Re: Unable to installworld after successful buildworld and buildkernel

Thomas Mueller wrote this message on Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:00 +: > > > But where is DB_FROM_SRC documented? I never saw it anywhere. UPDATING > > > file needs to be updated for installing FreeBSD on a partition where > > > there is no OS installed. > > > It's documented in Makefile.inc1

Re: Unable to installworld after successful buildworld and buildkernel

> > But where is DB_FROM_SRC documented? I never saw it anywhere. UPDATING > > file needs to be updated for installing FreeBSD on a partition where there > > is no OS installed. > It's documented in Makefile.inc1 where the less commonly used options > are documented. It should be documented i

Re: Changes to UART ns8250

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote: > Zbigniew, > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Zbigniew Bodek wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I would like to present a patch for ns8250 serial that I would like to >> commit in the near future (if there are no objections). >> >> The patch is

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > >> On 2013-10-08 16:17, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> > On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote: >> >> Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to >> >> implement ins

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2013-10-08 16:17, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote: > >> Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to > >> implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k > >> sec

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 now available

On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 02:46:32AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > I had supposed an Alpha /usr/src would compile even if it broke at run > > > time. > > > Not so, 10.0-ALPHA4 src/ is broken (with & without obj & depend). > > >cd /usr/src ; make -i install > > > > I thought buildworld+in

Re: Virtual box require LIBCXX

Em Tue, 08 Oct 2013 17:34:33 -0700, Eric L. Camachat escreveu > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 10/08/2013 15:01, Jimmy Kelley wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 05:01:35PM -0300, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >> Em Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:43:19 -0700, Eric L. Camachat escreveu >

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 now available

Hi, Reference: > From: Benjamin Kaduk > Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 20:07:59 -0400 (EDT) Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > [-re] > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > >> The fourth ALPHA build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available > >> on the FTP servers for the amd

Re: Virtual box require LIBCXX

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/08/2013 15:01, Jimmy Kelley wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 05:01:35PM -0300, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: >> Em Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:43:19 -0700, Eric L. Camachat escreveu >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On 10/08/20

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 now available

[-re] On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Julian H. Stacey wrote: The fourth ALPHA build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and sparc64 architectures. Note: Due to build issues within the head/ branch, ALPHA3 ISO builds were ski

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:56:46PM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote: > On 10/8/13 4:33 PM, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message <52542687.7000...@pix.net>, Kurt Lidl writes: > >> On 10/8/13, Julian Elischer wrote: > >>> On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eit

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 2013-10-08 16:17, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote: >> Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to >> implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k >> sector gnop trick, and optional GELI encryption. We would like to

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2013-10-08 18:40:20 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-08 18:40:20 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 10/08/13 23:21, Kurt Lidl wrote: >> >> On 10/8/2013, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote: Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supp

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2013-10-08 18:40:20 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-10-08 18:40:20 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013

Re: rcs

On 2013-10-08, at 11:17 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: > ​I haven't kept up-to-date with all the developments, but isn't this part of > the bsdinstall/pkgng plan? Once the pkgng repos are all available and > populated, then bsdinstall will be able to install packages from there during > the install

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2013, at 10:48 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > > > On 2013-10-08 01:11, Teske, Devin wrote: > >> On Oct 7, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > >> > >>> On 2013-10-07 15:59, Allan Jude wrote: > Devin Teske and I have been working on

Re: Virtual box require LIBCXX

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 05:01:35PM -0300, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > Em Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:43:19 -0700, Eric L. Camachat escreveu > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 10/08/2013 07:17, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > > root@valfenda:/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose #

Re: test

What were you testing? On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Joe Nosay wrote: > /div> class="utdU2e"> id=":2il" tabindex="-1">test > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Alexander Panyushkin wrote: > >> test >> __**_ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing li

Re: Unable to installworld after successful buildworld and buildkernel

> To cross install FreeBSD on a system without the required users/groups > you must either install them on the base system so that install and > mtree can use them or use the -DDB_FROM_SRC option when running the > installworld/installkernel/distribution targets. -- Brooks That worked for install

