Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT [SOLVED]

2003-09-16 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Damian Gerow wrote: > Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16/09/03 16:24]: > > I have no time to track this down but the output of acpidump -t may help > > someone else who might be interested. You're looking for the pointers > > that are stored in RSD PTR. > > I'm sti

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT [SOLVED]

2003-09-16 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16/09/03 16:24]: > I have no time to track this down but the output of acpidump -t may help > someone else who might be interested. You're looking for the pointers > that are stored in RSD PTR. I'm still on 5.1-R, and there's no '-t' flag to acpidump.

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT [SOLVED]

2003-09-16 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Damian Gerow wrote: > Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16/09/03 15:00]: > > I'm almost certain your problem is defining MAXMEM to 512 MB. Remove that > > from your kernel config and try again. MAXMEM causes all kinds of > > problems. If this doesn't solve it, star

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-16 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16/09/03 15:00]: > I'm almost certain your problem is defining MAXMEM to 512 MB. Remove that > from your kernel config and try again. MAXMEM causes all kinds of > problems. If this doesn't solve it, start with the stock GENERIC and add > back in your c

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-16 Thread Nate Lawson
> (To recap: I'm having ACPI problems on a DFI CD70-SC, with both 5.1-R and > 5-CURRENT. Booting GENERIC doesn't show any problems, however, so there's > a good chance it's a misconfiguration issue.) > > Thus spake Damian Gerow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/09/03 17:

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-15 Thread Damian Gerow
(To recap: I'm having ACPI problems on a DFI CD70-SC, with both 5.1-R and 5-CURRENT. Booting GENERIC doesn't show any problems, however, so there's a good chance it's a misconfiguration issue.) Thus spake Damian Gerow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/09/03 17:34]: > It's

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-15 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13/09/03 14:42]: > The post you reference shows the user with a kernel that has both APM and > ACPI installed, apparently. This is not valid. > > Please report your kernel config. If GENERIC in 2003/9/6 booted fine with > ACPI and then your rebuilt ker

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-13 Thread Nate Lawson
The post you reference shows the user with a kernel that has both APM and ACPI installed, apparently. This is not valid. Please report your kernel config. If GENERIC in 2003/9/6 booted fine with ACPI and then your rebuilt kernel from 2003/9/7 fails, it is almost certainly the devices you include

Re: ACPI problems on MSI K7D

2003-09-09 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: > Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Please report the dmesg from boot -v as that should help figure out why > > pci_cfgregopen() fails. > > Full log attached, both with and without ACPI. Perhaps someone who knows our PCI code be

Re: ACPI problems on MSI K7D

2003-09-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please report the dmesg from boot -v as that should help figure out why > pci_cfgregopen() fails. Full log attached, both with and without ACPI. > Also, I think the following should be "\_S3": >Name (\SS3, Package (0x04) That shouldn't have any impac

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-08 Thread Nate Lawson
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote: > I have a feeling that my acpi table didn't actually get overridden > though, due to the following from dmesg: > > ACPI: DSDT was overridden. > -0424: *** Error: UtAllocate: Could not allocate size 6e49202a > ACPI-0428: *** Error:

Re: ACPI problems on MSI K7D

2003-09-07 Thread Nate Lawson
This is the line that triggers that panic, from /sys/dev/acpica/Osd/OsdHardware.c: if (pci_cfgregopen() == 0) panic("AcpiOsDerivePciId unable to initialize pci bus"); Please report the dmesg from boot -v as that should help figure out why pci_cfgregopen() fails. Also, I think the fol

ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-07 Thread Damian Gerow
I set up a box yesterday to play with -CURRENT on. I used the 2003-09-06 snapshot code from ftp://current.freebsd.org/. Initial setup and boot worked just fine, but when I did a rebuild/reboot last night, this is what I saw: pmap_mapdev: Couldn't alloc kernel virtual memory So thinking I mi

RE: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c (fwd)

2003-09-05 Thread Tony Maher
]> > To: "Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Tony Maher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Robert Blacquière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:50:03 -0700 (PDT) > Organization: http

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Terry Lambert
Doug Barton wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > I attached a verbose dmesg, just in case someone wants to take a look. > > > > | ACPI: DSDT was overridden. > > | -0424: *** Error: UtAllocate: Could not allocate size 50204453 > > | ACPI-0428: *** Error: Could not allo

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Doug Barton
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > > I use this acpi_dsdt code: http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.dsl > > > > Thanks for the suggestion... I tried that one, but got the same error > > about not enough memory to load the override file. > > > > I attached a verbos

