Hi Guys,
I just wanted to mention that George's changes should be incorporated
into the official FreeNAS build of 0.7 (it's RC1 right now) when it
comes out, so using our custom image should only be a temporary thing
should you choose to go the A2000 route.
Regards,
David Davis
Software
On 7/16/09 6:12 PM, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd love to hear about any test results you may get comparing software with
hardware raid.
I received the hardware yesterday. There was a last minute change due
to cost. Instead of getting 4x 2TB drives I opted for 6x 1TB
I would like to setup a home fileserver running FreeNAS (which itself runs
on FreeBSD 7.2). Can someone recommend hardware for this?
I know I'd have to get 3 harddrives. Two will be at home running RAID1, and
the third will be mirrored about once per quarter and brought offsite.
What kind
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav
alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
What kind of RAID chassis, computer system should I get for this setup? Would
a soekris be sufficient, or is that overkill?
Or should I just buy a barebones headless desktop PC (Dell has them
cheap now for $241)
On 7/19/09, Aleksandr Miroslav alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav
alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
What kind of RAID chassis, computer system should I get for this setup?
Would a soekris be sufficient, or is that overkill?
Or should I just buy a
Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
I would like to setup a home fileserver running FreeNAS (which itself runs
on FreeBSD 7.2). Can someone recommend hardware for this?
I know I'd have to get 3 harddrives. Two will be at home running RAID1, and
the third will be mirrored about once per quarter
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
I would like to setup a home fileserver running FreeNAS (which itself runs
on FreeBSD 7.2). Can someone recommend hardware for this?
I know I'd have to get 3 harddrives. Two will be at home running RAID1, and
the third will be mirrored about
Tim Judd writes:
On 7/19/09, Aleksandr Miroslav alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav
alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
What kind of RAID chassis, computer system should I get for this setup?
Would a soekris be sufficient, or is that overkill?
' drives.
See http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSQuickStartGuide
I guess the last question I'll ask (as any more may
uncover my ignorance) is if you need to use hardware RAID at
all? It seems both UFS2 and ZFS can do software RAID
which seems to be quite reasonable with respect to
performance
Richard Mahlerwein wrote:
With 4 drives, you could get much, much higher performance out of
RAID10 (which is alternatively called RAID0+1 or RAID1+0 depending on
the manufacturer
Uh -- no. RAID10 and RAID0+1 are superficially similar but quite different
things. The main differentiator is
A bit of reading shows that ZFS, if it's stable enough, has some
really great features that would be nice on such a large pile o'
drives.
See http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSQuickStartGuide
I guess the last question I'll ask (as any more may uncover my
ignorance) is if you need to use hardware
--- On Tue, 7/14/09, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
Subject: Re: ZFS or UFS for 4TB hardware RAID6?
To: mahle...@yahoo.com
Cc: Free BSD Questions list freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 4:23
--- On Sun, 7/12/09, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com
Subject: ZFS or UFS for 4TB hardware RAID6?
To: Free BSD Questions list freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sunday, July 12, 2009, 11:47 PM
Hello all,
I'm about to build a new file server
--- On Mon, 7/13/09, Richard Mahlerwein mahle...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Richard Mahlerwein mahle...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: ZFS or UFS for 4TB hardware RAID6?
To: Free BSD Questions list freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, July 13, 2009, 1:29 PM
--- On Sun, 7/12/09, Maxim Khitrov
, if necessary.
For data security, I can't answer for the UFS2 vs. ZFS. For hardware setup,
let me amend everything I said above with the following:
Since you are seriously focusing on data integrity, ignore everything I said
but make sure you have good backups! :)
Sorry,
-Rich
No problem
--- On Mon, 7/13/09, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: ZFS or UFS for 4TB hardware RAID6?
To: mahle...@yahoo.com
Cc: Free BSD Questions list freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, July 13, 2009, 2:02 PM
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Richard Mahlerweinmahle...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 7/13/09, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: ZFS or UFS for 4TB hardware RAID6?
