On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 11:39:11PM +0100, Yuri wrote:
> These have been in there for quite some time now, and every time I
> try to grep something I see this (I know about -s option, but it's
> there in opengrok and other tools output as well):
> grep:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:14:30PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:24:45 -0700 John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
But, can you tell use how you built your kernel and on what system?
COMPILER_TYPE should always be defined... Are you trying to build
a HEAD kernel on
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 09:19:32PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
As of r255321, we are no longer building gcc or libstdc++ as part of
the default install on platforms where clang is cc.
I guess I missed where this was discussed.
I don't feel we should not ship 10.0 without /usr/bin/g[c+][c+].
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:02:06PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
rather busy organising the DevSummit. The notes for the sessions will
be posted to various mailing lists soon (and summarised for a special
status report), but since the ports and toolchain build sessions are
already largely up
For some reason bmake is now using share/mk/ from within a source tree
instead of the installation in /usr/share/mk/:
/w/10/usr.bin/xinstall$ bmake
bmake: /b/deo/10/share/mk/bsd.own.mk line 444: MK_BMAKE can't be set by a
user.
I believe this is against POLA as there is no guarantee that
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:13:26PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 15.12.2012 23:03, Alexander Motin wrote:
Sorry, it's my fault. I've tried to save some time on patch generation
and forgot about that change in lib/. We haven't touched user-level in
our work except that file. Here is patch
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 05:46:21PM +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Friday, 9 November 2012 at 13:52:24 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Looks like yet another cpp -traditional abuse.
Use or abuse? In any case, it's not the only one. In the Good Old
Days people did things like that. So,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:36:18PM +0200, Ulrich Sprlein wrote:
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year.
...
Should people feel strongly about them, we might be able to move them
over to the doc repository.
This does not seem a RFC --
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:53:11PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
How about converting them to SGML and integrating them into
the Handbook (with the caveat that they are outdated, but
retained for archival purposes)?
I find the Handbook to not look very well due to its SGML nature and one
page per
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:14:45AM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
On 1 Jul 2012, at 10:20, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Just FYI,
the svn2cvs exporter is currently down due to
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/237860 .
I'll fix it as soon as I get back from lunch, so should be back in
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:55:57PM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
Tested patches are accepted
(http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/svnadmin/tools/export.py), or even better -
work on killing off CVS sooner rather than later.
I like the latter. :-)
As we discussed at BSDcan -- I don't use CVS
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:03:17AM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote:
Yes. You to have a statically linked /rescue/sh on board, so what's the
point of /bin/sh being dynamic?
While you and I agree on this, the primary reason we went with a
dynamically linked root was for PAM and NSS support -- which are
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:34:58PM +0300, Vladimir Sharun wrote:
=== usr.bin/file (all)
...
file.o: In function `main':
/usr/src/usr.bin/file/../../contrib/file/file.c:(.text+0x717): undefined
reference to `magic_getpath'
/usr/src/usr.bin/file/../../contrib/file/file.c:(.text+0x7df):
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:05:37PM +0200, Jan Sieka wrote:
--- a/lib/libmagic/Makefile
+++ b/lib/libmagic/Makefile
@@ -10,9 +10,16 @@ DPADD= ${LIBZ}
LDADD= -lz
MAN= libmagic.3 magic.5
+HOSTOSRELDATE!= echo ${VERSION} | cut -d -f 4
$ cd lib/libmagic
$ make -V
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote:
Apparently, current dependencies are much more spread, e.g. /bin/sh
is dynamically linked [etc]
That seems like a bad mistake, because it would prevent even booting
single-user if rtld/libraries are broken.
When one enters single
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:52:01AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
You could use /rescue/sh as your single-user shell. Of course, that would
perhaps let you still be able to recompile things if you had a static
toolchain. :)
Having the toolchain static has saved me in exactly this way.
--
--
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 09:06:18AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On 4/20/2012 5:16 AM, Jan Sieka wrote:
I can't build world from recent sources (HEAD as of 2012.04.19 11:06:48
UTC) on a machine running FreeBSD 7.3.
...
Ugh. The usecase (that's now broken) is that Jan from Semihalf might
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:13:32PM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Easier said than done. Feel free to give libedit a try.
That has nothing to do with our process and everything to do with us
blindly hacking away pissing all over to be our own thing -- BUT still
wanting to take work from the
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 01:19:56PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:41 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:56:45PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
I have the current version of jemalloc integrated into libc as
contrib/jemalloc:
http://people.freebsd.org
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:56:45PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
I have the current version of jemalloc integrated into libc as
contrib/jemalloc:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/patches/jemalloc_20120404b.patch
Looking at the latest patch
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:41:12PM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:55:37PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb friends with libedit
after r228114.
