On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 14:19 -0500, Og Maciel wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Stormy Peters
> wrote:
> > So far we've gotten very little feedback on what people think the GNOME
> > Foundation should accomplish in 2010.
> >
> > I've put together a short survey if you'd like to weigh in th
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Stormy Peters wrote:
> I would like to see us all agree on GNOME Foundation goals and then work on
> how I can best make those happen.
Great!
> So far we've gotten very little feedback on what people think the GNOME
> Foundation should accomplish in 2010.
>
> I'v
I would like to see us all agree on GNOME Foundation goals and then work on
how I can best make those happen.
So far we've gotten very little feedback on what people think the GNOME
Foundation should accomplish in 2010.
I've put together a short survey if you'd like to weigh in that way.
Please
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
wrote:
> Those are great goals for gnome overall, but I don't think they have much to
> do with Stormy's actual duties. Do they?
Applying them probably not, but getting the right people together and
soliciting funds to support improving th
Og:
I think there is more value in suggesting ways that the CEO goals should
be refocused. However, there has been little discussion about that so
far. How would you suggest improving the goals and metrics to ensure
that concerns that you have are better addressed moving forward?
For starte
On 01/25/2010 01:44 PM, Og Maciel wrote:
get more feedback and constructive criticism. I'd love to see
milestones related to getting localization and accessibility teams on
the roadmap for 2010 and holding sprints/what-not with members of
these teams to see how to make GNOME more accessible to pe
Thank you Brian for a great email and probably the best answer I got
(no offense to John or Dave). It became a whole lot clear to me the
reason behind the milestones I was questioning... it also became
apparent that my concerns *do* apply for the next 'iteration' as some
of these now more mundane t
Og:
The bonuses both reflect pie in the sky,
you are probably never going to get this done items to more mundane items
which none the less, contribute to the growth of the foundation.
I just felt that goals such as:
$500 - Improving relations with the advisory board, starting
Hi Dave!
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
>> $500 - Improving relations with the advisory board, starting
>> regular 1-on-1 meetings with them, etc.
>
> For this one, the starting point is worth bearing in mind. If I
> understand your argument, you're saying th
Hi,
Og Maciel wrote:
> I just felt that goals such as:
>
> $500 - Improving relations with the advisory board, starting
> regular 1-on-1 meetings with them, etc.
For this one, the starting point is worth bearing in mind. If I
understand your argument, you're saying that anyone *
Thank you for your reply John.
> The bonuses both reflect pie in the sky,
> you are probably never going to get this done items to more mundane items
> which none the less, contribute to the growth of the foundation.
I just felt that goals such as:
$500 - Improving relations with the advis
Bonus goals are meant to direct energy into places we feel are most
important for the current cycle. The bonuses both reflect pie in the sky,
you are probably never going to get this done items to more mundane items
which none the less, contribute to the growth of the foundation. We could
just pa
Forgive me for my ignorance, I definitely mean no harm, but the list
of goals which led to bonus being paid to Stormy look a lot like what
I'd expect the CEO to do already. If those goals dictate her bonus,
which activities not listed here comprise of her non-bonus
tasks/responsibilities?
To be cl
13 matches
Mail list logo
