Re: HEADS UP: -current world broken since Feb 10

On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, John Hay wrote: > > > > DO NOT TRY TO UPGRADE -STABLE OR A PRE-FEB 10 -CURRENT TO A POST-FEB > > > > 10 -CURRENT UNTIL THIS IS RESOLVED. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. > > > > > > Any updates on this yet ? > > > > Warner committed a fix for this. But I'm having trouble building wor

Re: HEADS UP: -current world broken since Feb 10

> > > DO NOT TRY TO UPGRADE -STABLE OR A PRE-FEB 10 -CURRENT TO A POST-FEB > > > 10 -CURRENT UNTIL THIS IS RESOLVED. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. > > > > Any updates on this yet ? > > Warner committed a fix for this. But I'm having trouble building world > with it. Well make world finished here, but

Re: HEADS UP: -current world broken since Feb 10

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David O'Brien wrote: > cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include >-D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6 > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/locale >-DBROKEN_DES -DYP -DHESIOD > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /

Re: HEADS UP: -current world broken since Feb 10

> > > DO NOT TRY TO UPGRADE -STABLE OR A PRE-FEB 10 -CURRENT TO A POST-FEB > > > 10 -CURRENT UNTIL THIS IS RESOLVED. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. > > > > Any updates on this yet ? > > Warner committed a fix for this. But I'm having trouble building world > with it. > > cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIB

Re: HEADS UP: -current world broken since Feb 10

On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 10:44:10AM +0100, Stephan van Beerschoten wrote: > > DO NOT TRY TO UPGRADE -STABLE OR A PRE-FEB 10 -CURRENT TO A POST-FEB > > 10 -CURRENT UNTIL THIS IS RESOLVED. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. > > Any updates on this yet ? Warner committed a fix for this. But I'm having trouble b

Re: HEADS UP: -current world broken since Feb 10

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > 'make world' on -CURRENT has been broken since Feb 10 due to a change > in the size of struct __sFILE (which changes the address of stdin, > stdout and stderr). It will remain broken for a few more days while we > work out the best possible soluti

HEADS UP: -current world broken since Feb 10

'make world' on -CURRENT has been broken since Feb 10 due to a change in the size of struct __sFILE (which changes the address of stdin, stdout and stderr). It will remain broken for a few more days while we work out the best possible solution to this problem. DO NOT TRY TO UPGRADE -STABLE OR A P

Re: world broken: mbuf.h:120: `MSIZE' undeclared here

On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 11:23:45AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001126 11:18] wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 01:06:12PM -0600, Michael Harnois wrote: > > > On 26 Nov 2000 12:48:48 -0600, Michael Harnois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > > > OK,

Re: world broken: mbuf.h:120: `MSIZE' undeclared here

* Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001126 11:18] wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 01:06:12PM -0600, Michael Harnois wrote: > > On 26 Nov 2000 12:48:48 -0600, Michael Harnois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > OK, I think I have it now. Remove sys/mbuf.h and change > > > machine/mutex.

Re: world broken: mbuf.h:120: `MSIZE' undeclared here

On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 01:06:12PM -0600, Michael Harnois wrote: > On 26 Nov 2000 12:48:48 -0600, Michael Harnois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > OK, I think I have it now. Remove sys/mbuf.h and change > > machine/mutex.h to sys/mutex.h. > > Except that the kernel won't build if sys/mbuf

Re: world broken: mbuf.h:120: `MSIZE' undeclared here

On 26 Nov 2000 12:48:48 -0600, Michael Harnois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > OK, I think I have it now. Remove sys/mbuf.h and change > machine/mutex.h to sys/mutex.h. Except that the kernel won't build if sys/mbuf.h isn't included. Oh well. -- Michael D. Harnois, Redeemer Lutheran Church

Re: world broken: mbuf.h:120: `MSIZE' undeclared here

On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 18:01:33 -0500 (EST), Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > jlemon, I think you may want to remove the include for > sys/mbuf.h in if_var.h if it isn't needed (try) -- I think this > is what may be screwing up netstat. OK, I think I have it now. Remove sys/

