On Monday 18 November 2002 07.29, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Has anyone tried them yet? After removing the #error triggered by
__FreeBSD_version being over 50, I got the thing nvidia.ko to build,
but:
00:50:30 aldan shutdown: reboot by root: New world, kernel. Nvidia drivers
00:56:12 aldan
On Monday 18 November 2002 09.03, David Holm wrote:
Hi,
I suggest you read the following post to this list:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1510354+0+/usr/local/www/db/tex
t/2002/freebsd-current/20021110.freebsd-current
It talks about the (now deprecated) kernel config option
On 2002-11-17 23:53 +, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Try putting this in your loader.conf:
hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range=1
This allowed the device to probe for me, but the system locks up when
I try and start X.
Do you by any chance either have an SiS chipset or a regular TNT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 11/17/02 18:34:
I haven't been able to complete a full buildworld with an SMP on a
Abit BP6 (bi-celeron) board for two weeks (the kernel config is just
a full GENERIC with SMP and APICIO options enabled).
I also am running a BP6. IS ANYONE successfully
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 05:51:15PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
I've installed fresh -current box and it seems it does not have
/usr/libexec/makewhatis.local script.
How about connecting makewhatis.local to the build? That is shell
script and doesn't require perl.
This will be addressed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 11/18/02 07:52:
Any reason why this doesn't work ?
sheelsudo boot0cfg -B ad0
boot0cfg: /dev/ad0: Operation not permitted
securelevel too high ?
Dan
--
Dan Lukes tel: +420 2 21914205, fax: +420 2 21914206
root of FIONet, KolejNET, webmaster of
David Holm wrote:
Note that the patch has already been applied so no need to patch your kernel!
BTW, why hasn't anyone set the mailing list to automatically set the reply-to
address to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Because the poster may not be a list subscriber, and the most
important person to reply
Hi
Just did the following:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=1k count=512 #remove old stuff
fdisk -I da1#cover the entire disk with one da1s1 slice
fdisk da1 #check what's put there
disklabel -rw da1s1 auto#install virgin disklabel
disklabel -e da1s1 #add partition e:,
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/icecast-1.3.12_1.log
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/readline -pthread
threads.c: In function `thread_block_signals':
threads.c:467: `SIGBUS' undeclared (first use in this function)
threads.c:467: (Each undeclared
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:43:28AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/icecast-1.3.12_1.log
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/readline -pthread
threads.c: In function `thread_block_signals':
threads.c:467: `SIGBUS' undeclared
I see these changes were made about four days ago and I seem to be the only one
having problems. BTW, I don't use device bpf in my kernel config.
cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
- Forwarded message from Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
One or more ports that you maintain are currently unbuildable under
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT/i386 on the FreeBSD package-building cluster.
[...]
- End forwarded message -
...
gmake[2]: Entering directory
Hello,
(again again) I'm trying to install 5.0-DP2 on my little server
and at this time:
DEBUG: trying to piece 82 of 249: /base/base.dd
(da0:mly0:1:0:0): Request Requered
(da0:mly0:1:0:0): Retrying Command
And sysinstall hangs ...
vd
To Unsubscribe:
I'i try to set up jail with following script, however
as result, urandom/stdin/stdout/stderr will not appear.
They exist before applying devfs rules, but I cannot find
rules how to unhide those. Any ideas!?
best regards,
taavi
PS. sshd PRNG not seeded seems to be related to urandom existance.
In trying to setup a ccd on a -current system I
seem to have run into a few issues:
/etc/ccd.conf:
# ccd ileave flags component devices
ccd0 64 none/dev/ad1s1a /dev/ad2s1a
# ccdconfig -g
ccd064 0 /dev/ad1s1a /dev/ad2s1a
# ls
Mon Nov 18 15:15:00 GMT 2002
cvs [update aborted]: /home/ncvs/CVSROOT: Interrupted system call
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
I'm running a recently (as in today) cvsup'd current box. Today I compiled
phoenix 0.4. Oddly enough it would say Connection refused to any URL.
Looking at truss/tcpdump I realized it was ALWAYS trying to connect to
an ipv6 address, for any site. I searched around google and found this
link:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
I really /hate/ this CPU feature crap.
So do I.
I've also found that the only way to reliablly disable it is to comment it
out from sys.mk.
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 2 x '84
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:51:16 -0600
John Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jnn I'm running a recently (as in today) cvsup'd current box. Today I compiled
jnn phoenix 0.4. Oddly enough it would say Connection refused to any URL.
jnn Looking at truss/tcpdump I realized it was ALWAYS trying to
As Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
I really /hate/ this CPU feature crap.
So do I.
I've also found that the only way to reliablly disable it is to comment it
out from sys.mk.
