fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

2014-06-06 Thread tonyp
Does fossil support or has plans to support autocrlf (like Git)? (Text files internally saved always with Linux line endings, but extracted as Win, Linux, Mac line endings depending on the platform FOSSIL runs on)___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-use

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

2014-06-07 Thread tonyp
I know about crnl-glob. But it is a completely different issue than autocrlf (like with Git). As for the hash mismatch this is just a minor technical issue easily solved. The hash would have to calculated after stripping off all CRs (Win/DOS) or converting to LFs (Macs) in text files. Then i

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

2014-06-07 Thread tonyp
Well, I can give a couple of personal examples that you easily try yourselves: * Windows side: Copy/Paste in Windows can not deal with LF endings correctly. Example: PNotepad editor in Windows loads Linux files but copy-pasting from it (for example) to other apps messes up all text (puts it all

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

2014-06-07 Thread tonyp
From: Scott Robison Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 12:05 AM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git? * Several old time assemblers will choke on wrong line endings. Their binaries cannot be updated as the source is no longer available. So, you must edit

Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git?

2014-06-07 Thread tonyp
From: Scott Robison Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 12:58 AM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] autocrlf like in Git? > I completely agree with the points other than the one that "the DVCS is the > only tool that can effectively manage the EOL convention of the files". I u

[fossil-users] How to deal with incomplete code?

2014-06-14 Thread tonyp
Hi all, It seems to me that commits are best (from a logical point of view) when they refer to completed work, not for work-in-progress (WIP). Besides, it’s not nice to see a timeline filled with incomplete non-working code. For example, I create a new library code file that is under initial

Re: [fossil-users] How to deal with incomplete code?

2014-06-14 Thread tonyp
I think your suggestion would work fine under some conditions: 1. You always use a top-down design methodology. 2. Your whole repo is a single project. (1) If you have a bottom-up design (e.g., first design the library, and when you get it working, integrate it into the main app), you’ll never s

Re: [fossil-users] How to deal with incomplete code?

2014-06-14 Thread tonyp
Private branches? I don't know, I'll give that a try. Thanks for your suggestion. Questions (to all): 1. If the only way is to use a special branch to do what I need, can at least a single branch be reused multiple times? I mean the same branch name (e.g., the WIP branch) to be created, clo

Re: [fossil-users] How to deal with incomplete code?

2014-06-15 Thread tonyp
Well, maybe my ideas are wrong for you, but I assure you, to me they always seem very right! :) Just like programming styles, mine *may* be very wrong to many, but it's the best there is to me, and has never let me down! But at least we agree on committing those work-in-progress files on some

Re: [fossil-users] diff with --from --to

2014-08-15 Thread tonyp
I suppose you’re referring to this comment: “Note that "--from branch --to current" and "--from branch" are not quite the same thing. The second form (without the --to) does a diff between the branch and the code in the current check-out including local uncommitted changes. Adding the --to op

[fossil-users] Inconsistency with DIFF/GDIFF and --brief option

2014-08-15 Thread tonyp
FOSSIL DIFF --BRIEF shows a list of files that changed. FOSSIL GDIFF --BRIEF seems to ignore the brief option. They share a common help screen where the option is available presumably to both.___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.or

[fossil-users] UI diff issue

2014-09-21 Thread tonyp
Hi all, (This is fossil version 1.30 [ee46563cbd] 2014-08-15 12:46:27 UTC) When using the UI to look at differences between versions by marking the little square boxes to indicate the ‘from’ and ‘to’ versions, if you mark the ‘from’ but need to go a different page (using newer/older) to mark the

Re: [fossil-users] UI diff issue

2014-09-21 Thread tonyp
Oh, I see. Well, one possible solution I can think without knowing if it would be easy (or even possible) to implement: When someone selects a ‘from’ box, the script should update the links for older/newer options to include the selected ‘from’ parameter. [Perhaps the URL (for Older/Newer) can

Re: [fossil-users] UI diff issue

2014-09-21 Thread tonyp
Correction: upon pressing (say, Older) should become something like: upon selecting a ‘from’ should become something like: From: to...@acm.org Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 3:45 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] UI diff issue Oh, I see. Well, one possible sol

Re: [fossil-users] gdiff/opendiff on os x: suppress unchanged files?