Re: world broken: mbuf.h:120: `MSIZE' undeclared here

On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 18:01:33 -0500 (EST), Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > jlemon, I think you may want to remove the include for > sys/mbuf.h in if_var.h if it isn't needed (try) -- I think this > is what may be screwing up netstat. I tried your suggestion and it got me

Re: world broken: mbuf.h:120: `MSIZE' undeclared here

No biggie guys... jlemon, I think you may want to remove the include for sys/mbuf.h in if_var.h if it isn't needed (try) -- I think this is what may be screwing up netstat. Sorry, Steve, for this inconvenience, but this stuff does occasionally happen in -CURRENT. :-) On Sat, 25 No

world broken: mbuf.h:120: `MSIZE' undeclared here

===> usr.bin/netstat cc -O -pipe -Wall -DIPSEC -DINET6 -DIPSEC -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/if.c In file included from /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/net/if_var.h:78, from /usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/if.c:49: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/

Re: world broken

> > looks like the boot loader is killing -current. I have a patch, but > it just cuts all the offending references. > > Comments? rebuild/reinstall libstand. Sorry; should have HEADS-UPped that one. > Warner > > cc -nostdlib -static -Ttext 0x0 -o loader.sym >/usr/obj/home/imp/FreeBSD/src/

Re: world broken

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes: : > : > looks like the boot loader is killing -current. I have a patch, but : > it just cuts all the offending references. : > : > Comments? : : rebuild/reinstall libstand. Sorry; should have HEADS-UPped that one. I can't reinstall libstand.

world broken

looks like the boot loader is killing -current. I have a patch, but it just cuts all the offending references. Comments? Warner cc -nostdlib -static -Ttext 0x0 -o loader.sym /usr/obj/home/imp/FreeBSD/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/../btx/lib/crt0.o main.o conf.o bcache.o boot.o commands.o console

Re: make installkernel broken ? (was Re: World broken)

Salvo Bartolotta wrote: > > Dear FreeBSd'ers, > > The good news: I have just made buildworld (sources cvsup'ed today), > and made buildkernel with no problems. > > The (moderately) bad news: make installkernel fails: Already fixed. Please re-cvsup. Note that the kernel will be called 'kernel'

make installkernel broken ? (was Re: World broken)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 7/23/00, 7:19:03 AM, Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding World broken: > cc -O -pipe -DMD5 -DSHA1 -DRMD

World broken

makeworld from -stable is broken. Needless to say this is completely and totally unacceptible. Would the people involved with the mtree and settofflags changes please get together and fix this right. cc -O -pipe -DMD5 -DSHA1 -DRMD160 -I/usr/obj/home/imp/FreeBSD/src/i386/usr/include -o mtre

world broken in libpcap

cvsup'ed 1 hour ago cc -O -pipe -I. -Dyylval=pcap_lval -DHAVE_SYS_IOCCOM_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H=1 -DHAVE_ETHER_HOSTTON=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN=1 -DLBL_ALIGN=1 -DINET6 -I/usr/src/lib/libpcap/../../contrib/libpcap -I/usr/src/lib/libpcap/../../contrib/libpcap/lbl -I/usr/obj/

Re: world broken?

Hi, ignore this for now please - I am getting past this on the same sources with a second buildworld. I suspect a hardware problem :( --Stijn On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 12:31:59AM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > Hi, > > Trying to build world, source just cvssup'ed, clean builddir and I get > this erro

world broken?

Hi, Trying to build world, source just cvssup'ed, clean builddir and I get this error: Script started on Wed Jul 5 00:14:00 2000 firsa# make buildworld [...snip...] -- >>> stage 3: cross tools

'make world' broken

while making usr.sbin/kdump or usr.bin/truss: - In file included from ioctl.c:80: /usr/obj/ext/src/i386/usr/include/sys/memrange.h:18: warning: `MDF_ACTIVE' redefined /usr/obj/ext/src/i386/usr/include/pccard/cardinfo.h:80: warning: this is the loca

Re: World broken again...

