Hi,
CAVEAT: Dov does not like this content, and I respect his judgement.
Nonetheless, I believe there's good information here on the whole. two
points:
1) Take a look at Screen Captures 102 here:
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/magazine/technical/screencapgraphicshomepage.html
.
2) Drawing
No.
I wouldn't move a production machine to Vista for at least another 9 months.
I'd run SnagIt on the test box and document on XP.
However, FM has always had issues with OLE, I recommend avoiding it on any
and all OSes.
On 1/30/07, William Gaffga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Now that
-
From: T.W. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:37 PM
To: William Gaffga
Cc: Framers List
Subject: Re: FM 7.1 Compatibility
No.
I wouldn't move a production machine to Vista for at least
another 9 months.
I'd run SnagIt on the test box and document on XP.
However, FM has always had
Hi,
CAVEAT: Dov does not like this content, and I respect his judgement.
Nonetheless, I believe there's good information here on the whole. two
points:
1) Take a look at Screen Captures 102 here:
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/magazine/technical/screencapgraphicshomepage.html
.
2) Drawing
No.
I wouldn't move a production machine to Vista for at least another 9 months.
I'd run SnagIt on the test box and document on XP.
However, FM has always had issues with OLE, I recommend avoiding it on any
and all OSes.
On 1/30/07, William Gaffga wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Now that it is out, I
- Dov
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: T.W. Smith
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:37 PM
> > To: William Gaffga
> > Cc: Framers List
> > Subject: Re: FM 7.1 Compatibility
> >
> > No.
> >
> > I wouldn't mo
I don't have FM 7.2, only 7.1. However, based on what I've heard, here's my
thoughts:
The good news is, 7.2 includes WWP 8 SE, not WWP 7 SE. That's also the bad
news. WWP 8 is better than 7 in a host of ways that you mostly cannot
realise with the standard edition, and to add insult to injury
Does it run on the new version of Windows?
On 1/16/07, Scott Abel wrote:
>
> Received this in my inbox. It certainly ends the "RoboHelp is dead"
> discussion and will cause competitors to find a new sales strategy as
> they can no longer rely on the "RoboHelp replacement" message.
>
> Cheers,
>
I don't have FM 7.2, only 7.1. However, based on what I've heard, here's my
thoughts:
The good news is, 7.2 includes WWP 8 SE, not WWP 7 SE. That's also the bad
news. WWP 8 is better than 7 in a host of ways that you mostly cannot
realise with the standard edition, and to add insult to injury the
Does it run on the new version of Windows?
On 1/16/07, Scott Abel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Received this in my inbox. It certainly ends the RoboHelp is dead
discussion and will cause competitors to find a new sales strategy as
they can no longer rely on the RoboHelp replacement message.
I know you answered this already, and others have offered advice on handling
this, but I think it reasonable to set a limit to the length of headings.
Long headings lose readability, anyway, so suggesting a rule that improves
readability and accommodates the TOC seems fair. After all, you don't
I know you answered this already, and others have offered advice on handling
this, but I think it reasonable to set a limit to the length of headings.
Long headings lose readability, anyway, so suggesting a rule that improves
readability and accommodates the TOC seems fair. After all, you don't
Hi,
I thought one of us might know the answer to this Acrobat question. (I know
this is not an Acrobat forum, so please forgive me the off-topic post.)
I have Acrobat 7 Pro all patched up, Windows XP all patched up (and FM 7.1,
though it has nout to do with the question.)
I have a PDX catalog
Hi,
I thought one of us might know the answer to this Acrobat question. (I know
this is not an Acrobat forum, so please forgive me the off-topic post.)
I have Acrobat 7 Pro all patched up, Windows XP all patched up (and FM 7.1,
though it has nout to do with the question.)
I have a PDX catalog
Rebecca,
I'm not sure what you are trying to say.
The quality with which the image displays in FrameMaker only matters if
FrameMaker is the deliverable.
FrameMaker does not display the EPS vector but displays a low-res preview
image, a TIFF. The person who creates the EPS decides what the
Rebecca,
I'm not sure what you are trying to say.
The quality with which the image displays in FrameMaker only matters if
FrameMaker is the deliverable.
FrameMaker does not display the EPS vector but displays a low-res preview
image, a TIFF. The person who creates the EPS decides what the
Hi,
Agreed: use EPS as it is cross platform. WMF and EMF are really for Windows.
On 8/7/06, Combs, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem transferring wmf files from a PC to a Mac.
WMF stands for Windows Metafile Format. I'm not a Mac user, but I
Hi,
Agreed: use EPS as it is cross platform. WMF and EMF are really for Windows.
On 8/7/06, Combs, Richard wrote:
>
> elizfee at abacom.com wrote:
>
> > I have a problem transferring wmf files from a PC to a Mac.
>
> WMF stands for Windows Metafile Format. I'm not a Mac user, but I
> believe
Hi,
If you had WWP, you would have to install it *after* FrameMaker.
I believe Acrobat can be installed before FM 7.x, just make sure to skip
FrameMaker's installation of the PDF printer and Adobe Distiller.
You'll have to install FrameMaker before FrameScript and IXGen, for they
need to know
Hi,
If you had WWP, you would have to install it *after* FrameMaker.
I believe Acrobat can be installed before FM 7.x, just make sure to skip
FrameMaker's installation of the PDF printer and Adobe Distiller.
You'll have to install FrameMaker before FrameScript and IXGen, for they
need to know
I thought having Adobe Acrobat was pretty much a necessity for technical
writers?
Still, Visio 2003 does, I think, save as SVG. Perhaps FrameMaker 7.1+ can
use that?
As for PDF or EPS, I think PDF is more processing and overhead for
FrameMaker; you might care if you use a ton of PDFs.
==
T.
I think there's two things going on here. But, the editor should be open to
discussion because she's a member of the team.
Anyway:
1) If X then Y is fine. The conditional clause can be introduced that way.
However, where I think the editor is going is the need for coordinating
conjunctions to
This is OT because am asking about creating PDFs using Acrobat 7 Pro from MS
Word 2002 in Windows XP, but this is the best place I can think to ask after
getting no response from the U2U forums.
I ahve an 8x6 page size in Word and it's a pain to create an 8x6 PDF from
that. Does anyone have the
This is OT because am asking about creating PDFs using Acrobat 7 Pro from MS
Word 2002 in Windows XP, but this is the best place I can think to ask after
getting no response from the U2U forums.
I ahve an 8x6 page size in Word and it's a pain to create an 8x6 PDF from
that. Does anyone have the
Nope. Never happened to me.
You running some FrameScript or other, maybe pulling graphics from a
different directory than you think you are, etc?
On 3/25/06, Bill Swallow wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why this is happening but I've been using PNGs for years
> and have never come across this problem
A better trick that was told to me on the Adobe U2U forums, by I believe
Sheila Carlisle or maybe Peter Gold, several years ago was this:
Use master page mappings.
Create a new left master page. Call it LeftAllTheTime or something. Set it
up so that it is always used by pages that contain text,
A better trick that was told to me on the Adobe U2U forums, by I believe
Sheila Carlisle or maybe Peter Gold, several years ago was this:
Use master page mappings.
Create a new left master page. Call it "LeftAllTheTime" or something. Set it
up so that it is always used by pages that contain
27 matches
Mail list logo
