Donn Miller wrote:
> This is on a recently-built -current box. When I try to move ftp from
> port 21 to port 2121 in /etc/services, I get a "Connection refused"
> message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites.
Well _there's_ a surprise.
> Should ftp be this dependent on /etc/services?
* Donn Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000816 14:43]:
> This is on a recently-built -current box. When I try to move ftp from
> port 21 to port 2121 in /etc/services, I get a "Connection
> refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites. Should ftp
> be this dependent on /etc/services?
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Donn Miller wrote:
> This is on a recently-built -current box. When I try to move ftp from
> port 21 to port 2121 in /etc/services, I get a "Connection
> refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites. Should ftp
> be this dependent on /etc/services? What if
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Donn Miller wrote:
:This is on a recently-built -current box. When I try to move ftp from
:port 21 to port 2121 in /etc/services, I get a "Connection
:refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites. Should ftp
:be this dependent on /etc/services? What if you _
>This is on a recently-built -current box. When I try to move ftp from
>port 21 to port 2121 in /etc/services, I get a "Connection
>refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites. Should ftp
>be this dependent on /etc/services? What if you _have_ no services
>running, e.g. inetd &
On 16-Aug-00 Donn Miller wrote:
> refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites. Should ftp
> be this dependent on /etc/services? What if you _have_ no services
> running, e.g. inetd & portmap? Returning ftp to port 21 in services fixes
I think the answer to this is 'yes
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 05:39:33 -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
> This is on a recently-built -current box. When I try to move ftp from
> port 21 to port 2121 in /etc/services, I get a "Connection
> refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites.
Sounds like ftp(1) is doing its job -- it
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 05:39:33AM -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
> This is on a recently-built -current box. When I try to move ftp from
> port 21 to port 2121 in /etc/services, I get a "Connection
> refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites. Should ftp
> be this dependent on /etc/
> This is on a recently-built -current box. When I try to move ftp from
> port 21 to port 2121 in /etc/services, I get a "Connection
> refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites. Should ftp
> be this dependent on /etc/services? What if you _have_ no services
> running, e.g. ine
This is on a recently-built -current box. When I try to move ftp from
port 21 to port 2121 in /etc/services, I get a "Connection
refused" message when I try to login to anonymous ftp sites. Should ftp
be this dependent on /etc/services? What if you _have_ no services
running, e.g. inetd & portm
10 matches
Mail list logo