On 25/05 10:27, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 11:04:30AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > cc -O -pipe -march=k6 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -Wall > > -I/usr/obj/usr/current/ > > Not to be picky, but optimizations apart from -O -pipe were not supported I'm going to be pick

Re: World broken again...

Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000525 02:19] wrote: > > Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 11:04:30AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > Dammit, given severe breakage of the world during past several days the idea to > > > > establish a fine

Re: World broken again...

* Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000525 02:19] wrote: > Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > > On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 11:04:30AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > Dammit, given severe breakage of the world during past several days the idea to > > > establish a fine to a breaker not seems so stupid...

Re: World broken again...

Szilveszter Adam wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 11:04:30AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Dammit, given severe breakage of the world during past several days the idea to > > establish a fine to a breaker not seems so stupid... > > > > cc -O -pipe -march=k6 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -Wall >

Re: World broken again...

On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 11:04:30AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Dammit, given severe breakage of the world during past several days the idea to > establish a fine to a breaker not seems so stupid... > > cc -O -pipe -march=k6 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -Wall > -I/usr/obj/usr/current/ Not to be

World broken again...

Dammit, given severe breakage of the world during past several days the idea to establish a fine to a breaker not seems so stupid... cc -O -pipe -march=k6 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -Wall -I/usr/obj/usr/current/ src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/current/src/lib/libdisk/create_chunk.c -o create_chunk

RE: Parallel make world broken

here too Donn Miller wrote: > ===> librsausa > mkdir: openssl: File exists > cp /usr/src/secure/lib/librsausa/../libcrypto/opensslconf-i386.h > openssl/openssl > conf.h > *** Error code 1 > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > 1 error > *** Error

Re: Parallel make world broken

On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Donn Miller wrote: > > > ===> librsausa > > mkdir: openssl: File exists > > cp /usr/src/secure/lib/librsausa/../libcrypto/opensslconf-i386.h > > openssl/openssl > > conf.h > > *** Error code 1 > > What -j setting? This works fine

Re: Parallel make world broken

On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Donn Miller wrote: > ===> librsausa > mkdir: openssl: File exists > cp /usr/src/secure/lib/librsausa/../libcrypto/opensslconf-i386.h > openssl/openssl > conf.h > *** Error code 1 What -j setting? This works fine for me. Kris In God we Trust -- all others must submit a

Parallel make world broken

===> librsausa mkdir: openssl: File exists cp /usr/src/secure/lib/librsausa/../libcrypto/opensslconf-i386.h openssl/openssl conf.h *** Error code 1 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error - Donn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [

world broken?

Hi! Is the world broken or I've missed something important? ===> gnu/usr.bin/groff/lkbib cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/lkbib/../include -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DIRENT_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_DIR_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DUNISTD_H_DECLARES_GETOPT=1 -DSTDLIB_H_DECLARES_

World broken in modules/linprocfs

===> sys/modules/linprocfs @ -> /src/src/sys machine -> /src/src/sys/i386/include rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -DLINPROCFS -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../include -I/usr/obj/src/src/i386/usr/include /src/src/sys/modules/linprocfs/../../miscfs/linprocfs/linprocfs_misc.

Re: world broken using /usr/local/lib?

On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Robert C. Noland III wrote: > You have a libcrypto in /usr/local/lib which was not compiled with > rsaref. When it reaches out to get rsaref, it also picks up the > libcrypto and libssl from /usr/local/lib rather than the build tree. > Move them out of the way... I figured

world broken using /usr/local/lib?

You have a libcrypto in /usr/local/lib which was not compiled with rsaref. When it reaches out to get rsaref, it also picks up the libcrypto and libssl from /usr/local/lib rather than the build tree. Move them out of the way... robert. Alfred Perlstein writes: >broken here for the last 12 hours

Re: world broken using /usr/local/lib?

