In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
lian Elischer writes:
>
>
>On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
>> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> > Julian Elischer writes:
>> >
>> > >Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the
>> > >wings and that was more than impolite, it wa
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > Julian Elischer writes:
> >
> > >Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the
> > >wings and that was more than impolite, it was stupid, because most of the
> > >shortcomings of devfs and SLICE
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Julian Elischer writes:
>
> >Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the
> >wings and that was more than impolite, it was stupid, because most of the
> >shortcomings of devfs and SLICE had been solved and all I was waiting for
> >was the CAM
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Your MUA wraps incorrectly.
On Friday, 17 August 2001 at 9:16:59 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian
>Elischer writes:
>
>> Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he ha
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
lian Elischer writes:
>Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the
>wings and that was more than impolite, it was stupid, because most of the
>shortcomings of devfs and SLICE had been solved and all I was waiting for
>was the CAM sw
Julian Elischer wrote:
> > If it is to be counted as my only achivement on -core that I timed
> > out SLICE and DEVFS, I'll still be proud of what I did there.
>
> Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the
> wings and that was more than impolite, it was stupid, beca
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >Julian feels he has no avenue of recourse and gives up..--
>
> if (!strcmp("DEVFS", "SLICE"))
> return (ECONFUSED);
>
> Julian, you had four years, during which you didn't even manage to
> make half of the commits made to the
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
> lian Elischer writes:
>
> >> A quick script run on the cvs tree paints this picture of number
> >> of commits to src/sys/miscfs/devfs per year:
> >>
> >>julian phk other
> >>
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
> lian Elischer writes:
>
> >> A quick script run on the cvs tree paints this picture of number
> >> of commits to src/sys/miscfs/devfs per year:
> >>
> >>julian phk other
> >>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
lian Elischer writes:
>> A quick script run on the cvs tree paints this picture of number
>> of commits to src/sys/miscfs/devfs per year:
>>
>> julian phk other
>> 199556 3 15
>> 1996
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> After 3 years I gave up on the hope that it would ever be fixed
> well enough to become politically acceptable.
>
> After 6 years I removed it.
>
> A quick script run on the cvs tree paints this picture of number
> of commits to src/sys/miscfs/d
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 August 2001 at 6:36:45 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Lehey writes:
> >> In view of the fact that this thread is about deficiencies in your
> >> devfs, this is particularly uncalled for. One of th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Lehey writes:
ls -la /dev/fd
>>>
>>> What am I supposed to see there? I get three character devices, all
>>> mounted on /dev directly.
>>
>> Uhm, have you forgotten how ls(1) works ?
>
>No.
>
>> Try this then:
>>
>> ls -lad /dev/fd /dev/fd/[012]
On Thursday, 16 August 2001 at 6:36:45 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Lehey writes:
>> On Wednesday, 15 August 2001 at 19:17:47 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
>>> lian Elischer writes:
>>>
the lack of subdirector
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Lehey writes:
>On Wednesday, 15 August 2001 at 19:17:47 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
>> lian Elischer writes:
>>
>>> the lack of subdirectory support is a pitty.
>>
>> There is support for subdirectories:
>>
>> ls -
[snip]
> And in general, can we stop the high incidence of mud-slinging we've
> seen on the lists lately?
Here, here!
Brandon
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
16 matches
Mail list logo
