as if that is the case for you.
Unless you have a specific reason why portsnap doesn't fit your use
case, it's definitely the way to go for just keeping a ports tree
updated regularly.
Last 10 years I am using cvsup. Any good guide for the transition to
subversion ?
For ports is easy(portsnap
On 27/01/2013 00:11, W. D. wrote:
What would be the best Cron command to keep ports updated on a daily
basis?
Try this as a crontab entry:
0 3 * * * * /usr/sbin/portsnap cron update
Two points to note:
1) The 'cron' verb is important for anyone setting up an automated job
like this.
On Sunday 27 Jan 2013 09:46:51 Matthew Seaman wrote:
to get yourself a portsnap-ready copy of the ports tree. You only need
to do that once, but you should move aside any pre-existing copy of
/usr/ports obtained by any means other than portsnap(8) before you do
(but keep anything under
On 27/01/2013 08:35, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
Last 10 years I am using cvsup. Any good guide for the transition to
subversion ?
Most of the guides around freebsd.org are aimed at developers who will
be using SVN read-write. For simple read-only use (ie. not checking
anything
On 27/01/2013 10:07, Mike Clarke wrote:
I suppose the best approach with ZFS would be to make a snapshot immediately
prior to running portsnap.
Yes. That would do the trick quite neatly. In fact, snapshot before
each time you run portsnap.
Cheers
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J
On 27/01/2013 12:46, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Cheers,
Matthew
Matthew,
Fantastic howto ! Thanks ! Really a good job...as usual :-)
Peter
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
not recognise the change and
download a proper copy.
The only downside with svn seems to be the 728 MB footprint.
Cheers ...
Mark
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:46:23 Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 27/01/2013 08:35, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
Last 10 years I am using cvsup. Any good guide for the transition
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:51:12 -0500
MFV mrk...@acm.org wrote:
The only downside with svn seems to be the 728 MB footprint.
With hard disc space running at around 10c per gigabyte it's a
minor issue.
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.org
___
Steve O'Hara-Smith writes:
The only downside with svn seems to be the 728 MB footprint.
With hard disc space running at around 10c per gigabyte it's a
minor issue.
Doesn't that depend on whose money it is?
Robert Huff
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote:
2) Choose a protocol for access the SVN servers. Your choices in
order of preference are
svn://
https://
http://
Use svn:// for best performance. If you're concerned about MITM
attacks injecting trojans into the
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:51:12 -0500
MFV wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Thanks for an outstanding piece of documentation. It resolves a
number of concerns I had and convinced me to move from portsnap where
I discovered an apparent bug that gave me security concerns. More
specifically I manually
According to:
http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html
Cvsup is deprecated. If I have a Cron entry like:
#-
#Min HrDOM Mnth DOW Command
# At 3:46 in the morning, everyday, as root, update the ports tree:
46
W. D. w...@us-webmasters.com writes:
According to:
http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html
Cvsup is deprecated. If I have a Cron entry like:
#-
#Min HrDOM Mnth DOW Command
# At 3:46 in the morning
.
With cvsup I don't have such a problem.
I have no information about pkgng, whether I can maintain private
repository with pkgng or not?
I guess the best in this case is to switch to subversion.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsSubversionPrimer
Janos Mohacsi
Head of HBONE+ project
I've been using cvsup for upgrading all of my installations for more years
than I want to remember. I just detected that I have a problem.
Configuration:
supfile=/usr/local/etc/cvs-supfile and contains:
*default tag=RELENG_9
*default host=cvsup15.freebsd.org
*default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup
TreeList failed: Error in
/usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup/cvsroot-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_9: Bad header
line. Delete it and try again.
I deleted that above mentioned file before running cvsup. I've been using
the configuration file for many years with no changes and don't normally
check because
/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_8_1 and
retrying cvsup?
I realize that 8.1 isn't formally supported anymore, but should cvsup still
work? I can't upgrade right now because of the conflict between GPT and
gmirror what was introduced in 8.2.