To: mahle...@yahoo.com
Cc: Free BSD Questions list freebsd
On 7/13/09 3:23 PM, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Richard Mahlerweinmahle...@yahoo.com wrote:
I guess the last question I'll ask (as any more may uncover my ignorance) is
if you need to use hardware RAID at all? It seems both UFS2 and ZFS can do
--- On Mon, 7/13/09, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: ZFS or UFS for 4TB hardware RAID6?
To: mahle...@yahoo.com
Cc: Free BSD Questions list freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, July 13, 2009, 3:23 PM
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009
hardware RAID at all? It seems
both UFS2 and ZFS can do software RAID which seems to be quite
reasonable with respect to performance and in many ways seems to be
more robust since it is a bit more portable (no specialized
hardware).
I've thought about this one a lot. In my case, the hard drives
Hello all,
I'm about to build a new file server using 3ware 9690SA-8E controller
and 4x Western Digital RE4-GP 2TB drives in RAID6. It is likely to
grow in the future up to 10TB. I may use FreeBSD 8 on this one, since
the release will likely be made by the time this server goes into
production.
http://www.avitechtecnologia.com.br/flashmkt3/track.aspx?i...@2258@AC26
A2E4-AE48-rmpH7mvZ8uw%3d512-AF99-E0B050D6B741
http://www.avitechtecnologia.com.br/flashmkt3/pecas/5c52646/img/02.jpg
Prezado(a),
http://www.avitechtecnologia.com.br/flashmkt3/pecas/5c52646/img/02c.jpg
Hi,
Is it possible for you to provide us with an updated hardware certified
vendor list for FreeBsd. We would like to know if FreeBSD is supported
on HP Blades and which models, network cards, HBA cards for connecting
to SAN's. Any help will be greatly appreciated. We need
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Thompson,
Rhettrhett.thomp...@soroc.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible for you to provide us with an updated hardware certified
vendor list for FreeBsd. We would like to know if FreeBSD is supported
on HP Blades and which models, network cards, HBA cards
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 03:18:33PM -0400, Thompson, Rhett wrote:
Is it possible for you to provide us with an updated hardware certified
vendor list for FreeBsd.
There is no such thing, AFAIK. The volunteers who form the FreeBSD
project spend their time improving FreeBSD, not doing formal
in, and
installed FreeBSD-7.1. My only problem so far has been a BIOS issue, but
IBM site-support has been great.
--
from posts here about branded hardware including you, i see that i do
right things.
i just buy parts and make computer from them, not only it's cheap, but
it have similar
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 08:43:08AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar typed:
Buy second hand branded hardware from ebay (allegro in poland). It's
usually hardware that was used in offices and replaced by more modern
ones. It's already tested!!!
You could get high-end PIII with 512MB RAM for $30
task that even Pentium 100 will do.
I'm hosting websites on 5-10 years old SUN hardware. V100/120 with ultrasparc II
400-650 Mhz. Just put in some new disks and memory, no sweat. They allmost
normal. 400MHz SUNs are available here for 100$ or less. they usually have
quite a lot of RAM even
hard to get them to tell you what controllers
and chipsets they're using in servers, to compare against the supported
hardware list.
What I'm looking for isn't all that exotic:
rack mountable
RAID-5 controller
4-6 or more disks (hot swappable would be nice, but not mandatory)
dual power supplies
ericr wrote:
I need to buy some new servers, and mgmt has decreed that we get them from
someplace which will provide service contracts with on-site h/w suppport,
which means HP, Dell, Sun, IBM, etc.
We use Dell almost exclusively. Although Dell doesn't officially support
FreeBSD, Dell hardware
better for them, in fact, they seem
to run hotter.
iXsystems, the PC-BSD guys, build components and provide hardware
warranty like the big companies.
I would pick IBM or iXsystems. IBM's warranty policy is written out,
the IBMs have had more overall success than any other big company
brand
.
jerry
Has anyone bought servers from one of the big manufacturers lately and had
good luck with them? It seems hard to get them to tell you what controllers
and chipsets they're using in servers, to compare against the supported
hardware list.
