Hi
This morning at about 7 am, I noticed to commits to stable/9 that I wanted to
pull in and so did and then rebuilt from source.
Just now, I noticed this: svn commit: r240807 - in stable/9/contrib/bind9: .
lib/dns lib/dns/include/dns
I really can't be bother to requildworld again, can I
Guys,
I never got my old, bind9[3.X] that is past its EOL to upgrade.
Pretty sure I read about the same problem I found that some others
had to. Am I misinformed?
thanks in advance.
gary
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Journey Toward
hey guys,
ok I fixed the reverse zone file and now it's working perfectly!
@ IN SOA ns1.summitnjhome.com. bluethundr.gmail.com. (
2011032901 ;serial
14400 ;refresh
3600 ;retry
604800 ;expire
10800;minimum
)
. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:19:26 -0400
From: Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com
Subject: reverse dns in bind9
Hello,
I am attempting to setup reverse dns in bind 9 under freebsd
On 3/28/11 7:21 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your reply!
I took your advice and removed that line from resolv.conf and added
it into /etc/named/named.conf
Now it looks like this
// RFC 1912
zone localhost{ type master; file master/localhost-forward.db; };
zone
wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:19:26 -0400
From: Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com
Subject: reverse dns in bind9
Hello,
I am attempting to setup reverse dns in bind 9 under freebsd... this is
in an attempt to allow mysql to work a little easier with DNS
resolution.
In my
, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:19:26 -0400
From: Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com
Subject: reverse dns in bind9
Hello,
I am attempting to setup reverse dns in bind 9 under freebsd... this is
in an attempt to allow mysql to work a little
)
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:19:26 -0400
From: Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com
Subject: reverse dns in bind9
Hello,
I am attempting to setup reverse dns in bind 9 under freebsd
On 3/28/11 11:36 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Now I could probably understand it FAILING due to perhaps a type-o in
the config. But I am genuinely curious as to how forward lookups will
work and reverse lookups time out.
I would expect them to time out if your dns server knows nothing about
the
hello
no crabby comments on restart at all!
LBSD2# /etc/rc.d/named restart
Stopping named.
Waiting for PIDS: 4970.
Starting named.
Ah but yes some complaints from the logs
Mar 29 04:59:47 LBSD2 named[5469]: master/summitnjhome-reverse.db:10:
ignoring out-of-zone data (summitnjhome.com)
Mar 29
On 3/29/11 12:05 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
hello
no crabby comments on restart at all!
LBSD2# /etc/rc.d/named restart
Stopping named.
Waiting for PIDS: 4970.
Starting named.
Ah but yes some complaints from the logs
Mar 29 04:59:47 LBSD2 named[5469]: master/summitnjhome-reverse.db:10:
ignoring
Hello,
I am attempting to setup reverse dns in bind 9 under freebsd... this
is in an attempt to allow mysql to work a little easier with DNS
resolution.
In my /etc/named/named.conf file I have the following:
// RFC 1912
zone localhost{ type master; file master/localhost-forward.db; };
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:19:26 -0400
From: Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com
Subject: reverse dns in bind9
Hello,
I am attempting to setup reverse dns in bind 9 under freebsd... this is
in an attempt to allow mysql to work a little easier with DNS
resolution.
In my /etc/named
oKay, since my prev question caught no wixards, how about looking at
the errors from bind-9.3.6? [I rebuilt this from the src tarball; it
finally installed; I fixed some obvious errors, but several remain.
Here is the log file where bind9 fails on em0, my NIC
file where bind9 fails on em0, my NIC in my server.
This is one failure that is simply over my head.
+++
Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: could not listen on UDP socket: address in
use
Jan 24
remain.
Here is the log file where bind9 fails on em0, my NIC in my
server.
This is one failure that is simply over my head.
+++
Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: could not listen
file where bind9 fails on em0, my NIC in my server.
This is one failure that is simply over my head.
+++
Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: could not listen on UDP socket: address in
use
Jan 24
errors, but several remain.
Here is the log file where bind9 fails on em0, my NIC in my server.
This is one failure that is simply over my head.
+++
Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747
; it
finally installed; I fixed some obvious errors, but several remain.
Here is the log file where bind9 fails on em0, my NIC in my server.
This is one failure that is simply over my head.
+++
Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
/var/named/etc/namedb
errors, but several remain.
Here is the log file where bind9 fails on em0, my NIC in my server.
This is one failure that is simply over my head.
+++
Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:48:46PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
You already have another instance of Bind running, so you cannot have TWO
!!!
