- Forwarded message from Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Which program core dumped? Do a dmesg| grep core
If you can find the core file, do a file [core file] and
find out what signal caused the core dump.
- End forwarded message -
I now have a core file, from make [signal
Hi,
I've tried to build world since yesterday, doing cvsup's inbetween hoping for
a fix. But it always fails on bin/cat with a bunch of unresolvable pthread
symbols at linking. I have cleared out my old /usr/obj.
=== bin/cat
cc -march=pentium3 -O3 -pipe-Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:02:56AM -0500, Dhee Reddy wrote:
Hello all.
Just tried to look up some info and saw that the /proc filesystem doesn't
contain any files.
Shouldn't they contain entries correcponding to all the processes ?
The procfs filesystem is not mounted by default
Hi,
I tested the patches on my Sony FX601.
The problem is still the machine starts resuming after suspending to S3,
but the display stays black.
I attached my dmesg output and the output from acpidump, ... there are a
lot of acpi related errors
bye,
Mitsuru IWASAKI schrieb:
Hi all,
I've
At 6:45 PM -0500 2002/11/21, Robert Watson wrote:
I appreciate the effort, and am interested in the idea, but in this case
it was as much a solicitation for a developer as for the testing
environment itself. This won't just be testing of netncp and nwfs, this
will probably require a
Fri Nov 22 01:00:13 PST 2002
U include/Makefile
U release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/hardware/alpha/proc-alpha.sgml
U release/doc/ja_JP.eucJP/hardware/common/dev.sgml
U release/doc/ja_JP.eucJP/hardware/i386/proc-i386.sgml
U release/doc/ja_JP.eucJP/hardware/ia64/article.sgml
U
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:29:54AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
NetBSD builds a directory full of tools that you can later use to
incrementally build, say, 'ls' or 'cat' because one can define
USETOOLS to be 'yes' and have the make automatically pick them up when
Steve Kargl wrote:
Don't worry about it; it's being totally blown out of proportion;
there's no way anyone will commit to importing a 2 day old 3.2.1,
which is why I put the smiley's there.
Well, the 2-day old 3.2.1 fixes numerous problems
with our 3.2.1 [FreeBSD] 20021009 (prerelease).
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:31:19PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 21-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wilkinson,Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Is FreeBSD
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:48:01PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have long wondered why NOCLEAN isn't the default. There seem to
be a few cases where it doesn't DTRT for kernel builds, but it
seems a bit conservative to make incremental world
There is neither a gcc 3.2.1 nor a gcc 3.3 yet, so I would't use any of
them in a stable release.
In fact, there is a gcc 3.2.1 release. And it seems that 3.2.1 pre-release
will be the compiler for 5.0R.
Marc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 04:30:02PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Thus spake John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
: Make release is a very poor example b/c make release goes to great
: efforts to create a
What does it do for all the other code in -ports, and in the
comp.source.* archives, and that anyone else has ever written,
such that you know it doesn't cause more problems than it
solves?
I don't think that the system cc is supposed to compile all code ever
written. IMHO It should compile the
It's a new import, and a complete regression test. Talk to the
maintainer: he's already made his statement, and you arguing with
I'm fine with it. In fact, I don't if I would be the gcc mainter if I would
import it. Probably not I guess..
me because I was willing to stand up and reiterate what
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
If I might suggest: there's a freebsd-qa mailing list. It's a great place
to organize QA efforts, whereas freebsd-chat is notorious for its lack of
signal (it's where dead signals go to rot).
There's been some talk of freebsd-qa, but so
On 22 Nov 2002, Dhee Reddy wrote:
Just tried to look up some info and saw that the /proc filesystem
doesn't
contain any files.
Shouldn't they contain entries correcponding to all the processes
? truely -- dhee
In fresh 5.0 installs, procfs is not enabled by default. Right
Robert Watson wrote:
The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
follow-on to the compile fixes :-). Was wondering if
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Martijn Pronk wrote:
The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
follow-on to the compile fixes :-).
