Replace with just Windows. Delphi hasn't had these since version 1.0 and they
are aliased to that one Unit. No idea why they exist in the unit. In question
also Very strange.
Sent from my iPhone 4
On 21 Apr 2011, at 17:22, John Lee johnelee1...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just downloaded
On 09/03/2011 12:52, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi, does anyone knows if there's a library/class/function to handle .m4a
(IPhone sound files)? also, if it allows conversion to other formats, such as
.wav?
m4a is basically aac, so I'd look down that route. However, m4a files
can be protected by
On 16/02/2011 09:48, Frank Church wrote:
How about Apollo?
This was the code name for Adobe Air - I expect it would be hard to get
traction if Adobe still hold some kind of rights over it.
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
On 28/01/2011 11:08, Ben wrote:
Hi,
Anybody here using FPC on Haiku? If so, how well does it work compared
to under Windows or Linux?
It used to work well enough under BeOS R5, but there was always an issue
with the C++ nature of the Be API. Haiku seems to have a Qt port, so you
might get
On 10/01/2011 09:26, alexv...@mail.ru wrote:
If so, there must be an executable format supported by all FPC target
platforms natively. I don't know any such format. We have to duplicate
some OS functions to make things crossplatform.
I don't think that is what Sven meant. I think the
On 10/01/2011 11:09, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Like I said, your proposal requires that we emulate all OSes on all
other OSes.
Or create a VM layer that levels the OS level differences - but again,
why do this? Creating such a VM is probably a magnitude of complexity
over just
On 08/12/2010 09:42, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
Couldn't find it there, although there are some examples with SDL and
OpenGL available with Jedi-SDL. So perhaps I don't need a specific
SDL_opengl header (I'm porting a C app).
Darius
Did you try here? http://www.freepascal-meets-sdl.net/
Or here?
On 07/12/2010 10:46, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Still not ideal, however.
Well, no. As Android targets any processor - not just ARM. Indeed, there
are Intel based versions. Native is bad, and only come in to existence
to compete with other platforms with purely native compilation -
Sent from my iPhone 4
On 18 Nov 2010, at 08:31, Max Vlasov max.vla...@gmail.com wrote:
But I thought about it recently and I think at least that there's a platform
that could be such - Symbian.
Never developed for Symbian using their native SDK, but as an OS - Symbian is
extremely
On 17/11/2010 09:16, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
You could try MeeGo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MeeGo
Which is. at least in this instance, based on Maemo.
At the moment with this phone: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N900
My best advice - and this is real world experience
Sent from my iPhone 4
On 17 Nov 2010, at 15:26, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
Which smartphone platform do you recommend then?
None of them are ideal at the moment. From a Free Pascal perspective, iPhone
has the best support. If I was choosing, I'd
On 14 Nov 2010, at 13:16, Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 November 2010 14:18, Sven Barth wrote:
IInterface and IUnknown are the same in Delphi 7 as well as they are in FPC
(although they are aliased the other way round, but that doesn't matter).
So then comes the
On 16 Oct 2010, at 14:23, Uffe Kousgaard u...@routeware.dk wrote:
Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote in
message
TCriticalSection is a WinAPI struct if you include the unit Windows.
Appart from unit ordering (which is a shaky way of reliably resolving things),
you could always
Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Oct 2010, at 22:44, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Aren't there automation systems for this? Just like debian's 'apt-get update
upgrade' with a custom repository with your software? But then for
windows I presume?
I haven't seen any yet.
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
So which one would be more fitting for any mime types, or is there
another option I didn't think of? Here is a simple usage example of
the TfpgMimeData class - to help put this in perspective:
This seems a lot like the BMessage class used with in the BeAPI. There
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 29 April 2010 14:51, Florian Klaempfl flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
Having a bigger lookahead makes a lot more things far more complex
epecially in combination with include files, macros, generics.
Why? You only apply the extra lookaheads where needed
Adrian Veith wrote:
//pcol^ := Plongword(p)^; -- changed
pcol^ := (LongWord(p[3]) shl 24) + (LongWord(p[2]) shl 16) +
(LongWord(p[1]) shl 8) + LongWord(p[0]);
This looks like an endian issue. Aren't Bitmaps in Little Endian format
(as per the usual endianess of the Intel x86
Adrian Veith wrote:
..the bitmaps look scrambled and have different colors.