What I'm looking for isn't all that exotic
Hi,
I need to buy some new servers, and mgmt has decreed that we get
them from
someplace which will provide service contracts with on-site h/w
suppport,
which means HP, Dell, Sun, IBM, etc.
I have two Intel servers that I like a lot. I don't have on-site
support, but it might be
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:56:35 -0600,
ericr erobi...@gmail.com said:
E Has anyone bought servers from one of the big manufacturers lately and had
E good luck with them?
I've always had good luck with Dell, especially the GX-260s. I've used
them for file-servers handling over 100 Samba
I'm sure this has been answered but I can't Google it.
Where's the 600 MB gone to?
Len
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
In response to Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com:
I'm sure this has been answered but I can't Google it.
Really? This question has been asked a gazillion times ...
Where's the 600 MB gone to?
i386 arch can only see 4G total, but much hardware reserves the
last 500M or so for special hardware
/search?q=+4+GB+RAM+hardware+but+only+3.4+GB+real%2Favail
The first link takes me to:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000811.html
Which appears to be largely Windows specific, but very detailed if you are
looking for a
more in-depth explanation and also says:
To be perfectly clear
as:
ath%d: ath_chan_set: unable to reset channel %u (%u Mhz) The Atheros
Hardware Access Layer was unable to reset the hardware when switching
channels during scanning. This should not happen.
sys/contrib/dev/ath/ah.h documents the error 3 as:
HAL_EIO = 3,/* Hardware didn't respond
The first two utils I run if I suspect hardware issues
both independant of resident os ;
http://www.memtest.org/
http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/technolo/dft/dft.htm
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
I have what looks like a hardware problem with an Intel 1U server,
which I am using mainly as a mysql database server for some of my
bigger website clients.
The server went down last week with a badly corrupted file system.
After spending a day trying to fix the file system, we gave up
, I've never really had to deal with a hardware failure
before, so it's a good learning process.
If the machine is out of warranty, you might consider replacing it
altogether. My employer's IT department ditches PC's and servers at
the first
failure after the warranty runs out. Accordinf to them
On Apr 13, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
The database ran well for about 2 minutes, then the server crashed
again. The filesystem was again corrupted so badly that we could
not even log in to look at the logs.
did memtest? it looks like it's fine until you stress your hardware
The database ran well for about 2 minutes, then the server crashed again. The
filesystem was again corrupted so badly that we could not even log in to look
at the logs.
did memtest? it looks like it's fine until you stress your hardware
We've reinstalled FreeBSD again, just to be able
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:07:25PM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
I have what looks like a hardware problem with an Intel 1U server,
which I am using mainly as a mysql database server for some of my
bigger website clients.
The server went down last week with a badly corrupted file system
Graeme Dargie wrote:
My grandmother had a HP that just died too. My brother took the first stab
at it, describing it as a likely DC-DC converter problem, and I was seeing
indication of a bad seat on the CPU. It was working just fine and for the
CPU to become unseated is not likely. I tore
2009/4/12 Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.com:
Hi all
very sorry for this OT post, does anyone know of a good usenet or other
forum to ask about laptop hardware repair? My quite expensive and now
out-of-warranty HP laptop has suddenly become very dead and I'm in shock :((
Thanks
Chris
Hi, Chris
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.com wrote:
Hi all
very sorry for this OT post, does anyone know of a good usenet or other
forum to ask about laptop hardware repair? My quite expensive and now
out-of-warranty HP laptop has suddenly become very dead
Chris Rees wrote:
2009/4/12 Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.com:
Hi all
very sorry for this OT post, does anyone know of a good usenet or other
forum to ask about laptop hardware repair? My quite expensive and now
out-of-warranty HP laptop has suddenly become very dead and I'm in shock
Glen Barber wrote:
Hi, Chris
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.com wrote:
Hi all
very sorry for this OT post, does anyone know of a good usenet or other
forum to ask about laptop hardware repair? My quite expensive and now
out-of-warranty HP laptop has suddenly
hardware repair? My quite expensive and now
out-of-warranty HP laptop has suddenly become very dead and I'm in shock
:((
Even though it's (OT), maybe some of us could be able to help. What's
the problem?
