On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:36:30AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 09:20:35AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
Might help if you provided a pointer to the problems you had in the
upgrade from -STABLE case. For that matter, a bit more detail on the
install failed to mount
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
One issue to be careful of here is that the removal of the
tcptmpl actually causes a performance hit that wasn't there
in the 4.3 code. My original complaint about tcptmpl taking
up 256 instead of 60 bytes stands, but I'm
Mike Silbersack wrote:
Hm, true, I guess the improvement is respectable. My thought is mostly
that I'm not sure how much it's extending the performance range of a
system; testing with more varied packet loads as suggested by Alfred would
help tell us the answer to this.
I didn't respond to
I am using -current box as a homedir server for my Solaris clients and
have noticed a wierd problem.
When I login my homedir gets mounted ok but when I type ls -l it just
waits until I ^C it.
If I run snoop on Solaris I see a getattr request being sent and
an answer being received but apparently
Hi all,
From: Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 01:15:38 +0100
::Hi,
::
::I was wondering if anybody has any suggestions about why this might
::be happening in -current:
cut
::pccbb1: RF5C478 PCI-CardBus Bridge irq 0 at device 10.1 on pci0
::pccbb1: PCI Memory allocated:
Over than an year ago (9.9.2000) I submitted a pr (kern/21154)
to ask renaming from actual *_saver.ko to saver_*.ko of saver
modules to uniform names under /boot/kernel as sound (snd_*),
interfaces (if_*), splash (splash_*) and netgraph (ng_*).
I tryed to figure where are used and I found only
Hi, Intel folks. I've just found the bug in rsutils.c which double
free(); AcpiUtRemoveReference() and ACPI_MEM_FREE(). Here is a fix.
Index: rsutils.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/rsutils.c,v
retrieving
Riccardo Torrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would be a great idea add /dev/uphoto and even better a sort
of photo-file-system, where read is mapped to download image,
unlink to delete and maybe create file to take a picture so
we can use ls, cp, rm and touch to access photo camera...
Yes,
I tried to install latest 5-current via ftp. However, when sysinstall
fetches all bin distribution, following dialog (sorry, I've forget to
copy a screenshot) is shown:
User Confirmation Requested
Unable to transfer the bin distribution from ...
Do you want to try to
Paul van der Zwan wrote:
If I run snoop on Solaris I see a getattr request being sent and
an answer being received but apparently it gets ignored by Solaris.
This happens on both Sol x86 and Sparc ( both with MU5 installed)
Please do a tcpdump, and examine it; I suspect you will find
that
Actually, I've also noticed problems in FreeBSD-current also- ls and
reads work, but things like mkdir hang. Here's the tcpdump output:
Script started on Sun Oct 14 12:21:50 2001
quarm.feral.com root tcpdump -vv -i fxp0 host antares
tcpdump: listening on fxp0
12:21:58.498568
Hi,
One more problem is in nfsd, if I set it to use udp only it starts
eating all cpu cycles it can get,but only the master process. Trussing
the process shows no system calls whatsoever being performed.
The last one is a know problem. There is a (unfinished) patch available to
solve this
The last one is a know problem. There is a (unfinished) patch available to
solve this problem. Thomas Moestl [EMAIL PROTECTED] is still working on
some issues of the patch. Please contact him if you like to know more.
Here is the URL for the patch:
You have been invited to check out this adult site
by one of your friends who visited us.
click here , our URL is: http://www.openxxx.net/
enjoy,
OpenXXX TEAM 2001
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 00:46:57 +0900 (JST)
::Hi, Intel folks. I've just found the bug in rsutils.c which double
::free(); AcpiUtRemoveReference() and ACPI_MEM_FREE(). Here is a fix.
::
::Index: rsutils.c
On Sun, 2001/10/14 at 21:38:26 +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
The last one is a know problem. There is a (unfinished) patch available to
solve this problem. Thomas Moestl [EMAIL PROTECTED] is still working on
some issues of the patch. Please contact him if you like to know more.
Here is the URL
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
I need to look at it again.. (I figured I just didn't have the time to try
understand it all AND do the rest of the kernel.) Of course the best woudl
be if Mr. Popov did the conversion but I believe he's incredibly busy at
the moment.. Certainly
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 01:02:09 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
If the receive ring for that packet size is full, it will hold off on
DMAs. If all receive rings are full, there's no reason to send more
interrupts.
I think that this does nothing, in the FreeBSD
18 matches
Mail list logo