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, walt wrote:
I noticed David Xu's changes to libpthread this morning, so I did a
make libraries and noticed with surprise that libpthread.so.5 was
still dated Sep 16.
I then did 'cd /usr/src/lib' and a 'make' and noticed that libpthread
did not show up during the make.
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:11:42 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert
Watson) wrote:
This is not actually DP2, it's about a week earlier. That said, I'm not
sure that bug was fixed in the missing week. If you can, try booting off
of the 5.0-DP2 ISOs found at:
Dhee Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all.
Just tried to look up some info and saw that the /proc filesystem doesn't
contain any files.
Shouldn't they contain entries correcponding to all the processes ?
truely
This question was just asked a few days ago (yesterday?). By
Can DP2 be cvsup'd?
Thanks, Rob.
--
-
The Numeric Python EM Project
www.pythonemproject.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
[Bcc to -net because it is relevant there. This email has been triggered
by a private discussion i was having with other committers (who will
easily recognise themselves :) which suggested the possibility of adding
more fields to mbuf headers]
Just
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
Dhee Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all.
Just tried to look up some info and saw that the /proc filesystem doesn't
contain any files.
Shouldn't they contain entries correcponding to all the processes ?
truely
This
I am running -current circa Nov 19. cvsupped today.
Buildworld core dumps on
cc -c -p -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -fexceptions -DIN_GCC -DIN_LIBGCC2
-D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -DFINE_GRAINED_LIBRARIES -D_PTHREADS -DGTHREAD_USE_WEAK
-I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools
Hi!
A malloc(0) returns always 0x800 on my system. This causes some third-party
software to fail, because they expect malloc(0) to return NULL. Is this a
bug or a feature? malloc(3) doesn't mention anything.
Regards,
Marc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:31:04 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(local.freebsd.current) wrote:
Alt-F2 shows:
pid 85 (cpio) uid 0, inumber 5278 on /mnt: filesystem full
/stand/cpio: write error: No space left on device
/stand/gunzip: failed fwrite
I think I saw something about that in a recent posting so I
ACPI works pretty well on my HP Pavilion Notebook. But is it possible
to get the apm saver (apm_saver.ko) to work with ACPI? From what I
understand, acpi is a superset of apm, and is able to provide some
emulation of apm functionality. So, by this principle, shouldn't
apm_saver work with
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 03:37:53AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Steve Kargl wrote:
Don't worry about it; it's being totally blown out of proportion;
there's no way anyone will commit to importing a 2 day old 3.2.1,
which is why I put the smiley's there.
Well, the 2-day old 3.2.1
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:25:20PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
Hi!
A malloc(0) returns always 0x800 on my system. This causes some third-party
software to fail, because they expect malloc(0) to return NULL. Is this a
bug or a feature? malloc(3) doesn't mention anything.
Feature in malloc and
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marc Recht writes:
Hi!
A malloc(0) returns always 0x800 on my system. This causes some third-party
software to fail, because they expect malloc(0) to return NULL. Is this a
bug or a feature? malloc(3) doesn't mention anything.
Then you didnt read malloc(3) well
On 21-Nov-2002 Scott Sipe wrote:
On Thursday 21 November 2002 04:26 pm, John Baldwin wrote:
Erm, well, PSE and PGE are already disabled in GENERIC on DP2. Hmm.
Can you try doing gdb -k kernel.debug in multiuser under DEBUG and
see if gdb behaves any better? Another idea might be to use
On 22-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
It's the PSE and PGE, John. Are you sure you won't agree to
not disclose, so I can tell you what's happening?
Bosko has a patch which he will give you if you ask him for it
that (mostly) works around the problem.
DP2 shipped
On 22-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Is it any help to know that my problems on P4 stopped after enabling
DISABLE_PSE? Initially I had both of these enabled, but seems that
one is enough. Just FYI.
