Should ixgbe 2.4.8 (supplied with 9.1-RELEASE) support ALTQ?
My card:
ix0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0xa12c8086 chip=0x150b8086
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = '82598EB 10-Gigabit AT2 Server Adapter'
class = network
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:52:15 -0500
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:15 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com
wrote:
It's about latency, realtime has priority over non-realtime.
I sort of understand this, but I can't figure out how that would apply
to my example:
altq on $wan
Hello,
I'm setting up pf with altq support in my kernel on freebsd 9.0-Stable
(soon to switch to the -RELEASE once it's available).
The system is a quad-core Xeon E31220, running amd64.
I've done a bit of googling and found various results. I know the
freebsd handbook says ALTQ_NOPCC is required
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:15 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:51:39 -0500
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
I've read everything I could find on the topic of configuring hfsc
altq in pf (4.5, FreeBSD 9), but I still have no clear idea of how it
is actually implemented. I
APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up pf with altq support in my kernel on freebsd 9.0-Stable
(soon to switch to the -RELEASE once it's available).
The system is a quad-core Xeon E31220, running amd64.
I've done a bit of googling and found various results. I know the
freebsd handbook
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:51:39 -0500
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
I've read everything I could find on the topic of configuring hfsc
altq in pf (4.5, FreeBSD 9), but I still have no clear idea of how it
is actually implemented. I even started looking through the source
code, but that might take a while
I've read everything I could find on the topic of configuring hfsc
altq in pf (4.5, FreeBSD 9), but I still have no clear idea of how it
is actually implemented. I even started looking through the source
code, but that might take a while. My main questions are:
1. Difference between 'realtime
Hello all,
I'm configuring pf on FreeBSD 7.3 and would like to use the following
altq settings:
altq on $ext priq bandwidth 9240Kb queue {low, red, med, top}
altq on {$int1, $int2, $srv} priq bandwidth 100Mb queue {low, red, med, top}
queue low priority 1 priq(default) # Default priority queue
On 3 July 2010 00:05, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I'm configuring pf on FreeBSD 7.3 and would like to use the following
altq settings:
altq on $ext priq bandwidth 9240Kb queue {low, red, med, top}
altq on {$int1, $int2, $srv} priq bandwidth 100Mb queue {low, red, med
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:17 PM, krad kra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 3 July 2010 00:05, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I'm configuring pf on FreeBSD 7.3 and would like to use the following
altq settings:
altq on $ext priq bandwidth 9240Kb queue {low, red, med, top
Здравствуйте, irix.
It will be great if altq can queue like in dummynet with dst/src masks
Вы писали 17 мая 2009 г., 3:47:37:
i Hello Freebsd-pf,
i Sorry for my english.
i OpenBSD team is abandon the altq project.
i Maybe FreeBSD team does not come as OpenBSD team.
i In Kernel is present
Hello Freebsd-pf,
Sorry for my english.
OpenBSD team is abandon the altq project.
Maybe FreeBSD team does not come as OpenBSD team.
In Kernel is present options ALTQ_CDNR # Traffic conditioner,
that is may be used for simple ingress traffic shaping (like
dummynet). Maybe
, and I'd like to solve it.)
This is exactly the reason why I built my own router several years ago.
I have done the same with PF and AltQ for the past few years. It is so
effective on my 1536/384 ADSL that I now have the opposite problem: a
large download will lag both downloads and uploads. Sadly
. This is a problem, and I'd like to solve it.)
This is exactly the reason why I built my own router several years ago.
I have done the same with PF and AltQ for the past few years. It is so
effective on my 1536/384 ADSL that I now have the opposite problem: a
large download will lag both
http://homerouters.info/wiki/Main_Page
Be aware that I'm not a very good teacher... ;-)
On the contrary, you're an excellent teacher, and I now have a working
pf configuration handling my NAT duties as well as outbound traffic
shaping (and handy graphs, too). Thank you very much for the
looked at various ALTQ + pf setups on the Web, but I have one
caveat. I use FreeBSD 6.4 on my home gateway, and it is also using the
default natd server, which relies on an ipfw divert rule. I don't know
if this matters, or if I need to switch from natd to a pf-based NAT setup.