Right. This isn't version-related
deleting /var/db/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_8_1 and
retrying cvsup?
Somehow I got it in my head that that was a file living on the cvsup server and
not locally.
After deleting that file all is good. Thanks for your help!
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect j...@nasby.net
I keep getting this error when trying to update source on 8.1:
TreeList failed: Error in /var/db/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_8_1:
13890: Could not parse status record. Delete it and try again.
I realize that 8.1 isn't formally supported anymore, but should cvsup still
work? I can't
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
Is there a way to query one of the FreeBSD cvsup mirrors, something
like 'svn list -v svn:...' (only with cvs or csup)? I'm
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
I'm not looking for a specific version of a file, but trying to find out
whether any arbitrary cvsup mirror is current with the main repository.
Not version control, but network monitoring.
http://www.mavetju.org/unix
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
Is there a way to query one of the FreeBSD cvsup mirrors, something
like 'svn list -v svn:...' (only with cvs or csup)? I'm looking to
find the revision or date of a file.
Anonymous CVS is probably the best approach for you.
It's covered
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
Is there a way to query one of the FreeBSD cvsup mirrors, something
like 'svn list -v svn:...' (only with cvs or csup)? I'm looking to
find the revision or date of a file.
Anonymous CVS is probably the best
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 14:53:58 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
Is there a way to query one of the FreeBSD cvsup mirrors, something
like 'svn list -v svn:...' (only with cvs or csup)? I'm
Is there a way to query one of the FreeBSD cvsup mirrors, something like
'svn list -v svn:...' (only with cvs or csup)? I'm looking to find the
revision or date of a file.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Hi all,
Running FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p6 here, we've noticed that both the amd64 build of
supfilesrv as installed by the sup-2.0.20060802 package AND the amd64 build
of cvsupd as installed by the cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 package, both
segmentation fault immediately upon connection.
The easiest
Update.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Devin Teske
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 12:05 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Broken amd64 packages: cvsup-without-gui and sup
Hi all,
Running
Hello guys,
I notice FreeBSD is now using (and probably has been for a while) csup
instead of cvsup. The parameters looking identical - at least from the
no-gui perspective.
Can anyone advise what the difference is, and perhaps educate me on how
this came to be?
Thanks
Foo JH wrote:
Hello guys,
I notice FreeBSD is now using (and probably has been for a while) csup
instead of cvsup. The parameters looking identical - at least from the
no-gui perspective.
Can anyone advise what the difference is, and perhaps educate me on how
this came to be?
I'm
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:54:25AM +0800, Foo JH wrote:
Hello guys,
I notice FreeBSD is now using (and probably has been for a while) csup
instead of cvsup. The parameters looking identical - at least from the
no-gui perspective.
Can anyone advise what the difference is, and perhaps
Michael Powell writes:
Csup is a rewrite of cvsup in the C language, and as such can be
included as part of the base operating system. It is only linked
against a few system libraries. This also means it can be built
using the same tools and system compiler whenever the system
itself
On 12/12/2011 7:39 πμ, Robert Huff wrote:
Michael Powell writes:
Csup is a rewrite of cvsup in the C language, and as such can be
included as part of the base operating system. It is only linked
against a few system libraries. This also means it can be built
using the same tools
Hi
cvsup -g -L 2 /usr/local/etc/cvsup/cvsup-ports.conf
I have next conf for cvsup
cat cvsup-ports.conf
*default host=cvsup6.jp.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs date=2008.10.15.00.00.00
*default delete use-rel-suffix
*default compress
ports-databases date
1.0.24 is latest
it seems that the latest version did not carry across with the cvsup
i have most documentation available
have tried portupgrade - no go
am stuck
how do i update this individual port
and is it possible to have two separate versions of same port in the tree
example: to rename libsndfile
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:17:09 +0100
wayne mitchell wrote:
hey,
i have just cvsup'ed for first time (newbie)
RELENG_8_1_RELEASE
You probably want to use RELENG_8_1 which is the security branch for
the 8.1 release. RELENG_8_1_RELEASE is the version on the CD, without
any security fixes.