If we can verify that DISABLE_PG_G has no effect then that would be
On 22-Nov-2002 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:31:19PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 21-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wilkinson,Alex
On 22-Nov-2002 Moore, Robert wrote:
Unfortunately, the ACPI specification also says this:
Each register block contains two registers of equal length: GPEx_STS and
GPEx_EN (where x is 0 or 1). The length of the GPE0_STS and GPE0_EN
registers is equal to half the GPE0_LEN. The length of the
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:57:44AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 22-Nov-2002 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:31:19PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 21-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:57:42AM -0500, John Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has an effect: writing CR3 or a TSS resulting in a changed CR3
will not invalidate TLB entries with the G flag set, if PGE is set
in CR4.
I know what PG_G does, Terry. My question is that if DISABLE_PG_G
Feature in malloc and bug in third-party code. C99 says:
[..]
Thanks! Then I'll try to change it in the third-party app...
Also see the V flag listed in malloc(3).
Nice. Maybe I just make it my system's default..
Regards,
Marc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On 22-Nov-2002 Rob wrote:
Can DP2 be cvsup'd?
Not directly, no. It was not done as a branch in CVS. However,
the differences between CVS and DP2 are relatively minor, mostly
just going around and change it to say 5.0-DP2 instead of
5.0-CURRENT. :)
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 22-Nov-2002 Nate Lawson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Mitsuru IWASAKI:
Thanks.
Here is the result. The first check is there and there are several others
in acpidump output. Full dump at
http://www.keltia.net/download/acpidump-z600tek
-=-=-=-
On 22-Nov-2002 Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-21 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: VM locking problem... And doscmd(8) ]
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
I'm getting a giant owned assertion failure in the vm_map code, simply
by running doscmd
John Baldwin wrote:
On 22-Nov-2002 Rob wrote:
Can DP2 be cvsup'd?
Not directly, no. It was not done as a branch in CVS. However,
the differences between CVS and DP2 are relatively minor, mostly
just going around and change it to say 5.0-DP2 instead of
5.0-CURRENT. :)
--
John
John Baldwin wrote:
On 22-Nov-2002 Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-21 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: VM locking problem... And doscmd(8) ]
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
I'm getting a giant owned assertion failure in the vm_map code,
On 22-Nov-2002 Donn Miller wrote:
ACPI works pretty well on my HP Pavilion Notebook. But is it possible
to get the apm saver (apm_saver.ko) to work with ACPI? From what I
understand, acpi is a superset of apm, and is able to provide some
emulation of apm functionality. So, by this
I just installed from cdrom using 5.0-DP2-disc1.iso:
Minor Nit:
After configuring fxp0, it gave me no chance to configure my ed1,
(inconvenient as ed1 is my internal co-ax net, fxp my external UTP).
Possible reason ?
It might be this was because of other ed1 config problems, but I suspect
current@ people,
5.0-DP2-disc1.iso with my ASUS P2L97-DS ACPI BIOS Revision 1008 Dual cpu box
boots OK :-) But 4.7-RELEASE stable produce a boot panic with a kernel
where ATA + dual processor are both enabled.
Does that mean there is code in 5.0 that could be
retro-fitted to Stable, to help
Shizuka Kudo wrote:
--- Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. If I loaded netgraph, ng_ubt at loader prompt and had the dongle plugged in
already, the
system failed to attach. I could, however, un-plug then re-insert the dongle
to make the
driver
attached successfully.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:04:40PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
I'm wondering if I should mention the new binutils.. :)
There will be a Binutils 2.13.2 import for 5.0-R w/in days.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 07:29:47AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
I respect David's judgement about bringing 3.2.1 into the
tree, but your statement above (totally blown out...)
suggests you don't follow GCC development. Several
significant bugs were fixed between our pre-release version
and
On 2002-11-22 16:25, Marc Recht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
A malloc(0) returns always 0x800 on my system. This causes some third-party
software to fail, because they expect malloc(0) to return NULL. Is this a
bug or a feature? malloc(3) doesn't mention anything.
