On 26 okt 2008, at 22:42, Alexander Limi wrote:
Hi team,
There's been a lot of activity and excitement about Plone 4 after the
Plone Conference, and I'd like for us to start moving on the
development
for it.
Hanno Schlichting has said that he'd like to be the release manager
for
Plone
Previously Steve McMahon wrote:
Here are my 3.3 PLIP tallies as of 5:45 2008-10-28 (UTC). These include some
unambiguous votes pulled from e-mail messages to the FWT list.
Can this be turned into a result? What I would like to have is a list of
PLIPs, with for each plip the result
Is it correct that http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/245 hasn't
been officially proposed for 3.3? I can't remember we discussed it
though.
Danny
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Steve McMahon wrote:
Here are my 3.3 PLIP tallies as of 5:45 2008-10-28 (UTC). These
include some
unambiguous votes pulled from e-mail messages to the FWT list.
Can this be turned into a result?
i'd say not yet. i'm aware
On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
Is it correct that http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/245
hasn't been officially proposed for 3.3? I can't remember we
discussed it though.
afaict (scanning the archives) it's never been proposed to the
framework team list, which
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
hi team,
afaict PLIP 234[1] was never proposed to the framework team list.
technically we require this in order to consider a PLIP, or at least
we repeatedly asked PLIP authors to announce their PLIPs here so we're
aware of them. seeing that this particular PLIP has
Hi.
Alexander Limi wrote:
Hanno Schlichting has said that he'd like to be the release manager for
Plone 4, and I'd like to formally propose him as a candidate for this
role.
Over the last couple of months, I have been considering to step up for
the release manager job and have gotten positive
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Steve McMahon wrote:
Here are my 3.3 PLIP tallies as of 5:45 2008-10-28 (UTC). These
include some
unambiguous votes pulled from e-mail messages to the FWT list.
Can this be turned into a result?
i'd say
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:33, Danny Bloemendaal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it correct that http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/245 hasn't been
officially proposed for 3.3? I can't remember we discussed it though.
Correct; the author only announced it on plone-developers as a PLIP
for a
Alexander Limi wrote:
Hi Framework Team,
On behalf of Andreas Zeidler, I'd like to offer up the following PLIP
for your consideration for Plone 3.3:
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/246
It's a pretty trivial PLIP that adds a new view that is capable of
rendering events as an
Hi framework team,
I'm sorry I didnt' comment on the previous discussion about PLIP #244,
but I wasn't subscribing this list. Anyway, I'd like to comment on some
of the objections already posted in the PLIP page.
About the usefulness of site-wide portlets, let me give an example: you
have a
+1 to Hanno/Martin being Plone 4 release manager/communicator
--
Alan Runyan
Enfold Systems, Inc.
http://www.enfoldsystems.com/
phone: +1.713.942.2377x111
fax: +1.832.201.8856
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
Andreas,
Please confirm, the outstanding questions are:
- Wichert asking, How are the marshallers configured via GenericSetup
This is a great question.
- Ricardo asking, how the OS X resource fork issue was resolved.
We should not focus on how a certain platform works
steve,
here's the tally of my remaining plips:
126 +1
228 +1
236 -1
238 +1
239 +1
240 +1
241 +1
242 -1
243 +1
244 -1
247 +1
i've posted the votes and their motivations at the plips, but not on
the list.
cheers,
tom
On 28.10.2008, at 11:21, Tom Lazar wrote:
yes, sorry for holding things
On 28.10.2008, at 11:53, Ricardo Alves wrote:
Hi framework team,
I'm sorry I didnt' comment on the previous discussion about PLIP
#244, but I wasn't subscribing this list. Anyway, I'd like to
comment on some of the objections already posted in the PLIP page.