Re: Unable to installworld after successful buildworld and buildkernel

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:38:14PM +, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > To cross install FreeBSD on a system without the required users/groups > > you must either install them on the base system so that install and > > mtree can use them or use the -DDB_FROM_SRC option when running the > > installworld

Re: rcs

Hello, Daniel. You wrote 8 октября 2013 г., 19:40:23: DN> If they get the package repositories back up - which I assume will DN> happen before any official releases from 10 - it should just be "pkg DN> install rcs". As challenges go, that doesn't seem too bad? Topic starter mentioned, that assum

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 10/08/13 23:21, Kurt Lidl wrote: > > On 10/8/2013, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote: >>> Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to >>> implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, >>> the 4k >>> sector gnop trick, and o

Re: Running i386 CURRENT on an AMD64 platform:: CLang related

Which has the latest source? On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 08.10.2013 11:55, Boris Samorodov пишет: > > 08.10.2013 11:45, Joe Nosay пишет: > >> I've ran into compiling problems with some ports. World and kernel have > not > >> yet been rebuilt. 10.x is a pre-APLHA rel

Re: test

/div>testwrote: > test > __**_ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsub

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

Devin Teske wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 20:50 +: > > 2. Why are you using camcontrol? That is guaranteed not to work on > > non-CAM systems. You should use the GEOM ident string if you need an ID. > > I imagine we could get the info from many places, and to be honest, I never >

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 10/8/2013, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote: Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k sector gnop trick, and optional GELI encryption. We would like to commit this i

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

5. I think some substantial part of the MBR code will blow up if you are reinitalizing a previously formatted disk (the bsdlabel will be retasted and come back from the dead). Will not some combination of "gpart destroy -F" and (insert suggestion) work? Yes, that will work just fine. Actual

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On 10/8/13 4:33 PM, Cy Schubert wrote: In message <52542687.7000...@pix.net>, Kurt Lidl writes: On 10/8/13, Julian Elischer wrote: On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: Hey all, RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. I

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 10/08/13 22:50, Teske, Devin wrote: > On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > >> On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote: >>> Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to >>> implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k >>> sector gnop

Re: rcs

On Oct 8, 2013 1:37 PM, "Cy Schubert" wrote: > > In message om> > , Jos Backus writes: > > On Oct 7, 2013 7:31 PM, "Lyndon Nerenberg" wrote: > > > > > > Okay folks, can we make a call about keeping the RCS tools in the base? > > > > > > The proponents wanting to remove RCS need to speak up and m

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote: >> Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to >> implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k >> sector gnop trick, and optional GELI encryption. We woul

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Cy Schubert wrote: I've started work on a port (not that this was my highest priority but received a private email that I may want to do this instead of rcs57). Would the majority here rather have it in base? Just finished schlepping the OpenBSD source to my laptop (the link

Re: rcs

I've iterated my views on these things a few times. I honestly am not all _that_ interested in trying to build a polished OS. I'd rather participate in building an OS toolkit that let's PCBSD, pfsense, "that storage appliance I keep forgetting the name of (heh)", etc all build OSes on top of it.

Re: rcs

Am 08.10.2013 um 22:29 schrieb Cy Schubert : > > A Red Hat-like kickstart or Solaris jumpstart possibly? > http://blog.hostileadmin.com/2013/04/11/installing-freebsd-via-cobbler/ I wish it was using bsdinstall, though. ___ freebsd-current@fre

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 10/08/13 22:25, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Nathan Whitehorn > mailto:nwhiteh...@freebsd.org>>wrote: > > 4. What is this gnop stuff for? > > > Can't comment on the rest, but gnop is required to create 4K-aligned > vdevs where the minimum block size is 4K (aka ashift

Re: rcs

On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote: I think that's great. But, as we are increasingly finding, theres no stable ports snapshot, so unless we as a project change how packages are managed, there may not really be a stable, predictable version of things once they're moved from base to a packag

Re: rcs

On 10/8/13 11:17 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Alfred Perlstein >wrote: On 10/7/13 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: On 10/8/13 11:19 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: On 2013-10-07, at 8:15 PM, Steve Kargl mailto:s...