available within the cvs repository are:
1.0.20, 1.0.23, 1.0.24 - but not 1.0.21
1.0.24 is latest
it seems that the latest version did not carry across with the cvsup
i have most documentation available
have tried portupgrade - no go
am stuck
how do i update this individual port
wayne mitchell wrote:
hey,
i have just cvsup'ed for first time (newbie)
Cvsup as an add-on port is actually no longer needed. Csup is cvsup
rewritten in C and is a part of the base OS now. Functionally identical.
RELENG_8_1_RELEASE
rebuilt world...
there is a problem with a particular
Tim Dunphy wrote:
hey listers!! sorry for all the trouble.. just as an FYI it turned out
to NOT be a DNS issue at all!!!
it was a routing issue...
this command apparently did the trick...
[r...@lbsd2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#/etc/rc.d/routing restart
add net default: gateway 192.168.1.1
thanks for the suggestion! but the other machines on this network do
not use the FreeBSD machine as a router. They merely reference it as
their first choice of DNS servers. So as of now networking is good to
go for all machines.
best!!
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Michael Powell
hey listers!! sorry for all the trouble.. just as an FYI it turned out
to NOT be a DNS issue at all!!!
it was a routing issue...
this command apparently did the trick...
[r...@lbsd2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#/etc/rc.d/routing restart
add net default: gateway 192.168.1.1
guys,
thanks for the input. busy couple of days sorry for not following up sooner.
at any rate, I tried many suggestions.
Here is the current state of things:
This is a working resolv.conf on the rest of the network which are
CentOS machines:
[r...@lbsd2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#cat
Are the forwarders in your named.conf file OK?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Are the forwarders in your named.conf file OK?
That was the next thing I was about to suggest. His FIOS router should be
running DNS itself by default, with it pointing to Verizon's name servers.
So he could try using 192.168.1.1 in his named.conf forwarders directive.
This is the current state of affairs:
[r...@lbsd2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#host bsd2
bsd2 has address 199.101.28.20
Host bsd2 not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
[r...@lbsd2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#ping yahoo.com
PING yahoo.com (69.147.125.65): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No route to host
ping: sendto: No route to
ms
thanks for your continued assistance with this problem!
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
Tim Dunphy wrote:
hello,
I accidentally deleted my ports tree thinking that cvsup was already
installed. it wasn't. :(
csup is cvsup rewritten
Tim Dunphy wrote:
Thanks guys! But to give more background the host in question IS
networking, at this point I can ssh into and out of it.. I just can't
resolve externally.
[r...@lbsd2:/usr/ports]#ifconfig
bge0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
hello,
I accidentally deleted my ports tree thinking that cvsup was already
installed. it wasn't. :(
I seem to be having a little trouble resolving external hosts tho my
trusty named server on this host is working fine to resolve the local
network. I need to reinstall my ports with sysinstall
Tim Dunphy wrote:
hello,
I accidentally deleted my ports tree thinking that cvsup was already
installed. it wasn't. :(
csup is cvsup rewritten with C and exists in the base system. You no longer
need to install cvsup, just use csup.
I seem to be having a little trouble resolving
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:44:42 -0400
Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
I accidentally deleted my ports tree thinking that cvsup was already
installed. it wasn't. :(
csup is part of the system, no need to use cvsup from the ports any longer.
I seem to be having a little trouble resolving
Hi,
While updating my servers I recently found out a stange behaviour.
I have a configuration file for cvsup.
If I set the default tag to be RELENG_7_3, I will build a kernel of
name 7.3-RELEASE-pX
If I set the default tag to be RELENG_7, I will build a kernel of name
7.3-STABLE
On 08/03/2010 10:44 AM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hi,
While updating my servers I recently found out a stange behaviour.
