I would like to see us all agree on GNOME Foundation goals and then work on
how I can best make those happen.
So far we've gotten very little feedback on what people think the GNOME
Foundation should accomplish in 2010.
I've put together a short survey if you'd like to weigh in that way.
Please
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 14:19 -0500, Og Maciel wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Stormy Peters stormy.pet...@gmail.com
wrote:
So far we've gotten very little feedback on what people think the GNOME
Foundation should accomplish in 2010.
I've put together a short survey if you'd like
Thank you for your reply John.
The bonuses both reflect pie in the sky,
you are probably never going to get this done items to more mundane items
which none the less, contribute to the growth of the foundation.
I just felt that goals such as:
$500 - Improving relations with the
Hi,
Og Maciel wrote:
I just felt that goals such as:
$500 - Improving relations with the advisory board, starting
regular 1-on-1 meetings with them, etc.
For this one, the starting point is worth bearing in mind. If I
understand your argument, you're saying that anyone
Hi Dave!
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
$500 - Improving relations with the advisory board, starting
regular 1-on-1 meetings with them, etc.
For this one, the starting point is worth bearing in mind. If I
understand your argument, you're
Og:
The bonuses both reflect pie in the sky,
you are probably never going to get this done items to more mundane items
which none the less, contribute to the growth of the foundation.
I just felt that goals such as:
$500 - Improving relations with the advisory board, starting
Thank you Brian for a great email and probably the best answer I got
(no offense to John or Dave). It became a whole lot clear to me the
reason behind the milestones I was questioning... it also became
apparent that my concerns *do* apply for the next 'iteration' as some
of these now more mundane
On 01/25/2010 01:44 PM, Og Maciel wrote:
get more feedback and constructive criticism. I'd love to see
milestones related to getting localization and accessibility teams on
the roadmap for 2010 and holding sprints/what-not with members of
these teams to see how to make GNOME more accessible to
Og:
I think there is more value in suggesting ways that the CEO goals should
be refocused. However, there has been little discussion about that so
far. How would you suggest improving the goals and metrics to ensure
that concerns that you have are better addressed moving forward?
For
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
m...@avtechpulse.com wrote:
Those are great goals for gnome overall, but I don't think they have much to
do with Stormy's actual duties. Do they?
Applying them probably not, but getting the right people together and
soliciting funds to
GNOME Foundation:
Over the past several weeks, the board has been working to put together
a more formal set of GNOME Foundation goals. Aside from the obvious
benefit of having goals better enumerated, these goals are needed in
order to compute the bonus that the GNOME Foundation CEO receives.
Bonus goals are meant to direct energy into places we feel are most
important for the current cycle. The bonuses both reflect pie in the sky,
you are probably never going to get this done items to more mundane items
which none the less, contribute to the growth of the foundation. We could
just
12 matches
Mail list logo