Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/csu Makefile src/gnu/lib/libgcc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libiberty Makefile src/gnu/lib/libobjc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libstdc++ Makefile config.h src/gnu/lib/libsupc++ Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Makefile.fe Makefile.inc ...

2002-05-11 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:41:53PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:04:27PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Bmake bits for Gcc 3.1. This also vanished my YACC building fixes and broke world while attempting to build `cc1plus' in a cross-tools stage. The changes

Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/csu Makefile src/gnu/lib/libgcc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libiberty Makefile src/gnu/lib/libobjc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libstdc++ Makefile config.h src/gnu/lib/libsupc++ Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Makefile.fe Makefile.inc ...

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:44:11AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:41:53PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:04:27PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Bmake bits for Gcc 3.1. This also vanished my YACC building fixes and broke world while

Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/csu Makefile src/gnu/lib/libgcc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libiberty Makefile src/gnu/lib/libobjc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libstdc++ Makefile config.h src/gnu/lib/libsupc++ Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Makefile.fe Makefile.inc ...

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:44:11AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: The malloc usage is in the Byacc output, not the input. There's no difference, [b]yacc just copies C code blocks intact. No. Byacc copies C code blocks from the input grammer intact. It also adds more C code to the output. See

bsd.port.mk dependency loop checking patch (Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?)

2002-05-11 Thread KOMATSU Shinichiro
(add To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ? Date: Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:31:32AM JST there's a circular dependency that was just introduced to gettext. gettext now depends on expat, which depends on gmake, which depends

Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/csu Makefile src/gnu/lib/libgcc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libiberty Makefile src/gnu/lib/libobjc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libstdc++ Makefile config.h src/gnu/lib/libsupc++ Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Makefile.fe Makefile.inc ...

2002-05-11 Thread Peter Wemm
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:41:53PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:04:27PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Bmake bits for Gcc 3.1. =20 This also vanished my YACC building fixes and broke world while attempting to build `cc1plus' in a

Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/csu Makefile src/gnu/lib/libgcc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libiberty Makefile src/gnu/lib/libobjc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libstdc++ Makefile config.h src/gnu/lib/libsupc++ Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Makefile.fe Makefile.inc ...

2002-05-11 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:00:27AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:44:11AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:41:53PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:04:27PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Bmake bits for Gcc 3.1.

[panic] pb in ATA ? Or elsewhere ?

2002-05-11 Thread Ollivier Robert
Hello, I just got the following panic during resume. It is current just before gcc 3.1 went in. FreeBSD sidhe.freenix.org FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Thu May 9 17:14:15 CEST 2002 roberto@sidhe:/local/src/src/sys/i386/compile/SIDHE i386 Here is the trace: I'll keep the dump in case anyone

[panic] USB related panic

2002-05-11 Thread Ollivier Robert
FreeBSD sidhe.freenix.org FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Thu May 9 17:14:15 CEST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/local/src/src/sys/i386/compile/SIDHE i386 Sony VAIO Z600TEK, current just before gcc 3.1. Having tested the usb subsystem a few weeks ago (it hung during resume), I decided to try after the

Re: bsd.port.mk dependency loop checking patch (Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?)

2002-05-11 Thread Maxim Sobolev
KOMATSU Shinichiro wrote: (add To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ? Date: Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:31:32AM JST there's a circular dependency that was just introduced to gettext. gettext now depends on expat,

Re: bsd.port.mk dependency loop checking patch (Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?)

2002-05-11 Thread Oliver Braun
* Maxim Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-11 15:00]: KOMATSU Shinichiro wrote: (add To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ? Date: Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:31:32AM JST there's a circular dependency that was

buildworld seems broken (very early in process)

2002-05-11 Thread David Wolfskill
OK; I managed to get -CURRENT built yesterday, but the breakage I'm now seeing is ... different. It's not a matter of warnings, anyway: cc -O -pipe -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -static -o yacc closure.o error.o lalr.o lr0.o main.o mkpar.o output.o reader.o skeleton.o symtab.o verbose.o warshall.o

Current compile error at kerverosIV/lib

2002-05-11 Thread ken
Recent current compilation causes the following error; : : : (snip) cc -O2 -pipe -DENCRYPTION -DAUTHENTICATION -DSRA -I/usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libtelnet/../../../crypto/telnet -DKRB4 -I/usr/src/kerberosIV/lib/libtelnet/../../../crypto/kerberosIV/lib/krb