2014-09-24 Thread tonyp
If it's any consolation, the same problem exists under Windows with WinDiff (default GDIFF program). I suppose the reason for this is the screening of which files to show is done by the application, and not fossil. And, WinDiff, in my case has no problem showing a comparison between two equal

Re: [fossil-users] gdiff/opendiff on os x: suppress unchanged files?

2014-09-24 Thread tonyp
Here’s a very easy way to verify the problem (at least on a Win machine): (F = FOSSIL) (This is fossil version 1.30 [ee46563cbd] 2014-08-15 12:46:27 UTC) 1. f g --from prev any_unchanged_file_path 2. f diff --tk --from any_unchanged_file_path [1] will show the files but without any differences. [2

Re: [fossil-users] gdiff/opendiff on os x:suppress unchanged files? (OOPS)

2014-09-24 Thread tonyp
Here’s a very easy way to verify the problem (at least on a Win machine): (F = FOSSIL) (This is fossil version 1.30 [ee46563cbd] 2014-08-15 12:46:27 UTC) 1. f g --from prev any_unchanged_file_path 2. f diff --tk –from prev any_unchanged_file_path [1] will show the files but without any differences

Re: [fossil-users] gdiff/opendiff on os x: suppress unchanged files?

2014-09-24 Thread tonyp
There is a "Show Identical Files" option in WinDiff but changing only affects whether the contents of the files are shown, or a blank screen is shown. The problem is still that the WinDiff application is invoked even though there is no difference in the files. -Original Message- From:

Re: [fossil-users] gdiff/opendiff on os x: suppress unchanged files?

2014-09-24 Thread tonyp
Wait a moment, did you specify a path/file with the GDIFF command, or was it a show-me-all case, i.e., no files given? Because the latter will correctly go only through the files that have changed. The problem appears when you specify a set of files (even a single one). Then, all specified fil

Re: [fossil-users] gdiff/opendiff on os x: suppress unchanged files?

2014-09-24 Thread tonyp
MessageOK, but still you need to try with a file that has NOT changed. It should show nothing, but you will see the file, instead. From: dave Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 11:17 PM To: 'Fossil SCM user's discussion' Subject: Re: [fossil-users] gdiff/opendiff on os x: suppress unchanged f

[fossil-users] Compilation with SSL option fails on Win7

2014-09-28 Thread tonyp
Here's what I do: (I have installed the latest perl - Strawberry Perl, and I have installed openssl-1.0.1i.tar.gz under the compat subdirectory) Then (with MSVC) I do: nmake -f Makefile.msc FOSSIL_ENABLE_SSL=1 and after some successful work, it halts with this message: -- C:

Re: [fossil-users] Compilation with SSL option fails on Win7

2014-09-28 Thread tonyp
Update (if it helps): The problem appears in the latest trunk version [e061a675e6]. I also tried with an earlier version [ee46563cbd], and it worked OK. But the latest trunk fails consistently, so something must have broken in between these two. -Original Message- From: to...@acm.o

Re: [fossil-users] Compilation with SSL option fails on Win7

2014-09-28 Thread tonyp
Nope! The same exact error. I uninstalled StraberryPerl before installing ActivePerl. So, the problem is elsewhere. Also, as I mentioned in the follow-up email: The problem appears in the latest trunk version [e061a675e6]. When I tried with an earlier version [ee46563cbd], it worked OK. Sin

Re: [fossil-users] Compilation with SSL option fails on Win7

2014-09-28 Thread tonyp
I'm building on Win7 64-bit. Tomorrow, at work, I can try again on a Win7 32-bit, and see if that makes a difference. Version [ee46563cbd] built without any errors, and apparently has SSL support (much larger file size, and an attempt to connect to an HTTPS server did not produce errors about

Re: [fossil-users] Compilation with SSL option fails on Win7

2014-09-29 Thread tonyp
I'm afraid several changes were made that were not directly related to the problem I was having at all, even if they may have added greater robustness to the build process. (BTW, I always did NMAKE from within the win subdirectory that contains the makefile.msc so that was definitely not part of

Re: [fossil-users] How to use the ticket subsystem?

2014-09-30 Thread tonyp
Thanks, this is great! One problem though! The values I set are not pulled to my local copy. Is that expected? (Server is Fossil version [3d49f04587] 2014-01-27 17:33:44 client is fossil version 1.30 [ee46563cbd] 2014-08-15 12:46:27 UTC) From: Stephan Beal Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 6

Re: [fossil-users] I have two trunks?

