On Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:08:44 +0100
Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 9 Feb 2022, at 10:57, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > test-includes uses pf.h when checking usage of pfvar.h.
> >
> > But, these lines in include/Makefile remove pf.h when WITHOUT_PF is
> > set in src.conf:
> >
> > .if ${MK_PF} != "no"
> >
On 9 Feb 2022, at 10:57, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> test-includes uses pf.h when checking usage of pfvar.h.
>
> But, these lines in include/Makefile remove pf.h when WITHOUT_PF is
> set in src.conf:
>
> .if ${MK_PF} != "no"
> INCSGROUPS+= PF
> .endif
>
> This breaks buildworld. The error message:
Hi!
> Has anyone compiled a script/test suite for testing various NIC
> features to make sure they work/function properly?
>
> That is, being able to run a couple interfaces back to back, and turn
> off the features off on one, and make sure things like checksum offload
> and the like work
Alan Somers wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 9:11 AM Rick Macklem wrote:
>>
>> Alan Somers wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 6:38 PM Rick Macklem wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have a little program for testing the copy_file_range(2) syscall I've
>> >> been
>> >> working on. (The current version is
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 9:11 AM Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> Alan Somers wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 6:38 PM Rick Macklem wrote:
> >>
> >> I have a little program for testing the copy_file_range(2) syscall I've
> >> been
> >> working on. (The current version is attached, in case anyone is
> >>
Alan Somers wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 6:38 PM Rick Macklem wrote:
>>
>> I have a little program for testing the copy_file_range(2) syscall I've been
>> working on. (The current version is attached, in case anyone is interested.)
>>
>> It take a few minutes to run on a slow system and uses
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 6:38 PM Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> I have a little program for testing the copy_file_range(2) syscall I've been
> working on. (The current version is attached, in case anyone is interested.)
>
> It take a few minutes to run on a slow system and uses about 6Gbytes of disk
>
Please use freebsd-test for testing
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-test
Vince
On 08/10/2013 23:00, Joe Nosay wrote:
What were you testing?
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Joe Nosay superbisq...@gmail.com wrote:
/div/td/tr/tbody/table/td/tr/tbody/table/divdiv
/div/td/tr/tbody/table/td/tr/tbody/table/divdiv
class=utdU2e/divdiv class=tx78Ic/divdiv
class=aHl/divdiv id=:2il tabindex=-1/divdiv id=:2i7
class=ii gt m1419842a752abb3c adP adOdiv id=:2i6
style=overflow: hidden;testbr__
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Alexander
What were you testing?
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Joe Nosay superbisq...@gmail.com wrote:
/div/td/tr/tbody/table/td/tr/tbody/table/divdiv
class=utdU2e/divdiv class=tx78Ic/divdiv class=aHl/divdiv
id=:2il tabindex=-1/divdiv id=:2i7 class=ii gt m1419842a752abb3c
adP adOdiv id=:2i6
Hi all again!
I've just committed some more fixes to TX power calibration for the AR9220
and AR9280.
I -think- I have all of the radio setup correct now for the AR5416, AR9160,
AR9220 and AR9280.
If you're using any of these, especially if you're using the AR9220/AR9280
(and doubly so oif
-grenoble.fr
wrote:
On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi all,
For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd
really
appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup
mikael.uran...@ujf-grenoble.fr
wrote:
On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi all,
For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd
really
appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
I've done
hello!
FreeBSD 9.0-900033-CURRENT #0 r219338M: Mon Mar 7 11:31:40 VLAT 2011
All fine with AR9285, WPA2 is used
stable 36/48/54Mbps with my AP
07.03.2011, 06:14, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com:
On 7 March 2011 03:21, Ian FREISLICH i...@clue.co.za; wrote:
Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'd like
wrote:
Hi all,
For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
Since running the new code, I get a slew of these:
Mar 6 14:41:53 mini wpa_supplicant[422]: Trying to associate with
00:30:4f:58:bf:94 (SSID='quasar' freq
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi all,
For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
Since running the new code, I get a slew of these:
Mar 6 14:41:53 mini wpa_supplicant[422]: Trying to associate with
00:30:4f:58:bf:94 (SSID
2011/3/6 Ian FREISLICH i...@clue.co.za:
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi all,
For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
Since running the new code, I get a slew of these:
Mar 6 14:41:53 mini wpa_supplicant[422]: Trying
Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'd like to establish at least a range of subversion revisions so we can
start binary searching which one(s) caused instabilities.