Re: Some ports fail on -current because ${BINOWN} and ${BINGRP} seems to be not defined

2002-05-11 Thread Bill Fenner
This is presumably fallout from the /usr/share/mk rearrangement, but rev 1.306 of /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk should fix this. Oh, hey, are the failing ports all ones that use bsd.port.pre.mk and bsd.port.post.mk? I guess bsd.port.pre.mk needs the same fix as bsd.port.mk does. Bill To

RE: pam su

2002-05-11 Thread John Baldwin
On 11-May-2002 Galen Sampson wrote: Hello all, After a 'make buildworld -DNO_WERROR` with sources today (05/10/02) and a mergemaster I am seeing the following on the console when I su: Don't mergemaster until after you've installworld'd. Is this normal? Welcome to current. It will go

Re: Some ports fail on -current because ${BINOWN} and ${BINGRP} seems to be not defined

2002-05-11 Thread Oliver Braun
* Bill Fenner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-11 17:12]: This is presumably fallout from the /usr/share/mk rearrangement, but rev 1.306 of /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk should fix this. on my -current box it doesn't. The world was build last Saturday 2002-05-04, including rev 1.306 of

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-05-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-05-11 Thread Hiten Pandya
=== libtelnet cc1: warnings being treated as errors /.amd_mnt/freefall/host/d/home/des/tinderbox/src/crypto/telnet/libtelnet/kerberos.c: In function `kerberos4_cksum': /.amd_mnt/freefall/host/d/home/des/tinderbox/src/crypto/telnet/libtelnet/kerberos.c:496: warning: unreachable code at

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-05-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Hiten Pandya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: === libtelnet cc1: warnings being treated as errors /.amd_mnt/freefall/host/d/home/des/tinderbox/src/crypto/telnet/libtelnet/kerberos.c: In function `kerberos4_cksum':

Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/csu Makefile src/gnu/lib/libgcc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libiberty Makefile src/gnu/lib/libobjc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libstdc++ Makefile config.h src/gnu/lib/libsupc++ Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Makefile.fe Makefile.inc ...

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:35:38PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: I say again, the malloc usage is not in c-parse.in, it is in the parser driver produced by Byacc. OK, now that you've explained it: I'll look this patch over carefully, but at first glance it all seems like stylistic

fatal trap 21 panic in today's current

2002-05-11 Thread Steven G. Kargl
I get the following panic (hand transribed): Fatal trap 21: FPU bounds check fault while in kernel mode instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc02433f5 stack pointer= 0x10:c040fc60 frame pointer= 0x10:c040fc7c code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b =

-current and vmware2

2002-05-11 Thread Julian Elischer
seems something broke in the networking side of things using host-only networking.. vmnet1 doesn;t show up any more.. If I have a moment I'll look for it but if anyone has familiarity with it feel free to get there forst.. oh yeah.. it doesn't compile any more either... --

Re: fatal trap 21 panic in today's current

2002-05-11 Thread Steve Kargl
Dang. I sent the wrong dmesg output. The correct dmesg follows. Note the broken ACPI. Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD

Re: -current and vmware2

2002-05-11 Thread Hiten Pandya
--- Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: seems something broke in the networking side of things using host-only networking.. vmnet1 doesn;t show up any more.. Does vmware2 crash when it is started? I was recently trying vmware2 on FreeBSD-CURRENT, but gaveup because it tried to load the

patch to add athlon to bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Steven G. Kargl
This applies to post gcc 3.1 upgrades. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ --- bsd.cpu.mk.orig Sat May 11 11:57:01 2002 +++ bsd.cpu.mk Sat May 11 12:00:49 2002 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ . elif ${CPUTYPE} == pentium CPUTYPE = i586 . elif ${CPUTYPE} == athlon -CPUTYPE = k7

Re: -current and vmware2

2002-05-11 Thread Julian Elischer
Hiten Pandya wrote: --- Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: seems something broke in the networking side of things using host-only networking.. vmnet1 doesn;t show up any more.. Does vmware2 crash when it is started? I was recently trying vmware2 on FreeBSD-CURRENT, but gaveup

Re: bsd.port.mk dependency loop checking patch (Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?)

