Lin Sims offered Eva some good advice on numbering:
> Remember when using a numbering string to provide it with a series tag
> (e.g., "H:" for headings) and to have the same number of blocks in
> each tag's string.
>
> That is, if your Heading1 is "1." and Heading2 is "1.1" and resets
> after ea
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Eva Whitley wrote:
> Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
> to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
> fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and I
> just can't figure out how
Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and I
just can't figure out how to structure the headings so Heading 1.1 in
Section 2 re-
Eva Whitley wrote:
> Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
> to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
> fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and
I
> just can't figure out how to structure the headings so Head
Lin Sims offered Eva some good advice on numbering:
> Remember when using a numbering string to provide it with a series tag
> (e.g., "H:" for headings) and to have the same number of blocks in
> each tag's string.
>
> That is, if your Heading1 is "1." and Heading2 is "1.1" and resets
> after ea
users.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Lin Sims
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:00 PM
To: Eva Whitley
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Weird autonumbering problem with Framemaker
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Eva Whitley wrote:
> Well, after litera
mers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Lin Sims
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:00 PM
To: Eva Whitley
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Weird autonumbering problem with Framemaker
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Eva Whitley wrote:
> Well, aft
Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and I
just can't figure out how to structure the headings so Heading 1.1 in
Section 2 re-
Eva Whitley wrote:
> Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
> to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
> fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and
I
> just can't figure out how to structure the headings so Hea
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Eva Whitley wrote:
> Well, after literally hours of work, I've managed to trace the problem
> to a bad second level heading that was causing the re-set. However,
> fixing it meant trying to re-do the autonumbering on the headings, and I
> just can't figure out how
Note to TCS1 users?
>My heading and body pgf formats have the following autonumber format
>so that they restart the list numbering:
>N:< =0>< =0>
If you are using TCS1 to pull in FM files and build help, using:
N:< =0>< =0> may not re-set your number lists to one.
Due to a bug,
Note to TCS1 users?
>My heading and body pgf formats have the following autonumber format
>so that they restart the list numbering:
>N:< =0>< =0>
If you are using TCS1 to pull in FM files and build help, using:
N:< =0>< =0> may not re-set your number lists to one.
Due to a bug,
Richard,
I agree with simplifying, however, that may not be possible in a
corporate environement with numerous documents that use the same
template. Without a lot of effort.
The reasoning behind using a reset of the stream by a previous paragraph
number is to automate the numbering without hum
Richard,
I agree with simplifying, however, that may not be possible in a
corporate environement with numerous documents that use the same
template. Without a lot of effort.
The reasoning behind using a reset of the stream by a previous paragraph
number is to automate the numbering without hum
quills at airmail.net wrote:
> I would note, that while the series letter is very important, and will
> regularize the numbering stream, it seems likely that Eva is using a
> single stream in order to restart the numbering sequence at the start
of
> each section/chapter without using a separate s
qui...@airmail.net wrote:
> I would note, that while the series letter is very important, and will
> regularize the numbering stream, it seems likely that Eva is using a
> single stream in order to restart the numbering sequence at the start
of
> each section/chapter without using a separate sta
In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/grafixtraining
> facebook| plaxo
>
> Click to tell me the social media sites you belong to
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Art Campbe
In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/grafixtraining
> facebook| plaxo
>
> Click to tell me the social media sites you belong to
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Art Campbell
Scott's idea is something I didn't notice when you published your
numbering strings.
Insert a letter in front of the string to specify a unique numbering
stream -- you can have 50+ of them, but it's best to make each type
unique. Specifying a specific stream ensures that other tags won't
reset one
In the book file, select each chapter, then right click and select
Numbering > Paragraphs.
Is it set to increment?
And did you update and save the book before checking the table
numbering, to force a refresh?
Art
Art Campbell
art.campbell at gmail.com
"... In my opinion, there's
First off, thanks to all those who helped me with my document containing
both 81/2"x11" and 11"x17" pages. As suggested, I pulled out the 11"x17"
pages into a new document that will be another chapter in the book.
Now I'm seeing a problem in autonumbering that is defying all my newbie
efforts t
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Art Campbell
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 1:18 PM
To: Eva Whitley; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Weird autonumbering problem with Framemaker
Scott's idea is something I didn't notice when you published your numbering
st
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Art Campbell
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 1:18 PM
To: Eva Whitley; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Weird autonumbering problem with Framemaker
Scott's idea is something I didn't notice when you published your nu
Check that the styles with numbering formats that fall between those
tables are replicating the proper stream. Someone is either off a
placeholder, or resetting your numbers.
Scott
Eva Whitley wrote:
> First off, thanks to all those who helped me with my document containing
> both 81/2"x11" an
Scott's idea is something I didn't notice when you published your
numbering strings.
Insert a letter in front of the string to specify a unique numbering
stream -- you can have 50+ of them, but it's best to make each type
unique. Specifying a specific stream ensures that other tags won't
reset one
Check that the styles with numbering formats that fall between those
tables are replicating the proper stream. Someone is either off a
placeholder, or resetting your numbers.
Scott
Eva Whitley wrote:
> First off, thanks to all those who helped me with my document containing
> both 81/2"x11" an
In the book file, select each chapter, then right click and select
Numbering > Paragraphs.
Is it set to increment?
And did you update and save the book before checking the table
numbering, to force a refresh?
Art
Art Campbell
art.campb...@gmail.com
"... In my opinion, there's no
First off, thanks to all those who helped me with my document containing
both 81/2"x11" and 11"x17" pages. As suggested, I pulled out the 11"x17"
pages into a new document that will be another chapter in the book.
Now I'm seeing a problem in autonumbering that is defying all my newbie
efforts t
28 matches
Mail list logo