Is this all the source?
Old:
$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c,v 1.300 2011/02/21 19:22:45 adrian Exp $
$FreeBSD:
On 7 March 2011 03:21, Ian FREISLICH i...@clue.co.za wrote:
Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'd like to establish at least a range of subversion revisions so we can
start binary searching which one(s) caused instabilities.
Is this all the source?
Old:
$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c,v 1.300
to -HEAD and re-test.
I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and
found/fixed a few bugs
in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced
regressions. I'd
like to make sure that I haven't broken legacy (11abg
it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few
bugs
in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced regressions.
I'd
like to make sure that I haven't broken legacy (11abg) support in
weird/wonderful ways. I'd also
On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi all,
For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs
in the TX path. It's
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 19:31, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs
in the TX path
of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few
bugs
in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced regressions.
I'd
like to make sure that I
, Urankar Mikael mikael.uran...@ujf-grenoble.fr
wrote:
On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi all,
For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
I've done a variety of changes
Hi all,
For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs
in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced regressions. I'd
like to make sure
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 03:17:05PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
It looks strange to have `ifconfig create' vlan interface on tap,
while tap uses different semantics and can disappear after closing it?
With ef it is even worse, pseudo-devices are created while ef is
starting, so ef module
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:04:42PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
I'm not convinced this is the right direction to move in. The problem
is that users are beginning to expect that pseudo-interfaces be created
with network interface cloning, but tun, tap, and vmnet aren't. I'm
Same about ef(4)
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:35:34PM +0200, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:04:42PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
I'm not convinced this is the right direction to move in. The problem
is that users are beginning to expect that pseudo-interfaces be created
with network
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 07:29:08AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brooks Davis writes:
| Properly dismantle and remove the interface and destroy the dev_t=20
| at last close of the device.
I'm not convinced this is the right direction to move in. The
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:57:19PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Please test this patch:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/if_tun.patch
There is a slight change in semantics in that the interface will disappear
entirely when the /dev/tun%d device is closed.
If no objections this
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brooks Davis writes:
| Properly dismantle and remove the interface and destroy the dev_t=20
| at last close of the device.
I'm not convinced this is the right direction to move in. The problem
is that users are beginning to expect that pseudo-interfaces be
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
This patch moves the SCSI cd driver under GEOM.
On sparc64 (or with geom_sunlabel in your kernel) try inserting a
solaris install CD and then:
true /dev/cd0 # make GEOM taste media
ls -l /dev/cd*
You should now be able to see the boot partitions.
It
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ulrich Spoerlein writes:
--OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 23.09.2003 at 10:27:12 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
On sparc64 (or with geom_sunlabel in your
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote:
Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tunefs now uses libufs and tunefs is
one of the crunched programs, I realised that I really needed to make
newfs(8) use libufs. To show off that it *can* help us reduce space,
a good bit in some cases.
Good to see
* De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ]
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote:
Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tunefs now uses libufs and tunefs is
one of the crunched programs, I realised that I
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ]
[ Subjecte: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ]
[rambling, and a patch]
I thought every bit of code that would possibly write out was protected by
Nflag, it isn't. I'll re-instate the wtfs function as a wrapper to
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ]
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ]
[ Subjecte: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ]
[rambling, and a patch]
I thought
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ]
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote:
Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tunefs now uses libufs and tunefs is
one
* De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ]
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ]
* De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ]
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ]
I just went to do this, and found that pwrite is failing, saying EBADF.
Could this be because of the failed ioctl? I'm not sure why this is
happening. Any
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote:
Here's the URL once more:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jmallett/newfs-libufs.diff
Two minor issues: one use of if Nflag is left near the beginning of the
diff and would prefer the check in bwrite() be if !Nflag instead of
returning early.
-Nate
On Friday 16 November 2001 07:09, Brian K. White wrote:
testing...
Brian K. White -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
http://www.aljex.com/bkw/
+[+++[-]-]+..+.+++.-.[+---]
++. filePro BBx Linux SCO Prosper/FACTS AutoCAD #callahans
Satriani
kindly use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have you tested the foof bug itself?
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 10:57:18AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
Anyone running -current on a true Pentium with the F00F bug that can verify
that this simple cleanup patch works?
On 24-Oct-01 Julian Elischer wrote:
have you tested the foof bug itself?
cjc did. The change has already been committed.