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 04:00:53PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: KOMATSU Shinichiro wrote: (add To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ? Date: Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:31:32AM JST there's a circular dependency

Re: patch to add athlon to bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:12:16PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote: This applies to post gcc 3.1 upgrades. Thanks! Committed. Note that GCC 3.1 also supports SSE instructions. (I think SSE2 will be in 3.2, or did that make it into 3.1 recently??) If anyone has other _tested_ updates for Alpha

Re: patch to add athlon to bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:12:16PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote: This applies to post gcc 3.1 upgrades. Eek, actually there was no reason to remove K7. It should still be accepted as an alias for athlon. Your patch broke existing settings, including mine. :-( Be liberal in what you accept,

Re: patch to add athlon to bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:12:16PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote: -. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7 -_CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6 # gcc doesn't support athlon yet, but it will +. if ${CPUTYPE} == athlon +_CPUCFLAGS = -march=athlon AFAIK the k7 is a valid name for the athlon (marchitecture name). Don't

Re: -current and vmware2

2002-05-11 Thread Hiten Pandya
--- Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah I just tracked it doen to if_tap not working as a module any more... don't know what broke it but it's not showing up in /dev/ (devfs) any more and not creating interfaces.. Exactly the same problem, but when kldload is called, it

Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!

2002-05-11 Thread Mark Murray
On Thursday 09 May 2002 02:33 pm, Mark Murray wrote: Hi The response to the perl-script rewriting project has been very hearteningly _fantastic_! Here is the list as it stands. The gaps are fairly obvious (and probably mostly not critical in the short term): /usr/bin/afmtodit

embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:] What do people think of this patch to embellish bsd.cpu.mk? I also changed pN to be the more canonical pentiumN (with pN aliases of course). Index: bsd.cpu.mk

Re: patch to add athlon to bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:08:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:12:16PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote: -. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7 -_CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6 # gcc doesn't support athlon yet, but it will +. if ${CPUTYPE} == athlon +_CPUCFLAGS = -march=athlon

Re: patch to add athlon to bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:08:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:12:16PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote: -. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7 -_CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6 # gcc doesn't support athlon yet, but it will +. if ${CPUTYPE} == athlon +_CPUCFLAGS = -march=athlon

Re: patch to add athlon to bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:38PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:08:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:12:16PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote: -. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7 -_CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6 # gcc doesn't support athlon yet, but it will

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: [bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:] What do people think of this patch to embellish bsd.cpu.mk? I also changed pN to be the more canonical pentiumN (with pN aliases of course). Index:

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: -87,17 +113,17 # presence of a CPU feature. .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == i386 -. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7 -MACHINE_CPU = k7 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486 i386 +. if ${CPUTYPE} == athlon +MACHINE_CPU = athlon 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: What do people think of this patch to embellish bsd.cpu.mk? I also changed pN to be the more canonical pentiumN (with pN aliases of course). Do we need PPC and Sparc flags? -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:46:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: @@ -87,17 +113,17 @@ # presence of a CPU feature. .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == i386 -. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7 -MACHINE_CPU = k7 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486 i386

RE: pam su

2002-05-11 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 11 May 2002, John Baldwin wrote: On 11-May-2002 Galen Sampson wrote: Hello all, After a 'make buildworld -DNO_WERROR` with sources today (05/10/02) and a mergemaster I am seeing the following on the console when I su: Don't mergemaster until after you've installworld'd.

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:46:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: @@ -87,17 +113,17 @@ # presence of a CPU feature. .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == i386 -. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7 -MACHINE_CPU = k7 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486 i386

Solved -- was Re: buildworld seems broken (very early in process)

2002-05-11 Thread David Wolfskill
Well, the reason no one else encountered the problem I had was that no one else did something quite so stupid :-( I had managed to botch the sources for /bin/cp during yesterday's build (in a misdirected effort to avoid the warnings) in such a way that the resulting program executed with a

Re: -current and vmware2

2002-05-11 Thread Robert Watson
I know that for at least a little while, the rtc driver was left behind by KSE and devfs. I had a locally updated copy, but I seem to have lost it. I seem to recall that there was some confusion about calling the make_dev() from the device attach, so it never appeared in devfs... Unfortunately,