I have a configuration file for cvsup.
If I set the default tag to be RELENG_7_3, I will build a kernel of
name 7.3-RELEASE-pX
If I set the default tag to be RELENG_7, I
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:44:54 +0700 (ICT)
Olivier Nicole olivier.nic...@cs.ait.ac.th wrote:
Hi,
While updating my servers I recently found out a stange behaviour.
I have a configuration file for cvsup.
If I set the default tag to be RELENG_7_3, I will build a kernel of
name 7.3-RELEASE
Hi all,
Its been a while since I have used CVSup.
I have a server with FreeBSD 8 RELEASE on it. It was built very shortly
after 8.0 was released.
I want to run CVSup on the source and ports before deploying it
TO make sure that just ports and source are updated, what tag do I use
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:26:22PM -0400, Grant Peel thus spake:
Hi all,
Its been a while since I have used CVSup.
I have a server with FreeBSD 8 RELEASE on it. It was built very shortly
after 8.0 was released.
I want to run CVSup on the source and ports before deploying it
TO make sure
RELENG_8_0
Yes. This will give you the latest 8.0 release + desired patch level
(critical security patches). This is almost certain what you want to be
running before going to production status. I mean, you could use
RELENG_8_0_RELEASE I suppose, but then the cvsup would be without merit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 17:26:22, Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Its been a while since I have used CVSup.
I have a server with FreeBSD 8 RELEASE on it. It was built very shortly
after 8.0 was released.
I want to run CVSup on the source and ports before
What is the difference between using portsnap and cvsupping a ports supfile?
The last time I really used FreeBSD was several years ago, but it seems that
portsnap has replaced cvsup ports-supfile. What exactly is the difference
between the two? What makes portsnap the better option
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 7:08 PM, mailinglist mailingl...@ucwv.edu wrote:
What is the difference between using portsnap and cvsupping a ports supfile?
The last time I really used FreeBSD was several years ago, but it seems that
portsnap has replaced cvsup ports-supfile. What exactly
I am trying to update my ports collection on a new server using cvsup.
I've added a mirror site to my ports-supfile, but keep getting the
following error message:
on# csup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
Parsing supfile /root/ports-supfile
Connecting to cvsup7.us.FreeBSD.org
Cannot connect
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
I am trying to update my ports collection on a new server using cvsup. I've
added a mirror site to my ports-supfile, but keep getting the following
error message:
on# csup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
Parsing supfile
The csup servers do have a rate-limiting feature on them. However, I
think it gives a different error message than that. Operating not
permitted makes it seem more like a networking issue on the local
machine. Can you ping the IP? Firewall blocking outgoing ports?
I pinged a few of the mirror
John Almberg wrote:
I am trying to update my ports collection on a new server using cvsup.
I've added a mirror site to my ports-supfile, but keep getting the
following error message:
on# csup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
Parsing supfile /root/ports-supfile
Connecting to cvsup7.us.FreeBSD.org
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 09:13:00AM -0500, John Almberg wrote:
I am trying to update my ports collection on a new server using cvsup.
I've added a mirror site to my ports-supfile, but keep getting the
following error message:
Have you tried portsnap(8)? I find it much more convenient
I've seen this somewhere before; but I can't find it. How to backstep the ports
collection to a previous release.
Since the current xorg port is banged up for my equipment I want to backstep it
to release 7.1.
-or can I connect to a previous package collection?
Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Short wrote:
I've seen this somewhere before; but I can't find it. How to backstep the
ports collection to a previous release.
Since the current xorg port is banged up for my equipment I want to backstep
it to release 7.1.
-or can I
After running cvsup and doing a buildworld, I tried to make a new kernel,
and got the following error..
