In this day and age, is Internet "bandwidth" use for text e-mails really an
issue? :)
Plus, are you saying that you know/believe that FrameMaker is not going to be
released as a cloud-based license model soon? Love to hear the news.
And, in my opinion, btw, my discussion (feel free to call it w
frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/matt%40mattrsullivan.com
Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com<mailto:listadmin
at frameusers.com>. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed..
As has been stated before, we obviously think differently. My perspective is
that new versions of software generally do have bug fixes, code improvements,
etc., and in general run better, faster, with new features, etc. So, I *prefer*
to upgrade when new versions are released - although this pro
As has been stated before, we obviously think differently. My perspective is
that new versions of software generally do have bug fixes, code improvements,
etc., and in general run better, faster, with new features, etc. So, I *prefer*
to upgrade when new versions are released - although this pro
tter.com/maxwellhoffmann -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/maxwellhoffmann blogs.adobe.com/techcomm
Upcoming webinars http://adobe.ly/Pbz6xIRecorded webinars:
http://adobe.ly/Pbdp0J
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pi
Lisa, have you tried assigning a table format rather than explicitly formatting the row?
-MattMatt R. Sullivan co-author Publishing Fundamentals: Unstructured FrameMaker 11 P: 714.798.7596 | C: 714.585.2335 | m...@mattrsullivan.com @mattrsullivan LinkedIn facebook mattrsullivan.com
On Jul 17, 201
>
>
> You are currently subscribed to framers as matt at mattrsullivan.com.
>
> Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit
> http://lists.frameusers.co
…and please stop taking up bandwidth about an issue that has not been announced as an issue by the TCS team!
-MattMatt R. Sullivan co-author Publishing Fundamentals: Unstructured FrameMaker 11 P: 714.798.7596 | C: 714.585.2335 | m...@mattrsullivan.com @mattrsullivan LinkedIn facebook mattrsullivan
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130717/5185046f/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: twitter.png
Type: image/png
Size:
So if you don't like the new licensing model, don't upgrade. I can't
imagine much useful that Adobe's going to add to those apps that they
don't do already.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain
(syed.hos...@aeris.net) wrote:
> Ummm ... I believe that his point was that, in time, the
I am using read write rules along with my EDD, etc. to convert XML to
structured FrameMaker files. Is anyone familiar with using RW rules to control
the row ruling within multiple heading rows? I am able to get the 2nd heading
line in with a mix of xml tagging and my rules. What I'm having an is
David, it seems logical to me:
if the CC licence is for version >6, and your CS version is 6, flies
created with the cloud version won't be able to be opened with your
local version. Just like you cannot open FM version 10 files in FM
version 9.
Grant
On 7/17/2013 4:52 AM, David Creamer wro
Fair enough. I misunderstood that state of things.
BTW: My description is flawed about the structapps files. It does read the
local one on the next load of FM.
Craig
From: Matt Sullivan [mailto:m...@mattrsullivan.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:26 PM
To: craig...@hotmail.com
Cc: 'F
Reinstalling completely to fix the maker.ini files seems a bit like
overkill. When editing the maker.ini file it is a good idea to make a copy
in the same location. I name the copy maker.ini.ORIG, so I can use that to
get back to the original settings if they are needed.
This use of two structa
Does this help?
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FrameMaker/9.0/Using/WSd817046a44e105e21e63e3d11ab7f7960b-7ed5.html
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Donald Rinderknecht
- NOAA Federal
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 2:24 PM
To: frame
.
**
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130717/a5b25c57/attachment.html>
So if you don't like the new licensing model, don't upgrade. I can't
imagine much useful that Adobe's going to add to those apps that they
don't do already.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain
(Syed.Hosain at aeris.net) wrote:
> Ummm ... I believe that his point was that, in time,
Oops, my apologies too. Please ignore my last e-mail too - I responded to it
before I saw this one from you and from others.
Z
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of David Creamer
Sent: Wednesday, July 17,
Ummm ... I believe that his point was that, in time, the file format used by
the "ever-improving" versions of CC would become unreadable in the existing,
"no longer upgraded" version of CS6. It is a highly likely possibility.