Re: rcs

In message , Jos Backus writes: > On Oct 7, 2013 7:31 PM, "Lyndon Nerenberg" wrote: > > > > Okay folks, can we make a call about keeping the RCS tools in the base? > > > > The proponents wanting to remove RCS need to speak up and make their > technical case. > > Perhaps slightly off-topic, but h

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

In message <52542687.7000...@pix.net>, Kurt Lidl writes: > On 10/8/13, Julian Elischer wrote: > > On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > >>> Hey all, > >>> > >>> RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want

Re: rcs

In message <525422b6.9040...@mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes: > On 10/8/13 8:04 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > >>> I think the fact is that most direct users of RCS use it in a very > >>> simple way, and > >>> it works just fine for that. with no real need for any updates or any > >>> change. > >

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > 4. What is this gnop stuff for? > Can't comment on the rest, but gnop is required to create 4K-aligned vdevs where the minimum block size is 4K (aka ashift=12). Without this, ZFS relies on the underlying disk driver providing the correct

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

In message <52538d19.8000...@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer writes: > On 10/8/13 12:34 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer > > wrote: > > > > On 10/8/13 9:33 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oc

Re: urtwn driver for Edimax EW-7811U WLAN nano USB Adapter

On 10/8/13 10:41 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hi Alfred & cc current. Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 10/6/13 8:21 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: I wrote Thu, 03 Oct 2013 23:28:43 +0200 Rui Paulo wrote: On 2 Oct 2013, at 16:57, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hi current@, It seems I need if_urtwn driver f

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

In message <52538562.6030...@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer writes: > On 10/8/13 10:03 AM, Steve Rikli wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 06:32:21PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >> On 10/7/13 6:30 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > >>> ... > >>> PS: As noted, the code is GPL. There has been an effort > >

Re: rcs

oops, sent from my non-subscribed email.. On 10/8/13 11:17 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Alfred Perlstein >wrote: On 10/7/13 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: On 10/8/13 11:19 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: On 2013-10-07, at 8

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On 10/07/13 21:59, Allan Jude wrote: > Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to > implement installing on a ZFS pool. It supports both GPT and MBR, the 4k > sector gnop trick, and optional GELI encryption. We would like to commit > this in time for 10.0-BETA1 so it needs

Re: Virtual box require LIBCXX

Em Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:43:19 -0700, Eric L. Camachat escreveu > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 10/08/2013 07:17, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > root@valfenda:/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose # kldload vboxdrv > > root@valfenda:/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose # > >

Re: rcs

I think that's great. But, as we are increasingly finding, theres no stable ports snapshot, so unless we as a project change how packages are managed, there may not really be a stable, predictable version of things once they're moved from base to a package. A number of users and companies like that

Re: urtwn driver for Edimax EW-7811U WLAN nano USB Adapter

Hi, Note the noise floor differences.. wonder why that is. Rui ported the uwrtn stuff, right? He may be able to help. The driver is recent and its likely there are bugs to shake out. -adrian On Oct 8, 2013 2:49 PM, "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > > I too am seeing > > urtwn0: timeout waiting

Re: urtwn driver for Edimax EW-7811U WLAN nano USB Adapter

> I too am seeing > urtwn0: timeout waiting for checksum report & urtwn0: at uhub3, port 3, addr 4 (disconnected) (BTW there's no external hub, uhub3 must be inside laptop, & there's no loose connection, laptop was not touched, all work was remote) PS a typical sample comparison of

Re: rcs

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > You're right on the money, to be honest this is one of the reasons why > I've switched to using OSX as my desktop OS. > > zsh, vim, screen by default. and upgrades work. At the end of the day > I'm spending time doing work, not mucking a

Re: rcs

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On 10/7/13 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> On 10/8/13 11:19 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: >> >>> On 2013-10-07, at 8:15 PM, Steve Kargl >> edu > wrote: >>> >>> Maybe there was no development for 15 years. However, the 7364 lines