Technically you
have looked at various ALTQ + pf setups on the Web, but I have one
caveat. I use FreeBSD 6.4 on my home gateway, and it is also using the
default natd server, which relies on an ipfw divert rule. I don't know
if this matters, or if I need to switch from natd to a pf-based NAT setup.
Should I use
Morgan Wesström wrote:
I've put together a documentation, mainly to help myself being
consistent, but your free to look at my examples there and the reasoning
behind it. It's in the Firewall setup guide but it's rather long since
I explain in detail every part of the firewall rule set:
it another way: When I max out my upstream, and my upstream is
capped lower than my downstream, my downstream becomes useless and I am
forced to wait until the upload finishes before I can resume using the
downstream. This is a problem, and I'd like to solve it.)
I have looked at various ALTQ + pf
I have been using PF for several years now and used IPFW previous to
PF that I've grown more and more fond of. I now need to manage
bidirectional traffic I have used Dummynet before to do similar
things but it is my understanding that Altq can only manage outgoing
traffic.
My questions
I have been using PF for several years now and used IPFW previous to
PF that I've grown more and more fond of. I now need to manage
bidirectional traffic I have used Dummynet before to do similar
things but it is my understanding that Altq can only manage outgoing
traffic although I find
Edwin L. Culp wrote:
I have been using PF for several years now and used IPFW previous to PF
that I've grown more and more fond of. I now need to manage
bidirectional traffic I have used Dummynet before to do similar things
but it is my understanding that Altq can only manage outgoing traffic
Hello,
I am trying to find out how to specify services in the below scenario:
ext_if=kue0
altq on $ext_if priq bandwidth 1024Kb queue { q_pri, q_def }
queue q_pri priority 7
queue q_def priority 1 priq(default)
pass out on $ext_if proto tcp from $ext_if to any flags S/SA
keep
2008/8/19 Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I am trying to find out how to specify services in the below scenario:
ext_if=kue0
altq on $ext_if priq bandwidth 1024Kb queue { q_pri, q_def }
queue q_pri priority 7
queue q_def priority 1 priq(default)
pass out on $ext_if proto
I am trying to setup traffic shaping on our network. I was wondering if it
was possible to limit a users download bandwidth and upload bandwidth within
the same state connection. For example, say a user connects to an external
FTP site and does some uploading and downloading. Can I allow him to
I am trying to setup traffic shaping on our network. I was wondering if it
was possible to limit a users download bandwidth and upload bandwidth within
the same state connection. For example, say a user connects to an external
FTP site and does some uploading and downloading. Can I allow him to
On 18:18:09 Mar 27, Joe Ryan wrote:
I am trying to setup traffic shaping on our network. I was wondering if it
was possible to limit a users download bandwidth and upload bandwidth within
the same state connection. For example, say a user connects to an external
FTP site and does some
Ovi wrote:
Hello
I am trying a simple setup to shape bandwidth on up and down using
FreeBSD 6.2, PF, ALTQ with CBQ and on download everything works well,
but on upload it works only at half of asigned bandwidth, with packets
dropped.
Here is my pf.conf
# pf.conf
Hello
I am trying a simple setup to shape bandwidth on up and down using
FreeBSD 6.2, PF, ALTQ with CBQ and on download everything works well,
but on upload it works only at half of asigned bandwidth, with packets
dropped.
Here is my pf.conf
# pf.conf
Hello all,
I have a problem and I can't seem to find a solution to it by just goggling;
so maybe you can help me.
I am trying to set up a traffic shaper using pf and altq with hfsc queues.
Actually I did set that up about a year ago and it worked perfectly. But
lately the number of clients
On Mon, November 12, 2007 08:04, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
Hope the above explanation suffices.
Yu, it does. Very nice explanation, thanx.
Can you clarify your needs a bit more?
Well, it's actually quite simple: our internet access line, which is used
by several people (directly,
Peter Boosten wrote:
On Mon, November 12, 2007 08:04, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
Hope the above explanation suffices.
Yu, it does. Very nice explanation, thanx.
Can you clarify your needs a bit more?
Well, it's actually quite simple: our internet access line, which is used
by
the info you need is
right there.