Yes indeed. So, since things are working again, as before I did a
can provide better insight I'd go with that :)
If it all does fail in the long run (but I seriously doubt it) you only
need to update your sources and rebuild world to return to bind9.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hello,
My problem (PowerDNS crash my system at startup) have been solved by
correcting the configuration of PowerDNS as follow:
Edit /usr/local/etc/pdns/pdns.conf and be sure that :
daemon=yes
guardian=yes
Thanks with best wishes.
Hello,
I was looking for a solution to manage Bind9
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Sayed Nimer sayed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was looking for a solution to manage Bind9 DNS server through a web so I
can add/edit zone.
I thought PowerDNS/PowerAdmin would be a good solution for my requirements.
I successfully installed both PowerDNS/PowerAdmin
On 7 January 2011 15:53, Sayed Nimer sayed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Sayed Nimer sayed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was looking for a solution to manage Bind9 DNS server through a web so I
can add/edit zone.
I thought PowerDNS/PowerAdmin would be a good solution
Hello,
I was looking for a solution to manage Bind9 DNS server through a web so I
can add/edit zone.
I thought PowerDNS/PowerAdmin would be a good solution for my requirements.
I successfully installed both PowerDNS/PowerAdmin and tested them was
working fine.
When I restart my box I found
Hello.
I am sorry if my comment sounds stupid... but It won't be WEBMIN an
alternative for managing simple BIND operations?
Jorge Biquez
At 11:10 a.m. 07/01/2011, Sayed Nimer wrote:
Hello,
I was looking for a solution to manage Bind9 DNS server through a web so I
can add/edit zone.
I
Hello,
I was looking for a solution to manage Bind9 DNS server through a web so I
can add/edit zone.
I thought PowerDNS/PowerAdmin would be a good solution for my requirements.
I successfully installed both PowerDNS/PowerAdmin and tested them was
working fine.
When I restart my box I found
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Sayed Nimer sayed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was looking for a solution to manage Bind9 DNS server through a web so I
can add/edit zone.
I thought PowerDNS/PowerAdmin would be a good solution for my requirements.
I successfully installed both PowerDNS
will simply
write the files up again. Well it's not like that... i;ve did pgk_delete,
make deinstall, make rmconfig, tryed to manually delete all the files
required but no joy. Now i've tryed to use all bind9 bind96 and bind97 from
ports and even get the source from isc.org but they all did the same
Hi,
/etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: run_rc_command: cannot run /usr/sbin/named
/etc/rc.d/named ans /usr/sbin/named are not from the ports but from
native FreeBSD distribution.
Portsx will go into /usr/local/ only.
So apparently you mixed-up distribution and port, deleted part of one
and part of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2010 16:51:09, Olivier Nicole wrote:
/etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: run_rc_command: cannot run /usr/sbin/named
/etc/rc.d/named ans /usr/sbin/named are not from the ports but from
native FreeBSD distribution.
Portsx will go into
Hello,
I have setup FreeBSD recently, can somebody help me with one interesting
thing - Bind9 slave DNS server, everything is works great, but I got a
problem with extended logging of xfer, etc.
Bind9 started in chroot:
root 7880.0 0.1 3156 1004 ?? Ss Fri01AM 0:02.10
/usr/sbin
On Saturday 30 May 2009 14:50:31 Prokofyev Vladislav wrote:
Bind9 started in chroot:
root 7880.0 0.1 3156 1004 ?? Ss Fri01AM 0:02.10
/usr/sbin/syslogd -l /var/run/log -l /var/named/var/run/log -s
bind30792 0.0 1.2 16212 12864 ?? Is4:10PM 0:00.23
/usr/sbin
Prokofyev Vladislav wrote:
Hello,
I have setup FreeBSD recently, can somebody help me with one interesting
thing - Bind9 slave DNS server, everything is works great, but I got a
problem with extended logging of xfer, etc.
Bind9 started in chroot:
root 7880.0 0.1 3156 1004
named_enable=YES
named_program=/usr/sbin/named
named_chrootdir=/var/named
-Mike
After adding these options on my system, named didn't start at boot.
Manully attempt to start it via '/etc/rc.d/named start' brought to the
following error:
/etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: run_rc_command: cannot
On Saturday 30 May 2009 17:01:17 Prokofyev Vladislav wrote:
The named running chrooted has no clue about /var/named. You can either
use ducttape:
cd /var/named/var sudo ln -s .. named
or just strip /var/named from your config file, hence use
/var/log/xfer.log.