The remaining
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:56:31AM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
You still failed to name a single compelling reason to leave profiled
libs even in -CURRENT.
Sorry Joe, I don't think your reasoning is compelling.
I'm sure you know how to stick NO_PROFILE=true in your /etc/src.conf.
How far do you
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:57:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote:
If you go with (2) above, we'll still have *tons* of ports that want a
libreadline, so we'll just end up growing a port of it and we'll wind up
with a libreadline
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:59:33PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org
wrote:
? ? pmake sucks as far as
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:04:08AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
I think this is useful, perhaps send it to harti@ or jilles@ for review?
I'd like to get some NetBSD bmake maintainers POV too.
We should reduce the needless diversion between the two makes.
--
-- David (obr...@freebsd.org)
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:35:50AM -0800, Matt Mullins wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
implement a new -N switch or so which isn't based on a file's
existance, but a file's checksum.
You can always use net/rsync, which does by default
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:46:30PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
This is a separate issue that I want to handle separately.
I see no value in handling it separately. I either have a libreadline on
my system or I don't.
Again, what problem are you trying to solve?
The question is what to do with gdb
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:46:17PM +, Max Khon wrote:
Author: fjoe
Date: Tue Nov 29 19:46:17 2011
New Revision: 228143
URL:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb friends with libedit
after r228114.
The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
1) just build link gdb with libedit
OR
2) re-import libreadline from gdb sources and build
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 08:01:37PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
and last: upgrade flex to the latest upstream version (it will need the m4
upgrade) while here I'll move back flex to contrib/
patches can be found there:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/flex-update.diff
Hi Baptiste,
I
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 06:00:02PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
--- libs/m3core/src/thread/POSIX/ThreadPosix.m3.orig 2011-09-09
17:58:12.867431639 +0300
+++ libs/m3core/src/thread/POSIX/ThreadPosix.m3 2011-09-09
17:58:30.380428486 +0300
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
pausedThreads : T;
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 07:48:23PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
My recollection is that this is because kensmith forgot to take
'makeoptions DEBUG=-g' out of GENERIC when branching stable/8, and no one
noticed until a couple of releases in, at which point it seemed consistent
with POLA to
Hi KIB,
Thanks for the list of issues you know about -- I don't believe we have
PRs covering those.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
- I believe Peter Holm has more test cases that fails with tmpfs. He
would have more details. I somewhat remember some panic on
Does anyone object to this patch?
David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two
years with no problems.
I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on
TMPFS either.
Index: tmpfs_vfsops.c
Feb 24 19:43:16 : FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #662 r218815:218845M: Tue Feb 22 00:13:31
PST 2011
Feb 24 19:43:16 : /sys/i386/compile/DRAGON i386
[..]
Mar 5 14:41:38 : start = 0, len = 1659, fs = /storage
Mar 5 14:41:38 : panic: ffs_alloccg: map corrupted
Mar 5 14:41:38 : cpuid = 0
Mar 5 14:41:38 :
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:31:41PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:43 PM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Thoughts?
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #654 r215604M: Sat Nov 20 19:51:27 PST 2010
? ?ro...@dragon:/sys/i386/compile/DRAGON i386
[..]
start = 0, len = 3359
Machine booted, without any mention of sf(4) in rc.conf or loader.conf and
without sf(4) in the core kernel. This is without WITNESS or INVARIANTS.
From multi-user, I issued 'ifconfig sf0' and got the below panic.
These are the console messages related to this:
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #654
Thoughts?
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #654 r215604M: Sat Nov 20 19:51:27 PST 2010
ro...@dragon:/sys/i386/compile/DRAGON i386
[..]
start = 0, len = 3359, fs = /files
panic: ffs_alloccg: map corrupted
cpuid = 1
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper(c0839222,a0d7365,0,c08affe0,7,...) at 0xc04e9ab6
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #654 r215604M: Sat Nov 20 19:51:27 PST 2010
ro...@dragon:/sys/i386/compile/DRAGON i386
[..]
start = 0, len = 2, fs = /jazz
panic: ffs_alloccg: map corrupted
cpuid = 2
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper(c0839222,0,1,4,0,...) at 0xc04e9ab6 =
Thoughts?
anh-thu.NUXI.org dumped core - see ./vmcore.1
Tue Nov 30 16:10:57 PST 2010
FreeBSD anh-thu.NUXI.org 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #85 r214782M: Thu Nov
4 09:13:24 PDT 2010
ro...@anh-thu.nuxi.org:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/ANH-THU i386
panic: make_dev_credv: bad si_name
Thoughts?