Don't worry about altq.
Best,
Girish
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
Hi all,
One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of traffic
with altq, traffic that is not bound to specific IP addresses, like online
radio?
Looks like I finally understood what you want.
You want to block the protocol from
Hi all,
One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of traffic
with altq, traffic that is not bound to specific IP addresses, like online
radio?
Thanks in advance.
Peter
--
http://www.boosten.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
Hi all,
One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of traffic
with altq, traffic that is not bound to specific IP addresses, like online
radio?
Yes.
Not altq(It is for QoS).
But pf can of course. :)
localip = www.shoutcast.com
On Sun, November 11, 2007 15:43, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
Hi all,
One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of traffic
with altq, traffic that is not bound to specific IP addresses, like
online radio?
Yes.
Not altq
On Sun, November 11, 2007 15:43, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
Hi all,
One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of traffic
with altq, traffic that is not bound to specific IP addresses, like
online radio?
Yes.
Not altq
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Peter Boosten wrote:
On Sun, November 11, 2007 15:43, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
Hi all,
One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of traffic
with altq, traffic that is not bound
On Sun, November 11, 2007 20:16, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 14:03:29 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
Hi all,
One quick question: is it possible to filter specific kinds of
traffic with altq, traffic that is not bound to specific IP
addresses, like online radio?
If you can identify the traffic
On 18:49:37 Nov 11, Peter Boosten wrote:
Thanks for your answer, although that's not quite what I'm looking for:
Okay. Find my answer below.
I know it's possible to 'shape' the traffic with altq, so it's possible in
theory to shape certain kind of traffic to almost nihil. Smart devices
Mel wrote:
On Saturday 13 October 2007 00:17:32 Ovi wrote:
Hello guys
I have this example from OpenBSD:
altq on $br1_if cbq bandwidth 20Mb qlimit 100 tbrsize 1000 queue { std1,
customer_1 } queue customer_1 bandwidth 1Mb cbq(red,ecn) { customer_1_bulk,
customer_1_ack } queue
On Saturday 13 October 2007 16:04:10 Ovi wrote:
Mel wrote:
On Saturday 13 October 2007 00:17:32 Ovi wrote:
Hello guys
I have this example from OpenBSD:
altq on $br1_if cbq bandwidth 20Mb qlimit 100 tbrsize 1000 queue { std1,
customer_1 } queue customer_1 bandwidth 1Mb cbq(red,ecn
Hello guys
I have this example from OpenBSD:
altq on $br1_if cbq bandwidth 20Mb qlimit 100 tbrsize 1000 queue { std1,
customer_1 }
queue customer_1 bandwidth 1Mb cbq(red,ecn) { customer_1_bulk, customer_1_ack }
queue customer_1_ack priority 7
queue customer_1_bulk priority 0
I want to use CBQ
On Saturday 13 October 2007 00:17:32 Ovi wrote:
Hello guys
I have this example from OpenBSD:
altq on $br1_if cbq bandwidth 20Mb qlimit 100 tbrsize 1000 queue { std1,
customer_1 } queue customer_1 bandwidth 1Mb cbq(red,ecn) { customer_1_bulk,
customer_1_ack } queue customer_1_ack priority 7
On 06/02/07, Justin Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've actually already done everything you've suggested with little or no
impact at all. One point where we have different results is with
ADAPTIVE_GIANT, I actually noticed a drop of about 50kpps thruput when
disabling it.
Hmm I am
At 08:03 AM 2/6/2007, Chris wrote:
On 06/02/07, Justin Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've actually already done everything you've suggested with little or no
impact at all. One point where we have different results is with
ADAPTIVE_GIANT, I actually noticed a drop of about 50kpps thruput
So, this may be the wrong list to post to, but it seemed the most
appropriate. If someone could suggest a better location to move/cross
post to let me know.
I've been running some tests with using FreeBSD to filter and rate
limit traffic. My first thoughts were to goto the latest stable
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:03:41 -0800, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
I suppose my concerns are two-fold. Why is 6.x collapsing under traffic
that 4.11 could easily block and run merrily along with, and is there a
queueing mechanism in place that doesn't tie up the box so much on
I've actually already done everything you've suggested with little or no
impact at all. One point where we have different results is with
ADAPTIVE_GIANT, I actually noticed a drop of about 50kpps thruput when
disabling it.