--
Mel
This
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:53 AM, R Dicaire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:32 AM, User Lenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With a bit of work I was able to successfully build/replace bind9.4.2
port and add pgsql sdb support. If anyone's interested, I can post the
method I used.
Hi folks...I'm looking to rebuild bind9 to support the pgsql sdb
interface, from /usr/src/contrib/bind9. However I don't see the
contrib subdir in bind9/ where the sdb files reside (as they do in the
src tarball). So how would I go about rebuilding bind to have this
support?
--
aRDy Music
With a bit of work I was able to successfully build/replace bind9.4.2
port and add pgsql sdb support. If anyone's interested, I can post the
method I used.
--
aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire present:
http://www.ardynet.com
http://www.ardynet.com:9000/ardymusic.ogg.m3u
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:32 AM, User Lenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With a bit of work I was able to successfully build/replace bind9.4.2
port and add pgsql sdb support. If anyone's interested, I can post the
method I used.
I am interested, please if you put the posts it would be nice
Which is the best way to upgrade bind9 using portupgrade without setting
anything on fire?
I have two FreeBSDs which act as master and slave DNS (not installed by me),
should i upgrade both bind's before they can work again?
should i kill bind before upgrading?
I'm sorry if any of my questions
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 11:45:58PM +0100, QADMOS wrote:
Gelsema, P (Patrick) a écrit :
On Sun, December 23, 2007 23:04, QADMOS wrote:
Jonathan Horne a écrit :
On Sunday 23 December 2007 02:52:43 pm QADMOS wrote:
Hi everyone,
i'm having a hard time with bind9.
I'm
Hi everyone,
i'm having a hard time with bind9.
I'm trying to set up an authoritative dns server.
Unfortunately when i try to launch it with an 'rndc start' i get this
error message :
rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused
I've reviewed my conf files but frankly i
On Sunday 23 December 2007 02:52:43 pm QADMOS wrote:
Hi everyone,
i'm having a hard time with bind9.
I'm trying to set up an authoritative dns server.
Unfortunately when i try to launch it with an 'rndc start' i get this
error message :
rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection
Jonathan Horne a écrit :
On Sunday 23 December 2007 02:52:43 pm QADMOS wrote:
Hi everyone,
i'm having a hard time with bind9.
I'm trying to set up an authoritative dns server.
Unfortunately when i try to launch it with an 'rndc start' i get this
error message :
rndc: connect failed
On Sun, December 23, 2007 23:04, QADMOS wrote:
Jonathan Horne a écrit :
On Sunday 23 December 2007 02:52:43 pm QADMOS wrote:
Hi everyone,
i'm having a hard time with bind9.
I'm trying to set up an authoritative dns server.
Unfortunately when i try to launch it with an 'rndc start' i
Gelsema, P (Patrick) a écrit :
On Sun, December 23, 2007 23:04, QADMOS wrote:
Jonathan Horne a écrit :
On Sunday 23 December 2007 02:52:43 pm QADMOS wrote:
Hi everyone,
i'm having a hard time with bind9.
I'm trying to set up an authoritative dns server.
Unfortunately when i
My apologies for the blank post. Apparently, I became a bit trigger happy
while setting up Kmail for mailing lists.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
On Sunday 23 December 2007 05:45:58 pm QADMOS wrote:
--
Glen Barber
(570)328-0318
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QADMOS wrote:
Gelsema, P (Patrick) a écrit :
On Sun, December 23, 2007 23:04, QADMOS wrote:
Jonathan Horne a écrit :
On Sunday 23 December 2007 02:52:43 pm QADMOS wrote:
Hi everyone,
i'm having a hard time with bind9.
I'm trying to set up an authoritative dns server
On Dec 23, 2007 3:45 PM, QADMOS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gelsema, P (Patrick) a écrit :
On Sun, December 23, 2007 23:04, QADMOS wrote:
Jonathan Horne a écrit :
On Sunday 23 December 2007 02:52:43 pm QADMOS wrote:
Hi everyone,
i'm having a hard time with bind9.
I'm trying
On Monday 24 December 2007 02:15, Jonathan Horne wrote:
otherwise, there is always 'forcestart' intead of 'start'.
and Darren Spruell wrote:
You can get around the need to activate the variable by
prefixing your commands with the 'force' keyword (e.g.
/etc/rc.d/named forcestart, etc.)
To
On Dec 23, 2007 10:43 PM, Jonathan McKeown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 02:15, Jonathan Horne wrote:
otherwise, there is always 'forcestart' intead of 'start'.
and Darren Spruell wrote:
You can get around the need to activate the variable by
prefixing your
08:19
Hi
I use FreeBSD 6.2 and the base bind9.