2014-10-02 Thread tonyp
If it helps: I tried something very simple (in this example: https://chiselapp.com/user/rberteig/repository/WPCLI/home), and it apparently fixed the problem in cloned copy at least. I shunned the empty initial checking, rebuilt, and re-enabled the artifact (just in case). The timeline show

Re: [fossil-users] Is it possible to add empty folders to the repo?

2014-10-06 Thread tonyp
(BETTER YET: Is it possible to REMOVE empty folders?) For me, there is an even more ‘annoying’ problem with the way empty directories are handled, but I think it is the opposite use case. For example: You have version X that has subdirectories a, b, and c. And, another version Y that has only a

Re: [fossil-users] Ordering ticket priority/severity

2014-10-12 Thread tonyp
I suppose the simplest solution would be to rename them to start with the required digit. Example: 1 Critical 2 Important -Original Message- From: org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 12:00 AM To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: [fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] FINFO suggestion

2014-10-17 Thread tonyp
I guess the timeline equivalent would work, too! However, I'd be more interested in being able to see just the code changes (i.e., check-ins) and not all the 'noise' about wiki edits, tickets, tags, etc which the timeline gives by default (unless one uses the "-t ci" option). So, I thought sin

Re: [fossil-users] FINFO suggestion

2014-10-17 Thread tonyp
I did a quick try, and it seems to work OK with only one small exception, the root directory itself (where _FOSSIL_ is). There, “fossil tim .” for example (which works OK in subdirectories), shows nothing “+++ no more data (0) +++” when obviously there is quite a lot because if I give “fossil t

Re: [fossil-users] FINFO suggestion

2014-10-17 Thread tonyp
One more problem I see is that it sometimes shows the same timeline entry multiple times in a row (same SHA1 and description) From: to...@acm.org Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 7:51 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] FINFO suggestion I did a quick try, and it seems

Re: [fossil-users] FINFO suggestion

2014-10-17 Thread tonyp
An observation related to the last problem. The identical multiple entries seem to match the number of files that have changed in that subdirectory. So, if three files changed, the same timeline entry appears three times. From: to...@acm.org Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 8:30 PM To: Fossil S

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option (WAS: FINFO suggestion)

2014-10-17 Thread tonyp
Seems to work much better. I no longer get duplicates. Thanks. (I haven't yet checked whether the entries I see are the correct ones, e.g., no missing ones, but on first inspection the timeline seems correct). So, for now the only remaining problem I can see is the failure to show any change

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option (WAS: FINFOsuggestion)

2014-10-17 Thread tonyp
OK, here's one more minor issue you can easily test with sqlite3 repo under Windows. Windows filenames are case insensitive. Trying with wrong case fossil tim readme.md -R sqlite3.fossil +++ no more data (0) +++ while, trying with correct case fossil tim README.md -R sqlite3.fossil === 2

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option (WAS: FINFO suggestion)

2014-10-17 Thread tonyp
This new timeline functionality really makes a huge difference in everyday work! Thank you all. -Original Message- From: Martin Gagnon On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:43:53PM +0300, to...@acm.org wrote: So, for now the only remaining problem I can see is the failure to show any changes

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option (WAS: FINFO suggestion)

2014-10-17 Thread tonyp
Last change with case sensitivity for Windows works great. One note about the previous fix regarding the repo root. It assumes (based on comment in source) equivalence to no filename given. But this prints 'noise' like tickets, wiki edits, etc. So, I guess a simple fix is to force enable the

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option (WAS: FINFOsuggestion)

2014-10-17 Thread tonyp
Again, thanks for the quick fix regarding forced -t ci on filename. Works perfectly. As far as I can tell this new feature is complete! Great work! ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option (WAS: FINFOsuggestion)

2014-10-18 Thread tonyp
Case sensitivity does not work for directory names, only for filenames. -Original Message- From: to...@acm.org Last change with case sensitivity for Windows works great. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http:/

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option (WAS:FINFOsuggestion)

2014-10-18 Thread tonyp
I re-ran all use cases I had tried before, and everything seems OK. * Case-insensitivity for Windows (OK) * Root directory (OK) * No duplicates (OK) From: Richard Hipp Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2014 1:36 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAM

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option(WAS:FINFOsuggestion)