Mike Tancsa wrote:
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:03:41 -0800, in
At 09:53 PM 2/5/2007, Justin Robertson wrote:
I've actually already done everything you've suggested with little
or no impact at all.
Are you sure you had kern.polling.idle_poll=1 enabled ? It makes a
big difference in RELENG_6 with it on or off in my tests.
---Mike
.
scrub in all
# Queueing: rule-based bandwidth control.
altq on $ext_if priq queue { std_out, voip_out, ack_out, high_out, low_out }
queue std_out priority 4 priq (default)
queue voip_out priority 9
queue ack_out priority 10
queue high_out priority 5
queue low_out priority 3
# Translation: specify
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 03:11:04AM -, John Levine wrote:
I am putting together a FreeBSD router to replace a tired old BSD/OS
one. My external line is a T1, so I got a Wanic 400 on ebay. I have a
/24 that is about half full so I don't do NAT and don't expect to need
to do so.
[snip
fixed IP addresses, but how
do I do the priority. The altq man pages say that each driver has to
support altq, and the sr driver doesn't.
Can I do this with netgraph? Is there something else I'm missing?
TIA,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Dear list.
My pf.conf not working.
I have pf in bridge machine with xl2 to internet firewall and xl1 to
internal switch. Bridging is ok.
This my simple pf.conf
me=172.16.0.228
altq on xl1 bandwidth 100% cbq queue {me,dflt}
queue mebandwidth 8Kb
queue dflt bandwidth 16Kb cbq
Dear all
any one here have some sample script to limit
connection for p2p ( edonkey , kazza , etc ) with pf
also how to limit some ip not port with pf .
sory if my question so newbie
thx
My Regard's
SONJAYA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
also how to limit some ip not port with pf .
you set up your queues, then assign traffic to them via your pass
rules. Your pass rules can use whichever criteria you like, ie
altq on $ext_if cbq bandwidth 10Mb queue { def, mostofmybandwidth, notalot }
queue def bandwidth 20% cbq(default
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 18:24, Norberto Meijome wrote:
hi there :)
I was planning to migrate a 4.11 firewall using a combo of ipf/ipnat and
ipfw pipe/dummynets to pf + ALTQ.
pf/ipf/ipfw dummynet/ALTQ are available since 5.3-R if I recall correctly.
One thing I haven't figured out how
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:20:19 +0300
Nikos Vassiliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 18:24, Norberto Meijome wrote:
hi there :)
I was planning to migrate a 4.11 firewall using a combo of ipf/ipnat and
ipfw pipe/dummynets to pf + ALTQ.
pf/ipf/ipfw dummynet/ALTQ
/ALTQ.
I know for sure that you can use pf and ipfw at the same
time. The filtering is done in a serial way(packets that
are allowed through the first packet filter, go through the
second etc). You can load the modules in any order you like
and this will be the order packets flow through the packet
hi there :)
I was planning to migrate a 4.11 firewall using a combo of ipf/ipnat and ipfw
pipe/dummynets to pf + ALTQ.
One thing I haven't figured out how to do with pf is the plr option to the
dummynet configuration - we use it to simulate modem connections or just simply
bad links.
Also
On Thursday 30 March 2006 16:42, fbsd_user wrote:
Can ALTQ support be compiled into a custom kernel and be
used stand-a-lone?
They can be used in anything which is compiled to use them, yes.
Then if what you say is true, there would be man pages in the
base system for using ALTQ stand
Reading the pf firewall man pages says to use ALTQ with PF a
custom kernel has to be complied with the ALTQ options included.
This seems to indicate that ALTQ is only available when
used with the pf firewall.
ALTQ used to be available as a port so it could be used
stand-a-lone.
Can ALTQ support
Can ALTQ support be compiled into a custom kernel and be
used stand-a-lone?
They can be used in anything which is compiled to use them, yes.
--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Then if what you say is true, there would be man pages in the
base system for using ALTQ stand-a-lone and there are none.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 10:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
Back in 5.2 development when OpenBSD pf was being included
in the base system there was talk that ALTQ for bandwidth
management was also being worked on to become part of
the base system.
