config-recursive
Once set, the options won't be requested on a second run.
Hey! Wow! Thanks! That will work for me.
Needless to say, I didn't know about that Makefile target, until now.
This target (and several other useful ones) are listed
and explained in the manpage: man 7 ports
In message 20121008012414.34fd6a65.free...@edvax.de,
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
...
# make config-recursive
...
This target (and several other useful ones) are listed
and explained in the manpage: man 7 ports. :-)
Hey! Thanks again. I didn't know about that man page either
... Note that setting the BATCH environment variable to yes will answer
yes to any prompts during this process, removing the need for manual
intervention during the build process.
(This was said with respect to upgrading ports via portupgrade.)
Or you can use portmaster, which runs
I am working on switching from updating my systems with csup to
subversion, for the systems I have behind a proxy server. When I was
using csup, I used an SSH connection, tunneling the 5999 port through
the proxy server. Now that I am looking at subversion, I have found the
On 2012-10-05 10:16, dweimer wrote:
I am working on switching from updating my systems with csup to
subversion, for the systems I have behind a proxy server. When I was
using csup, I used an SSH connection, tunneling the 5999 port through
the proxy server. Now that I am looking at subversion,
/pci.ids for example):
$ grep '1002 4752' /usr/local/share/pciids/pci.ids
1002 4752 Proliant Rage XL
the number of ports that each card has
That one is near impossible.
Since every add-in card is going function differently, you really need
a device-specific enumeration
the number of ports that each card has
That one is near impossible.
Since every add-in card is going function differently, you really need
a device-specific enumeration method to (for example) count things
like PHYs provided by a single NIC.
Imagine if you will, the case of the card
a port
to the ports collection.
Specifically, I want to add WordShell (http://wordshell.net/) to the
FreeBSD ports collection. I want to install it for myself, and I
generally don't like using software outside of some sort of software
manager wherein I can keep everything neatly up-to-date
in a couple of the ways
listed there. However, my main interest is contributing a port to the ports
collection.
Specifically, I want to add WordShell (http://wordshell.net/) to the FreeBSD
ports collection. I want to install it for myself, and I generally don't
like using software outside
Natex MUXes. It works
[..]
VS Solution 2. Using an existing networked FreeBSD box sitting next to
VS the MUX, it already has COM ports. Advantage: cheap, no additional
ok. no interactivity. But I'm still optimistic about virtualization.
emulators/qemu at the least should be able to run
Hello,
I am thinking about creating a port for SOGo[1]. Is there already someone
working on it?
Kind regards,
Matthias
[1] http://www.sogo.nu/english.html
--
Matthias Petermann matth...@d2ux.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
___
freebsd-po...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
I have done:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/sogo.tar.gz
and
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt
.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Well, basically, you can mount your usb HDD as distfiles directory
under /usr/ports.
That would
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:08:25 +0400, иван кузнецов wrote:
i was download 135g distfiles from russian mirror on usb hdd,
and i have no room on laptop for this files.how to setup apps
from it,how to build pbi files? i was read some articles but i
cant.
I assume it's better to ask PBI-related
to fit on your drive, however there is
some pbi software in ports for you to check out..
ports-mgmt/pbi-manager
sysutils/pbimaker
x11-fm/pbi-thumbnailer
sysutils/easypbi
I've experimented a bit with the software on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT and
PC-BSD 9 machine - but I'm not an authority on the subject
135G of
files from Russia that won't seem to fit on your drive, however there is
some pbi software in ports for you to check out..
ports-mgmt/pbi-manager
sysutils/pbimaker
x11-fm/pbi-thumbnailer
sysutils/easypbi
I've experimented a bit with the software on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT and
PC-BSD
-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
I'm not sure how building PBI files is going to help with your 135G of
files from Russia that won't seem to fit on your drive, however there is
some pbi software in ports for you to check out..
ports-mgmt/pbi-manager
sysutils/pbimaker
x11-fm/pbi
has COM ports. Advantage: cheap, no additional
rack space and power. Disadvantage: doubts if this solution is feasible,
especially on the Windows side.
A minicom or any other interactive terminal emulation software is out
of the question. The MUX managing software uses its own protocol over
RS323
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
In fact, the question is whether there is a standards compliant
(not written for some proprietary hardware terminal server
protocol) driver for Windows. Not exactly a FreeBSD question,
I know :)
Finding a Windows driver that will work with an existing
On 3-9-2012 5:02, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc
Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su writes:
Hi,
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
Yes, sredird on the FreeBSD box NetDialout from PCMicro
Peter Boosten pe...@boosten.org wrote:
On 3-9-2012 5:02, Victor Sudakov wrote:
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports
be accessed by Windows hosts over the network?
