Re: NIS client performance seems very poor under network load

2001-10-04 Thread Thyer, Matthew
Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Thyer, Matthew writes: > > So the answer is a name service caching daemon ala nscd on Solaris. > > > > Or linux. Apparently, there is an nscd in glibc. Perhaps somebody > with motivation could determine if its any good. If so, they could > chop it out of glibc, ma

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Thu, 04 Oct 2001 12:33:56 CST, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > What are *you* doing to address the problem? Are you stepping up as a > > maintainer? > > Yes. If you read the list archives you will see I've done so > twice in the past already. This looks good. I can think of several people who

kerberos in -current snapshots

2001-10-04 Thread Vincent Poy
Greetings: I was wondering which options in make.conf do I need to enable to get the same kerberos that is in the binary snapshots of -RELEASE and -CURRENT? Is it IV I need or is it 5 or both? Thanks. Cheers, Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President __ Un

Re: log(9) bug? or feature?

2001-10-04 Thread Kazutaka YOKOTA
Sorry, >2) log() in rev 1.67 or later > > log() ---> the log buffer ONLY This should be 2) log() in rev 1.67 or later log() ---> the log buffer ONLY, if a process is reading it log() ---> /dev/console ONLY, if no process is reading the log buffer Kazu To Unsubscribe: sen

Re: log(9) bug? or feature?

2001-10-04 Thread Kazutaka YOKOTA
>>In rev 1.67 and later, the message goes to the log buffer only if a >>process is reading the log buffer. If no process is reading, the >>message goes to the console ONLY, and it is not put into the log >>buffer. This behavior is inconsistent with the above comment. Is this >>a bug introduced i

Panic at vlan_input()

2001-10-04 Thread Jun Kuriyama
I got another panic on my yesterday's -current. At this time, I made a kernel with "device vlan". db> t vlan_input(c0e73800,..) at vlan_input+0x42 ether_demux(c156b000,...) at ether_demux+0x12a ether_input(c156b000,...) at ether_input+0x5a wi_rxeof(c156000,...) at wi_rxeof+0x1b7 wi_intr(c156b00

Re: named pid file in /var/run/named/pid?

2001-10-04 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:03:02AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 01:19:15PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote: [snip] > > That wouldn't work. The whole point of /var/run/named is to set the > > permissions on the directory such that a non-root user (the 'bind' > > user in FreeBS

Re: log(9) bug? or feature?

2001-10-04 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > Actually, I *desperately* want a way to turn this off. I agree (somewhat less emphatically) and even filed a PR about a related issue. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: named pid file in /var/run/named/pid?

2001-10-04 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 01:19:15PM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 06:17:13PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > > At Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:21:19 + (UTC), > > > Bernd Walter wrote: > > > > I run an md based filesystem for /var/run so i

Re: named pid file in /var/run/named/pid?

2001-10-04 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 06:17:13PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > > At Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:21:19 + (UTC), > > Bernd Walter wrote: > > > I run an md based filesystem for /var/run so it is empty after startup. > > > Does that mean that I also need t

Re: log(9) bug? or feature?

2001-10-04 Thread Peter Wemm
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kazutaka Y OK > OTA writes: > > >In rev 1.67 and later, the message goes to the log buffer only if a > >process is reading the log buffer. If no process is reading, the > >message goes to the console ONLY, and it is not put into the l

Re: log(9) bug? or feature?

2001-10-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kazutaka YOK OTA writes: >In rev 1.67 and later, the message goes to the log buffer only if a >process is reading the log buffer. If no process is reading, the >message goes to the console ONLY, and it is not put into the log >buffer. This behavior is inconsistent

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 12:14:49PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > I'm talking about the one in FreeBSD. > > uux job is to setup the commands for the next site and break the > > next sitename if it equals 8 letters. > > That's strange. For over two years I've talked hourly to a pair > of UUCP

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Blaz Zupan
> > What are *you* doing to address the problem? Are you stepping up as a > > maintainer? > > Yes. If you read the list archives you will see I've done so > twice in the past already. > > > Are you willing to fix the problems with UUCP in FreeBSD as it is > > Yes. > > > How much time are you willi

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
> What are *you* doing to address the problem? Are you stepping up as a > maintainer? Yes. If you read the list archives you will see I've done so twice in the past already. > Are you willing to fix the problems with UUCP in FreeBSD as it is Yes. > How much time are you willing to contribute?

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Nate Williams
> > I don't get your point - what is wrong with having it a port? > > Well, here's one reason: > > 1) Remove all the network interfaces from your system (Ethernet, > PPP, SL/IP, etc). > > 2) cd into /usr/ports and try to build UUCP. > > Unless you have a prepopulated /usr/ports/distfiles, it

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Blaz Zupan
> Again I ask: if maintenance is an issue, why would you not even > attempt to find a maintainer? How do you "find a maintainer"? Do you run a contest on your favourite TV channel or what? Maintainers appear by themselves or they don't. Considering how long UUCP has been unmaintained, they don't

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
> > Just like with anonymous FTP, don't make it world writable if you don't > > want the world writing to it. > > Right - that's what actually was done. > Don't install it unless you need. Oh give me a break. You do not disable anonymous FTP uploads by 'rm /usr/libexec/ftpd'. > I'm talking abou

