Trent Nelson wrote:
> pid 159 (ldconfig), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
As suggested by Donn Miller in a previous thread, the command
`brandelf -t Linux /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig' fixes that up.
Thanks.
Trent.
To Unsubscribe: s
Originally cvsup'd and made world successfully on the 30th and found
the following problems to occur. Cvsup'ing to a new -current and a new
kernel still sees the same things occurring.
Everything's detected at boot time hassle free (printer, sound, network
card) so I have no idea
Ted Sikora wrote:
>
> I have been getting these messages from my kernel for some time now.
> Could the culprit be these 2 isa cards:
> non-pnp SB16 sbc0
> ne2000 ed0
> They are on a SMP BP6
I've posted a message both to current and questions about this now. I'm
experiencing the same th
Ted Sikora wrote:
> Your right the addresses seem to be standard machine resources. Are you
> using SMP? The irq's are remapped on a SMP machine so maybe that's were
> the trouble lies? The PNP tag is what has me stumped. I replaced the isa
> cards with pci this evening out of curiosity...same
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> I just updated an i386 machine after a month to the latest 5.0-CURRENT,
> and I now get some strange boot messages:
>
> isa0: too many memory ranges
> ...
> unknown0: at port 0x20-0x21,0xa0-0xa1 irq 2 on isa0
> unknown1: at port 0-0xf,0x81-0x83,0x87,0x89-0x8b,
le-based forwarding enabled,
default to accept, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default
Profiling kernel, textsize=1509504 [c01211c0..c0291a40]
cputime 65, empty_loop 2, nullfunc_loop_profiled 167, mcount 228, mexitcount 157
Profiling overheads: mcount: 62+163, 148+76; mexitcount: 6
n't UFS mount the stable partition and use the /bin directory
from that, because boot_crunch doesn't come with mount_ufs. (Or at
least there's no user-interface to mount_ufs that I can see).
So. As far as I can see, without fluking Ctrl-C at the right time
to get enough
FreeBSD again?
In light of what you've just said about this being a different
problem to what other people have been reporting, I marked each
slice as being UFS+S Y so they were recreated with newfs. This
has worked! So, it looks like it's just a problem with existing
and install the bin distribution again, it
worked.
Not exactly an elegant solution, unfortunately. It'd be interesting
to hear if anyone else has this problem.
> Thanks,
> Bob
Regards,
Trent.
--
Trent Nelson - Software Engineer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"A
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Previously I had X + moused working just fine, so I had the best
> > of both worlds. With X 4.0.1 if I use moused I get no response from the
> > mouse in X at all.
>
> Make sure you use
>
> Option
I've experienced -current lock up in exactly the same way twice now;
once with 5.0-RC2, and just now, with sources from 30th December.
The system in question is a Sharp PC-AR50 laptop. In both instances
the system was idle and I was editing a file in vim on ttyv0. Both
ystat/convtbl.c
/usr/src/usr.bin/systat/convtbl.c
--- /shared/data/trent/src/src/usr.bin/systat/convtbl.c Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
+++ /usr/src/usr.bin/systat/convtbl.c Sat Jan 4 00:13:11 2003
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2003, Trent Nelson, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
+ * All rights
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 09:50:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This looks pretty useful.
Thanks! I think so, so have most other people I've spoken to.
> As far as I can see you have some genuine fixes in there:
>
> >--- /shared/data/trent/src/src/usr.bin/systat/cmds.c Wed Dec 12 00:1
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 11:16:57AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Sounds like an atkbd or syscons problem.
> Did you suspend the laptop and resume before this happens?
No. However, it happened to me today shorty after I issued a sysctl
-w hw.acpi.cpu.economy_speed=8. (Why does it default
eip = 0, esp = 0xd1d51d7c, ebp = 0 ---
Regards,
Trent.
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 09:12:34AM -0600, Trent Nelson wrote:
>
> I've experienced -current lock up in exactly the same way twice now;
> once with 5.0-RC2, and just now, with sources from 30th December.
I'm not sure if this is a result of the recent sched_ule import, but
buildkernel is dying on a bunch of undefined symbols (that from what
I can see, are definitely present in both sched_(4bsd|ule)). I fol-
llowed a discussion on -arch about being able to nominate the prefe-
rre
ither
isn't present -- as I haven't installworld'd yet -- but it'd be ni-
ce if it did.
Trent.
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 03:35:00PM +, Trent Nelson wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is a result of the recent sched_ule import, but
> buildkernel
for setting up a FreeBSD development environment.
> Thanks!
>
> Dave Leimbach
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 16:41:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Trent Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Trying to chase up an old post.
:Hi Matt,
:
:You posted
18 matches
Mail list logo
