Re: compilation failure (in the kernel SCSI code)

2002-05-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > the import of GCC3.1 seems to reveal old bugs : > (while cross-compiling a new kernel atfer cross-compiling a new -Current > world under a fresh -Stable) > (the %b flag is not recognized in the printf()s of scsi_low.c) This is just because gcc-3's f

Re: make.conf and -CURRENT

2002-05-13 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Fri, 10 May 2002 17:46:31 EST, "David W. Chapman Jr." wrote: > > sysctl.conf is also missing. If its not there, it doesn't get > > parsed. You only need make.conf if you wish to put stuff in there. > > same with rc.conf, except everyone puts something in rc.conf > > > N/m on the sysctl

Re: [panic] USB related panic

2002-05-13 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Josef Karthauser: > and that you're running it from a module so the debugger doesn't have > access to the symbols. If you get a moment perhaps you could track > down where in the usb code the panic occured. I compile the usb driver > into the kernel to get around the symbol problem.

GCC 3.1 generates bounds traps for bogous va_arg() use...

2002-05-13 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
GCC 3.1 whines about these two instances of va_arg() and generates code which calls "int 5" if they are executed. This workaround works for me, but I don't know if this is the correct fix so I won't commit it. In light of this, we may want to change the kernels panic message for these traps to

Problem with Intel 2011b

2002-05-13 Thread John Angelmo
Hello I just got my hands on a Intel 2011b Wireless card, I'm running FreeBSD current (dated just before gcc 3.1). Now my problem is that I insert the card and well nothing happens, the system gets locked, when I remove the card I everything starts working once again, and it says it can't mana

Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/newfs newfs.8 newfs.c

2002-05-13 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On Friday 10 May 2002 03:35 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: = On 2002-05-02 23:06, Makoto Matsushita wrote: = > = > Mikhail.Teterin> BTW, whatever became of the effort to make a = > Mikhail.Teterin> wrapper called mount_mfs? = > = > See mdmfs(8). It was been there since Jun/2001 (about 10 months = >

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-05-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:22:30AM -0700, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > -- > >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree > -- > >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools >

VLock and 5.0 DP1

2002-05-13 Thread Andrzej Kwiatkowski
When i try to compile Vlock from ports, i get: cc -O -pipe -DUSE_PAM -c vlock.c cc -O -pipe -DUSE_PAM -c signals.c cc -O -pipe -DUSE_PAM -c help.c cc -O -pipe -DUSE_PAM -c terminal.c cc -O -pipe -DUSE_PAM -c input.c input.c:64: security/pam_misc.h: No such file or directory input.c:67:

RE: Problem with Intel 2011b

2002-05-13 Thread alan . edmonds
I have used the non-B version with -current and an IBM thinkpad. What kind of laptop? dmesg output would be nice. Do any other cards work? Alan Edmonds -Original Message- From: John Angelmo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 May 2002 15:02 To: current Cc: freebsd-mobile Subject: Probl

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-05-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: does the order of .a files matter?

2002-05-13 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On Monday 13 May 2002 02:06 am, Terry Lambert wrote: = > If you think that providing bits on the link line in dependency = > order is a natural way of linking and the "proper" way of doing = > it, how do you explain our improper use of putting object files in = > lexical order in libraries and ho

Re: GCC 3.1 generates bounds traps for bogous va_arg() use...

2002-05-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > GCC 3.1 whines about these two instances of va_arg() and generates > code which calls "int 5" if they are executed. > > This workaround works for me, but I don't know if this is the > correct fix so I won't commit it. I just committed a correct fix

Re: Problem with Intel 2011b

2002-05-13 Thread John Angelmo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have used the non-B version with -current and an IBM thinkpad. > > What kind of laptop? dmesg output would be nice. > Do any other cards work? > > Alan Edmonds > > -Original Message- > From: John Angelmo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 13 May 2002 15:02

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-05-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Fixed in bsd.lib.mk,v 1.125. On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:22:30AM -0700, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > -- > >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree > -- > >>> stage 1: bootstrap to

RE: Problem with Intel 2011b

2002-05-13 Thread alan . edmonds
I haven't tried the NEWCARD stuff (it panics my hp 510 - 16bit bridge chips) so I can't comment on that. Did you try booting with the card installed? If you boot verbose (boot -v) should see it dump the pci id contents. Also check if /etc/defaults/pccard.conf contains an entry for the card.