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 10:57:18AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
Anyone running -current on a true Pentium with the F00F
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 10:57:18AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
Anyone running -current on a true Pentium with the F00F bug that can verify
that this simple cleanup patch works?
http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/f00f.patch
I can probably do it over the weekend.
Kris
PGP signature
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 10:57:18AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
Anyone running -current on a true Pentium with the F00F bug that can verify
that this simple cleanup patch works?
http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/f00f.patch
I can. Running it on p5/133 right now.
CPU: Pentium/P54C
On 18-Dec-00 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Baldwin writes:
On 17-Dec-00 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
This patch is for the printf(9), log(9) /dev/console stuff.
The result is that you can watch the output from /etc/rc in
your /var/log/messages.
Poul-Henning
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
This patch is for the printf(9), log(9) /dev/console stuff.
The result is that you can watch the output from /etc/rc in
your /var/log/messages.
This works spectacularly for me on a UP -current with up to date
sources. The only nit I have is that it doesn't
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 01:15:41PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
This patch is for the printf(9), log(9) /dev/console stuff.
The result is that you can watch the output from /etc/rc in
your /var/log/messages.
This works spectacularly for me on a UP
On 17-Dec-00 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
This patch is for the printf(9), log(9) /dev/console stuff.
The result is that you can watch the output from /etc/rc in
your /var/log/messages.
Poul-Henning
1. Replace logwakeup() with msgbuftrigger++; There is little
point in calling a
On 17-Dec-00 Doug Barton wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
This patch is for the printf(9), log(9) /dev/console stuff.
The result is that you can watch the output from /etc/rc in
your /var/log/messages.
This works spectacularly for me on a UP -current with up to date
sources. The
On 2000-Dec-17 15:06:40 -0800, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17-Dec-00 Doug Barton wrote:
Would there be any harm to changing the dots to something more
meaningful, like "Done with additional network setup" on its own line?
The '.'s are simple and not too cluttery.
Agreed. I
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2000-Dec-17 15:06:40 -0800, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17-Dec-00 Doug Barton wrote:
Would there be any harm to changing the dots to something more
meaningful, like "Done with additional network setup" on its own line?
.
Agreed. I think the
This patch is for the printf(9), log(9) /dev/console stuff.
The result is that you can watch the output from /etc/rc in
your /var/log/messages.
Dec 17 13:00:26 console.info Master /boot/kernel/kernel: Doing
additional network setup:
Dec 17 13:00:26 console.info Master
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Baldwin writes:
On 17-Dec-00 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
This patch is for the printf(9), log(9) /dev/console stuff.
The result is that you can watch the output from /etc/rc in
your /var/log/messages.
Poul-Henning
1. Replace logwakeup() with
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Jeremy writes:
I'm not offering code right now, but how about using a `newline or
timeout' approach? If there's a partial line and there's been no
console output for some number of seconds, forward the line to log(9).
I played with this, and I was not happy
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
This patch is for the printf(9), log(9) /dev/console stuff.
The result is that you can watch the output from /etc/rc in
your /var/log/messages.
Dec 17 13:00:26 console.info Master /boot/kernel/kernel: Doing
additional network setup:
Dec 17 13:00:26
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Barton writes:
The '.'s are simple and not too cluttery. Fixing the console to line buffer
what it sends to log(9) is a better fix, IMO.
I specifically decided not to do this because I want to be able to
see stuff like:
echo -n "Press return
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Andrey Rouskol wrote:
Hi there !
Some days ago I was tring to compile mysql at -current and found that
./configure freezes at 'checking for restartable system calls'. Here is a
code witch is executed - if you compile it with '-lc_r -lm -lcrypt' it will
It should be
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Andrey Rouskol wrote:
Some days ago I was trying to compile mysql at -current and found that
./configure freezes at 'checking for restartable system calls'. Here is a
code witch is executed - if you compile it with '-lc_r
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Andrey Rouskol wrote:
Hi there !
Some days ago I was tring to compile mysql at -current and found that
./configure freezes at 'checking for restartable system calls'. Here is a
code witch is executed - if you compile it with '-lc_r -lm -lcrypt' it will
freeze.
Fix
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:34:58 +0200, "Vincent Bruijnes" wrote:
How can i unsubscribe from freebsd-current and subcribe to freebsd-stable,
Thanks, Vincent
Send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not to this list) with
unsubscribe freebsd-current
subscribe freebsd-stable
in the message body.
64 matches
Mail list logo