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Terry Lambert
Doug Barton wrote: > > I use this acpi_dsdt code: http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.dsl > > Thanks for the suggestion... I tried that one, but got the same error > about not enough memory to load the override file. > > I attached a verbose dmesg, just in case someone wants to take a look. |

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Robert =?unknown-8bit?q?Blacqui=E8re?=
Oeps I've put the old one up... Now ik have the new one. I don't load the VESA modules, it seems these are loaded before acpi code is replaced? Robert On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 01:49:42AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Robert [unknown-8bit] Blacquire wrote: > > > I don't seem to

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Doug Barton
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Robert [unknown-8bit] Blacquière wrote: > I don't seem to have these problems. I use xbattbar without problem. Argh. How recent is your -current? I compile regularly, and I was up to date as of this afternoon. > I use this acpi_dsdt code: http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsd

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Robert =?unknown-8bit?q?Blacqui=E8re?=
I don't seem to have these problems. I use xbattbar without problem. I use this acpi_dsdt code: http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.dsl On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 07:50:03PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > I got interested in this recently because I inherited one of these > laptops from work. > >

RE: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Doug Barton
I got interested in this recently because I inherited one of these laptops from work. On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote: > Which version of the N610C BIOS are you using? (F.14 is the latest on > the hp.com website.) I know that the _OSI("Windows 2001") bug will be > fixed in

Re: Thinkpad R40 and ACPI problems on current

2003-08-30 Thread Nate Lawson
Please submit a PR and send me the PR number. Include full dmesg and a URL to the two files produced by: acpidump -t -d -o my.dsdt > my.asl -Nate ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscr

Thinkpad R40 and ACPI problems on current

2003-08-29 Thread Martin
Hi, I have never seen my Notebook shutting down correctly, e.a. I can see the line "Powering system off using ACPI" and it stays there. Well, it's not critical, because I can still press the power button. But I think it has generally problems with ACPI. This is what I get when booting current

Re: ACPI problems on Samsung Q10 (AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE /AE_BAD_PARAMETER)

2003-06-23 Thread Hendrik Scholz
Hi! I applied the patch from http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=214877+0+archive/2003/freebsd-current/20030615.freebsd-current and the AE_BAD_PARAEMTER error disappers. Hendrik -- Hendrik Scholz - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://raisdorf.net/ Forcast for tonight: Dark. ___

Re: ACPI problems on Samsung Q10 (AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE /AE_BAD_PARAMETER)

2003-06-23 Thread Eirik Oeverby
Hi, I'm seeing similiar things on my setup - both the ACPI Global Lock messages and the wi0 issues. In fact, the wi driver seems to be incredibly unstable - Every half hour or so I need to remove and re-insert the card to regain network connectivity (and ofcourse killall dhclient ; ifconfig wi0 ..

ACPI problems on Samsung Q10 (AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE /AE_BAD_PARAMETER)

2003-06-23 Thread Hendrik Scholz
Hi! I recently bought a Samsung Q10 and on both 5.1-RELEASE and -current I get these acpi errors: Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBS

Re: ACPI problems on 5.1

2003-06-18 Thread Antony T Curtis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks! I have it working nicely now - without any problems. I decompiled, fixed and compiled... problem sorted :) On Wednesday 18 June 2003 8:58 am, Sid Carter wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:21:41PM +0100, Antony T Curtis wrote: > > On a Comp

Re: ACPI problems on 5.1

2003-06-18 Thread Sid Carter
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:21:41PM +0100, Antony T Curtis wrote: > > On a Compaq Armada V300 notebook, if I load the acpi module, boot fails after > the kernel prints about half a dozen "acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR", fails > to detect any of the hardware and panics because of failure to moun

ACPI problems on 5.1

2003-06-17 Thread Antony T Curtis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On a Compaq Armada V300 notebook, if I load the acpi module, boot fails after the kernel prints about half a dozen "acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR", fails to detect any of the hardware and panics because of failure to mount root. With the acpi mod

ACPI problems on 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-11 Thread Jesse D. Guardiani
Howdy list, What info do I need to provide, and who do I need to send it to, so that I can get ACPI into a usable state on my IBM A30p thinkpad? The short description of my acpi problems is that I can suspend the laptop with 'acpiconf -s 3', but not with 'acpiconf -s 1',

Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23

2003-06-05 Thread Matthew Emmerton
- Original Message - From: "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:21 AM Subject: Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23 > > From: &qu

Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23

2003-06-05 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:45:21AM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > > > This is The Way Things Work. Logial device attachments are no longer > > compiled into the kernel in 5.x by default (see the entry in GENERIC > > about this), so you need to define those attachments in the device.hints > > f

Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23

2003-06-05 Thread Matthew Emmerton
> Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > I cvsup'd from 5.0-R to HEAD and enabled ACPI to see if anything had changed > > in the past 6 months. > > Indeed, things have, and a few workarounds I had implemented before were no > > longer needed. > > > > However, I still got a host of errors from ACPI upon boot,

Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23

2003-06-05 Thread Scott Long
Matthew Emmerton wrote: I cvsup'd from 5.0-R to HEAD and enabled ACPI to see if anything had changed in the past 6 months. Indeed, things have, and a few workarounds I had implemented before were no longer needed. However, I still got a host of errors from ACPI upon boot, and some hacks to device.h

Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23

2003-06-05 Thread Kevin Oberman
> From: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:00:53 -0400 > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000_0069_01C32A80.2F346810 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding:

ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23

2003-06-05 Thread Matthew Emmerton
I cvsup'd from 5.0-R to HEAD and enabled ACPI to see if anything had changed in the past 6 months. Indeed, things have, and a few workarounds I had implemented before were no longer needed. However, I still got a host of errors from ACPI upon boot, and some hacks to device.hints were still neccess

Re: secondary ACPI problems

2003-03-20 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Kevin Oberman writes: > > From: Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:41:17 -0500 (EST) > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Daniel O'Connor writes: > > > Restart X? :-) > > > > I wish. The board seems totally gone after an ACPI suspend. This seems t

Re: secondary ACPI problems

2003-03-19 Thread Kevin Oberman
> From: Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:41:17 -0500 (EST) > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Daniel O'Connor writes: > > Restart X? :-) > > I wish. The board seems totally gone after an ACPI suspend. This seems to > be a common problem with ATI cards. Work-arou

Re: secondary ACPI problems

2003-03-19 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Daniel O'Connor writes: > Restart X? :-) I wish. The board seems totally gone after an ACPI suspend. This seems to be a common problem with ATI cards. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: secondary ACPI problems

2003-03-19 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 08:28, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > Shouldn't a driver without a suspend/resume implementation implicitly > veto the suspend? That's how OS-X does it. I don't think so - the reason being that when a lot of this stuff was written it was done for APM. Since the OS doesn't _usually

Re: secondary ACPI problems

2003-03-19 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > Nate Lawson writes: > > On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > This does not happen if I do not have rp.ko loaded. I suspect that > > > the rocketport card needs some setup when power is restored. It > > > polls all its ports, so it ma

Re: secondary ACPI problems

2003-03-19 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Nate Lawson writes: > On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > This does not happen if I do not have rp.ko loaded. I suspect that > > the rocketport card needs some setup when power is restored. It > > polls all its ports, so it makes sense that a swi would get clogged. > > > > I

Re: secondary ACPI problems

2003-03-19 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > This does not happen if I do not have rp.ko loaded. I suspect that > the rocketport card needs some setup when power is restored. It > polls all its ports, so it makes sense that a swi would get clogged. > > I thought it might be sufficent to unload

Re: ACPI problems: ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failedAE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT

2003-02-14 Thread Scott Long
Martin Blapp wrote: This IBM X-Series 305 show these ACPI problems. And rebooting the box with ACPI enabled hangs it (deadlock). Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: acpi0: on motherboard Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE31 Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01

ACPI problems: ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failedAE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT

2003-02-14 Thread Martin Blapp
This IBM X-Series 305 show these ACPI problems. And rebooting the box with ACPI enabled hangs it (deadlock). Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: acpi0: on motherboard Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE31 Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625

Re: [simon@uow.edu.au: Problems installing 5.0 RC2 on a Compaq Amarda M700 (acpi problems)]

2003-01-14 Thread Francis Barnhart
eone in here can help me. > > > - Forwarded message from Simon Coggins > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - > > Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 21:56:29 +1100 From: > Simon Coggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problems > installing 5.0 RC2 on a Compaq Amarda

Re: [Problems installing 5.0 RC2 on a Compaq Amarda M700 (acpi problems)]