I will try the HP support forums as suggested but...
It's a nc6320 (RH383ET#ABU
-Original Message-
From: Tim Judd [mailto:taj...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 April 2009 21:38
To: Chris Whitehouse
Cc: Glen Barber; User Questions
Subject: Re: (OT) good laptop hardware repair group or forum
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.comwrote:
Glen
Hi all
very sorry for this OT post, does anyone know of a good usenet or other
forum to ask about laptop hardware repair? My quite expensive and now
out-of-warranty HP laptop has suddenly become very dead and I'm in shock :((
Thanks
Chris
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:24:24 +, Ricardo Jesus ricardo.meb.je...@gmail.com
wrote:
Polytropon I can't seem to find usbconf.
% usbconf
usbconf: Command not found.
% whereis usbconf
usbconf:
Is it a third party application?
My mistake, sorry. Of course it's usbdevs, a tool that comes
devinfo -v
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:29 AM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all:
How could I find out the list of hardware in my machine? I used dmesg and
var/run/dmesg.boot, it didn't seem to help that much as I expected.
which file lists all of hardware in the machine?
Thanks
Josh Carroll wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:59 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all:
How could I find out the list of hardware in my machine? I used dmesg and
var/run/dmesg.boot, it didn't seem to help that much as I expected.
which file lists all of hardware in the machine?
Thanks
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:07:51 +, Ricardo Jesus ricardo.meb.je...@gmail.com
wrote:
% pciconf -lv
man pciconf for further details.
Additionally: usbconf to list USB devices, and camcontrol
to list SCSI devices, as well as atacontrol for ATA devices.
And finally, dmesg. :-)
Note that these
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:07:51 +, Ricardo Jesus ricardo.meb.je...@gmail.com
wrote:
% pciconf -lv
man pciconf for further details.
Additionally: usbconf to list USB devices, and camcontrol
to list SCSI devices, as well as atacontrol for ATA devices.
And finally, dmesg.
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:07:51 +
Ricardo Jesus ricardo.meb.je...@gmail.com wrote:
Josh Carroll wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:59 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all:
How could I find out the list of hardware in my machine? I used
dmesg and var/run/dmesg.boot, it didn't seem to help
Den Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:24:24 +
skrev Ricardo Jesus ricardo.meb.je...@gmail.com:
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:07:51 +, Ricardo Jesus
ricardo.meb.je...@gmail.com wrote:
% pciconf -lv
man pciconf for further details.
Additionally: usbconf to list USB devices, and
Hi all:
How could I find out the list of hardware in my machine? I used dmesg and
var/run/dmesg.boot, it didn't seem to help that much as I expected.
which file lists all of hardware in the machine?
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:59 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all:
How could I find out the list of hardware in my machine? I used dmesg and
var/run/dmesg.boot, it didn't seem to help that much as I expected.
which file lists all of hardware in the machine?
Thanks.
Give the sysutils
On Monday 02 March 2009 01:57:21 pm Paul Schmehl wrote:
We have FreeBSD installed on a SunFire box running two AMD Opteron
processors. I was upgrading to 7.1 STABLE on Friday, and after
installing the kernel I rebooted. Now the box is completely unusable.
Does anyone know how to get a
On Monday 02 March 2009 5:06 pm, new_guy wrote:
Paul Schmehl-2 wrote:
I've done some Googling, and the most common answer seems to be hit
STOP+A,
but there is no STOP key on an Intel keyboard. Is there a magic
incantation
that will work? Maybe the entrails of a young goat?
Ctrl +
We have FreeBSD installed on a SunFire box running two AMD Opteron processors.