On my 6.4-STABLE x86 machine, I received the following:
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
Hello list,
in the last few months more and more cvsup-servers are printing
error-messages like them:
host# csup ports-supfile
Connected to 212.118.165.142
Authentication required by the server and not supported by client
host#
Even cvsup has problems with them. What does the error messages
Am Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:48:39 +0200
schrieb Stevan Tiefert stevan-tief...@kabelmail.de:
Hi Stevan,
I connected to cvsup5.de.freebsd.org a long time with no errors.
Jochen
Hello list,
in the last few months more and more cvsup-servers are printing
error-messages like them:
host# csup
After running cvsup a few minutes ago, an attempt to build a new kernel
failed with:
=== zyd (depend)
@ - /usr/src/sys
machine - /usr/src/sys/i386/include
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE
-DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq
-I/usr/src
Here at my work we use FreeBSD in production. We have the following
debate and wish to know better the differences between cvsup(csup) and
portsnap. One of my co-workers think that portsnap should NOT be used
and only gets the latest and greatest port collection, no matter what
version
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Barry McCormick wrote:
Here at my work we use FreeBSD in production. We have the following
debate and wish to know better the differences between cvsup(csup) and
portsnap. One of my co-workers think that portsnap should NOT be used
and only gets the latest and greatest
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Barry McCormick ba...@pdc4u.com wrote:
Here at my work we use FreeBSD in production. We have the following
debate and wish to know better the differences between cvsup(csup) and
portsnap. One of my co-workers think that portsnap should NOT be used
and only
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Neither one is right, per se. However, if you use one, continue to
use _that_one_ to avoid conflicts.
Actually meant to say, neither one is wrong or better than the
other. Came out wrong. :)
--
Glen
. There isn't a separate ports tree for,
ket's say, 5.4-RELEASE, except you use that from the installation
media (or from FTP) and DON'T update it.
In addition, if you use cvsup to update your sources, you can
of course specify the exact release (with patches), the release
branch (stable
Hi, Barry
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Barry McCormick ba...@pdc4u.com wrote:
Here at my work we use FreeBSD in production. We have the following
debate and wish to know better the differences between cvsup(csup) and
portsnap. One of my co-workers think that portsnap should NOT be used
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having quite the issue with a cvsup-mirror install (1.3_8) here. It
seems to be keeping some meta information file somewhere and has FAILED to
give me a local mirror (not one to be publicly available) yet.
Being
I am having quite the issue with a cvsup-mirror install (1.3_8) here. It
seems to be keeping some meta information file somewhere and has FAILED to
give me a local mirror (not one to be publicly available) yet.
Being the stubborn person I am, I have multiple times cleared some and all
Charles Howse cho...@charter.net writes:
Mainly, it's curiosity. I know-fer-a-fact I saw a list of physical
locations back when 4.x was the latest release. Probably been
deleted.
Certainly wouldn't be accurate any more.
The server CNAMEs get shifted around from time to time, generally when
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a link that shows the physical location of the
U.S. cvsup servers?
--
Thanks,
Charles
Things that make you say, Hmm...
How fast do you have to go to keep up with the sun so you're never in
darkness?
___
freebsd
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:50:46 -0500 Charles Howse said:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a link that shows the physical location of the
U.S. cvsup servers?
Not physical, but by wire time:
localhost# fastest_cvsup -c us
--
Don Read donr...@sbcglobal.net
Don Read wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:50:46 -0500 Charles Howse said:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a link that shows the physical location of the
U.S. cvsup servers?
Not physical, but by wire time:
localhost# fastest_cvsup -c us
...and for those in Canada:
# fastest_cvsup -c ca,us
On Mar 17, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Don Read wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:50:46 -0500 Charles Howse said:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a link that shows the physical location of
the
U.S. cvsup servers?
Not physical, but by wire time:
localhost# fastest_cvsup -c us
Charles Howse wrote:
How fast do you have to go to keep up with the sun so you're never in
darkness?
Oh, and my answer to that question would be pi/43200 radians per second.