Maybe i should do this using a preconfigure script in my port... :-)
--
cheers, Jorg .-.-. --... ...--
In the last episode (Nov 17), John De Boskey said:
It would be nice if rc.conf could start a 2nd copy of named (split
dns). Comments on the following simplistic patch?
Just upgrade to bind 9 and set up two views. Much easier :)
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 15:51:59 +0100, Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I'm concerned about the used character: -r is similiar to -R
Yes, `-r' would be a very poor choice for the reason you state.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
I've just turned witness back on on the bento cluster, and got the
following lock order reversals a number of times overnight:
Nov 18 07:45:40 user.crit gohan11 kernel: 1st 0xc6887200 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @
/local0/src-client/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:465
Nov 18 07:45:40 user.crit gohan11 kernel:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:14:58PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
What am i supposed to do in order to get cross-compilation working
properly? I've already tried a number of things, and my -current
from August at least gave in when setting MACHINE_ARCH=avr for
the cross-coimpilation.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:41:36PM -0600, Alan L. Cox wrote:
This late-night commit might help:
jeff2002/11/17 01:33:00 PST
Modified files:
sys/kern kern_exec.c
Log:
- Release the imgp vnode prior to freeing exec_map resources to avoid
deadlock.
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
Hi
Just did the following:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=1k count=512 #remove old stuff
fdisk -I da1#cover the entire disk with one da1s1 slice
fdisk da1 #check what's put there
disklabel -rw da1s1 auto#install virgin
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021118 11:06] wrote:
I've just turned witness back on on the bento cluster, and got the
following lock order reversals a number of times overnight:
Nov 18 07:45:40 user.crit gohan11 kernel: 1st 0xc6887200 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:23:14AM -0800, Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what are the warnings?
what version of disklabel.c?
Here's script output:
Script started on Mon Nov 18 21:46:07 2002
bash-2.05b# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=1k count=512
512+0 records in
512+0 records out
As Kris Kennaway wrote:
What am i supposed to do in order to get cross-compilation working
properly?
NO_CPU_CFLAGS=yes
This is documented in make.conf.
At least not in my version of make.conf's man page. Just checked,
neither in the current version.
I (and obviously not only I) wish
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:39:01AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Well now they are, I will investigate as time permits.
Thanks.
I'm still in a holding pattern about adding more debugging info to
lockd now that we're in release candidate mode. I may ask for a
branch to be done, but i'm not
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:57:24PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As Kris Kennaway wrote:
What am i supposed to do in order to get cross-compilation working
properly?
NO_CPU_CFLAGS=yes
This is documented in make.conf.
At least not in my version of make.conf's man page. Just
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021118 12:01] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:39:01AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Well now they are, I will investigate as time permits.
Thanks.
I'm still in a holding pattern about adding more debugging info to
lockd now that we're in release
On 18-Nov-2002 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021118 12:01] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:39:01AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Well now they are, I will investigate as time permits.
Thanks.
I'm still in a holding pattern about adding more debugging
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:23:14AM -0800, Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what are the warnings?
what version of disklabel.c?
Here's script output:
Script started on Mon Nov 18 21:46:07 2002
[...]
sysid 165
On 18-Nov-2002 John Baldwin wrote:
On 18-Nov-2002 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021118 12:01] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:39:01AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Well now they are, I will investigate as time permits.
Thanks.
I'm still in a holding
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:00:37PM -0800, Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
In pre-geom days we had a realhack (TM) that would fiddle the
label if you read it direct from the disk. In other words
it fixed it to always look (u relative I think) even if you
read it from
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:18:08PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021118 12:01] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:39:01AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Well now they are, I will investigate as time permits.
Thanks.
I'm still in a holding
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:19:11AM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote the words in effect
of:
I have a machine that is running -current from October 10, 2002. It had
been running fine for about two weeks--up until I had to reboot it.
When it came back up, one of my disks apparently lost its
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:00:37PM -0800, Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
In pre-geom days we had a realhack (TM) that would fiddle the
label if you read it direct from the disk. In other words
it fixed it to always look
At 9:11 AM +0100 2002/11/18, David Holm wrote:
BTW, why hasn't anyone set the mailing list to automatically set the reply-to
address to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html.
--
Brad Knowles, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
When support for building a.out binaries was removed from -current it
was implied that a toolchain port would be created, but so far this
hasn't happened. Who will step up and do this before 5.0-RELEASE?