I haven't found the solution for this yet.
Ignore that last message. It seems WinCE is only ever little endian. So
it is probably more to do with DIB vs general device dependent Bitmaps.
Have you tried converting the
Sent from my iPhone
On 24 Feb 2010, at 06:10, Jürgen Hestermann
juergen.hesterm...@gmx.de wrote:
Well, *this* can be done much easier ;-): snip
I think an interjection at this point is required - all of this is
down to personal experience, preference and style. It is what you are
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Feb 2010, at 19:37, JoshyFun joshy...@gmail.com wrote:
z := iff(a=b,1,2);
But to me it looks awful and a bit of c-ism
No, that is a VB-ism. A C-ism would be:
z = (a==b ? 1 : 2);
Which I fo tend to use myself in c# as it is a lot more convenient in
some cases.
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
It also proves that such solution external to the language is possible. That
weakens the case for a language feature
My point exactly! The language doesn't need such a feature because your
editor of choice should be able to do that,
Marco van de Voort wrote:
IMHO Prism is not even Delphi. Just recycling of the brand.
Laying cards on the proverbial table, I don't think it was ever intended
to be Delphi. RemObjects developed the compiler completely outside of
Delphi for a number of years before the technology was
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Maybe this discussion could be moved to the fpc-other list? It's not
really directly applicable to FPC anymore.
Indeed, which is why I said [..] I can also see why it is not something
worth discussing further. I guess if someone was committing to
developing the compiler
After almost 10 years of being on this list (FPC was at about 0.9x when
I joined), it occurs to me that I just don't code in Pascal any more and
don't foresee doing so again. I do read messages, but more from a
nostalgic point of view. So, I'm going to leave the list. This will be
a two stage
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
And it is exactly why I can't use MySQL, MSSQL: they don't have sequences or
generators. I need the ID BEFORE I insert the record, not after.
YES!! This is also missing from SQL Server... or at least, using a GUID
is complete overkill. The mechanisms SQL Server
Inoussa OUEDRAOGO wrote:
Have you try SCOPE_IDENTITY() ? Available at least since SQL SERVER 2000.
I have used it with success.
Well, yeah. But it's not perfect. I want generators, as in:
create generator an_atomic_counter;
set an_atomic_counter = 1 /*or something like that*/
declare
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
My point of view is that a database is for storage, not for logic...
Ah, this is basic use of resources. The benefit of Stored Procs is speed
of execution.
For dialy routines, only if they are not complex, and
On 10 Apr 2008, at 11:44, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Oh, and CPU is cheap compared to DB licenses nowadays.
Aha, the Microsoft defense! ;-) Chewbaka was a Wookie, don't you
know? ;-)
I saw him whine yesterday in the Empire Strikes Back yes. And he was
as
realistic as buying P-I client
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Any documentation for Interbase 5.5 or 6.0 should be fairly helpful.
TBH, the way Firebird did security last time I looked, was pretty
similar to the way SQL Server does it if you don't use integrated
security. Adding users was hell, but adding grants etc was pretty
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Matt Emson wrote:
The only negative thing I can say about Firebird is that it can produce
a corrupt backup file.
IIRC Mass insertion could bring down the db (slow to an effective DOS to
other users) unless you commit the transaction every
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
... At the moment we simply hard-code a firebird
username and password in the application to create the connection,
then access our own 'users' table to manage access to our application.
Is that how everybody else does it with Firebird?
Yes. I've seen that in a number
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Marco van de Voort wrote:
IIRC Mass insertion could bring down the db (slow to an effective DOS to
other users) unless you commit the transaction every 1 items or so.
Not in my experience: over 600.000 records inserted in 1
On 7 Apr 2008, at 20:07, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Ingemar Ragnemalm wrote:
Linux works (I did the port myself) but is still a bit rough on the
deployment side, so they don't include it officially yet.