Alphons (sorry, couldn't resist)
--
All right, that does it Bill [Donahue]. I'm pretty sure that killing
Jesus is
Charles Howse wrote:
On Mar 17, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Don Read wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:50:46 -0500 Charles Howse said:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a link that shows the physical location of the
U.S. cvsup servers?
Not physical, but by wire time:
localhost
On Mar 17, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Charles Howse wrote:
On Mar 17, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Don Read wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:50:46 -0500 Charles Howse said:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a link that shows the physical location
of the
U.S. cvsup
Charles Howse wrote:
On Mar 17, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
What do you want to achieve? fastest_cvsup will tell you addressing of
the servers. You will have to contact those responsible for the IPs to
see where they are located to ensure any form of accuracy regarding
-- Connecting to cvsup.us.freebsd.org [198.104.69.57]...
* error: connect: timeout
-- Connecting to cvsup2.us.freebsd.org [130.94.149.166]...
- server replied: OK 17 0 SNAP_16_1h CVSup server ready
- time taken: 62.86 ms
-- Connecting to cvsup3.us.freebsd.org [128.31.0.28]...
- server replied
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:22:04AM +, RW wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:32:49 -0500
Troy t...@twisted.net wrote:
I'm having a problem with cvsup and it just started happening. I have
other servers on the same LAN that are having no problem connecting
to the very same servers. I found
I'm having a problem with cvsup and it just started happening. I have
other servers on the same LAN that are having no problem connecting to the
very same servers. I found other people that had this problem by
searching but nothing gave a definitive answer on how to solve this. I
tried
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:32:49 -0500
Troy t...@twisted.net wrote:
I'm having a problem with cvsup and it just started happening. I have
other servers on the same LAN that are having no problem connecting
to the very same servers. I found other people that had this problem
by searching
Hi,
I cvsupped my portstree yesterday and updated my system with portupgrade -a.
All went well except for logcheck. Since the cvsup I don't receive the normal
hourly mail with the results of the checking in my mailbox but the following
(the subject of the mail is: Cron logch...@yokozuna
Le Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:48:58 +0100,
Marco Beishuizen mb...@xs4all.nl:
I cvsupped my portstree yesterday and updated my system with
portupgrade -a. All went well except for logcheck. Since the cvsup I
don't receive the normal hourly mail with the results of the checking
in my mailbox
On Saturday 14 March 2009 14:35:36 Patrick Lamaizière wrote:
Le Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:48:58 +0100,
Marco Beishuizen mb...@xs4all.nl:
I cvsupped my portstree yesterday and updated my system with
portupgrade -a. All went well except for logcheck. Since the cvsup I
don't receive the normal
Stefan Miklosovic wrote:
Hi all,
I decided to set up my own CVSup server just for my local
network. After reading all related stuff I should find, I have
solid knowledge about this issue but one thing disturbed my mind.
My pc, server which I will mirroring from, is also downloading
source tree
Hi all,
I decided to set up my own CVSup server just for my local
network. After reading all related stuff I should find, I have
solid knowledge about this issue but one thing disturbed my mind.
My pc, server which I will mirroring from, is also downloading
source tree from another server
Hi, me again,
I also havent noticed, that there is a choice
among -current or -stable. If I want to
mirror just -stable (this is possible with cvsup stable-supfile),
can I?
thank you again
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Stefan Miklosovic
miklosovic.free...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i did cvsup with supfile given in example,
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile,
and set base to /var/db and prefix to /home/ncvs as suggested and then
cvsup -g -L 2 -h HOST /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile
where HOST is the one that run
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have my small box, 10.3.1.25 ip, that cvsup-ed files from repository
into
it. it use cvs-supfile in /usr/share/examples/cvsup
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have my small box, 10.3.1.25 ip, that cvsup-ed
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have my small box, 10.3.1.25 ip, that cvsup-ed files from repository
into
it. it use cvs-supfile in /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ to collect files.
now that i want my other
1 - 100 of 1688 matches
Mail list logo