Re: Problem with Intel 2011b

2002-05-13 Thread Eric Masson
> "John" == John Angelmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> Well 2011b is a 32bit card (if I'm not mistaking) Nope, it's only a 3,3V 16 bits card. If you're using -stable, the following is needed : > cat /etc/pccard.conf # Intel PRO/Wireless 2011B LAN PC Card card "Intel" "PRO/Wireless LAN

Re: Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-13 Thread Ian
> From: Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [misinformation from Terry and lots of flamage snipped] > > Gentlemen.. does this discussion on a public list serve any useful purpose? Of course it does ... it's training newcomers to the list and people who peruse the list archives in the future

Argument list too long in BUILDWORLD

2002-05-13 Thread Martin Kacerovsky
Hi, I've got error : /bin/sh:Argument list too long, while making buildworld, I haven't found any solution in archives, can you help me? Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Argument list too long in BUILDWORLD

2002-05-13 Thread Makoto Matsushita
wizard> I've got error : wizard> /bin/sh:Argument list too long, wizard> while making buildworld, IIRC, it is already fixed; re-cvsup again. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Argument list too long in BUILDWORLD

2002-05-13 Thread Edwin Culp
If my memory serves me right doesn't NO_WERROR=yes in your /etc/make.conf file do that? ed Quoting Martin Kacerovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | Hi, | I've got error : | /bin/sh:Argument list too long, | while making buildworld, | I haven't found any solution in archives, can you help me? |

Re: Argument list too long in BUILDWORLD

2002-05-13 Thread Edwin Culp
Nope, sorry. My memory didn't server me right. sorry, ed Quoting Edwin Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | If my memory serves me right doesn't | | NO_WERROR=yes | | in your /etc/make.conf file do that? | | ed | | Quoting Martin Kacerovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | | | Hi, | | I've got error : |

Re: does the order of .a files matter?

2002-05-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Mikhail Teterin wrote: > = I explain the lexical ordering by way of the following commands when > = exiting the Makefile in "vi" in command mode: > = > = !!ls *.c > = J[...] > = ISRCS= > = > = 8-). > > This does not explain anything. Whatever the joke was, I did not get it. These

Re: Problem with Intel 2011b

2002-05-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eric Masson writes: : John> Well 2011b is a 32bit card (if I'm not mistaking) : : Nope, it's only a 3,3V 16 bits card. H, I've found that the Intel PRO/Wireless are 5.0V devices. Maybe this is a different card than what I'm used to dealing with. : If you're

Re: Problem with Intel 2011b

2002-05-13 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Angelmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Hello : : I just got my hands on a Intel 2011b Wireless card, I'm running FreeBSD : current (dated just before gcc 3.1). : Now my problem is that I insert the card and well nothing happens, the : system gets

Re: Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Ian wrote: > > From: Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [misinformation from Terry and lots of flamage snipped] > > > > Gentlemen.. does this discussion on a public list serve any useful purpose? > > Of course it does ... it's training newcomers to the list and people who > peruse the list a

makefiles broken with make -j?

2002-05-13 Thread John Hay
Hi, It looks like the makefiles are a bit broken if make -j13 is used. What I see here is that osreldate.h in obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/ looks like this: ... #ifdef _KERNEL #ifdef _KERNEL #error "/usr/include/osreldate.h cannot be used in the kernel, use sys/param

installworld problem with /usr/src/usr.bin/tip/tip

2002-05-13 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
I get the following everytime I make installworld on -current ln: /usr/bin/cu: Operation not permitted *** Error code 1 To fix it I have to modify /usr/src/usr.bin/tip/tip/Makefile and remove the LINKS to cu and then all works well. Is anyone else having this problem? -- David W. Chapman Jr

GCC-3.1 Optimization -Os broken

2002-05-13 Thread Daniel Rock
Hi, after a "make world" I noticed that my dialout was broken (NAT for UDP packets seems to work but not for TCP). After a few tests I finally found the bug: -Os compilation seems broken with gcc-3.1. I normally compile complete world with -Os (instead of -O) (via CFLAGS=-Os in /etc/make.conf

Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD

2002-05-13 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
> "Garance" == Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Garance> I agree. That's why a redirector makes more sense, because Garance> the redirector can be part of the base-system, and the port Garance> can be installed in /usr/local. There is one problem with the /usr/bin/p

Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD

2002-05-13 Thread Jonathan Perkin
On Mon May 13, 2002 at 02:02:28PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > There is one problem with the /usr/bin/perl redirector: it can > cause autoconfiguration scripts to mistakenly think perl is > installed on the system (they find the /usr/bin/perl wrapper) when > it isn't (there is no perl-from-po

Something probably trivial

2002-05-13 Thread Pete Carah
I'm doing a cross-build of current on a system running stable, with a separate drive for current mounted as /current (with all sub-mounts correct). Separate problem causing me to cross-build: current doesn't like to boot lately - it hangs immediately after loading acpi.ko (on the SMP Supermicro; w

Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/newfs newfs.8 newfs.c

2002-05-13 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-05-13 10:12, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On Friday 10 May 2002 03:35 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > = On 2002-05-02 23:06, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > = > > = > Mikhail.Teterin> BTW, whatever became of the effort to make a > = > Mikhail.Teterin> wrapper called mount_mfs? > = > > = > See mdmfs(

Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD

2002-05-13 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Perkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jonathan> An auto-configuration script which merely checks for the Jonathan> existance of a file rather than actually testing it's the Jonathan> file it needs is a bit silly and probably deserves the Jonathan> breakag

Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD

2002-05-13 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:45:09PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > "Jonathan" == Jonathan Perkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jonathan> An auto-configuration script which merely checks for the > Jonathan> existance of a file rather than actually testing it's the > Jonathan>

Re: GCC-3.1 Optimization -Os broken

2002-05-13 Thread David Malone
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:57:08PM +0200, Daniel Rock wrote: > - recompile libalias with -Os => NAT broken > - recompile libalias with -O => NAT works again. > > I know any other optimization than -O isn't supported but this bug > (either in libalias or in gcc) should be investigated. If you co

Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD

2002-05-13 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:45:09PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > "Jonathan" == Jonathan Perkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jonathan> An auto-configuration script which merely checks for the > Jonathan> existance of a file rather than actually testing it's the > Jonathan>

Re: Keywords: pre-GCC3 tcsh coredump free/malloc reentrancy signal

2002-05-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 11:27:42PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > That one's easy to diagnose: > > You change your windowsize while tcsh happened to be in free(3) (frame #12). I've been seeing malloc crashes in tcsh as well, but not in the same codepath (they occur during a 'cd' operation)

Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD

2002-05-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Jonathan Perkin wrote: > On Mon May 13, 2002 at 02:02:28PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > There is one problem with the /usr/bin/perl redirector: it can > > cause autoconfiguration scripts to mistakenly think perl is > > installed on the system (they find the /usr/bin/perl wrapper) when > > it

Re: GCC-3.1 Optimization -Os broken

2002-05-13 Thread Loren James Rittle
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > found the bug: -Os compilation seems broken with gcc-3.1. I normally > [...] I know any other optimization than -O isn't supported but this bug > (either in libalias or in gcc) should be investigated. I can narrow it down *much* further to exact smal

Re: GCC-3.1 Optimization -Os broken

2002-05-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:47:42PM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote: > I can narrow it down *much* further to exact small test cases. FYI, > there are 8 C failures in the gcc 3.1 testsuite for FreeBSD/i386: > > 4 involve -Os (Quite sorry I never got around to fixing them > before the

Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD

2002-05-13 Thread Lamont Granquist
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Jonathan Perkin wrote: > On Mon May 13, 2002 at 02:02:28PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > There is one problem with the /usr/bin/perl redirector: it can > > cause autoconfiguration scripts to mistakenly think perl is > > installed on the system (they find the /usr/bin/pe

Automated reply from sattle@mail.sat50.com

2002-05-13 Thread sattle
Thanks for your inquiry. We will respond to your email in the order that it was received. Sattle http://www.sat50.com <-- This is an automated response --> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: installworld problem with /usr/src/usr.bin/tip/tip

2002-05-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 13 May 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > I get the following everytime I make installworld on -current > > ln: /usr/bin/cu: Operation not permitted > *** Error code 1 > > To fix it I have to modify /usr/src/usr.bin/tip/tip/Makefile and > remove the LINKS to cu and then all works well.

Re: make includes

2002-05-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
[CC: to -current as others may benefit from it too] On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 08:33:31PM +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: > Hi, > > I write to you since you have been touching src/Makefile alot and so on. > > I sometimes want a fresh /usr/include and wipes it and does a: > > cd /usr/src && make in

Re: make includes

2002-05-13 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 14-May-2002 (06:21:18/GMT) Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > I'm still unsure about the name; I'd have liked to rename it to > "includesinstall" but that is too long. U, buildworld, installworld, buildkernel, installkernel... It would be: buildinclude{s}, installinclude{s} just to be simmetric :)

Re: makefiles broken with make -j?

2002-05-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 08:41:11PM +0200, John Hay wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like the makefiles are a bit broken if make -j13 is used. What > I see here is that osreldate.h in obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/ looks > like this: > > > ... > #ifdef _KERNEL > #ifdef _KERNE

Re: make includes

2002-05-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:45:59AM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote: > On 14-May-2002 (06:21:18/GMT) Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > I'm still unsure about the name; I'd have liked to rename it to > > "includesinstall" but that is too long. > > U, buildworld, installworld, buildkernel, installkerne