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:] On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:43:10PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: +if !defined(CPUTYPE) +CPUTUNE ?= ev56 +.endif CPUTYPE ?= ev4 What is this for? Unlike i386, but catering to ev4 Alpha's; we strongly

Re: -current and vmware2

2002-05-11 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 11:18 AM -0700 5/11/02, Julian Elischer wrote: seems something broke in the networking side of things using host-only networking.. vmnet1 doesn't show up any more.. If I have a moment I'll look for it but if anyone has familiarity with it feel free to get there forst.. oh yeah.. it doesn't

RE: pam su

2002-05-11 Thread Galen Sampson
Hello, --- Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 11 May 2002, John Baldwin wrote: On 11-May-2002 Galen Sampson wrote: Hello all, After a 'make buildworld -DNO_WERROR` with sources today (05/10/02) and a mergemaster I am seeing the following on the console when I su:

Pthreads

2002-05-11 Thread Galen Sampson
Hello all, Experiencing some troubles with pthreads building ports. An example: configure: error: --with-pthreads specified for a system without pthread suppor t === Script configure failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [maintainer] and attach the

RE: pam su

2002-05-11 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Galen Sampson wrote: Don't mergemaster until after you've installworld'd. Yeah, I bumped into this on the TrustedBSD branch lately also. It goes side by side with the don't installworld until you mergemaster rule. And the very basic rule which is Don't run

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:17:40PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:46:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: -87,17 +113,17 # presence of a CPU feature. .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == i386 -. if

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-05-11 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 12 May 2002 00:37:05 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: It is ugly. I'm not sure if it's non-standard too. Duff's device was valid in C89. I can't speak for whether C99 has broken this. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since most of the time people use it to prove

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:28:14PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:43:10PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: +if !defined(CPUTYPE) +CPUTUNE ?= ev56 +.endif CPUTYPE ?= ev4 What is this for? Unlike i386, but catering to ev4 Alpha's; we strongly pessimize

Re: Pthreads

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:38:39PM -0700, Galen Sampson wrote: Hello all, Experiencing some troubles with pthreads building ports. An example: This is probably due to the gcc upgrade which you should have read about. Kris msg38221/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-05-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2002-05-11 18:34, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Hmm, does this mean Duff's Device is not valid C? It is ugly. I'm not sure if it's non-standard too. My impression until now was that jumping from an outter block 'inside' a contained block is not

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-05-11 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-05-11 18:34, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Hiten Pandya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /* * A comment is probably needed here for those not * well versed in the C language. Yes, this is * supposed to be a switch with the body of the * switch being a while

Re: -current and vmware2

2002-05-11 Thread Alexander N. Kabaev
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 11:18:40AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: seems something broke in the networking side of things using host-only networking.. vmnet1 doesn;t show up any more.. VMWare is working fine on -CURRENT from May 7th. As Garance A Drosihn has pointed out, the vmware startup

[panic] panic during probe with a gcc 3.1 kernel

2002-05-11 Thread Ollivier Robert
I just tried to compile and boot a new kernel. It has been compiled with gcc 3.1, just recently imported. Having -march=pentiumpro or not doesn't change anything. I load 3 modules (if_wi, random, vesa). May 12 01:16:21 sidhe kernel: cardbus0: CardBus bus on pccbb0 May 12 01:16:21 sidhe kernel:

Re: [panic] panic during probe with a gcc 3.1 kernel

2002-05-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:28:29AM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: I just tried to compile and boot a new kernel. It has been compiled with gcc 3.1, just recently imported. Having -march=pentiumpro or not doesn't change anything. I load 3 modules (if_wi, random, vesa). It panics during

Re: patch to add athlon to bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:35:05PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:08:35PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:12:16PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote: -. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7 -_CPUCFLAGS = -march=k6 # gcc doesn't support athlon yet, but it will

Re: -current and vmware2

2002-05-11 Thread Julian Elischer
Garance A Drosihn wrote: At 11:18 AM -0700 5/11/02, Julian Elischer wrote: [...] If this is your first attempt to get vmware2 working on -current, there are a few tricks to getting it to work right which the port does not know about yet. I've done this before.. the build failure is that