malloc(3) does mention
* De: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-22 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: libpthread question ]
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, walt wrote:
I noticed David Xu's changes to libpthread this morning, so I did a
make libraries and noticed with surprise that libpthread.so.5 was
still dated Sep
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
This is expected behavior -- libpthread is currently disconnected from the
build. I'd actually like to see it connected to the build, with an
appropriate WARNING: DRAGONS INCLUDED man page also hooked up to
discourage accidental use. At least,
* De: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-22 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: libpthread question ]
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
This is expected behavior -- libpthread is currently disconnected from the
build. I'd actually like to see it connected to the build, with
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:30:34PM -, local.freebsd.current wrote:
All goes well until I get Extracting base into / directory then
Write failure on transfer. Wrote -1 bytes of 240640 and at the
bottom of the screen /mnt: write failed, filesystem is full.
I had exactly the same problems
* De: Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-22 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: VM locking problem... And doscmd(8) ]
John Baldwin wrote:
On 22-Nov-2002 Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-21 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: VM locking problem... And
On 22-Nov-2002 Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
[Bcc to -net because it is relevant there. This email has been triggered
by a private discussion i was having with other committers (who will
easily recognise themselves :) which suggested the possibility of
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
On 22-Nov-2002 local.freebsd.current wrote:
Having installed DP2 and said NO to NFS client and
server in sysinstall (and there's nothing about them
in /etc/rc.conf) I see four nfsiod daemons running
after the first boot. Are they supposed to be
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
This is expected behavior -- libpthread is currently disconnected from the
build. I'd actually like to see it connected to the build, with an
appropriate WARNING: DRAGONS INCLUDED man page also
On Friday 22 November 2002 10:57 am, you wrote:
On 21-Nov-2002 Scott Sipe wrote:
On Thursday 21 November 2002 04:26 pm, John Baldwin wrote:
Erm, well, PSE and PGE are already disabled in GENERIC on DP2. Hmm.
Can you try doing gdb -k kernel.debug in multiuser under DEBUG and
see if gdb
I tried to kldload acpi on a system that has been running for about 3
days, and the kldload process has been sitting there swapping for
about an hour now. Breaking into DDB shows that
acpi_alloc_wakeup_handler() is trying to contigmalloc(), and this is
swapping around presumably trying to find
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 11:56:29AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I tried to kldload acpi on a system that has been running for about 3
days, and the kldload process has been sitting there swapping for
about an hour now. Breaking into DDB shows that
acpi_alloc_wakeup_handler() is trying to
* De: David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-22 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Lots of swapping from 'kldload acpi' ]
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 11:56:29AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I tried to kldload acpi on a system that has been running for about 3
days, and the kldload process
* De: David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-22 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Lots of swapping from 'kldload acpi' ]
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 11:56:29AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I tried to kldload acpi on a system that has been running for about 3
days, and the kldload process has
Fri Nov 22 13:00:03 PST 2002
...
U lib/libpthread/arch/i386/i386/thr_enter_uts.S
U lib/libpthread/arch/i386/i386/thr_switch.S
U release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh
U share/man/man5/make.conf.5
? sys/alpha/conf/LINT
U sys/boot/forth/loader.conf
U sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib_acpi.c
U
On 22-Nov-2002 Scott Sipe wrote:
On Friday 22 November 2002 10:57 am, you wrote:
On 21-Nov-2002 Scott Sipe wrote:
On Thursday 21 November 2002 04:26 pm, John Baldwin wrote:
Erm, well, PSE and PGE are already disabled in GENERIC on DP2. Hmm.
Can you try doing gdb -k kernel.debug in
On 22-Nov-2002 Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:57:42AM -0500, John Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has an effect: writing CR3 or a TSS resulting in a changed CR3
will not invalidate TLB entries with the G flag set, if PGE is set
in CR4.
I know what PG_G does,
On 22-Nov-2002 Moore, Robert wrote:
Yes. The spec appears to be ambiguous on this point.
I will change the GPE initialization so that if either the address or the
length are zero, the block is not supported.
This will appear in the next release of the code.
Thanks.