For dynamic DNS update, bind9 automatically generate the journal
file
(end in .jnl).
The default config is to use chroot and the running user as 'bind'.
The problem is that after named is started (/etc/init.d/named
start),
the default chroot
Thanks for reply.
Your suggestion solved my problem, thanks.
Yes, /etc/init.d/named is a typo.
Regards
Patrick
--- Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Dung wrote:
Hi
I use FreeBSD 6.2 and the base bind9.
For dynamic DNS update, bind9 automatically generate the journal
file
Hi
I use FreeBSD 6.2 and the base bind9.
For dynamic DNS update, bind9 automatically generate the journal file
(end in .jnl).
The default config is to use chroot and the running user as 'bind'.
The problem is that after named is started (/etc/init.d/named start),
the default chroot directory
Patrick Dung wrote:
Hi
I use FreeBSD 6.2 and the base bind9.
For dynamic DNS update, bind9 automatically generate the journal file
(end in .jnl).
The default config is to use chroot and the running user as 'bind'.
The problem is that after named is started (/etc/init.d/named start
channel
instead (less overhead, especially on a busy server). Either way
there
is information in the ARM that will help you,
/usr/share/doc/bind9/arm.
After furher testing, I got my problem solved.
1. I found named-log is ok to use.
2. I did not need to change my previous named.conf.
3
really need this to
go to syslog, you're probably better off writing to a file channel
instead (less overhead, especially on a busy server). Either way
there
is information in the ARM that will help you,
/usr/share/doc/bind9/arm.
After furher testing, I got my problem solved.
1. I found named-log
this is what i have from 5.2
logging {
channel namedlog {
file /var/log/named.log;
severity info;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
print-time yes;
};
category lame-servers {
I am using FreeBSD 6.2 with the default bind (not ports).
By default chroot is used.
When named start or stop, it does have log in /var/log/messages.
But for example, when some do domain transfer successfully, that is not
logged (zone transfer denied is logged).
So I tried to add this part in
I am using FreeBSD 6.2 with the default bind (not ports).
By default chroot is used.
When named start or stop, it does have log in /var/log/messages.
But for example, when some do domain transfer successfully, that is not
logged (zone transfer denied is logged).
So I tried to add this part in
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, John Murphy wrote:
Wasn't there, once upon a time, an error message in FreeBSD which
reported 'This doesn't look like Kansas, Toto'?
I remember seeing that error message somewhere, but do not remember
where or if it was in FreeBSD.
jerry
Seem
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, John Murphy wrote:
Wasn't there, once upon a time, an error message in FreeBSD which
reported 'This doesn't look like Kansas, Toto'?
I remember seeing that error message somewhere, but do not remember
where or if it
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, John Murphy wrote:
Wasn't there, once upon a time, an error message in FreeBSD which
reported 'This doesn't look like Kansas, Toto'?
I remember seeing that error message somewhere, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Favourite worst written error message in history:
Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue.
I have always loved this one!! Who made that up!?
Someone at IBM. That's what the original IBM PC, PC-AT, and
(presumably) PC-XT displayed if the keyboard
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:14:44PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except that bash requires all the icky GNU utilities to build so you
have to GNUify your system.
And perl doesn't? It was GPL last I knew.
The entirety of Perl falls under the GPL and Artistic
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerard
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 9:30 AM
To: User Questions
Subject: Re[2]: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9!
On July 04, 2007 at 09:53AM Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[snip
to...
BIND9!
How far do we get to go back in time? From the first online
fortran compiler:
ugh1 and ugh2. In fairness these were conditions that were not
supposed to
happen, but somehow they always do. In more recent times I always liked,
invalid page fault this perhaps as late as win98
Wasn't there, once upon a time, an error message in FreeBSD which
reported 'This doesn't look like Kansas, Toto'?
Seem to recall it occurring when I deleted the directory I was 'in'.
I may have imagined it though!
--
John.
___
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chad Perrin
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:39 AM
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9!
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:14:44PM -0700, Garrett Cooper
to... BIND9!
More to the point, Perl is dual-licensed -- redistributable under the
terms of either the GPL or the Artistic License, at your discretion.
Not correct. The Artistic license is less restrictive than the GPL so
GPL advocates can take a Perl install and call it GPLd perl
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:05:50 -0600
Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:41:13PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Chad Perrin writes:
Isn't Perl part of the base system these days?
Perl has not been part of the base system for several years
and was
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 9:36 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9!