I was upgrading to 7.1 STABLE on Friday, and after installing the kernel I
rebooted. Now the box is completely unusable. Does anyone know how to get a
SunFire box to boot from the CD ROM? Any changes I make to the
.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-know-SunFire-hardware-tp22294904p22297874.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Robert Huff wrote:
Has any one seen more on this?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10170648-1.html
http://www.marvell.com/featured/plugcomputing.jsp
They claim only Linux support for the brick, but the blurb on the
88F6281 system-on-chip processor claims BSD
Has any one seen more on this?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10170648-1.html
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Has any one seen more on this?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10170648-1.html
I think I found a new wish-list item for my birthday. ;)
--
Glen Barber
___
i don't see monitor connector? :)
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Robert Huff wrote:
Has any one seen more on this?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10170648-1.html
Robert Huff
___
will work?
I know Solaris has a Install_check tool which will give a list whether a
hardware has solaris drivers ,third-part driver or not supported.
Does Fbsd has something likely?
Thk in advance!
Here are some web pages to look at.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/laptop
I have a dimension 9150 that I am going to put amd64 freebsd on to play
with.
It has Intel ICH7 SATA300 on it, in the bios it says it can do raid.
I'm assuming that would be a hardware raid..
Would I be better off just using two disks and mirror them in software
raid (zpool) or using
. Cook wrote:
I have a dimension 9150 that I am going to put amd64 freebsd on to play
with.
It has Intel ICH7 SATA300 on it, in the bios it says it can do raid.
I'm assuming that would be a hardware raid..
Would I be better off just using two disks and mirror them in software
raid (zpool) or using
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:58:04PM -0500, B. Cook wrote:
I have a dimension 9150 that I am going to put amd64 freebsd on to play
with.
It has Intel ICH7 SATA300 on it, in the bios it says it can do raid.
I'm assuming that would be a hardware raid..
You are assuming wrong. It is software
RAID implementations (and most of the cheaper add-on RAID cards.) RAID that
is supported in the BIOS have one advantage over other software
implementations, and that is that you can boot from all supported RAID
configurations, which is not always the case otherwise.
always - if you use
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:18:42PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
RAID implementations (and most of the cheaper add-on RAID cards.) RAID that
is supported in the BIOS have one advantage over other software
implementations, and that is that you can boot from all supported RAID
model. You could always try freebsd-hardware list.
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
A client wants to buy some TigerDirect/VisionMan 1U's with this mobo:
http://www.biostar-usa.com/mbdetails.asp?model=P4M900%20MICRO%20775
RTL8201 PHY Ethernet
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.1R/hardware.html
... shows only RTL81xx
has anybody got RTL8201 working with FreeBSD 7.1, 7.0?
Hello,
since I have a AMD/ATI HDMI-capable graphics hardware my onboard sound
hardware (HDA) gets recogniced as pcm1-3, the HDA capable digital device
onboard the graphics adaptor is numberd pcm0. How can I force the OS
(FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE) to number the on-graphics-HDA device as the last
one
How can I detect if system has Software or hardware raid? Since in manual page:
The atacontrol command can also be used to create purely software RAID
arrays in systems that do NOT have a real hardware RAID card such as a
Highpoint or Promise card. A common scenario is a 1U server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
How can I detect if system has Software or hardware raid? Since in manual
page:
The atacontrol command can also be used to create purely software RAID
arrays in systems that do NOT have a real hardware RAID card
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
How can I detect if system has Software or hardware raid? Since in manual
page:
The atacontrol command can also be used to create purely software RAID
arrays in systems that do NOT have a real hardware RAID card
ar RAID devices are almost always software/BIOS RAID. In this case
intel matrix raid is software RAID provided by the system BIOS. The
it's always better to use gmirror. not mentioning more flexibility (you do
not have to mirror whole drives)
___
there is also the droboshare. great little fileserver.