Bob
On 22-Nov-2002 Kris Kennaway wrote:
I tried to kldload acpi on a system that has been running for about 3
days, and the kldload process has been sitting there swapping for
about an hour now. Breaking into DDB shows that
acpi_alloc_wakeup_handler() is trying to contigmalloc(), and this is
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:08:05PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
Can something be done to guard against this?
It's supposed to do that already:
If that isn't working then there is a bug.
There's a bug :-)
Kris
msg47249/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:02:36PM -0800, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Fri Nov 22 13:00:03 PST 2002
...
U lib/libpthread/arch/i386/i386/thr_enter_uts.S
U lib/libpthread/arch/i386/i386/thr_switch.S
U release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh
U share/man/man5/make.conf.5
? sys/alpha/conf/LINT
U
Thus spake David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:46:41PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
Don't worry about it; it's being totally blown out of proportion;
No problem.. :)
there's no way anyone will commit to importing a 2 day old 3.2.1,
which is why I put the smiley's
Hi,
it was reported on this list that the DP2 sysinstall can't delete NTFS
partitions.
Seems like this can be extended to OpenBSD FFS. Just tried to
delete a partition on my notebook and it failed miserably.
- Christian
--
http://www.unixpages.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG
I worked around this by changing the partition ID number to a freebsd
partition.
---
Barkley C. Vowk -- Systems Analyst -- University of Alberta
Math Sciences Department - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: CAB642A, 780-492-4064
Opinions expressed
Thus spake Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The reasons to deprecate procfs are many-fold -- not least that there are
existing interfaces in the kernel that provide most or all of its features
at a substantially lower risk. You just have to see the kernel-related
security advisories for
Robert Watson wrote:
It sounds like there are a couple of problems here
-- that we need a debugging guide (How to prepare a useful bug
report for a kernel panic, How to prepare a useful bug report
for a sysinstall failure, etc)
A bug-filing wizard would be useful. The send-pr system
Robert Watson wrote:
(2) truss currently relies on procfs, albeit not working very well. There
were a set of patches floating around to make truss use ptrace(),
which is the direction we probably do want to take this. If someone
could finish up that work, it would be great.
Donn Miller wrote:
ACPI works pretty well on my HP Pavilion Notebook. But is it possible
to get the apm saver (apm_saver.ko) to work with ACPI? From what I
understand, acpi is a superset of apm, and is able to provide some
emulation of apm functionality. So, by this principle, shouldn't
Steve Kargl wrote:
Supposedly, bringing in 3.2 was going to solve more problems
than it caused. It turns out the 4.x compiler, GCC 2.95.3,
also does not have an ICE as a result of compiling that code.
You know the reason why 3.2 pre-release was brought into
the tree, right? GCC has
John Baldwin wrote:
Is it any help to know that my problems on P4 stopped after enabling
DISABLE_PSE? Initially I had both of these enabled, but seems that
one is enough. Just FYI.
If we can verify that DISABLE_PG_G has no effect then that would be
nice.
It has an effect:
Vallo Kallaste wrote:
I have now definitive answer for _my_ case and environment. Just
finished full package build for my workstation bundle port (92
ports), including XFree-4, KDE3, mozilla-devel and whatnot. It all
went very well running kernel which had:
DISABLE_PSE enabled
Terry Lambert wrote:
Donn Miller wrote:
ACPI works pretty well on my HP Pavilion Notebook. But is it possible
to get the apm saver (apm_saver.ko) to work with ACPI? From what I
understand, acpi is a superset of apm, and is able to provide some
emulation of apm functionality. So, by
Scott Sipe wrote:
It was a trap 12, and definitely that address...I think something more
overarching must be going on though. I'm able to login with /bin/sh (not
csh/tcsh) and so I've been trying various things--I can't compile a kernel
because I get bus errors, same with many ports I've been
David Schultz wrote:
It really comes down to a question of living with known bugs, or risking
gaining a new set of unknown bugs.
In theory, the set of bugs in an actual release should be smaller
than the set of bugs in a prerelease.
