$B$"$C$?$+$$29$b$j;}$C$F$^$9$+!)(B
$B4($$?4$rKd$a$F$/$l$k$=$s$J=P2q$$$,$3$3$K$O$"$j$^$9!#(B
$B$?$a$7$K$"$J$?$N5$;}$A$r=q$-9~$s$G$4$i$s(B
$B4j$$$O$+$J$i$:3p$$$^$9$h!*(B
Http://www.if-j.net
$B=P2q$$7O%5%$%H!V%$%U!W$G$9!#(B
$B$"$J$?$KKbK!$r%F%/%^%/%^%d%3%s{(B
Greg Lehey wrote:
Since then, it has become possible for the loader to load modules
before booting the kernel. This means that, theoretically, it would
be possible to have a JFS root file system. Given the strong
opposition to the GPL in some factions of the FreeBSD project, I don't
see
Terry Lambert wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
Since then, it has become possible for the loader to load modules
before booting the kernel. This means that, theoretically, it would
be possible to have a JFS root file system. Given the strong
opposition to the GPL in some factions of the
Hi,
I get a panic kernel trap doesn't have ucred when I try to install
Linux ORACLE 8.1.7.
The ORACLE installation program is a JAVA application and only seems
to work with the included JRE (the IBM 1.1.8 JRE according to the
LICENSE file).
The JRE is using native Linux threads, and I know I
Terry Lambert wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
Since then, it has become possible for the loader to load modules
before booting the kernel. This means that, theoretically, it would
be possible to have a JFS root file system. Given the strong
opposition to the GPL in some factions of the
Hi folks,
Since last week, I'm having trouble compiling one of the utilities
supplied with Exim, which calls uname():
gcc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro \
-o exim_lock exim_lock.c -lcrypt -lpam
/tmp/cc2YeHtC.o: In function `main':
/tmp/cc2YeHtC.o(.text+0x50d): undefined
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 11:17 am, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Hi folks,
Since last week, I'm having trouble compiling one of the utilities
supplied with Exim, which calls uname():
gcc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro \
-o exim_lock exim_lock.c -lcrypt -lpam
/tmp/cc2YeHtC.o:
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
OK, I load the kernel from the JFS. I mount the root FS, which
is a JFS. I read the module jfs.ko from the JFS so that I can
mount the root FS, which is a JFS, so I can read the module jfs.ko
from the JFS so that I can mount the root FS, which is a JFS, so I
can
Peter Wemm wrote:
It is not a problem. The *kernel* does not load jfs.ko, it is loader
itself. There is no reason why a trivial non-gpl jfs reader couldn't be
written for boot2 and loader if the need was great enough. Or have /boot
as a seperate file system (eg: UFS or FAT32). We do this
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 10:30:04 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
performance without it - for reading OR writing. It doesn't matter
so much for RAID{1,10}, but it matters a whole lot for something like
RAID-5
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 03:34:37PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
I think this is what Mike was referring to when talking about parity
calculation. In any case, going across a stripe boundary is not a
good idea, though of course it
Hiten Pandya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
As long as nobody gets the idea to import VxFS... It's dog slow
compared to UFS+softupdates. :-) Dog slow even compared to
Solaris 8 UFS+logging. Of course, i
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:27:54PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
Hiten Pandya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
As long as nobody gets the idea to import VxFS... It's dog slow
compared to UFS+softupdates.
Ïðåäñòàâèòåëüñòâî Êîìïàíèè Capital Standard Corporation ïðèãëàøàåò Âàñ ïðèíÿòü
ó÷àñòèå â îäíîäíåâíûõ êîíñóëüòàöèîííûõ ñåìèíàðàõ-ïðàêòèêóìàõ äëÿ ýôôåêòèâíîãî è
áûñòðîãî ïîâûøåíèÿ êâàëèôèêàöèè ñîòðóäíèêîâ Âàøåé êîìïàíèè
Îäíîäíåâíûé êîíñóëüòàöèîííûé ñåìèíàð-ïðàêòèêóì «Áèðæåâàÿ
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 15:34:37 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 10:30:04 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
performance without it - for reading OR writing. It doesn't matter
so much for
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 02:07:40PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:27:54PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
Hiten Pandya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
As long as nobody gets the
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:00:34AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 15:34:37 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 10:30:04 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
..
and will go down the
Hi, not sure quite how to do a bug report on this, and didn't see any bug
reports that matched, so I thought I'd throw it to the list to see...
Audio output on my compile of current has noise in the audio stream, it's
usually very regular... an mp3 pops at a little more than 1hz, a wav is
too
Hi,All:
I love FreeBSD! But.. Can it support CD-RW disc and Simplie Chinese
Filename? A lot of files in CD-ROM that have Chinese name, how can i open it
under FreeBSD? Oh...Oh
Best Regard.
_
Send and receive Hotmail on
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 1:08:23 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
FS porting to FreeBSD is actually pretty trivial(*), though some
transactioning changes to the FreeBSD VFS layer consumers (the
system calls and NFS server code) would be necessary to make
the journal
Greg Lehey wrote:
Of course. But you're missing the point: ufs is *not* a port, it has
been with BSD since the beginning. There is a similar list of items
for JFS which would need to be addressed, with the additional issue of
the fact that it was not designed for FreeBSD.
I maintain that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pierre Y. Dampure
writes:
: Are you asking for specific options (my dhclient.conf is empty)? are you using a
:reservation?
I'm 100% sure it worked before the upgrade. :-(.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 3:11:21 +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 10:30:04 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
performance without it - for reading OR writing. It doesn't matter
so much for
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 23:41:51 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:00:34AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 15:34:37 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:06:33AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 10:30:04
I think I would rather see people tweaking the heck out of the existing UFS
filesystem and implementing new ways of getting it to go faster.
Implementing a whole new filesystem would probably take a lot of work, and
the performance wouldn't be much better anyways. IMHO, people interested in
On 06-Dec-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
That gives a hint about where to look for the clobbering conventions. From
gcc/config/i386/i386.c:
! /* Set the cc_status for the results of an insn whose pattern is EXP.
!On the 80386, we assume that only test and compare insns, as well
!as SI,
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 19:42:30 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
Of course. But you're missing the point: ufs is *not* a port, it has
been with BSD since the beginning. There is a similar list of items
for JFS which would need to be addressed, with the additional issue
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Kaltashkin Eugene wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JE: yes ncp and nwfs are broken in -current
Hm, and when this be work ?
when someone who understands the protocol can get time to
retrofit teh KSE changes
28 matches
Mail list logo