2014-10-18 Thread tonyp
I don’t know if anyone has noticed already, but there is an inherent ambiguity between possible dirnames/filenames, and tag names or internal keywords, such as current & now used by the timeline command. If there is a filename by the same name does the word refer to the filename, or to the keyw

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAMEoption(WAS:FINFOsuggestion)

2014-10-18 Thread tonyp
:01:55 [3450ec3047] *CURRENT* Added now filename (user: tonyp tags: trunk) +++ no more data (1) +++ Thanks. From: Richard Hipp Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2014 10:09 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAMEoption(WAS:FINFOsuggestion) On

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option (WAS: FINFOsuggestion)

2014-10-18 Thread tonyp
That's because 'trunk' is incorrectly interpreted as filename. This is related to the same problem I have already reported about filenames having priority over internal keywords and tags, instead of the other way around. I suspect it will be fixed soon. -Original Message- From: Stef

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option (WAS:FINFOsuggestion)

2014-10-18 Thread tonyp
I see three possibly easy solutions: 1. An SQL SELECT on the tag and keyword list decides whether to treat a word that has no slash as keyword/tag (exists), or filename (not exists). If there is a slash it is always a filename. 2. A possibly faster executing way (without having to run SQL to

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option (WAS:FINFOsuggestion)

2014-10-19 Thread tonyp
Regarding (1), I thought a bit more about it and it won't work because except for tag names you also have dates, and it is conceivable that a subdirectory name looks like a date (e.g., 2014-10-01), so checking the tag list is not enough to disambiguate. Regarding (2), we agree. I find it less

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option(WAS:FINFOsuggestion)

2014-10-19 Thread tonyp
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Bellon wrote: But why not just use some switch to indicate that the following argument is a file/directory rather than a branch/tag/...? From: Stephan Beal +1: no ambiguity problem and no unconventional file prefix. So, I guess the consensus is f

Re: [fossil-users] New TIMELINE with FILENAME option(WAS:FINFOsuggestion)

2014-10-19 Thread tonyp
On second thought, regarding these arguments (from Stephan Beal) : > @ is conventionally used by some apps to mean "include list from this file this is exactly what we need. Include the (timeline) list from this file (implying about this file) Plus, if we go with what some other apps do, then

Re: [fossil-users] diff --tk features and to-dos. Was: Diff against working copy

2014-10-23 Thread tonyp
>Please save me the trouble of search - Do I have a Contributors Agreement for >you in the firesafe? May I suggest this great SQLite3 tool to help you (1) keep track of your documents, and (2) quickly search for membership without even going to the safe? (Sorry, I couldn’t resist! )___

Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL ALL

2014-10-28 Thread tonyp
I tried it and it works very well. Thanks. So, I guess I can leave all repos open all the time at both locations, and only do PULL/SYNC/PUSH at start/end of work day. (I only worry a bit about the possibility of the USB eventually becoming full during a ‘push’ what consequences will it have on

[fossil-users] Possible bug: Failure to acknowledge changes after failing to overwrite write-protected file

2014-11-12 Thread tonyp
(This was seen on a Windows 7 machine) When opening a repo, if you select to overwrite all files, and a file to be updated happens to be read-only (R attrib set), the overwrite fails (it should) but if you then change the read-only to read-write, and try to see changes or try to revert the fail

Re: [fossil-users] Possible bug: Failure to acknowledge changesafter failing to overwrite write-protected file

2014-11-12 Thread tonyp
From the "F SET" command I see blanks for either: mtime-changes ... repo-cksum Regarding mtime, I understand the batch file test maybe too fast for the time to change, but the problem was noticed on a file that was many hours away from the repo version. -Original Message- From: Kee

Re: [fossil-users] Possible bug: Failure to acknowledge changes after failing to overwrite write-protected file

2014-11-13 Thread tonyp
And I have to ask: Why do you have to ask? :) A problem is a problem regardless of how it became evident. No, I don’t keep read-only files under fossil control, obviously. Note I used the word ‘happens’ to be read-only. The read-only status was set to temporarily protect this one file from be

Re: [fossil-users] Possible bug: Failure to acknowledge changes after failing to overwrite write-protected file

2014-11-13 Thread tonyp
I agree it’s not an everyday use case. I’ve been using fossil for nearly a year now, and it happened to me only once, just now. And, I’ve learned my lesson, so I’ll be more careful for this not to happen again. However, this is the kind of situation that it may not bite often at all but if it

[fossil-users] How to force text for all files?