In theory, practice will be the same as theory. 8-)
Hi,
I updated my CURRENT system today, previously I was running on a one week old
build.
After I updated I can no longer run xmms, it returns with the following
messages:
Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library
Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by Xlib, locale set to C
Gdk-WARNING
Hi,
just installed DP2 on my IBM Thinkpad R32 and updated to the latest
-CURRENT.
My wlan device (Prism 2.5, internal, no pccard) fails at bootup:
wi0: Intersil Prism2.5 mem 0xf800-0xf8000fff irq 11 at device 7.0 on pci2
wi0: No Mem space on prism2.5?
device_probe_and_attach: wi0 attach
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:51:08PM -0700, Barkley Vowk wrote:
I worked around this by changing the partition ID number to a freebsd
partition.
---
Barkley C. Vowk -- Systems Analyst -- University of Alberta
Math Sciences Department -
I now have DP2 running on my Vaio Z600 laptop, and I'm trying to get my
wireless ethernet running.
The cardbus is detected:
kernel: cbb0: RF5C475 PCI-CardBus Bridge at device 12.0 on pci0
kernel: cardbus0: CardBus bus on cbb0
kernel: pccard0: 16-bit PCCard bus on cbb0
But when it tries to
Hi,
just got this panic on my notebook. Had to manually shut it down
after a acpiconf -s 4. At the next bootup, the panic occured.
At the moment I'm trying to boot into my system again to reproduce
it.
Slab at 0xc26fffc8, freei 19 = 0.
panic: Dublicate free of item 0xc26ff980 from zone
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:08:05PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
Can something be done to guard against this?
It's supposed to do that already:
If that isn't working then there is a bug.
There's a bug :-)
Ah, Yes.
The function is called via SYSINIT. We need more `if (!cold)'
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 10:58:46AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:08:05PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
Can something be done to guard against this?
It's supposed to do that already:
If that isn't working then there is a bug.
There's a bug :-)
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: PCCARD: 3COM and Xircom(*). Xircom card is a 16550A
: UART based card and may not work very well because of
: sio driver issues. The same is true for any 16550A
: UART based card. However if you can convince
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc Recht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: A malloc(0) returns always 0x800 on my system. This causes some third-party
: software to fail, because they expect malloc(0) to return NULL. Is this a
: bug or a feature? malloc(3) doesn't mention anything.
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Hi,
:
: just installed DP2 on my IBM Thinkpad R32 and updated to the latest
: -CURRENT.
: My wlan device (Prism 2.5, internal, no pccard) fails at bootup:
:
: wi0: Intersil Prism2.5 mem 0xf800-0xf8000fff
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Tobin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I now have DP2 running on my Vaio Z600 laptop, and I'm trying to get my
: wireless ethernet running.
:
: The cardbus is detected:
:
: kernel: cbb0: RF5C475 PCI-CardBus Bridge at device 12.0 on pci0
: kernel:
Warner,
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: PCCARD: 3COM and Xircom(*). Xircom card is a 16550A
: UART based card and may not work very well because of
: sio driver issues. The same is true for any 16550A
: UART based card. However if you
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I see a lot of silo overflow errors under moderate load.
: As a result bytes get dropped on the floor. The Bluetooth
: spec defines extremely simple serial protocol (H4). It simply
: cannot tolerate UARTs that
Alright, this is pretty frustrating. I've installed DP2 4 or 5 times now
(each time reformatting).
The first time the installation program acted really weird and didn't do the
install correctly. The second time I had weird random core dump problems so
that I couldn't even log in. The third
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I see a lot of silo overflow errors under moderate load.
: As a result bytes get dropped on the floor. The Bluetooth
: spec defines extremely simple serial protocol (H4). It simply
: cannot tolerate UARTs
At 2:31 PM -0800 2002/11/22, Terry Lambert wrote:
A bug-filing wizard would be useful. The send-pr system
doesn't cut it, and most people are unaware of how to file a
decent bug report. It doesn't help when the process involves
another computer, a serial cable, recompiling a kernel to use
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
