Re: vga0, atkbdc0, fdc0 attaching to ISA bus?

2000-08-06 Thread Warner Losh
: >Well, I understand that, my question is, why are true PCI devices like : >video controllers still shown as being on isa0 by the kernel? Yokota-san's answer is correct here, which I've not repeated. however, atkbdc0 is a isa device as is fdc0. For some drivers it is easier to hack a pci fron

Re: vga0, atkbdc0, fdc0 attaching to ISA bus?

2000-08-06 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: >recognized to be on the ISA bus. But, the reality is that the PCI >video card is a half-PCI and half-ISA device... Thank you, Kazu. That sucks, but at least it makes sense now. Brandon D. Valentine -- bandix at looksharp.net | bandix at structbio

Re: vga0, atkbdc0, fdc0 attaching to ISA bus?

2000-08-06 Thread Kazutaka YOKOTA
>On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > >>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Warner Losh writes: >>: The reason you have a ISA to PCI bridge still is that the serial >>: ports, parallel ports, floppy, keyboard and mouse devices still live >>: on the ISA bus. They aren't full PCI nodes just yet in m

Re: vga0, atkbdc0, fdc0 attaching to ISA bus?

2000-08-06 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: >Well, I understand that, my question is, why are true PCI devices like >video controllers still shown as being on isa0 by the kernel? I wanted >an explanation of that. That's what doesn't make sense to me. Perhaps >there's a valid PC/AT hardware

Re: vga0, atkbdc0, fdc0 attaching to ISA bus?

2000-08-06 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Warner Losh wrote: >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Warner Losh writes: >: The reason you have a ISA to PCI bridge still is that the serial >: ports, parallel ports, floppy, keyboard and mouse devices still live >: on the ISA bus. They aren't full PCI nodes just yet in most ha

Re: vga0, atkbdc0, fdc0 attaching to ISA bus?

2000-08-06 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Warner Losh writes: : The reason you have a ISA to PCI bridge still is that the serial : ports, parallel ports, floppy, keyboard and mouse devices still live : on the ISA bus. They aren't full PCI nodes just yet in most hardware : designs (I've yet to see a floppy,

Re: vga0, atkbdc0, fdc0 attaching to ISA bus?

2000-08-06 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brandon D. Valentine" writes: : I've got a machine with an Abit SL6 w/ AGP/PCI/CNR onboard, but no ISA : slots, and it still has an ISA to PCI bridge built in. Some of the : devices still register with the kernel on the ISA bus, even though they : are quite obviou

Re: vga0, atkbdc0, fdc0 attaching to ISA bus?

2000-08-06 Thread Mike Muir
"Brandon D. Valentine" wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Donn Miller wrote: > > >Anyone know why these devices want to attach to the ISA bus on a primarily > >PCI bus machine? My MoBo is an Asus SP97-V, which has a mixture of ISA > >and PCI slots. I was wondering maybe if even machines that have

Re: vga0, atkbdc0, fdc0 attaching to ISA bus?

2000-08-06 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Donn Miller wrote: >Anyone know why these devices want to attach to the ISA bus on a primarily >PCI bus machine? My MoBo is an Asus SP97-V, which has a mixture of ISA >and PCI slots. I was wondering maybe if even machines that have all PCI >slots, that there's still an inter

vga0, atkbdc0, fdc0 attaching to ISA bus?

2000-08-06 Thread Donn Miller
Anyone know why these devices want to attach to the ISA bus on a primarily PCI bus machine? My MoBo is an Asus SP97-V, which has a mixture of ISA and PCI slots. I was wondering maybe if even machines that have all PCI slots, that there's still an internal ISA bus? Check out my dmesg. Specifica