Out of da blue Alfred Perlstein aka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > broken here for the last 12 hours or so: > > cc -pipe -O2 -DMONOLITH -DNO_IDEA -I/home/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl -DRSAref >-I/usr/obj/home/src/i386/usr/include -c >/home/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl/../../../crypto/openssl/apps/sp

world broken using /usr/local/lib?

broken here for the last 12 hours or so: cc -pipe -O2 -DMONOLITH -DNO_IDEA -I/home/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl -DRSAref -I/usr/obj/home/src/i386/usr/include -c /home/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl/../../../crypto/openssl/apps/speed.c cc -pipe -O2 -DMONOLITH -DNO_IDEA -I/home/src/secure/usr.bin/ope

Re: make world broken?

> ===> libdes Fixed - thanks! M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

make world broken?

===> libdes rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a-I/vol/vinum0/src/secure/lib/libdes/../../../crypto/libdes -I/usr/obj/vol/vinum0/src/i386/usr/include /vol/vinum0/src/secure/lib/libdes/../../../crypto/libdes/cbc_cksm.c /vol/vinum0/src/secure/lib/libdes/../../../crypto/libdes/pcbc_enc.c /vol/v

world broken in dialog

... install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 README /usr/share/examples/dialog install: README: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 The following patch fixed the problem: --- gnu/usr.bin/dialog/TESTS/Makefile.orig Fri Jan 7 22:35:43 2000 +++ gnu/usr.bin/dialog/TESTS/Makefile Fri Jan

Re: world broken in libcrypt

Neal Westfall wrote: > > ===> ../secure/lib/libcrypt > make: don't know how to make crypt-shs.c. Stop > *** Error code 2 Fixed. Thanks! -- Marcel Moolenaarmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project

world broken in libcrypt

cvsup'd as of 10am PST... sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 libutil.so.2 /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib ln -sf libutil.so.2 /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libutil.so cd /usr/src/lib; make depend; make all; make install ===> csu/i386-elf ===> libcom_err ===> libcom_err/do

Re: -CURRENT make world broken

On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 12:23:35PM -0500, Kenneth Wayne Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just wondering if anyone else was having a problem making the world > on -CURRENT right now? I don't remember the exact error I got because > I'm at work, and my machine is at home, but for the last

Re: -CURRENT make world broken

I build world this morning, and it built fine. Patrick - Original Message - From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 12:23 PM Subject: -CURRENT make world broken > I was just wondering if anyone else was h

-CURRENT make world broken

I was just wondering if anyone else was having a problem making the world on -CURRENT right now? I don't remember the exact error I got because I'm at work, and my machine is at home, but for the last 3 weeks whenever I try to make world, it dies in a different place, I've tried every day, so I'm

Re: make world broken

Greg Lehey wrote: > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/usr.bin/colldef created for > > /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef > > yacc -d /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/parse.y > > *** Signal 12 > > This looks like you've updated your source tree and have not built a > new kernel. Try the new kernel first, then the

Re: make world broken

juan wrote: > > yacc -d /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/parse.y > *** Signal 12 > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef. Are you doing anything special? If not, try cleaning /usr/obj first and make sure your source tree is ok. -- Marcel Moolenaarmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SCC Inte

Re: make world broken

On Wednesday, 29 December 1999 at 23:17:29 -0600, juan wrote: > When I tried to compile my world this fail... > > I'm Running FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. What date? > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/usr.bin/colldef created for > /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef > yacc -d /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/parse.y > *** S

make world broken

When I tried to compile my world this fail... I'm Running FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -c -o root -g wheel -m 555 /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/yyfix.sh /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin/yyfix sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 yacc /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/b

Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes )

On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Ben Rosengart wrote: > > vi -- which is in /usr. > > Good example of something else that would be great to have in /bin. > > *ducking* > > -- > Ben Rosengart and as a coworker, I'd have to tell you how to use cat ;) ROTFL. -Pat __ Pat Lynch

Re: make world broken with NO_FORTRAN=true

Jos Backus wrote: > > After some more digging I have found out why buildworlds are failing on my > system: it's because I have NO_FORTRAN=true in /etc/make.conf. [snip] Thanks. Will be fixed. -- Marcel Moolenaarmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SCC Internetworking & Databases

make world broken with NO_FORTRAN=true

After some more digging I have found out why buildworlds are failing on my system: it's because I have NO_FORTRAN=true in /etc/make.conf. cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771; make build-tools cc -O -pipe -march=pentium -DFREEBSD_NATIVE -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DDEFAULT_TARGET_VERSION=\"2.95.2\" -DD

Re: make world broken?