And if linux works, the other platforms should work also (I took
Bent Normann Olsen wrote:
I'm new to Mac development environment, and I was looking thru the
CoreMIDI/MIDIServices.h, to see how much work it's going to take (at least
maybe partially) to implement some of the functions to own projects. I hit
the wall with some typedef, for example struct
Peter Vreman wrote:
None the less very interesting example.
Problem is ofcourse FPC does not support the new Delphi 2007 features.
And the big question is how would you port this code to FPC ?
Please don't make _your_ problem our problem!!!
You knew beforehand that FPC doesn't support these
Andrey Gusev wrote:
This question was posted to fpc-other, yesterday, but seems wrongful,
in subject appropriation sense to that maillist.
===
I wish to introduce some additional (and general) functional to an
existing (and foreign) freepascal's unit. I wouldn't to introduce any
my own
Joao Morais wrote:
Damien Gerard wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Joao Morais wrote:
Damien Gerard wrote:
I have (it would seem) a stupid question :)
We have TStringList vars. User can do what he want with it.
Which one is the stupid or the better way to do it ?
TMyClass = class(TObject)
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Friday 18 January 2008 11:39, Bee wrote:
I used to use this feature on Turbo Delphi Explorer. But since I
totally switch to FPC/Laz and Ubuntu, I really missed this feature on
FPC. :(
No offense, but maybe this is a good time to start becoming a serious
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Bee:
Both compilers [CAN] use the UCSD Pascal unit system,
I have added a missing word from that statement I think.
which, as of today is still one of the best modular programming
systems. That is the base to start from.
No, no it is
Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Friday 18 January 2008 12:35, Bee wrote:
Namespaces are too flat and simply not powerful enough to justify the
implementation and maintenance effort.
And units are better because...?
I would take Namespaces over the crippled '80's unit notation any day.
Units
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Matt Emson wrote:
What is the difference ?
The second one saves on typing, which is a plus in my book ?
Right.. confusion over verbosity. Given two units called
Constants.pas, which one is the correct unit? Given a unit called
Utils.pas
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Michael Fuchs wrote:
But how can fpc find the unit which contains this namespace? I think
better is: Namespace = unit name = file name
It is easier to allow a dot in the unit name than writing code, which
search all units for the right naemspace.
The
Marco van de Voort wrote:
However again, as far as I understand partial classes (Class
Helpers in Delphi.NET), for this you need a registration system again because
you need
to compile all units that might use class X so that they auto import all
units with classhelpers for unit X. (or you have
Michael Fuchs wrote:
But how can fpc find the unit which contains this namespace? I think
better is: Namespace = unit name = file name
It is easier to allow a dot in the unit name than writing code, which
search all units for the right naemspace.
The filename would be MyAPI.Blah.pas as you
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to abort the compilation in this cases instead of a warning ?
Currently not.
If you want to be that strict, then use Interfaces instead of Abstract classes
I always found (and
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
As far as I know .pp is the old 'classical' file extension. .pas is
the new more widely know (I think) extension for Object Pascal. I
prefer .pas personally.
I had never seen .pp before FPC. In all the Delphi/Turbo Pascal I'd
used, it was always .pas. On the Mac
Adrian Maier wrote:
Hello,
I'm seeking for advice about which is the best way to hold an array of
class instances
I need to access the elements using its position (like a regular
array) , and also i'd like
the structure to grow when I add more elements
TObjectList
If you want specific non
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Adrian Maier wrote:
VArray: array of TSomeClass;
begin
SetLength(VArray, 10);
// now you have VArray[0] .. VArray[9];
SetLength(VArray, 20);
// now you have [0] .. [19];
// Length(VArray) = 20
// for I := 0 to Pred(Length(VArray)) is a valid
Krishna wrote:
Another thing, the code produced for the winemulator target is x86
code or arm code?
Depends. The Visual Studio 2003 emulator is x86. Based on the VirtualPC
core product. The Visual Studio 2005.. um.. I don't remember. I know
Microsoft provide an ARM emulator that runs dog slow.
Krishna wrote:
On 10/26/07, Matt Emson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are talking about Symbian OS here. For linux and windows mobile
devices, I understand you can use FPC directly, right?