This is true for FrameMaker for example ... try reading FM 11 files in
Oops, my apologies too. Please ignore my last e-mail too - I responded to it
before I saw this one from you and from others.
Z
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of David Creamer
Sent: Wednesday, July
Ummm ... I believe that his point was that, in time, the file format used by
the "ever-improving" versions of CC would become unreadable in the existing,
"no longer upgraded" version of CS6. It is a highly likely possibility.
This is true for FrameMaker for example ... try reading FM 11 files in
Read my note again. I didn't say CS6 would stop working. I said that
files created in the CC version may not always be backward compatible
with CS6. Right now, I don't know if CC has introduced any features that
create files that aren't backward compatible, but each new edition of
Photoshop te
> If you already own a perpetual license version, you don't have to stop
> using it. But if you start out as a renter, you do. And if you own a
> perpetual license, such as CS6, and then rent CC as your new upgrade
> path, when you stop paying, there's a good chance that your current
> files wi
Hi Dave...
I haven't followed this thread closely, but I have to say that is VERY unusual
that there would be a problem with Maker faithfully reading the read/write
rules file. If that's what's happening, then there must be an error in your
installation and/or setup of the configuration files.
s" file, wherever it is,
looks like a deal breaker that, I'm sorry to say, gives me pause about
continuing using FrameMaker.? There's just so much "pressure" to use
other XML editor computer programs . . ..
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrub
Read my note again. I didn't say CS6 would stop working. I said that
files created in the CC version may not always be backward compatible
with CS6. Right now, I don't know if CC has introduced any features that
create files that aren't backward compatible, but each new edition of
Photoshop te
David, it seems logical to me:
if the CC licence is for version >6, and your CS version is 6, flies
created with the cloud version won't be able to be opened with your
local version. Just like you cannot open FM version 10 files in FM
version 9.
Grant
On 7/17/2013 4:52 AM, David Creamer wrote
> If you already own a perpetual license version, you don't have to stop
> using it. But if you start out as a renter, you do. And if you own a
> perpetual license, such as CS6, and then rent CC as your new upgrade
> path, when you stop paying, there's a good chance that your current
> files wi
David Creamer wrote:
> > If you already own a perpetual license version, you don't have to stop
> > using it. But if you start out as a renter, you do. And if you own a
> > perpetual license, such as CS6, and then rent CC as your new upgrade
> > path, when you stop paying, there's a good chance t
David Creamer wrote:
> > If you already own a perpetual license version, you don't have to stop
> > using it. But if you start out as a renter, you do. And if you own a
> > perpetual license, such as CS6, and then rent CC as your new upgrade
> > path, when you stop paying, there's a good chance th
> If you already own a perpetual license version, you don't have to stop
> using it. But if you start out as a renter, you do. And if you own a
> perpetual license, such as CS6, and then rent CC as your new upgrade
> path, when you stop paying, there's a good chance that your current
> files wi
2013-07-17-03T12:55Z
Matt -
Thanks for the customary caution about protecting files. According to
our custom, our "source" \ structapps.fm is in safekeeping on a server
that is backed up.
Regards,
Dave Stamm
Information Engineer
From: Matt Sullivan [mailto:m...@mattrsullivan.com]
ill.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130717/6de975d0/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image
2013-07-17-03T12:30Z
Craig -
Thanks so much for the info. I'll check it out. The problem of
FrameMaker's not faithfully reading the "rules" file, wherever it is,
looks like a deal breaker that, I'm sorry to say, gives me pause about
continuing using FrameMaker. There's just so much "pres
of the structapps file (local and
global, both available from the Structure menu in Fm11), and I'm betting
you're getting snarled in the combinations of these files.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130717/d53fc4da/attachment.html>
> If you already own a perpetual license version, you don't have to stop
> using it. But if you start out as a renter, you do. And if you own a
> perpetual license, such as CS6, and then rent CC as your new upgrade
> path, when you stop paying, there's a good chance that your current
> files wi
36 matches
Mail list logo