Re: urtwn driver for Edimax EW-7811U WLAN nano USB Adapter

Hi Alfred & cc current. Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On 10/6/13 8:21 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > I wrote Thu, 03 Oct 2013 23:28:43 +0200 > >> Rui Paulo wrote: > >>> On 2 Oct 2013, at 16:57, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >>> > Hi current@, > It seems I need if_urtwn driver for a really mini

Re: unionfs related panic on 10.0-ALPHA4

For information: It's possible to reproduce this problem using the indication given in kern/121385 (5 years old PR). Regards, Olivier ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe,

problem to build world

Hi all. r256148 buildworld gives this error: ===> secure/usr.bin/ssh (all) cc -O2 -pipe -march=athlon64-sse3 -mtune=athlon64-sse3 -I/usr/src/secure/usr.bin/ssh/../../../crypto/openssh -include ssh_namespace.h -DHAVE_LDNS=1 -include krb5_config.h -std=gnu99 -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protecto

Customising FreeBSD - Was Re: rcs

[ My sympathies lean toward those who want to retain RCS, but as I dont personaly use it, that's all on that. ] ... > "screen, zsh, vim-lite, git" why is that so manual for me? Why can't I > just register a package set somewhere so that all I have to type in is > "alfred.perlstein.devel" into

Re: rcs

On 10/8/13 8:59 AM, Jonathan Anderson wrote: On 8 October 2013 16:04, wrote: > - For some of us, the attraction of FreeBSD is that it is a tightly > integrated system, and the base contains enough useful functionality > that we don't *have* to add a lot of packages. > > - Each package that is mo

Re: rcs

On 8 October 2013 16:04, wrote: > - For some of us, the attraction of FreeBSD is that it is a tightly > integrated system, and the base contains enough useful functionality > that we don't *have* to add a lot of packages. > > - Each package that is moved out of the base system means less useful >

The Base System (was: rcs)

On 8 October 2013 16:04, wrote: > - For some of us, the attraction of FreeBSD is that it is a tightly > integrated system, and the base contains enough useful functionality > that we don't *have* to add a lot of packages. > > - Each package that is moved out of the base system means less useful >

Re: rcs

On Oct 7, 2013 7:31 PM, "Lyndon Nerenberg" wrote: > > Okay folks, can we make a call about keeping the RCS tools in the base? > > The proponents wanting to remove RCS need to speak up and make their technical case. Perhaps slightly off-topic, but how about we move into the 21st century and import

Re: FreeBSD Alpha5 amd64 - Citrix Xen 6.2 problem

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 9:45, Josias L.G wrote: > Problem with Citrix Xen 6.2 and install from ISO. The "solution" was > remove cd-rom drive from virtual machine. Not possible now with xen > default in GENERIC kernel. > Message error:  > run_interrupt_driven_hooks - still waiting after 300 seconds

Re: rcs

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On 10/7/13 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> On 10/8/13 11:19 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: >>> >>> On 2013-10-07, at 8:15 PM, Steve Kargl >>> wrote: >>> Maybe there was no development for 15 years. However, the 7364 lines in

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On 10/08/13 16:36, Kurt Lidl wrote: > On 10/8/13, Julian Elischer wrote: >> On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: Hey all, RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to use RCS please in

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

On 10/8/13, Julian Elischer wrote: On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: Hey all, RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to use RCS please install either devel/rcs or devel/rcs57. If not, be sure to ch

Re: rcs

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 10:33, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Oh I have done that in the past, but why the editing, the makefiles, the > etc, etc, etc. Why isn't there a customize.freebsd.org where I just hit > a few checkboxes, save and then hit download? > A metaport builder web service would

Re: rcs

On 10/8/13 8:26 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote: On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Alfred Perlstein > wrote: On 10/8/13 8:04 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: I think the fact is that most direct users of RCS use it

Re: rcs

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On 10/8/13 8:04 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > >> I think the fact is that most direct users of RCS use it in a very simple way, and it works just fine for that. with no real need for any updates or any change. >>> Wit