Sorry, you said Winemulator. I read windows emulator not emulator for
windows. My bad
Marco Ciampa wrote:
Yes, it's so sad to see people that waste time reinventing the wheel...
To be fair to Walter, you have to look at his history. He wrote a lot of
different compiler implementations over the years - this is pretty much
what he's been doing *since* the time of Turbo Pascal.
Jilani Khaldi wrote:
Hi All,
just curious about the D language
(http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html), I read some articles on the
site, downloaded the compiler... and wrote some little examples. Well,
many of the things that the author presented as new and hot features
are already
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Is that correct behavior? When calling Halt() somewhere inside a
try..finally block, it _doesn't_ execute the finally code.
This is by design.
Halt finalizes the units and then exits.
Yeah, I always used
The Motorola MPx220 runs a 200-MHz Texas Instruments OMAP 1611 processor,
which is a a 32bit ARM v5 with a ARM926EJ-S core.
It runs Windows 2003 Smartphone though, so I'm guessing the answer is a little
more tricky - probably no.
M
- Original Message -
From: Pianoman
To:
Why no?
Because Windows CE Win32. Smartphone more so. However, the word
probably conveyed my doubt that I had all the facts. There you go.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Any idea how I know if a class, in a class pointer, overrides a virtual
method? Eg:
snip
vfooclass := tboo1;
// vfooclass doesn't implement sample.
vfooclass := tboo2;
// vfooclass implements sample.
You need to implement a virtual method, even if it does nothing. Are you
sure you're
So, at this moment I know that I can:
1. Use a safe, magic and efficient way, but I need to know if it exists;
2. Create a light instance using vfooclass.NewInstance method;
3. hack the vmt.
Which approach do you use?
I have worked with a bespoke OPF a few years ago. The way we got around
Has anyone seen this: a randon posting on the Borland web server... anyone
care to relieve the poor fellow ;-) ?
This is how FPC window looks on my monitor
at it's maximum size. Any idea/way to make it
bigger?
http://www.exsotron.com/exs_pics/bucket/freepascal.jpg;
He seems to be refering to
The picture link is dead, but in general it is simply a matter of
increasing
terminal/dosbox fontsize.
Odd, works okay for me... Okay, I'll post this ;-)
M
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
But is there such a thing as a free download of beos?
BeOS R5 PE - runs from a 500MB virtual partition -
http://bebits.com/app/2680
BeOS MAX - installs to a hard disk, a new version is in BETA -
http://bebits.com/app/3892
MAX is your best bet. BeOS is quite picky with hardware though. Mainly
The wikipedia article about zeta doesn´t look very promissing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnussoft_ZETA
That's a bit political thing. Bernd Kortz is the guy that licensed the code
from Palmsource/Access. He's the guy we need to worry about ;-)
As porting FPC to BeOS for PowerPC is
What´s wrong with codewarrior? They don´t like to release assemblers???
That's Metrowerks for you. They *never* seem to produce assemblers. But,
with the Apple platform, you had MPW, so that wasn't an issue. Else where
... ah.. problem!
___
fpc-pascal
Free Pascal 1.0.10 was released with a Beos-port, developed by Carl Eric
Codère. However, Carl stopped with FPC development, and nobody took over,
so the Beo-port had to be discontinued.
Not to contradict you, but version 2.11 is available from here:
http://bebits.com/app/4321 (which basically
Does Symbian use PE?
Yes, Symbian uses PE.
Symbian : EPOC 32 by another name ;-)
Ummm ... I would like to avoid that, but it seams that it´s easier to
use a c wrapper in fact.
The effort is larger, but you really do get a more stable and portable
solution. It doesn't tie you to a specific
Most of your arguments point to something like VB3
To clarify, I mean in language complexity. In VB 3, one could (with little
extra knowledge) code in BASIC quite quickly.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
[explaining classes is not really harder than program/unit]
I disagree with this part. Sure, you will get questions of about
programs/units, but the purpose of the keywords belonging to them is way
easier to explain than public, static and class.
To a complete novice, there's not really
Well, let's do the standard:
Pascal:
program
Hello_World;
begin
WriteLn ('Hello world.');
end.