Re: current install failure

2001-10-04 Thread $B>.Ln42@8(B
Hello. I have submitted a PR (bin/31009) with a followup including the patch. Hoping you have time to fix this soon... jkh = Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: jkh> mostly empty. Now that devfs is the default, phk needs to update jkh> libdisk so that it doesn't attempt to make the devic

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 10:56:15AM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > There are many other points - some examples I know of: > > The /var/spool/uucppublic which is writeable by everyone. > > Usually you don't want this. > > Just like with anonymous FTP, don't make it world writable if you don't >

RE: ntfs panic (lockmgr: not exclusive lock holder 470 unlocking

2001-10-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Oct-01 Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > I tried to use mount_ntfs, but it panic'ed. NTFS and NWFS are currently broken in -current due to the KSE stuff. Please don't use them for now. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpke

Re: named pid file in /var/run/named/pid?

2001-10-04 Thread Jos Backus
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 04:09:56PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > That's annoying if it becomes popular for services to use their own > subdirectory. It would be much better to get rid of pidfiles altogether. They have all sorts of nasty problems. -- Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/S

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
> There are many other points - some examples I know of: > The /var/spool/uucppublic which is writeable by everyone. > Usually you don't want this. Just like with anonymous FTP, don't make it world writable if you don't want the world writing to it. > Ever received a mail with an envelope like "

Re: reinstatement of MSDOSFS on boot floppy fails

2001-10-04 Thread Matthew Jacob
And the QLogic isp firmware (which has gotten quite large, what with separate firmware for 3 different SCSI and 3 different Fibre Channel cards) On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake Jordan Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Sure, I just don't have time to work on this right

Re: ntfs panic (lockmgr: not exclusive lock holder 470 unlocking)

2001-10-04 Thread David Taylor
On Thu, 04 Oct 2001, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > I tried to use mount_ntfs, but it panic'ed. > > > % sudo mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt > % cd /mnt > % ls -la > panic: lockmgr: pid 551, not exclusive lock holder 470 unlocking > Debugger("panic") > Stopped at Debugger+0x44: pushl%ebx > db> t > Deb

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Mike Bristow
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:36:26PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > All these "solutions" assume that everyone is wired up with IP > connectivity. The original questions was "who uses UUCP?" Me. > UUCP has many valid uses. Even today. If you don't understand the > software, that's fine with me.

Re: named pid file in /var/run/named/pid?

2001-10-04 Thread Leif Neland
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > At Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:21:19 + (UTC), > Bernd Walter wrote: > > I run an md based filesystem for /var/run so it is empty after startup. > > Does that mean that I also need to take care of creating directories in > > it during boot - and maintaining m

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-04 Thread Blaz Zupan
> UUCP has many valid uses. Even today. If you don't understand the > software, that's fine with me. Just don't use your ignorance as > an excuse to dike the software out. Or more precisely, admit > you want to rip the code out because you don't understand what > it is, rather than making up speci

Re: named pid file in /var/run/named/pid?

2001-10-04 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 10:16:25PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > At Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:21:19 + (UTC), > Bernd Walter wrote: > > I run an md based filesystem for /var/run so it is empty after startup. > > Does that mean that I also need to take care of creating directories in > > it during boot

Re: reinstatement of MSDOSFS on boot floppy fails

2001-10-04 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Jordan Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Sure, I just don't have time to work on this right now. Didn't someone recently submit a patch to sysinstall for kernel modules shipped on a third floppy? Most exotic hardware in GENERIC could then be migrated to klds. Alex To Unsubscribe: send

ntfs panic (lockmgr: not exclusive lock holder 470 unlocking)

2001-10-04 Thread Jun Kuriyama
I tried to use mount_ntfs, but it panic'ed. % sudo mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt % cd /mnt % ls -la panic: lockmgr: pid 551, not exclusive lock holder 470 unlocking Debugger("panic") Stopped at Debugger+0x44: pushl%ebx db> t Debugger() at Debugger+0x44 panic(c02ef100,227,c02ef0e0,1d6,cab5f

Re: named pid file in /var/run/named/pid?

2001-10-04 Thread Jun Kuriyama
At Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:21:19 + (UTC), Bernd Walter wrote: > I run an md based filesystem for /var/run so it is empty after startup. > Does that mean that I also need to take care of creating directories in > it during boot - and maintaining myself on every box. > Or it it the responsibility of

Re: NIS client performance seems very poor under network load

2001-10-04 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Thyer, Matthew writes: > So the answer is a name service caching daemon ala nscd on Solaris. > Or linux. Apparently, there is an nscd in glibc. Perhaps somebody with motivation could determine if its any good. If so, they could chop it out of glibc, make it into a port & add hooks to our l

Re: Staroffice6.0 Linux beta with FreeBSD

2001-10-04 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi Marcel, > What if you try it with linux_base-7? I've now more results. - The port "works" with old and new linux_base port, I it get started the right way. - Starting an install without -net does segfault suddenly. - Starting a user-install does segfault after registering the scripts. -

named pid file in /var/run/named/pid?

2001-10-04 Thread Bernd Walter
I run an md based filesystem for /var/run so it is empty after startup. Does that mean that I also need to take care of creating directories in it during boot - and maintaining myself on every box. Or it it the responsibility of the programms to enshure that the directories they need are created?