Just a update, I did the latest buildworld with the latest
-current sources and it still hapens...
root@pele [9:29pm][/usr/temp] >>
Jul 28 21:29:40 pele /boot/kernel/kernel: lock order reversal
Jul 28 21:29:40 pele /boot/kernel/kernel: lock order reversal
Jul 28 21:29:40 pele /boot/kernel
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Ian Dowse wrote:
>
> The panics in exit1() that have been reported on -stable appear to
> be caused by these commits:
>
> REV:1.92.2.4kern_exit.c 2001/07/25 17:21:46 dillon
> REV:1.72.2.7kern_sig.c 2001/07/25 17:21:46 dillo
I've imported the libmp-in-terms-of-OpenSSL library and connected it
to the build. I've also disconnected libgmp and friends from the
build, but have not `cvs rm`'d it yet. Assuming no problems turn up,
I plan to do that in two or three days. The only program that use
libmp that I haven't been
I am running -CURRENT as of 2001/01/31 12:00, more or less uneventfully
for the last six months on a Dell 5000e.
The one problem is that X occasionally dies without coredump or cleanup with
the error 'X in free(): error: recursive call.'. This usually (but not
always) happens while using Mozil
On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 22:29:40 +0800, Michael Robinson wrote:
> I'd like to get advice on which of the following courses of action to take:
>
> 1. Isolate and fix the problem. I would need some help here.
Try a better-proven release of XFree86, namely 3.3.6.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe:
>From: Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 16:38:06 +0200
>On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 22:29:40 +0800, Michael Robinson wrote:
>> I'd like to get advice on which of the following courses of action to take:
>> 1. Isolate and fix the problem. I would need some help here.
>Try a
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Wind-up A Friend, Colleague, Relative Or Even An Enemy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Call Jokeline and you'll be in stitches!
With our new service you're able to wind-up, confuse and
bemuse
Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
> >> I propose to have user-land screen savers instead of KLD
> >> screen savers.
> >
> >[ ... "performance degradation" ... ]
> >
> >[ ... "file access" ... ]
> >
> >I don't see either of these as being compelling arguments
> >in favor of a user space implementation; I gues
>Actually, running in user space adds two problems:
>
>1) Performance degradation as a result of protection
> domain crossing which does not exist in the current
> implementation
So, you seems to be effectively saying that any program running in the
lower priority in the user-lan
I just "upgraded" to current today on my goof-off box, and the mouse
moves in big jerks instead of smoothly. It does this either in X or
in console, and also in X without moused running (reading /dev/psm0
directly). I've also tried setting high resolution on this device
(flags 0x004). Nothing has
I've seen the same thing for over three weeks, but haven't had time to
figure out why. I am using devfs, so that is not it. Just typing text
is jerky and the system response is slower overall. This probably
started happening in the week or week and a half before July 8th.
On Sunday 29 July 200
Okay, had a storm here and power went out and fizzed a little, going
between on and off, until it finally shut off. Now, this is the first
time that I've actually had something like this happen, and have bad
things happen after fbsd rebooted.
First off, is there such a thing as lost+found? Also
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:48:21PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> Yep; I dont think anyone is talking about MFCing this in the near
> future. libgmp3 is already a port.
Doh! You're right there is a libgmp3 port. Can anyone tell my
brain is mush after having spent all day at a water park with
Using ktrace ref5, I created ~darrenr/ktrace.out with "ktrace -i cc ..."
but trying to print it I get:
% kdump -f ~/ktrace.out > lout
kdump: Cannot allocate memory
Is this stack corruption by kdump? ref5:~darrenr/ktrace.out is available
for anyone who wants to diagnose this further.
FYI:
% lim
This occurred when running vmware while simultaneously compiling koffice
over an NFS link. I've got dumpdev set now, so I'll get a core on the
next crash.
barry
fxp0: promiscuous mode enabled
vmnet1: promiscuous mode enabled
lock order reversal
1st 0xc19e8700 pcm0:3:play @ /usr/src/sys/dev/so
1) For some reason, my mdmfs line in /etc/fstab always does a chmod
777 /tmp at mount-time
/dev/md0/tmpmfs rw,-s=65536 0 0
2) the -X debugging option to mdmfs isn't documented in the manpage
3) The following sequence of commands will cause my -current b
I need to know, if OpenSSH is ever going to get MFC'ed, are there any people
currently running OpenSSH 2.9 from -CURRENT's base and getting major
problems with it? Or even minor ones that actually make things more
difficult? I want to have no real outstanding issues, except simple ones
like
Hi all,
For the past 2 or 3 weeks my -current system has been experiencing
temporary lockups, usually under disk load. The entire system will
hang for around 20-30 seconds, during which time absolutely no
network/IO/keyboard/mouse activity is accepted. Usually, after 20-30
seconds the system wi
I have an update on this one. (John, lemme know if you want access to
the crashdump).
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 21:30:49 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > Log:
> > Add build infrastructure for a libiconv loadable kernel module.
> >
> > This should allow the use of the smbfs module without the
This has happened on and off for various platforms since SMPNG.
On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For the past 2 or 3 weeks my -current system has been experiencing
> temporary lockups, usually under disk load. The entire system will
> hang for around 20-30 seconds, dur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The Solaris client mounts the FreeBSD exported filesystem fine. I can
> create, delete, and manipulate files fine.
>
> However, when I try to use fcntl to lock a file, the Solaris client hangs.
> Normally, I would just let this go; however, Cadence (the VLSI CAD tool
>
On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 22:18:51 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> (kgdb) frame 11
> #11 0xc01b806f in witness_destroy (lock=0xc1366d18)
> at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_witness.c:395
> 395 STAILQ_REMOVE(&all_locks, lock, lock_object, lo_list);
I got a little help from some folks on IRC who
Hi all,
I have started running down why my machine won't boot off
of a "current" CD when my new SCSI controller is installed.
When my scsi controller is installed (with or without the
SCSI-bus connected to the controller), `sysinstall' hangs
at the "deviceTry" call at line 403 of `devices.c'. A
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > You could also try building a kernel with CLK_CALIBRATION_LOOP defined
> > and then booting with -v (without the timer disabled). This might be
> > instructive (I don't know for certain that it'll calibrate the ACPI
> > timer, since it may not hav
At 9:53 PM -0400 7/29/01, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
>I need to know, if OpenSSH is ever going to get MFC'ed, are there any
>people currently running OpenSSH 2.9 from -CURRENT's base and getting
>major problems with it? Or even minor ones that actually make things
>more difficult? [...]
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:06:58AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> I've imported the libmp-in-terms-of-OpenSSL library and connected it
> to the build. I've also disconnected libgmp and friends from the
> build, but have not `cvs rm`'d it yet. Assuming no problems turn up,
> I plan to do that in tw
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:06:58AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > I've imported the libmp-in-terms-of-OpenSSL library and connected it
> > to the build. I've also disconnected libgmp and friends from the
> > build, but have not `cvs rm`'d it yet. Assum
I think I might have missed part of this thread so forgive me
if this has already been brought up. We need to get a couple
of package builds under our belts before this gets MFCd. I
seem to recall there were a couple of ports that expected libgmp
to be around. If so, we'll need to weed those ou
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 06:38:36PM -0500, Steve Price wrote:
> I think I might have missed part of this thread so forgive me
> if this has already been brought up. We need to get a couple
> of package builds under our belts before this gets MFCd. I
> seem to recall there were a couple of ports t
29 matches
Mail list logo