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Martin McCormick wrote
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9
On July 04, 2007 at 09:53AM Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[snip]
Actually perl has a lot of problems too. One of the biggest is that
perl script writers always seem to think like you, in that perl is
consistent across all platforms.
The biggest problems I've seen with perl scripts are when
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 12:26:01PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:05:50 -0600
Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:41:13PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Chad Perrin writes:
Isn't Perl part of the base system these days?
Perl has not
How far do we get to go back in time? From the first online fortran compiler:
ugh1 and ugh2. In fairness these were conditions that were not supposed to
happen, but somehow they always do. In more recent times I always liked,
invalid page fault this perhaps as late as win98.
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
Software Guru
Meditation Number
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
Software Guru
Eduardo Viruena Silva wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
If one is going to require the installation of something that may
not be part of a base system, that something might as well be bash :)
Except that bash requires all the icky GNU utilities to build so you
have to GNUify your system.
And perl doesn't? It was GPL last I knew.
The second
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If one is going to require the installation of something that may
not be part of a base system, that something might as well be bash :)
Except that bash requires all the icky GNU utilities to build so you
have to GNUify your system.
And perl doesn't? It
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin
McCormick
Then, there is the ultimate, the Check engine. light on the
modern car.
Check engine - CEL
It would be so nice if it said some indication as to
the seriousness of the problem so
Reminds me of a typical windows user i dealt with who saw an error about
explorer.exe and how it could not be read and let it slide. :-P
using my wicked non user friendly skillz of the damned, i personally
like the concept of a simple pebkac error when bind refuses to start
due to a
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 03:11:56PM -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
#! /bin/sh
a = 5
that's enough to make it happen. Run that, and you get:
a: not found
Interestingly enough, if you run that same script in a
Debian Linux environment, you get:
./testfile: line 2: a: command
Paul Chvostek writes:
This is actually just the difference between sh and bash. You'll see
the latter error if you type `a = 5` in bash in any OS. It just so
happens that most Linux distributions don't have a real sh:
I kind of thought that was the real issue. While
something like
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:44:14 -0500
Martin McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Chvostek writes:
This is actually just the difference between sh and bash. You'll
see the latter error if you type `a = 5` in bash in any OS. It
just so happens that most Linux distributions don't have a
: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 2:24 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9!
Reminds me of a typical windows user i dealt with who saw an error about
explorer.exe and how it could not be read and let it slide. :-P
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Martin McCormick wrote:
Paul Chvostek writes:
This is actually just the difference between sh and bash. You'll see
the latter error if you type `a = 5` in bash in any OS. It just so
happens that most Linux distributions don't have a real sh:
I kind of thought
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 09:36 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Martin McCormick wrote:
Paul Chvostek writes:
This is actually just the difference between sh and bash. You'll see
the latter error if you type `a = 5` in bash in any OS. It just so
happens that most Linux
This is actually just the difference between sh and bash ...
differences in, say, arithmetic handling and loops can sometimes
mean rewriting parts of shell scripts depending on whether it is
going to run in BSD or Linux.
That's a major argument for doing things in python or perl as
they
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 07:34:20PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is actually just the difference between sh and bash ...
differences in, say, arithmetic handling and loops can sometimes
mean rewriting parts of shell scripts depending on whether it is
going to run in BSD or
Chad Perrin writes:
Isn't Perl part of the base system these days?
Perl has not been part of the base system for several years and
was deprecated for some time before that.
Robert Huff
___
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:41:13PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Chad Perrin writes:
Isn't Perl part of the base system these days?
Perl has not been part of the base system for several years and
was deprecated for some time before that.
Is it part of the default install without
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is actually just the difference between sh and bash ...
differences in, say, arithmetic handling and loops can sometimes
mean rewriting parts of shell scripts depending on whether it is
going to run in BSD or Linux.
That's a major
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:29:03PM -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is actually just the difference between sh and bash ...
differences in, say, arithmetic handling and loops can sometimes
mean rewriting parts of shell scripts depending on
Jeffrey Goldberg writes:
I still remember as a newcomer to Unix a long long time ago getting
Bad magic number
In retrospect, I suspect that I'd typed ld where I'd meant to type ls.
I have been doing things on Unix systems since about
1990 and the thing I run across that makes
On Thursday 31 May 2007, Tom Wilson wrote:
I always liked one of the messages from an old version of the VMS (4 or 5?)
C compiler(may not be exactly it, but this was included):
Bad Code
Or the Level I BASIC error messages on a TRS-80.
What?
How?
Sorry?
And that's all folks. The entire
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