Script started on Sat Nov 20 22:44:55 2010
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #644 r215099M: Wed Nov 10 11:45:01 PST 2010
obr...@dragon:/usr/obj/4kib/i386/compile/DRAGON-WITNESS i386
WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance.
WARNING: DIAGNOSTIC option enabled, expect reduced
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:30:59PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:32:54PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepable locks held:
exclusive sleep mutex sf0 (network driver) r = 0 (0xc722b584) locked @
/usr/obj/4kib/modules/sf
Script started on Wed Nov 10 15:56:31 2010
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #644 r215099M: Wed Nov 10 11:45:01 PST 2010
obr...@dragon:/usr/obj/4kib/i386/compile/DRAGON-WITNESS i386
WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance.
WARNING: DIAGNOSTIC option enabled, expect reduced performance.
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:11:19PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Tinderbox agrees :(...
TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:28:27AM +0800, Randy Bush wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:14:02PM +0800, Randy Bush wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn (all)
c++ -O2 -pipe
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/src/preproc/eqn
-I.
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:52:23AM +0800, Randy Bush wrote:
Can you verify this is a 64-bit platform?
i can verify that this is am64
Ok, that explains why I could not reproduce this under i386.
Please try r215027.
--
-- David (obr...@freebsd.org)
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:42:27PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Ulrich Sp?rlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote:
Hey folks, not sure why, but I had a stab at looking which files were
actually read during building world.
[..]
usr.bin/cpio/test/* ? ? # move to
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:14:02PM +0800, Randy Bush wrote:
very current amd64
=== gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn (all)
c++ -O2 -pipe
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/src/preproc/eqn
-I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:14:02PM +0800, Randy Bush wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn (all)
c++ -O2 -pipe
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/eqn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/src/preproc/eqn
-I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:42:48PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
Style bug:
+growstrstackblock(int n) {
The opening brace should be on its own line.
Indeed. I'm surprised I did that. Thank you for catching it.
Your test is too fragile: it often fails to detect the bug. Calling like
sh
At $WORK we hit a bug where ${var%/*} was not producing the correct
expansion. There are two patches to fix this. I prefer the first
as I feel it is cleaner from an API perspective. I've also added
a regression testcase that shows the problem.
Thoughts?
--
-- David (obr...@freebsd.org)
This happens on AMD64 for me, r212166 (2010-09-02 15:37:13 -0700) kernel
sources.
But, an i386 kernel of r212166 sources boots fine on the same hardware.
Root mount waiting for: usbus6 usbus2
uhub2: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered
uhub6: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered
Trying to
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:34:10PM -0700, David O'Brien (@FreeBSD) wrote:
This happens on AMD64 for me, r212166 (2010-09-02 15:37:13 -0700) kernel
sources.
Sorry for the false alarm - this was a local environment problem.
-- David
___
freebsd-current
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 12:54:07PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock.
It seems related to SUJ with process waiting on suspfs or ppwait.
I've also seen it stalled in suspfs, but this information
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:00:18AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
I certainly agree.. can it be changed please?
I've waited a while to see what other opinions would be expressed on this
topic. I believe there is sufficient support to rename COMPAT_FREEBSD32
to something else based on responses
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:50:32PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 07:24:23PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
So the issue isn't as cut and dried as you might think. There's
multiple different conventions used here in addition to your simple
example.
I guess we'd have to
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:13:03PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: 20100312171206.ga31...@dragon.nuxi.org
David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org writes:
: * Simplify SRCDIR calculation by directly finding the kernel sources
: based directly on one of them.
: Reviewed by: dhw
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:44:26AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: 20100315142806.ga5...@dragon.nuxi.org
David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org writes:
: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:13:03PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: In message: 20100312171206.ga31...@dragon.nuxi.org
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:13:03PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
The Makefile already knows where the kernel src is located. Let's use
that knowledge to make things a little simpler. This also uses the
Makefile variable SYSDIR. It should also work with non-standard sys
directories.
..
Details at
http://trang.nuxi.org:8080/panics/DSC_0070.JPG
Kernel sources at r203083 are stable for me.
Unfortunately, I cannot get a dump for this.