2014-12-06 Thread tonyp
Hi, I’m looking for a way to force all files (except those matching binary-glob) to be treated as text rather than automatically (mis-)detected as binary. Any way to do that? TIA___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://li

Re: [fossil-users] How to force text for all files?

2014-12-06 Thread tonyp
One common (for me) example is a text file that includes maybe just one or two special 8-bit ASCII codes. This causes the whole files to be stored as binary and makes it impossible to ‘diff’. From: Richard Hipp Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 10:16 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subjec

Re: [fossil-users] How to force text for all files?

2014-12-07 Thread tonyp
I'm not sure about the exact characters that may be causing this as each file has different ones. (What characters would make the file binary in fossil’s eyes?) I'm dropping a zip with two examples here (www.dropbox.com/s/bmjp65hfcv1ex9w/text_or_bin.zip?dl=0) that I happened to use lately, bu

Re: [fossil-users] How to force text for all files?

2014-12-07 Thread tonyp
No irony at all. Certainly a file is either *assumed* to be text or binary, not both at the same time. But isn’t ‘binary’ (or ‘text’) a matter of perspective/interpretation? I don’t know of any formal definition or international standard of what constitutes ‘binary’ or ‘text’ files. For exa

Re: [fossil-users] How to force text for all files?

2014-12-07 Thread tonyp
-Original Message- From: Will Parsons And how could one possibly distinguish a file containing all 256 byte bit patterns from a binary file? That's the point, in effect you can't. It's up to you to decide how to interpret a file. Referring to "all 256 ASCII codes" is a misnomer.

Re: [fossil-users] How to force text for all files?

2014-12-08 Thread tonyp
How about this idea? During 'commit' when asked contains binary data. Use --no-warnings or the "binary-glob" setting to disable this warning. Commit anyhow (a=all/y/N)? to have one more option (Text) to override the automatic detection. Something like: contains binary data. Use --no-warn

Re: [fossil-users] File age in the tree view

2014-12-17 Thread tonyp
Just to note that on Win7 (Firefox browser – if it matters), the mouse-over shading is so faint that if I hadn’t read about it here I wouldn’t have noticed it at all. Can you make it a little more visible?___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@list

[fossil-users] Windows 'make' broken?

2015-01-10 Thread tonyp
I tried to compile the latest fossil with SSL, and failed with the following errors: cl -DOPENSSL_NO_SSL2 -DOPENSSL_NO_SSL3 /Fotmp32\cversion.obj -Iinc32 -I tmp32 /MT /Ox /O2 /Ob2 -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DDSO_WIN32 -W3 -Gs0 -GF -Gy -nologo - DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32 -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -DL_E

Re: [fossil-users] New search features

2015-02-03 Thread tonyp
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vujnqzgx3iaiu64/fossil.exe?dl=0 From: Richard Boehme Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:58 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] New search features Does anyone have a Windows binary of the latest fossil with search? I don't have the ability

[fossil-users] Fossil's reported app name under Windows firewall

2015-03-01 Thread tonyp
I was trying to modify firewall settings for fossil to work as server under Windows 7, and (even after adding fossil.exe again and again) I couldn't find any program named fossil or even containing the word fossil in the list of firewall enabled apps. To make a long story short, after lots of f

Re: [fossil-users] Justification for two-step mv and rm

2015-03-03 Thread tonyp
You could always have a global setting on how to deal with this (old way vs new way) to keep everyone happy :) -Original Message- From: Richard Hipp Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:22 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Justification for two-step mv and rm

Re: [fossil-users] Timeline graph display options

2015-03-10 Thread tonyp
Although both are good, my vote is for nomo=0 (choice 1) as being the one that 'goes to 11' :) -Original Message- On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:06:59PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: Which timeline graph do you prefer: (1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci&nomo=0 (2) https://ww

Re: [fossil-users] Is this a crazy idea?