I think i'm crying wolf here.. i just noticed that there was an older version of perl hanging out in /usr/local/bin.. lets see if thats the problem. -- Welcome My Son, Welcome To The Machine -- Bob Vaughan | techie@{w6yx|tantivy}.stanford.edu | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | P.O

make world broken?

I'm getting the following when I try to build world (cvs'd yesterday) i've blown away /usr/obj, re-cvs'd, and tried again.. it always fails in the same place. Writing Makefile for DynaLoader mkdir /usr/obj/c1/current/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib/auto/DynaLoader perl -I/usr/obj/c1/current/src/gnu

Re: make world broken

On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 05:13:39PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > I did a "make -j 4 buildworld" every day last week. I did not > see this error. Did you by any chance run configure in the > contrib/gcc (or whatever the current gcc contrib source tree > is called)? No. > If your build tree ends u

Re: make world broken

Jos Backus wrote: > More precisely, three things seem to be wrong: > > - hconfig.h is missing/not being generated. > > - /usr/include/stdio.h says: > > extern __const char *__const sys_errlist[]; > > but /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/../../../../contrib/gcc/system.h says: > > ext

Re: make world broken

More precisely, three things seem to be wrong: - hconfig.h is missing/not being generated. - /usr/include/stdio.h says: extern __const char *__const sys_errlist[]; but /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/../../../../contrib/gcc/system.h says: extern char *sys_errlist[]; possibly

Re: Proposed end-all fix for (Re: Make world broken in libc_r)

Jason Evans wrote: > > I've got a change in the pipeline that will cause world breakage again, > unless we do something about this. Is there anything wrong with simply > adding: > > CFLAGS+=-I${.CURDIR}/../../include > > to lib/libc_r/Makefile? It fixes such build problems. Yes, anything is

Proposed end-all fix for (Re: Make world broken in libc_r)

On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 11:40:08AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Mark Murray wrote: > > > Hi > > > > "make world" is broken in libc_r. Simple fix is to replace all > > "socklen_t" with "int". > > libc_r likes to pull data from /usr/include instead of the > source tree,

Re: make world broken

On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 04:30:16PM -0700, Darren Wiebe wrote: > I just built the world from sources about 3-4 hours ago. It was all > great. Fwiw, I just got the same error on another system, cvsupped this morning. -- Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Reliability means never

Re: make world broken

Jos Backus wrote: I just built the world from sources about 3-4 hours ago. It was all great. Darren Wiebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771; make build-tools > cc -O -pipe -march=pentium -DFREEBSD_NATIVE -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DDEFAULT_T > ARGET_VERSION=\"2.95.2\" -DDEF

Re: Init Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) ) )

David Scheidt wrote: > > What's wrong with run with system V runlevels? Other than it's system V and > everything AT^HUSL did is evil, of course. They try to map graphs into a line. -- Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS) who is as social as a wampas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTEC

make world broken

cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771; make build-tools cc -O -pipe -march=pentium -DFREEBSD_NATIVE -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DDEFAULT_T ARGET_VERSION=\"2.95.2\" -DDEFAULT_TARGET_MACHINE=\"i386-unknown-freebsd\" -I/us r/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/../cc_tools -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/../cc_tools -I/u

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 12:07:49AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I would prefer if the lines could be added to /etc/ttys somewhat > like: > sshd "/usr/local/sbin/sshd" none ondemand > > And then we could > telinit -on sshd > telinit -off sshd hal:/service# ls -l telnetd tot

Re: Init Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) ) )