Re: rcs

On 10/8/13 8:04 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: I think the fact is that most direct users of RCS use it in a very simple way, and it works just fine for that. with no real need for any updates or any change. With all due respect Julian, The more we discuss this more this really points to the prob

FreeBSD Alpha5 amd64 - Citrix Xen 6.2 problem

Problem with Citrix Xen 6.2 and install from ISO. The "solution" was remove cd-rom drive from virtual machine. Not possible now with xen default in GENERIC kernel. Message error:  run_interrupt_driven_hooks - still waiting after 300 seconds for xenbusb_nop_confighook_cb panic: run_interrupt_driv

Re: rcs

> > I think the fact is that most direct users of RCS use it in a very > > simple way, and > > it works just fine for that. with no real need for any updates or any > > change. > > With all due respect Julian, The more we discuss this more this really > points to the problem that FreeBSD appea

Re: Unable to installworld after successful buildworld and buildkernel

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 06:29:53AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote: > From $SRCDIR/UPDATING > > To cross-install current onto a separate partition > -- > # In this approach we use a separate partition to hold > # current's root,

Virtual box require LIBCXX

I finish install a virtual box from ports and it's build ok, look ===> Installing ldconfig configuration file ===> Registering installation for virtualbox-ose-4.2.18_1 Installing virtualbox-ose-4.2.18_1... done ===> SECURITY REPORT: This port has installed the following binaries which e

Re: rcs

On 10/7/13 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: On 10/8/13 11:19 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: On 2013-10-07, at 8:15 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: Maybe there was no development for 15 years. However, the 7364 lines in ChangeLog after 2010-02-04 suggests that there may be few bugs to worry about. I th

test

test ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: brigding between two interfaces

Yasir hussan gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, > > i am little bit weak in networking concept, i have two network interfaces > usb0 and eth0, eth0 is connected to a static ip, which works perfectly > fine, now i want that usb0 should be able to access static ip which is > connected to eth0, http://ww

Re: [CFT] Patch to bsdinstall to support root-on-ZFS and GELI

On Oct 7, 2013, at 10:48 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2013-10-08 01:11, Teske, Devin wrote: >> On Oct 7, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Allan Jude wrote: >> >>> On 2013-10-07 15:59, Allan Jude wrote: Devin Teske and I have been working on a big patch to bsdinstall to implement installing on a ZFS po

Re: Running i386 CURRENT on an AMD64 platform:: CLang related

08.10.2013 11:55, Boris Samorodov пишет: > 08.10.2013 11:45, Joe Nosay пишет: >> I've ran into compiling problems with some ports. World and kernel have not >> yet been rebuilt. 10.x is a pre-APLHA release. > > Please, show diagnostic messages (of failing ports). OK, I've seen you have posted the

Re: [patch] Re: drm2/radeon dfixed_trunc() warnings

On 07.10.2013 21:04, Sean Bruno wrote: > Proposed patch to eliminate this check. If I understand the macro > correctly, there's no way for these checks to ever do anything as bit > shifting an unsigned will simply clear out the value. So, the check for > <0 is completely bogus? Hello! I think y

Re: Running i386 CURRENT on an AMD64 platform:: CLang related

08.10.2013 11:45, Joe Nosay пишет: > I've ran into compiling problems with some ports. World and kernel have not > yet been rebuilt. 10.x is a pre-APLHA release. Please, show diagnostic messages (of failing ports). > Before I attempt to rebuild any of the system, has anyone else had any > problem

Running i386 CURRENT on an AMD64 platform:: CLang related

I've ran into compiling problems with some ports. World and kernel have not yet been rebuilt. 10.x is a pre-APLHA release. Before I attempt to rebuild any of the system, has anyone else had any problems related to building i386 on AMD64? ___ freebsd-curr

brigding between two interfaces

Hi, i am little bit weak in networking concept, i have two network interfaces usb0 and eth0, eth0 is connected to a static ip, which works perfectly fine, now i want that usb0 should be able to access static ip which is connected to eth0, can anyone guide me proper solutionwith command for this w