2015-03-20 Thread tonyp
I was about to suggest the same because I often have this situation, also. I need to commit a large number of files, except one or two which are still no ready for commit. I’ve been thinking about what the simplest way from a user’s point of view would be, and I think if in the editor that com

Re: [fossil-users] Select specific changes within files

2015-03-20 Thread tonyp
++1 From: Scott Robison Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 11:08 PM On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Steve Stefanovich wrote: If we are discussing "partial", I'm more interested in partial checkouts than partial commits, i.e. having the ability to checkout a specific directory only. Now that wou

[fossil-users] Minor bug that causes some confusion

2015-03-25 Thread tonyp
This is on a Windows machine so, filenames are case insensitive. To reproduce (f = fossil): f new xxx.fossil f o xxx.fossil echo Hello > hello f add hello f cha f ext f rev Hello f cha f ext Problem 1: “f rev Hello” does not revert the ADD (note: Hello is given with a different case from the pr

Re: [fossil-users] New timeline display options

2015-03-31 Thread tonyp
+1 -Original Message- From: Andy Bradford Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 7:20 PM To: Matt Welland Cc: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] New timeline display options Thus said Matt Welland on Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:08:49 -0700: +1 circular nodes, +1 colored li

Re: [fossil-users] Version 3.8.9 is in testing

2015-04-02 Thread tonyp
Just in case this was not intentional. I have received this only from the Fossil list(s), but not SQLite's. BTW, the introduction of the .dbinfo shell command made the more commonly used .dump come later and now needing more than just ".d" to invoke it. Bummer :( -Original Message-

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-05 Thread tonyp
But, what if the two forks become incompatible when merged? For your proposed auto-merge to work, it’s enough that the two forks simply touch (alter) different files. An auto-merge would obviously work without producing conflicts as neither fork touches files touched by the other fork. Now, i

Re: [fossil-users] Merge question

2015-04-15 Thread tonyp
I think what you're looking for is to simply copy a file from one branch to another. The way I often do this is to use the update command to bring in those files (usually one or very few files) from whatever other branch (any check-in really -- even from same branch, older version). No need t

[fossil-users] Can fossil be used to apply a diff patch?

2015-04-17 Thread tonyp
Can fossil be used to apply a diff patch (such as that created by the diff command)?___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Can fossil be used to apply a diff patch?

2015-04-17 Thread tonyp
Thank you but I wanted this for a Win7 machine, not Linux. (I have MINGW installed but its 'patch' is a bit unstable as it crashes most of the time besides not being available on most Win7 machines.) That's why I was hoping fossil would be able to eat its own ... diff Bundle is not good when t

Re: [fossil-users] Bug? FOSSIL MV does not work as expected (Win7machine)

2015-04-21 Thread tonyp
I’m aware of the “within the repository”, and actually I’m not among those who are so interested in this changing this, as proposed by others. So, not the same issue here. What I’m reporting is unrelated to changes happening on disk. If you run the example below you should not be allowed to c

Re: [fossil-users] Branch only timeline

2015-04-23 Thread tonyp
+1 (wish list) I don't think there is as I had asked for the same quite some time ago. But, I guess an option like -b [branch] could be added eventually to do this. (Similar to how -p can be used to filter by given file/dir name.) Example: -b without an explicit branch name to show timeline on

[fossil-users] FOSSIL STASH wish list

2015-04-30 Thread tonyp
To add to the perpetual wish list: Can the STASH [SAVE] command be made to behave similarly to the COMMIT command with respect to comments in the editor? That is, if nothing is typed as stash comments, the stash operation to be aborted. It currently does not allow one to abort, and if you don’t

[fossil-users] Fossil [f4aed6661c] compilation problem MSVC

2015-05-09 Thread tonyp
..\src\piechart.c(145) : error C2065: 'M_PI' : undeclared identifier ..\src\piechart.c(157) : error C2065: 'M_PI' : undeclared identifier___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil [f4aed6661c] compilation problem MSVC

2015-05-09 Thread tonyp
Yes, it now works. Thanks. BTW, if you're also interested in some long-standing warnings (with MSVC again), here they are: ..\src\url.c(459) : warning C4090: 'function' : different 'const' qualifiers ..\src\url.c(460) : warning C4090: 'function' : different 'const' qualifiers ..\src\url.c(485

[fossil-users] Linux compilation problem (Ubuntu v14) and is rebuild needed?

2015-05-23 Thread tonyp
Q1: How do I solve this? (I have already tried ./configure and didn’t make any difference) ./bld/piechart.o: In function `piechart_render': ./src/piechart.c:176: undefined reference to `sincos' ./src/piechart.c:179: undefined reference to `sincos' ./src/piechart.c:191: undefined reference to `si

Re: [fossil-users] Linux compilation problem (Ubuntu v14) and is rebuild needed?