What is the status of ALTQ is it a port or in the base system now
On 3/29/06, fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back in 5.2 development when OpenBSD pf was being included
in the base system there was talk that ALTQ for bandwidth
management was also being worked on to become part of
the base system.
What is the status of ALTQ is it a port or in the base
Carstea Catalin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want to read many about altq, but i don't found tehnical
documentation or tutorials.
Can u suggest something!?
There is a whole section about it in the Handbook.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
I want to read many about altq, but i don't found tehnical
documentation or tutorials.
Can u suggest something!?
--
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
regards,
Carstea Catalin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Thanks! And pf how it's enabled? I think need some device in /dev
This is created when compiling kernel with these options or need to
compile and options for pf?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
If you're using IPFW, there's no reason to enable PF. But here's the
code to enable in your kernel config:
# pf support
device pf
device pflog
device pfsync
Here's the handbook page on PF and ALTQ:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls
Hi!
I want to enable altq to use in conjunction with ipfw.
How can do that?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Vladone,
I was looking for the same thing a while back, wanting to use ALTQ for
PF. Enable support in the kernel by adding the following lines:
# ALTQ support
options ALTQ
options ALTQ_CBQ# Class Bases Queuing (CBQ)
options ALTQ_RED# Random Early
I have recently installed FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE i386 on a box that uses a
Supermicro P8SCT motherboard containing two Broadcom 5721 Gigabit Ethernet
controllers.
These are working fine and are recognized on boot, but when I tried to
configure pf to utilize ALTQ I received the following message
Hello to all
I am trying to install the diffserv model in my testbed. I have computers
with freebsd4.11 and kame + altq kernel options and computers with freebsd
5.4 + kame + altq and pf kernel options.
The first doubt that I have is:
My border routers are those with the freebsd5.4
Dear all,
I want to ask something that strange for me. I Have freebsd 5.4 Stable
with pf+altq compiled in kernel. i try to use the altq for bandwidth
shaping. the script is :
altq on $internet_if bandwidth 64Kb cbq queue { gateway, internet }
queue gateway priority 1 bandwidth 64Kb cbq
I need help moving from ipfw and dummynet to pf and altq. So far I
have converted most ipfw rules to pf.
Can someone tell me if there is something for altq like this for dummynet
# ipfw add 1 pipe 1 config bw 64Kbit/s queue 10Kbytes mask src-ip 0x
# ipfw add 2 pipe 2 confg bw 128Kbit/s
I apologize if this is the wrong list for this, but if it is, please let
me know. Basically when queue1 on my firewall starts pushing the full
amount of bandwidth, things that use the dflt queue become unreachable
or VERY slow. The dflt queue NEVER uses it's full amount of bandwidth,
Christopher McGee wrote:
I apologize if this is the wrong list for this, but if it is, please
let me know. Basically when queue1 on my firewall starts pushing the
full amount of bandwidth, things that use the dflt queue become
unreachable or VERY slow. The dflt queue NEVER uses it's full
What are they?
I can't use Intel cards because they are crashing my Adaptec RAID...
-AL.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dear all,
i have patch for ipfw altq support. i've patch it and rebuild the
kernel. i have 5.3 stable with ipfw and pf enabled.
but when i rebuild the kernel by make buildkernel KERNCONF=conf i
have error :
cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing
+++ Brian John [freebsd] [20-01-05 17:30 -0600]:
| Hello,
| I am trying to get pf to work on my 5.3 machine. I thought that I had
| it setup but it says that I don't have ALTQ support? What is that? Can
| someone help me set it up?
|
| Thanks
|
| /Brian
1) man altq
2) http
Hello,
I am trying to get pf to work on my 5.3 machine. I thought that I had
it setup but it says that I don't have ALTQ support? What is that? Can
someone help me set it up?
Thanks
/Brian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
try to add these lines to your kernel config,
and recompile after having made that particular
addition ...