--
-- David (obr...@freebsd.org)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
Details at
http://trang.nuxi.org:8080/panics/DSC_0010.JPG
Kernel sources at r203083 are stable for me.
Unfortunately, I cannot get a dump for this.
--
-- David (obr...@freebsd.org)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
* Simplify SRCDIR calculation by directly finding the kernel sources
based directly on one of them.
Reviewed by: dhw
This change does not increase the kernel build time. It also continues
to restrict the revision to just the kernel sources, and not the whole
tree.
Timing tests by: dhw
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 07:24:23PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: 7d6fde3d1003111720g7dccf93w1f51db88758a5...@mail.gmail.com
Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com writes:
: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:36
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 08:54:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Mike Jakubik
mike.jaku...@intertainservices.com wrote:
On 3/11/2010 9:50 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
As a result of importing 32-bit
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 02:49:04PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: 20100307054423.ge70...@dragon.nuxi.org
David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org writes:
: On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:41:40AM +, Robert Watson wrote:
: On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 08:51:22PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, David O'Brien wrote:
No, not it isn't. Provide a script to convert path's in the diff. This is
what $LARGE_FREEBSD_USER did when it rearranged it source tree.
It was done by creating a copy of the CVS repo
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:16:41AM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
I think you misunderstand. Some of us old-timers have been having this
discussion repeatedly for well over ten years. It always ends up the same
way - a re-org might make the source tree marginally prettier but the
consequences for
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 01:28:24AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
FWIW, NetBSD's charter has been to run their OS on a number of
architectures, not just a primary set of architectures; OpenBSD's
charter differs -- if we all were NetBSD or OpenBSD, then we'd all be
using the same thing. But
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 12:01:30PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail Account) wrote:
Oh, so because a lot of the programmers behind it receive wages, and the
project itself won't commit ritual suicide by basically blocking the
companies using FreeBSD from returning improvements they make to the
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:41:40AM +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message alpine.bsf.2.00.1003050912340.5...@fledge.watson.org, Robert
Watso n writes:
Doing that kind of rearrangement [...] would be a nightmare for anyone
with large [...]
Ever since kerberos5 got hooked up to the build by default I'm getting
*TONS* (758) of CPP macros. An example is:
In file included from /usr/obj/usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libasn1/roken.h:77,
from /usr/src/crypto/heimdal/lib/vers/print_version.c:38:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 11:47:24PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Richard Coleman wrote:
..snip..
For 5.2-CURRENT, I think we should revisit this issue with one of the
following conclusions winning out, and the rest being
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:03PM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote:
Also, I do not see any reason why bash should remain linked -static
for -current.
Lucky for me (who wants a static Bash), I don't have to make the
decission -- ports are frozen and have been for a while.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:17:39PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tim Kientzle writes:
David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:37:48AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
and [/usr/bin/ftp] doesn't support HTTP.
$ /usr/bin/ftp http://www.theregister.co.uk
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 01:36:03AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 01:02:18PM +0400, rihad wrote:
CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe
I'll try to build it without -O2, thanks.
*sigh*, I see we need more figlet in the documentation.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:14:10PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
We recommend
make buildworld
make buildkernel
make installkernel
reboot -s - single user
make installworld
make buildkernel ; make installkernel can be shortened to just
make kernel.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:16:37AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
The advantage of this method is it's simple, cheap, automatic, and lets
us say You can try setting ADDITIONAL_RESCUE=usr.sbin/foo in make.conf
and it may work,
Please send a tested patch for this. :-)
If ADDITIONAL_RESCUE will
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
As a user, I like /rescue better than the step-child that /stand/* used
to be. It's part of the world, which /stand wasn't.
Except that we still have /stand. It should be shot, but some won't let
it go...
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:07:55PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
What about the newer version of gcc? That is considerably slower than
previous versions, but I don't see people screaming to have it removed.
Uh... you must not know what you are talking about. GCC *COMPILES*
slower as it does a
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 03:48:57PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
... I think [/rescue] only needs to support those
recovery actions necessary to repair /bin and /sbin if they break.
My stance is that no failure mode needs to
be repairable that wasn't repairable with a static /.
I'm willing
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 06:00:36PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Scenarios that require /rescue are ones in which /bin and /sbin
are unusable, which is almost always going to imply a trashed file
in /bin, /sbin, or /lib. Thus, most /rescue scenarios are going to
involve locating a good copy of a
[ From: set to /dev/null as too many can't follow the Reply-To: ]
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:00:24AM -0500, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
NO. /rescue was allowed in the system to handle the case of a trashed
file in /lib[exec]. To allow a sysadmin to recover a system from the
same type of
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:46:54AM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 03:40:06 -0800, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We have made the assumption for the first three options since day one.