> On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 01:22:46AM -0500, Donn Miller wrote: > > > runlevels, OpenBSD does not or goes with an entirely different > > system), them would it be fair to consider FreeBSD "BSD"? The > > advantage here is that FreeBSD would mature into it's own type of > > UNIX with a BSD heri

Re: Init Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) ) )

On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 01:22:46AM -0500, Donn Miller wrote: > runlevels, OpenBSD does not or goes with an entirely different > system), them would it be fair to consider FreeBSD "BSD"? The > advantage here is that FreeBSD would mature into it's own type of > UNIX with a BSD heritage. Can

Re: Init Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) ) )

David Scheidt wrote: > What's wrong with run with system V runlevels? Other than it's system V and > everything AT^HUSL did is evil, of course. Well, the one danger is that we'd be slowly drifting away from the classic BSD way of doing thigs. Of course, the official BSD is dead (right?). But

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Jeremy writes : >On 1999-Dec-16 07:48:48 +1100, Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>And we don't really need YAD when we have init hanging around doing >>nothing for its keep anyway... > >I beg to differ. To quote init(8): > The role of init is

Re: Init Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) ) )

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dav > id Scheidt writes: > >What's wrong with run with system V runlevels? Other than it's system V and > >everything AT^HUSL did is evil, of course. > > runlevels are a very oldfashioned way to think about thing

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob writes: >> > >> >I was just thinking it could get tricky and have subtle ordering bugs of >> >new tty devices, changes to ttys and signals all about the same time. >> >> Well, they are no less subtle by having them in different processes... > >No, bu

Re: Init Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) ) )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dav id Scheidt writes: >On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes: >> >> I would really like to see the devd functionality to live in init >> and at the same time I wouldn't mind if init were taught to kee

Init Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) ) )

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes: > > I would really like to see the devd functionality to live in init > and at the same time I wouldn't mind if init were taught to keep > important programs running, things like sshd, inetd, sysl

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob writes: >> >Isn't this throwing an awful lot onto init? >> >> Not really... >> >> The meta-daemon part is no different from keeping gettys in the air... >> >> The devd thing consists of selecting on some magic fd and running a >> program when somet

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob writes: >> > >> I would really like to see the devd functionality to live in init >> and at the same time I wouldn't mind if init were taught to keep >> important programs running, things like sshd, inetd, syslogd and >> similar should be restarted i

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes: >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >: A "devd" program would solve 98% of what devfs could solve. It cannot >: solve the homebrew-a-vnode-for-the-root-fs problem. FreeBSD needs a >: "devd" program *anyway* because what go

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : A "devd" program would solve 98% of what devfs could solve. It cannot : solve the homebrew-a-vnode-for-the-root-fs problem. FreeBSD needs a : "devd" program *anyway* because what good is dynamic devices if you : can't do something intell

Re: make world broken building fortunes

On 1999-Dec-15 19:57:49 +1100, Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -gnu/usr.bin/bison gnu/usr.bin/cc >> +gnu/usr.bin/bison gnu/usr.bin/cc gnu/usr.bin/texinfo > >Presumably this hunk is a stray fix for something other than the fortune >database? :-) Yes it is. I was having problem

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: >"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote: >> >> Yea... been hearing that for 4 years... one of it's big short comings is >> that it needs a persistent backing store for this. Sounds like this C >> program could fullfill one of the missing parts of devf

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote: > > Yea... been hearing that for 4 years... one of it's big short comings is > that it needs a persistent backing store for this. Sounds like this C > program could fullfill one of the missing parts of devfs :-) F persistent backing store. The daemon solution is perfec

Re: make world broken building fortunes

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 06:21:48 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > @@ -344,7 +352,7 @@ > tools:: > .for _tool in ${_strfile} ${_aout_tools} usr.bin/gensetdefs \ > gnu/usr.bin/binutils usr.bin/objformat usr.bin/yacc usr.bin/colldef \ > -gnu/usr.bin/bison gnu/usr.bin/cc > +gnu/usr.bin/bison