2015-05-23 Thread tonyp
OK, got it working with these 3 steps: make clean ./configure make Q2: Do I need a rebuild after going to v1.33 from v1.32? Regarding Q2 I meant is a FOSSIL REBUILD required when going from 1.32 to 1.33? Although it seems the database schema hasn't changed from fossil v1.32 (based on f

[fossil-users] WARNING: multiple open leaf check-ins on trunk:

2015-05-29 Thread tonyp
I updated to this recent version of fossil: This is fossil version 1.33 [282ae5e4de] 2015-05-28 17:05:13 UTC Compiled on May 28 2015 21:56:18 using msc-18.00 (32-bit) SQLite 3.8.10.2 2015-05-20 18:17:19 2ef4f3a5b1 Schema version 2015-01-24 zlib 1.2.8, loaded 1.2.8 SSL (OpenSSL 1.0.2a 19 Mar 2015) U

Re: [fossil-users] WARNING: multiple open leaf check-ins on trunk:

2015-05-29 Thread tonyp
(BTW, this is a private repo). So, if this is a new feature, it means the problem was there all along and I simply now found out about it! Great! What I see at that time is the following (I hope the image won’t disappear – if it does, get it here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ozzicm164dc2o0d/fork

Re: [fossil-users] WARNING: multiple open leaf check-ins on trunk:

2015-05-29 Thread tonyp
FOSSIL MERGE would have been my guess too but it gives this message: "Merge skipped because it is a no-op. Use --force to override." And, using --force does nothing, of course. So, the timeline is still the same. But, come to think of it, fossil merge should logically fix the problem, even

[fossil-users] FOSSIL UPDATE behavior -- feature or bug?

2015-06-06 Thread tonyp
Using the UPDATE command, when trying to bring in a subdirectory from another version (I tried both from a different branch and from the same branch and I get the same behavior), and that subdirectory does not exist in the current version, nothing happens saying “changes: None. Already up-t

Re: [fossil-users] Automatically put version / checkout infomation into source code on commit

2015-07-13 Thread tonyp
To get the checkout version into your app, one way (I've been using successfully) is this: With the help of a little script (like the following Lua one) extract the checkout version into a file that is included from your app. This file is generated as part of the make build process and is itsel

Re: [fossil-users] diff after update

2015-09-11 Thread tonyp
Although I think --undo is not too bad as it clearly does not make sense to 'undo' a diff, another alternative that is less 'verbal' that might work is diff --back (as in "diff with what would be there if I were to go back, or back out the recent changes...") -Original Message- From

[fossil-users] FOSSIL LS bug?

2015-09-12 Thread tonyp
With this setting: relative-paths (local) 1 doing FOSSIL LS . from within a subdirectory displays the full path (from the root or the repo). I tried with older version and current trunk and get the same behavior. ___ fossil-users mailing list fos

Re: [fossil-users] MERGE problem (with renames/deletes)

2015-09-27 Thread tonyp
I’ve been reading much of this discussion so far, and although it has focused primarily on the possibility of a deleted file not merging in as one may have expected, I have to say that my report was not about that. What I reported had to do with the addition of new files in trunk that were neve

Re: [fossil-users] How to close an empty branch?

2015-10-24 Thread tonyp
I ran into the same problem just yesterday. Took me a while to figure out a solution. (And, this may not be the only way but it worked well.) In my case there were two possibilities. For one, I could just do 'unhide' and see the related timeline. The other (like yours, probably) did not show

Re: [fossil-users] How to close an empty branch?

2015-10-24 Thread tonyp
This makes wonder. Is there any practical reason to allow a check-in without any tags? If not, maybe a warning should be issued when trying to cancel the only remaining tag of a check-in. From: to...@acm.org Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2015 11:19 AM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: R

Re: [fossil-users] How to close an empty branch?

2015-10-24 Thread tonyp
Very easy to reproduce (Win7, f = fossil): f new sample.fossil f o sample.fossil echo Hello > somefile f add somefile f com --branch ghost -m "Save in some branch" f tag cancel ghost af9e rem The actual ID above may differ f up ghost rem not found: ghost f bra f up --does

  1   2   >