Class: What does program mean? Does the name matter? Does it have to be the
same as the executable? Why is there a colon at the end of the line - isn't
the begin end at
The fonctions use to manage sockets under Linux and Windows are different.
Rather than nasty ifdefs, you might want to look at the Free Pascal port of
the Synapse Sockets library. It will abstract away your OS differences and
pushes support of the network code away from your hands.
Another source of info might be
http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/changelog_page.php
Though it gives quite a lot of info, that page also fails with the following
error (just now, maybe not always?) :
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 10485760 bytes exhausted (tried to
allocate 35 bytes) in
I use singletons in the following cases.
The problem with using singletons in this way is that they're not [very]
thread safe. You end up needing a locking mechanism that gets tiring very
quickly. I can't offer you a better solution, but I have worked on a project
where it was a real problem,
I don't know all that much about graphics, but (Jedi-)SDL is a great 2D
and 3D library that uses OpenGL. It can also use other platform
dependant graphic engines like DirectX on Windows.
JEDI SDL is a Delphi (ObjectPascal) binding to SDL created by the JEDI
project (actually, I used to work
On 8 dec 2006, at 10:55, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I still don't know why we can't decrease visibility in Free Pascal.
Is there some internal language design that prevents it?
At least Borland explicitly says you cannot do that:
Hi Graeme - sorry to be slightly off topic, but is tiOPF working with FPC
now?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Yes, for a year now...
Been using it in a commercial application since January.
Cool.. and it works with Lazarus?
I looked at tiOPF, but went with instant objects becauuse it had better
Delphi 5 support.
tiOPF is cross platform too?
M
___
Delphi 5 support has been removed in tiOPF version 2, but version 1 is
still available on request. Anybody still using tiOPF v1 is highly
recommended to upgrade to tiOPF v2.
No, I used v1. I looked at how much work a backport to D5 would be. Mostly
it was routines missing from the Delphi RTL
How can I work around this? I mean, how can I redesign my idea to make
it work with FP?
Note that Qt requires that all methods to receive events, and signals
be from objects (I cannot use a procedure to receive events).
In Delphi, I'd do it through interfaces. Delphi has this neat little
In the future, make this kind of comments in private,
Would you listen any more gracefully?
not in the middle of a technical discussion.
It was related to the discussion. It was also a small proportion of the rest
of the email. 24 lines, only 4 related to this outburst. You are
overreacting.
- Original Message -
From: Terry Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 11:14 PM
Subject: [fpc-pascal] fpc arm big endian help
Hi all
I'm working on some code for the NSLU2 'slug'.
How do I get ppcarm to compile in big endian mode?
Ooops.. this time with a reply.. prt0.o is a bit of assembler IIRC... is
it compiled for bigendian? That looks to be your issue. Part of the RTL is
in little endian format and needs to be recompiled.
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
I have 2 FPC programs running on a Linux machine, is there an easy
way to exchange a few data between these programs (I do not want to
use disk operations). I was thinking of using environment variables,
but I cannot find a way to change environment variables from a
program.
MMap? Unix domain
http://www.borland.com/downloads/download_turbo.html
- Original Message -
From: Leonardo M. Ramé [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 8:37 PM
Subject: [fpc-pascal] TurboExplorer
It looks like TurboExplorer wait time is finished
Can anyone comment on the Delphi unit ShareMem and if FPC ever did any
work to incorporate what this Delphi unit is doing for DLL shared memory
managment? I'm looking so far, at the docs on creating a memory manager,
and at the strings unit, which has some pchar utilities in it.
I don't use
As noted, the Delphi Program integrates a DLL stub which forces me to
make calls using it's pre-defined Variants Only format.
I'm not clear why you need to have a FPC DLL between a PB DLL and Delphi...
this part makes no sense.
If you need to, dynamically load the DLL. If you are exporting
No. Typecasts, as any other aspect of a language, has to have rules.
AFAIR this cast in Delphi would require another cast from AnsiString
to Pointer. And if typed pointers is enabled would require another
cast from Pointer to TObject.