Last I knew Drobo supported only Samba, not NFS -- but that
was some time ago. Have they come out with an upgrade?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Clifton Royston wrote:
I'd consider running a Mac Mini (tiny, silent, s/b reliable) if
it weren't for needing 2+ drives for mirroring.
this would work fine with gmirror using usb/firewire drives.
there is also the droboshare. great little fileserver.
aopen cubes run great. i've had one
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:13 AM, michael michael.copel...@gmail.com wrote:
Clifton Royston wrote:
I'd consider running a Mac Mini (tiny, silent, s/b reliable) if
it weren't for needing 2+ drives for mirroring.
this would work fine with gmirror using usb/firewire drives.
there is also
My FreeBSD file server at home has been running for 5 or 6 years on a
succession of generic PC small form factor boxes (a.k.a shoebox
cases.) I'm not very happy with this approach, because the hardware
keeps dying every two years or so. The latest incarnation is getting
flakier and flakier
a list whether a
hardware has solaris drivers ,third-part driver or not supported.
Does Fbsd has something likely?
Thk in advance!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
/support/edocs/systems/opgx150/en/ug/index.htm
Anyway, I've had good luck so far with Dell desktop hardware; it seems
to be well-made, easy to work with and QUIET. Check it out if you can
get a machine cheap or free.
Hope this helps.
--
Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org
which will give a list whether a
hardware has solaris drivers ,third-part driver or not supported.
Does Fbsd has something likely?
Thk in advance!
The most reliable way to check, is by booting the livefs cd and checking
pciconf -lvvv for any none* devices. the none* devices may be given
Clifton Royston wrote:
My FreeBSD file server at home has been running for 5 or 6 years on a
succession of generic PC small form factor boxes (a.k.a shoebox
cases.) I'm not very happy with this approach, because the hardware
keeps dying every two years or so. The latest incarnation
if everything will work?
I know Solaris has a Install_check tool which will give a list whether a
hardware has solaris drivers ,third-part driver or not supported.
Does Fbsd has something likely?
Thk in advance!
The most reliable way to check, is by booting the livefs cd and checking
[I decided to ask this question here as it overlaps -hardware, -current,
and a couple other lists. I'd be glad to redirect the conversation to a
list that's a better fit, if anyone would care to suggest one.]
I'm in the process of planning the hardware and software for the second
generation
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 05:11:00PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
But if I remember my legal and ethics course correctly if you can arrive
at a conclusion through your own research then your reasonably clear.
For example, the drivers are closed source but the hardware itself is an
entirely separate
I think that can be handled quite easily by community social pressure,
and moderation would just set a precedent for it's someone else's job.
moderation is needed. Things like community social pressure
simply doesn't. Like with democracy - those who are more common and louder
will takeover,
and exactly is needed on that group. it would be enough that moderator's
job will be just removing posts that classify to NTG. NOTHING else.
As long as neither you, nor anyone that thinks like you, is in charge of
moderation, it might not be a *complete* disaster.
of course it should be you
There are many constructive ways of improving FreeBSD. You have already
submitted 7 bug reports in out bug database. If you think you can help
of which at least 2 was completely ignored;) (no even response)
by submitting *more* bug reports, testing FreeBSD patches, developing
new FreeBSD
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I think the list you're looking for when you talk about only discussing
the base-system already exists (probably stable or arch). This is
freebsd questions- and the nature of the list according to the
all-knowing handbook
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:06:58 +0100 (CET),
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Now i'm using FreeBSD and it got better each version. Really better,
not better.
And i really want to keep it that way, because there is no alternative
now!
There are many constructive ways of
reproduction of the technology
involved, even entirely independently. Someone described the
justification as avoiding a situation in which it would pay
to be ignorant of what others had done.
For example, the drivers are closed source but the hardware itself
is an entirely separate issue. So
base system: nothing appropriate
Maybe what we need isn't for you to keep complaining about 70% of the
very helpful list traffic,
helpful for whom?
thus producing another 5% of the list traffic
yourself (directly, and indirectly through annoyed responses to you), but
for someone to come
201 - 300 of 1749 matches
Mail list logo