Kris
msg46889/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
At 9:15 PM -0800 2002/11/17, Juli Mallett wrote:
Or at least abstracting it in such a way that it doesn't get in anyone's
way, and so it won't trigger the what if I need N where N2 case, and
in some meaningful way... Like maybe using a named_configs lists, and
start one named for each
At 10:01 PM -0800 2002/11/17, Terry Lambert wrote:
Interior and exterior DNS is a useful case; however, there
are multiple ways to set it up; in general, it's not possible
to have interior authoritative DNS at the same time you have
exterior authoritative DNS (this was a mistake we made on
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:08:49 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It's described in the file itself. Can you please file a PR about the
missing manpage documentation?
make.conf is no longer installed in -current. A user trying to
understand why some glop is being added automatically
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 06:15:24PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:08:49 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It's described in the file itself. Can you please file a PR about the
missing manpage documentation?
make.conf is no longer installed in -current.
Brad Knowles wrote:
It depends on how you do it. You could $INCLUDE the exterior
file inside the interior file, if that subset of information is the
same. You could also use BIND 9 views. Otherwise, split-horizon
can be a pain.
If you have a LAN behind a transient network
Brad Knowles wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't think of transient networks. Indeed, that does
make things a lot uglier. I'll have to think some more about all the
various implications, however.
One of the draft RFC's in the FTP directory I referenced is a
Best Current Practices document.
--
Buildkernel dies without device bpf in the config file.
I think this is due to Sam's commit on 11-14 changing
sys/net/bpf.c and bpf.h.
Anyone else seeing this?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
I've been porting an application from Linux to FreeBSD using STABLE, and it appears
from looking at the
semaphore code that the SysV semaphores are not thread safe on STABLE. I don't have
CURRENT source
code to look at currently. Does anyone know if they are thread-safe in CURRENT?
Thanks!
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Brian Smith wrote:
I've been porting an application from Linux to FreeBSD using STABLE, and it appears
from looking at the
semaphore code that the SysV semaphores are not thread safe on STABLE. I don't have
CURRENT source
code to look at currently. Does anyone know
Buildkernel dies without device bpf in the config file.
I think this is due to Sam's commit on 11-14 changing
sys/net/bpf.c and bpf.h.
Anyone else seeing this?
Yup, I'll fix it. Thanks.
Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the
- Terry Lambert's Original Message -
Brad Knowles wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't think of transient networks. Indeed, that does
make things a lot uglier. I'll have to think some more about all the
various implications, however.
One of the draft RFC's in the FTP directory I
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:33:38 -0500 (EST), Daniel Eischen wrote:
[ I assume you mean semop, semctl, not sema_* or sem_* ]
Yes ... semop() specifically is causing the problems...
Sure SysV semaphores are thread-safe. When a thread blocks on
one, the entire process blocks (no threads run). You
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:31:28 -0600, Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is this the recommended method of preventing these problems?
The recommended method of preventing these problems generally is to
use POSIX semaphores (or other POSIX synchronization mechanisms
appropriate to threaded
Something that needs to be addressed before 5.0 is the insecure
default permissions on many devices. For example, on my system, the
following devices have insecure permissions on 5.0 (but not on 4.x
with the default MAKEDEV settings):
crw-r--r-- 1 root operator 117, 0 Nov 18 14:49 acd0
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vallo Kallaste [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: partition c: partition extends past end of unit
: Warning, partition c doesn't start at 0!
: Warning, An incorrect partition c may cause problems for standard system utilities
: partition e: partition extends past
John De Boskey wrote:
This an interesting thread, but it seems to be getting
a bit off target. I need to kick off 2 name servers. The
first is authoritive for the domain as seen externally
and the 2nd which is authoritive for the internal network.
The internal forwards to the external
Brian Smith wrote:
Sure SysV semaphores are thread-safe. When a thread blocks on
one, the entire process blocks (no threads run). You won't
get any safer than that ;-)
Yikes that isn't good. Is that only in STABLE? or does CURRENT
do that as well? I guess I'll have to protect the
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:03:06PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Something that needs to be addressed before 5.0 is the insecure
default permissions on many devices. For example, on my system, the
following devices have insecure permissions on 5.0 (but not on 4.x
with the default MAKEDEV
At 4:41 PM -0800 2002/11/18, Terry Lambert wrote:
But. If you are transiently connected, then if the on site DNS
server is authoritative, then there is no way to look up externally
hosted services via DNS, unless the external DNS, also a hosted
service, and therefore not transiently
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Something that needs to be addressed before 5.0 is the insecure
default permissions on many devices. For example, on my system, the
following devices have insecure permissions on 5.0 (but not on 4.x
with the default MAKEDEV settings):
crw-r--r-- 1
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Tim Robbins wrote:
I'm glad you brought this up... I'd like to see /dev/devctl made mode 600
instead of 644 because it does not look very robust and because only one
devctl can be open at a time.
The two other security/reliability bugs I can see are that the async
64 matches
Mail list logo