Nope. The C style cast is not type safe. Using the as
Weird, I wouldn't expect OBJFPC mode to allow automatic conversion
from AnsiString to Pointer...
Um...
raise Not_Now (Exception_Message);
It's a CAST dude! Exception_Message is being case as Not_Now. That should
work fairly well in most dialects.t
M
Smaller than FPC ? That shouldn't differ too much, I think.
Delphi's optimizer is superior to FPC currently. Delphi has another 10 - 15
years and paid developers on top of FPC, so this can be expected, I guess.
And the compiler is just sooo fast.
Delphi 2005 gives 1.48MB for the mside.exe
debugger, fine. However do not blame your dislike of the Delphi debugger
on
your personal debugging preferences. I've been using Delphi commercially
since 1998, or there abouts, and the debugger is perfectly acceptable.
The
So can you confirm that looking at variables that are up the stack
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Well, compared with other commercial compilers it is broken ;)
Heh, well when I can do what I am currently able to do in Delphi in an FPC
based IDE, we'll talk again, yes? ;-)
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Because of
the superior functionality valgrind offers, I've installed vmware at my
pc at work and compile sometimes my programs with gcc (usually developed
with MSVC) to find memory leaks, dangling pointers etc.
Hmmm... so GCC produces the exact same output as MSVC now? I don't think so.
All
MSEgui has a distinct advantage over Lazarus. It compiles under Delphi. Just
tried it. Fiddled with one or two lines in the code, but I got the IDE to
compile and run and then built a small hello world app that also ran. Pretty
impressive really.
M
Hi,
Movie:
=
For those who did not
Not wishing to make this OT, but...
Talk to them about targets that c# does not reach, like *BSD, Mac OS
X, Sparc, etc =)
Um.. *cough* Portable.NET, *cough* Mono. Both will get you on to most of
those platforms. Don't assume Microsoft needs all the answers. You can
certainly compile under
Not so fresh, since it's the people that designed Delphi which designed
C# and .NET, so actually you are doing more of the same.
Nothing is fresh in IT. OP originated (so I understand, at least partially)
with additions to Pascal for MacOS.
God only knows what will happen now that Borland is
(astonishing that ShortStrings are slower than AnsiStrings in this example
in delphi).
Not really. Delphi is silently upcasting your shortstrings to AnsiStrings in
the background. You would probably have to recompile the VCL to get around
this ;-)
Hope that helps,
M
Thanks, I guess I lost the argument :]. Anyway, I guess it wouldn't hurt
to clarify that just a little bit in the manual :-/
However, IIRC complete boolean eval (which is what delphi calls it) would
blow the code up, as even if Foo was nil, the second half would be evaluated
regardless.
Maybe
i was pretty sure there might be some PSP lurkers on this list.
You have to be careful here, because there are two competing projects
called PSP. One is by a Spanish guy (who wrote the Nemesis Pascal
interpreter too) and uses an Object Pascal interpreter to pretty much do the
same kind of
How can I also do it in linux?
Use semaphores. There is a semaphore implementation for LINUX, Windows, BeOS
and probably most other Unices. Certainly, any platform that conforms to
POSIX and/or PThreads will have a semaphore implementation.
The mechanics will be different - the idea will be
Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc?
Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc
1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version?
Cygwin runs exclusively on Windows machines... FPC has a Windows port.
Whilst I can see the point of a port to Cygwin, I
Hi,
I have a stdcall reference to a c based dll. called target.dll
In c the setup is ...
Are you sure it is stdcall? Quite often it's the calling convention that
messes up the calling of a C DLL. Could it be safecall or cdecl? Which
compiler made the DLL?
float Get_l1_BidPriceSingle(void*
Just laid my hands on a used Zaurus SL5500. I was wondering how stable the
Zaurus cross compiler and QT wrapper were? I realise this is slightly off
topic, but I remember the developer working on the bindings posted to this
list a while back.
Any info?
TTFN,
Matt
The fpc qte binding demo program shows that it is usable.
If however you have problems and think it is binding or fpc
related, I am always willing to investigate this.
I just did so for someone who had a problem with QLCDNumber,
it probably is a small fpc bug concerning passing a double
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