2003-01-14 Thread Buki
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:13:39PM +1100, Simon Coggins wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem installing 5.0 RC2 from cd onto my Compaq amarda M700 > laptop. I get errors from acpi on boot that look like: > > ACPI-1287: *** Method execution failed. AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT > > And a complaint about t

[simon@uow.edu.au: Problems installing 5.0 RC2 on a Compaq Amarda M700 (acpi problems)]

2003-01-13 Thread Simon Coggins
on a Compaq Amarda M700 (acpi problems) Organisation: University of Wollongong (http://www.uow.edu.au/) Hi, I'm having a problem installing 5.0 RC2 from cd onto my Compaq amarda M700 laptop. I get errors from acpi on boot that look like: ACPI-1287: *** Method execution failed. AE_AML_BU

secondary ACPI problems

2002-12-14 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Hi, I've got an Intel D845EBG2. I have 2 ACPI related problems I'm looking for advice on: - ATI Rage 128 Pro TF If I suspend to S3 from text mode on console, the screen remains blank after resume. The system is otherwise functional, and can be logged into remotely. If I start X after resume,

Re: ACPI problems on -current

2001-11-20 Thread Wesley Morgan
I placed the verbose boot dmesg's at www.chemikals.org/acpi and www.chemikals.org/no-acpi Thanks in advance for any help rendered! On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wesley Morgan writes: > : Anyone have any ideas what the problem may be? The error mess

Re: ACPI problems on -current

2001-11-20 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wesley Morgan writes: : Anyone have any ideas what the problem may be? The error messages I see : from the wavelan card seem to indicate an interrupt problem, but it gets : the same irq w/o the module and works fine. With all due respect, this report is too vague to

ACPI problems on -current

2001-11-20 Thread Wesley Morgan
I am running -current with NEWCARD on a thinkpad x20. The system has a builtin 3com ethernet card that attaches on the xl driver, and I have a wavelan card. Neither network card functions when the ACPI module is loaded, but work perfectly with no acpi. Anyone have any ideas what the problem may b

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Mike Smith wrote: > This is the general form of a different problem. The hints > DO NOT supply PNP identifiers. Got it yet? You are adding nothing useful in terms of forward progress on solving his problem by commenting on my postings instead of addressing his issues, which I have at least

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-07 Thread Mike Smith
> Since you posted this message to -current, I just assumed you > had upgraded to the latest code, and thus were using ACPI (this > is the same thing that ended up confusing Mike Smith, who also > made the mistake in correcting me to say that ACPI was being > loaded twice on your system). Actuall

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-06 Thread Terry Lambert
Pete Carah wrote: > > Known problem... see the -current archives. It *is* a known problem. > > You are attaching twice: once because of ACPI, and again > > because of the "hints". You need to comment the entries > > out of your hints file to make them not get attached twice. It's just not thi

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-06 Thread Pete Carah
Terry Lambert wrote: > > > unknown: can't assign resources > > unknown: at port 0x378-0x37f on isa0 > > unknown: can't assign resources > > unknown: at port 0x3f8-0x3ff on isa0 > > unknown: can't assign resources > > unknown: at port 0x2f8-0x2ff on isa0 > > unknown: can't assign resourc

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-04 Thread Terry Lambert
Mike Smith wrote: > > > unknown: can't assign resources > > > unknown: at port 0x3f8-0x3ff on isa0 > > > unknown: can't assign resources > > > unknown: at port 0x2f8-0x2ff on isa0 Serial ports... [ ... ] > You're smoking crack, again. Hints don't supply PnP IDs. Still a known problem...

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-04 Thread Mike Smith
> > unknown: can't assign resources > > unknown: at port 0x378-0x37f on isa0 > > unknown: can't assign resources > > unknown: at port 0x3f8-0x3ff on isa0 > > unknown: can't assign resources > > unknown: at port 0x2f8-0x2ff on isa0 > > unknown: can't assign resources > > unknown: at irq 12

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-03 Thread Terry Lambert
Pete Carah wrote: > > I have a panic that I haven't seen in the notes so far; if I allow load > of the acpi module, it gets a "can't allocate memory" very early in the > boot process. > > Hopefully the following is complete - KDE2 cut-and-paste didn't work > as I expected for a big region. [ ..

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-02 Thread Pete Carah
I have a panic that I haven't seen in the notes so far; if I allow load of the acpi module, it gets a "can't allocate memory" very early in the boot process. Hopefully the following is complete - KDE2 cut-and-paste didn't work as I expected for a big region. Motherboard is ASUS A7V with 1.2G pr