Why should we change the assumptions just because we now have a dynamic
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:47:24AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
It strikes me that this whole conversation has gotten a little
confrontational... The middle ground of adding a static /sbin/sh for
scripts soudds like a reasonable choice, and has precedent in other
systems (Solaris).
Time for a
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 12:08:58PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Contrary to what David claims, I don't think /rescue does need
to support all of the recovery actions that a static /s?bin
would support. Rather, I think it only needs to support those
recovery actions necessary to repair /bin and
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 04:07:49PM -0500, Michael Edenfield wrote:
I doubt there is any perfect answer which will satisfy
everyone, but perhaps we can recognize that and figure out
some flexible middle ground.
Would it be possible, through some make.conf magic, for the end-user to
set
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 07:19:31PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: M. Warner Losh writes:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: : I'll bet a larger
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 06:27:13PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
The debate right now is over what programs from /usr/bin and
/usr/sbin should be included. Right now, that includes
tar, gzip, bzip2, and vi/ex.
All but vi(ex) were built statically, but installed into /usr/bin.
--
-- David
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 02:42:58AM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 5:22 PM -0800 2003/11/22, David O'Brien wrote:
Please, NO. There wasn't an FTP client available for this type of
recovery pre-/rescue, there shouldn't be one now.
Why? Why cut your nose off to spite your face? Even
As I pointed out earlier, some of the heat here comes
from the fact that /bin/sh is currently overloaded:
* It is the default system script interpreter, used
by the rc scripts and many other things. As such,
it must start quickly.
* It is the default user shell for many users. As
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 12:14:39AM -, Duncan Barclay wrote:
From: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll seriously argue against the 2nd point above. I don't know of a
SINGLE person that uses /bin/sh as their interactive shell when
multi-user. Not ONE. Every Bourne shell'ish user
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 06:27:01PM -0500, Richard Coleman wrote:
But it would be sorta odd to have statically linked versions of sh in
both /bin and /rescue.
We'd remove it from /rescue if the /bin/sh one was static. :-)
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:33:51PM -0600, Guy Helmer wrote:
Tim Kientzle wrote:
Guy Helmer wrote:
Thanks to /rescue and the live filesystem archives on
current.freebsd.org, I was able to recover a machine
that I hosed after the statfs change by trying to installworld
without
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:11:30PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Thanks to /rescue and the live filesystem archives on
current.freebsd.org, I was able to recover
... I could have used the ftp client (or fetch) in /rescue :-)
Yes, fetch would be useful. I imagine a lot of people
in
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:12:03AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
The kernel changes of the past week has totally turned my AMD64 machine
that I use in 32-bit mode running FreeBSD/i386 (GENERIC):
OK boot -v
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
instruction pointer = 0x0:0xa00
stack pointer
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:51:53AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
sledge.freebsd.org is now running in SMP, as is the loaner 4-way Opteron
that I have for testing.
Now that you've got all 4 CPU's spinning up, producing maxium BTU's,
aren't you glad I brought you that new useful space header for
The kernel changes of the past week has totally turned my AMD64 machine
that I use in 32-bit mode running FreeBSD/i386 (GENERIC):
OK boot -v
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
instruction pointer = 0x0:0xa00
stack pointer = 0x0:0xffe
frame pointer = 0x0:0x0
code segment=
# cd /usr/src ; cvs -qR up -PdA
...
U sys/netgraph/bluetooth/include/ng_btsocket_hci_raw.h
U sys/netgraph/bluetooth/include/ng_btsocket_l2cap.h
U sys/netgraph/bluetooth/include/ng_btsocket_rfcomm.h
panic: Assertion td-td_turnstile != NULL failed at
../../../kern/subr_turnstile.c:427
cpuid = 1;
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:37:47PM -0500, Bill Vermillion wrote:
1) Much smaller /bin and /sbin. On i386, /bin and /sbin are 33 MB
static.
Dynamically linked, they are only 4 MB.
I don't think saving that little space on the / partition is as
important as having everthing in
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:16:03PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Provided that we
2. replace the date with a convenient sequence number, which we can
call the minor version number, and
..
E.g.: libc.so.6.0, libc.so.6.1, and (first release) libc.so.6.2...
Please no -- it wouldn't be easy
1 - 100 of 1574 matches
Mail list logo