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brian Somers writes: : *cough*DEVFS*cough* devfs*D* Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: RE: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes )

: :Poul-Henning Kamp wrote :> It would make more sense, considering the way FreeBSD is distributed for :> /usr/local to be a mountpoint than for /usr to be a mountpoint. :> :> /var is traditionally a mountpoint to keep the logs out of harms :> way (and vice versa), but /usr never had that level o

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 01:39:28AM +, Brian Somers wrote: > [.] > > On a related subject: don't you think it's high time to end up this > > madness with MAKEDEV being a shell script, and reimplement it in C? Today, > [.] > *cough*DEVFS*cough* Gesunteit. - mark -- Mark Newt

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

> [.] > > On a related subject: don't you think it's high time to end up this > > madness with MAKEDEV being a shell script, and reimplement it in C? Today, > [.] > *cough*DEVFS*cough* Yea... been hearing that for 4 years... one of it's big short comings is that it needs a persistent back

Re: MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes ) )

[.] > On a related subject: don't you think it's high time to end up this > madness with MAKEDEV being a shell script, and reimplement it in C? Today, [.] *cough*DEVFS*cough* -- Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

MAKEDEV (Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken buildingfortunes ) )

On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Louis A. Mamakos wrote: > > > So how about /usr/sbin/chown -> /sbin/chown so that MAKEDEV works with > > just the root file system mounted? > > As one who just got his ass bitten by this, I would vote yes. On a related subject

Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes )

> "BSDman" == BSDman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BSDman> one idea about /usr is to allow the admin to mount it BSDman> read-only. I didn't tried it but this would give some BSDman> level of security against modifications of the files there BSDman> in. This is particulary us

RE: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes )

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote > It would make more sense, considering the way FreeBSD is distributed for > /usr/local to be a mountpoint than for /usr to be a mountpoint. > > /var is traditionally a mountpoint to keep the logs out of harms > way (and vice versa), but /usr never had that level of justi

Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes )

> How about removing awk from MAKEDEV so life isn't so hard to recover > when you use a 3.3 fixit floppy after removing /dev and not making > enough of it again. How about finally starting to work on devfs and forget about all the MAKEDEV junk and leave it as it is for now? Blaz Zupan, [EMAIL PR

Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes )

On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 07:38:32PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: > > > >I think at one time or another all of us have missed *something* in > >/usr that wasn't in /. For example, disklabel -e doesn't work without > >vi -- whic

Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes )

On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 10:32:23AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :> > :> > So how about /usr/sbin/chown -> /sbin/chown so that MAKEDEV works with > :> > just the root file system mounted? > :> > :> As one who just got his ass bitten by this, I would vote yes. > : > :As one who's missed chown

Re: make world broken building fortunes

On 1999-Dec-13 20:42:36 +1100, Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Index: Makefile.inc1 >=== >RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v >retrieving revision 1.106 >diff -u -r1.106 Makefile.inc1 >--- Makefile.inc1 1999/12

Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes )

[Recipient list trimmed down to just the list. dhw] >Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 19:38:32 +0100 >From: Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >It would make more sense, considering the way FreeBSD is distributed for >/usr/local to be a mountpoint than for /usr to be a mountpoint. It's hardly

Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes )

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: > >I think at one time or another all of us have missed *something* in >/usr that wasn't in /. For example, disklabel -e doesn't work without >vi -- which is in /usr. EDITOR=/bin/ed export EDITOR disklabel

Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes )

On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > I think at one time or another all of us have missed *something* in > /usr that wasn't in /. For example, disklabel -e doesn't work without > vi -- which is in /usr. Good example of something else that would be great to have in /bin. *du

Re: Speaking of moving files (Re: make world broken building fortunes )

:> :> > So how about /usr/sbin/chown -> /sbin/chown so that MAKEDEV works with :> > just the root file system mounted? :> :> As one who just got his ass bitten by this, I would vote yes. : :As one who's missed chown at times when only root's mounted, I'm with Bill. : :-- : Ben Rosengart : :UN

<    1   2   3   >