# ALTQ
options ALTQ
options ALTQ_CBQ# Class Bases Queueing
options ALTQ_RED# Random Early Drop
options ALTQ_RIO# RED In/Out
options
On Thursday 20 January 2005 05:30 pm, Brian John wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get pf to work on my 5.3 machine. I thought that I
had it setup but it says that I don't have ALTQ support? What is
that? Can someone help me set it up?
Thanks
/Brian
ALTQ is a kernel option. Add the line
On 01/20/05 18:30:23, Brian John wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get pf to work on my 5.3 machine. I thought that I
had it setup but it says that I don't have ALTQ support? What is
that? Can someone help me set it up?
Thanks
/Brian
___
freebsd
in on tun0 all random-id no-df
scrub in on tun0 all
# Queueing
altq on tun0 priq bandwidth 100Kb queue { q_pri, q_def, q_med }
queue q_pri priority 7
queue q_med priority 3
queue q_def priority 1 priq(default)
## nat
# General:
nat on tun0 from 192.168.2.0/24 to any - (tun0
# Queueing
altq on tun0 priq bandwidth 100Kb queue { q_pri, q_def, q_med }
queue q_pri priority 7
queue q_med priority 3
queue q_def priority 1 priq(default)
## nat
# General:
nat on tun0 from 192.168.2.0/24 to any - (tun0)
rdr on rl0 proto udp from any to 192.168.2.1/32 port 53
Hello!
altq(4) says:
SUPPORTED DEVICES
The driver modifications described in altq(9) and required to use
a certain network card with ALTQ have been applied to the
following hardware drivers an(4), ath(4), awi(4), bfe(4), dc(4),
em(4), fxp(4), hme(4), lnc(4), wi(4), de(4), rl(4
Lewis Thompson wrote:
I'm pretty sure this ``works'' but I was really hoping for more.
Without the 5.3 miniinst ISO downloading a SSH connection is perfect (no
lag, just like the local machine) but as soon as I set it going it
becomes a bit laggy. Am I expecting too much to have a lag-free SSH
Hi,
I want to use pf/altq to give ssh a high priority so I don't get lagged
down when something is downloading.
I have:
altq on ath0 priq queue { default, ssh }
queue default priq(default)
queue ssh priority 15 priq(red)
I'm pretty sure this ``works'' but I was really hoping for more
Giuliano Cardozo Medalha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The GENERIC kernel does have support to ALTQ ?
It does not.
There is some script that I can use to start the use of the function:
rc.conf or load.conf ?
Yes, once you have altq loaded.
man pf.conf
Hi,
I would like to know how to start ALTQ kernel support, tom implement
functions with PF.
The GENERIC kernel does have support to ALTQ ?
There is some script that I can use to start the use of the function:
rc.conf or load.conf ?
Thanks a lot
Giuliano
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Giuliano Cardozo
Medalha
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 19:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ALTQ
The GENERIC kernel does have support to ALTQ ?
No, it does not have the support for pf or ALTQ. Refer
Yes, they apply cleanly.
Regards,
Alex.
Hugo Silva wrote:
Hey,
I wanted to know if the patches available for ALTQ on FreeBSD 5.x work on
5.2.1.
I can't test this myself because the only 5.2.1 server I have is a
production server and I'd like to be 100% sure it will work first.
I don't know
Hey,
I wanted to know if the patches available for ALTQ on FreeBSD 5.x work on
5.2.1.
I can't test this myself because the only 5.2.1 server I have is a
production server and I'd like to be 100% sure it will work first.
I don't know if the patches will apply cleanly, the latest I found were
My class is defined with borrow. Why altqstat show that in this class
some packets are dropped ?
On my link i've got free 10 MBits, and i want to use it in other class.
thanks in advance
AK
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
i've got one problem with altq.
I'm using it in 4.9 stable, but on phisical interfaces i have vlan
trunking. My configured interfaces are vlan0,1 etc.
My question is:
If i setup output control on vlan interface, is traffic on this interface
controled in the same way as on phisical interface
I'm using FreeBSD 4.8 Stable with altq as my firewall for few networks.
Now by FBSD box is connected to my switch with 4 patchcords(one for one
vlan). Altq is working exactly as i want.
Now i would like to have only one cable to switch.
It's simpe and it's working, but how to force altq
99 matches
Mail list logo