About the usefulness of
On 28.10.2008, at 13:03, Alan Runyan wrote:
+1 to Hanno/Martin being Plone 4 release manager/communicator
same here!
tom
--
Alan Runyan
Enfold Systems, Inc.
http://www.enfoldsystems.com/
phone: +1.713.942.2377x111
fax: +1.832.201.8856
___
hi wichert,
just as a reminder: do you already have any thoughts regarding the
schedule for 3.2 and/or 3.3? like discussed before, we should better
try to set these up together in the future... ;)
cheers,
andi
--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Steve McMahon wrote:
Here are my 3.3 PLIP tallies as of 5:45 2008-10-28 (UTC). These
include some
unambiguous votes pulled from e-mail messages to the FWT
On Oct 28, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
i've posted the votes and their motivations at the plips, but not on
the list.
thanks tom! and the PLIP pages are fine — they are the canonical
source of information, at least for 3.x with x = 3.
andi
--
zeidler it consulting -
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi.
I'd like to propose to accept PLIP 237 - Minor i18n upgrades for Plone
3.3. The full text is at http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/237.
Short version:
Ship PloneLanguageTool 2.1 instead of 2.0 and
PlacelessTranslationService 1.5 instead of 1.4 with Plone 3.3.
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I guess I'm the first one. I want to propose PLIP 228 for Plone 3.3.
I feel that removing the removal of the 'Add Item' dropdown in many
places in Plone 3 is a regression in behaviour, and makes adding content
a lot more cumbersome. The PLIP has so far only received
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I want to propose PLIP 238: Disable inline editing by default
Motivation
--
I suspect that by now most of us have realized that the current inline editing
behaviour in Plone 3 is not very practical. It has two main problems:
* it is very easily triggered by
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:45, Raphael Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on both of them.
Indeed!
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Is it really that much work to fix the ui for starting an edit? I
think there are a lot of people who like this feature, but are
frustrated by the UI. Disabling it does nothing to fix that though,
it's just another regression to work around what many consider a real
UI bug.
Alec
On Tue, Oct
DRAFT Call for Plone 4.x Framework Team Members
Would you like to help choose what goes into Plone 4?
The Plone Framework team is now receiving applications for membership in the
Plone 4 Framework Team.
The Framework Team will be responsible for evaluating the PLone Improvement
Proposals
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Alec Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it really that much work to fix the ui for starting an edit? I
think there are a lot of people who like this feature, but are
frustrated by the UI. Disabling it does nothing to fix that though,
it's just another
Previously Alan Runyan wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Alec Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it really that much work to fix the ui for starting an edit? I
think there are a lot of people who like this feature, but are
frustrated by the UI. Disabling it does nothing to fix
Previously Ricardo Alves wrote:
Hi framework team,
I'm sorry I didnt' comment on the previous discussion about PLIP #244,
but I wasn't subscribing this list. Anyway, I'd like to comment on some
of the objections already posted in the PLIP page.
About the usefulness of site-wide
Here are the 3.3 PLIP Recommendations. A vote breakdown is attached in PDF.
Steve
===
126: Link type should automatically redirect when accessed directly
Accepted
187: Working Out-of-the-box WebDAV
Accepted
197: Add FeedParser as external requirement
Accepted
228: Restore 'Add
On Oct 28, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Alan Runyan wrote:
Andreas,
Please confirm, the outstanding questions are:
- Wichert asking, How are the marshallers configured via
GenericSetup
This is a great question.
- Ricardo asking, how the OS X resource fork issue was resolved.
We should not
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Ricardo Alves wrote:
Hi framework team,
I'm sorry I didnt' comment on the previous discussion about PLIP #244,
but I wasn't subscribing this list. Anyway, I'd like to comment on some
of the objections already posted in the PLIP page.
About the usefulness
On Oct 28, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Alan Runyan wrote:
If the OSX webdav support was dropped from this PLIP, then perhaps
the PLIP
should be updated to make that clear. At the moment, it clearly
suggests
that the OSX behavior was specifically targeted.
I will leave that up to Sidnei. Having a
Tom Lazar wrote:
On 28.10.2008, at 13:03, Alan Runyan wrote:
+1 to Hanno/Martin being Plone 4 release manager/communicator
same here!
I couldn't possibly imagine two more qualified people. Three cheers
for you both! :-)
:jon
___
33 matches
Mail list logo
