Hello
# please Cc: to me in reply time. because, i doesn't subscribe
# in to hackers and current.
There is a little problem in ports build on current, and I send an
email to you with its having been the function that you committed to
because the cause seemed to be lib function of current.
On 27-Oct-2001 (12:28:50/GMT) Riccardo Torrini wrote:
I have the same problem of 27 october with src and world of last
31 oct, xfmail doesn't work with libc.so.3 from compat3x (either
from ports or from COMPAT3X=yes), it crashes. Any ideas?
The only method to make it happy is this hack:
With world of 31 oct I finally make my new scanner visible.
It appear under /dev as uscanner0 and on console I got the notify:
uscanner0: EPSON Perfection1240, rev 1.00/1.14, addr 2
and if I switch it off I got:
uscanner0: at uhub0 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected
uscanner0: detached
and sane is
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Riccardo Torrini writes:
Yes, I know that /etc/rc.devfs is executed only at boot time.
Is /etc/usbd.conf usable also for chown/chmod commands? Must usbd
be running (I have no usbd now but it attach/detach the same).
Yes, you need usbd running and yes, that is the
Hello List
Is there a guide or a how-to showing how to downgrade from a
5.0-CURRENT snapshot to 4.4-STABLE without having to blat the system and
start again? The reason 5.0 is on there is because only 5 had support for
the promise udma 100 tx2 card, but now that 4.4 has it, i would like to
Having done this several times before, I highly recommend downgrading
via binary package.
Back up your system first!
Get your 4.4 CD, throw it in the drive, and see what happens.
As a rule this is not guaranteed to work, but if it doesn't then a
downgrade from source certainly won't. I
I'm having panic for the last few days, if I have PCCARD inserted.
If no card is inside, system boots up fine.
Here's the panic message, I've written down.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address= 0x3c
fault code = supervisor write,
Hello Mark,
From: mark tinguely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:31:28 -0600 (CST)
:: I'm having panic for the last few days, if I have PCCARD inserted.
:: If no card is inside, system boots up fine.
::
:: Here's the panic message, I've written down.
cut
::the panic appears to be a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Munehiro Matsuda writes:
: Hello Ogawa-san,
:
: Thank you for your patch.
: That completely fixed my pccard problem.
:
: Now my pccard-modem gets attached as sio2, instead of sio3 like few days
: ago which seemed bogus, because my system don't have sio2!
:
:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Munehiro Matsuda writes:
: ::- Let pccardd(8) pass -1 as unit number for
: :: pccard.conf entries without unit number
...
: ::--- usr.sbin/pccard/pccardd/file.c.orig Fri Nov 2 17:16:58 2001
: ::+++ usr.sbin/pccard/pccardd/file.c Fri Nov 2 17:17:17 2001
: ::@@
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:10:08AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
/usr/src/lib/compat/compat4x.alpha /tstsys/alpha/compile/GPLUS
yorp.feral.com root make obj all install clean
You cannot do this due to make(1) evaluation timming. You need to do:
root
Is anyone else seeing this problem? I posted a message the other day to this list,
and have yet to see a single response.
This is from a completely fresh cvsup of everything.
buildworld succeeds, but the kernel build fails on atomic.c with the following message
about the ATOMIC_ASM macros in
Please run this patch on you current machine and report any problems
you might notice!
Background:
All dev_t's in the system should be created with an explicit
make_dev() call and the old wildcard cdevsw[] mechanism be killed
to the extent we can.
This patch covers what I think is the trivial
I am trying to figure out how to cleany handle error
conditions with module loading/unloading, especially
when trying to load a module which is already statically
compiled in the kernel.
I have browsed through the source a bit but haven't found
a good example that I could understand.
Basically,
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 05:50:07 -0500, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 17:36:04 +0900, NINOMIYA Hideyuki wrote:
In implementation with current, even if you implemented it for the
reason that Linux included, there is the problem that behavior is
different from
What's this mean? i can't find anything in docs about it:
acpi_tz0: _AC0: temperature 60.0 = setpoint 50.0
acpi_tz0: switched from _AC-1 to _AC0
acpi_tz0: _AC0: temperature 60.0 = setpoint 50.0
acpi_tz0: switched from _AC-1 to _AC0
acpi_tz0: switched from _AC0 to _AC-1
THanks!
-Rob
To
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 17:36:04 +0900, NINOMIYA Hideyuki wrote:
In implementation with current, even if you implemented it for the
reason that Linux included, there is the problem that behavior is
different from Linux in about prototyping reference.
1) Our strcasestr() implementation is not
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
because `echo' nicely removes \n's from env vars when it prints them.
des@des ~% foo='bar
quote baz'
des@des ~% echo $foo
bar
baz
des@des ~% /bin/echo $foo
bar
baz
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001 12:01:19 +0300
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ache On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 17:36:04 +0900, NINOMIYA Hideyuki wrote:
In implementation with current, even if you implemented it for the
reason that Linux included, there is the problem that behavior is
On 02-Nov-2001 (12:58:55/GMT) Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
because `echo' nicely removes \n's from env vars when it prints them.
des@des ~% foo='bar
quote baz'
des@des ~% echo $foo
bar
baz
des@des ~% /bin/echo $foo
bar
baz
humm! what shell ($SHELL) are you using ?
Here (5.0-CURRENT 31-Oct
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 22:01:13 +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
I think nin said that having strcasestr() in our standard header
breaks existing program.
Existen programs must be ported to FreeBSD first.
That is, our header seems not confirm
standard.
Use #define _ANSI_SOURCE or
David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of
course, one of the other interesting issues with the above patch is that
awk was whining about the empty regex (//). Since the idea was
apparently to do nothing for such a record,
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 03 Nov 2001 03:34:01 +0100
course, one of the other interesting issues with the above patch is that
awk was whining about the empty regex (//). Since the idea was
apparently to do nothing for such a record, it seemed simpler to just
not tell
David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, I tried that. Maybe I should have put it in braces, but I
thought I tried that, too. Hmmm... I can hack on the build machine a
bit... I was aware that sed, by default, would print its input to
output, but had thought that awk would
For about a week, I've been getting panics at shutdown, caused by
cn_devopen() calling devsw() with a NULL dev argument. I imagine it
may be related to recent changes in the console code. If it's of any
interest, I have -Dh in my /boot.config.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25 matches
Mail list logo