If I understand your question correctly, then AFAICT the only way to
access serial ports over
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports
be accessed by Windows hosts over the network?
If I understand your question correctly, then AFAICT the only way to
access serial ports over the network is with a piece of additional
Eric Masson wrote:
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
Yes, sredird on the FreeBSD box NetDialout from PCMicro on the Windows
box.
Oh
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:02:17 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
There is some software like comms
Polytropon wrote:
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but are
there any
Hello.
2012/09/03 14:29:20 +0700 Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
VS There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
VS accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
VS have a success story for such a scenario
Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote:
In fact, the question is whether there is a standards compliant
(not written for some proprietary hardware terminal server
protocol) driver for Windows. Not exactly a FreeBSD question,
I know :)
Finding a Windows driver that will work with an
Colleagues,
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but are
there any (freeware) Windows virtual
... . The modules depend on each other in some
ways.
What is the proposed way to get this modules into the Ports Collection? Should
I submit a PR for each single module or it is reasonable to create one PR for a
bunch of new ports of the same category when they belong logically together?
Thanks
. product management, invoicing, crm, sales... . The modules
depend on each other in some ways.
What is the proposed way to get this modules into the Ports
Collection? Should I submit a PR for each single module or it is
reasonable to create one PR for a bunch of new ports of the same
category
Hi.
I am planning to deploy rt40 (sqlite backend) with nginx (fastcgi).
(nginx-devel and rt40 from /usr/ports)
After installing rt40, I setup the initial database by executing
/usr/local/sbin/rt-setup-database --action init
I have no problem using the standalone server:
/usr/local/bin
On 03/08/2012 11:29, Roby Sadeli wrote:
I am planning to deploy rt40 (sqlite backend) with nginx (fastcgi).
(nginx-devel and rt40 from /usr/ports)
Sqlite is really only suitable for development usage: RT expects a more
fully featured database that supports concurrent usage by several
instances
kron wrote:
I use in /etc/make.conf:
...
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/ports/x11-wm/openbox}
EXTRA_PATCHES+=/home/ok/patches/openbox/patch-VK-NULL_SELF_TITLE.diff
EXTRA_PATCHES+=/home/ok/patches/openbox/patch-VK-SPEED_FOCUS.diff
.endif
...
What do you do if the extra patches need some pathnames
ports has a way to keep and automatically
apply local patches to ports. I want to modify the way the internals of
a package/port operate, and not in a way that makes sense to move up-
stream. It's just my preference.
Is there a way in FreeBSD ports to keep a make this change to the
source code
can't figure out if FreeBSD ports has a way to keep and automatically
apply local patches to ports. I want to modify the way the internals of
a package/port operate, and not in a way that makes sense to move up-
stream. It's just my preference.
Is there a way in FreeBSD ports to keep
it
in a patch-local-* file in NetBSD pkgsrc.
I can't figure out if FreeBSD ports has a way to keep and automatically
apply local patches to ports. I want to modify the way the internals of
a package/port operate, and not in a way that makes sense to move up-
stream. It's just my preference
hi all
I want to install openbox from ports collection.
freebsd attempting to download libxml2 from fr.rpmfind.net but
I don't know why connection speed slow down after a while and finally
failed.
is it possible to change download location (mirror) or is it possible to
download file manually
hi all
I want to install openbox from ports collection.
freebsd attempting to download libxml2 from fr.rpmfind.net but
I don't know why connection speed slow down after a while and finally
failed.
is it possible to change download location (mirror) or is it possible to
download file manually
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Mr U wrote:
hi all
I want to install openbox from ports collection.
freebsd attempting to download libxml2 from fr.rpmfind.net but
I don't know why connection speed slow down after a while and finally
failed.
is it possible to change download
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:45:35AM -0700, Mr U wrote:
hi all
I want to install openbox from ports collection.
freebsd attempting to download libxml2 from fr.rpmfind.net but
I don't know why connection speed slow down after a while and finally
failed.
is it possible to change download
more than one source listed. If
one fails, try the next one.
Then place the file in /usr/ports/distfiles and restart the build.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions
, RANDOMIZE_MASTER_SITES is in effect.
Looking at this again, it seems I got myself confused as to where you should
download the distribution file. I think your system is trying to download a
plain tbz file, and not an RPM. If that's the case, the downloaded file will
actually go in /usr/ports/distfiles. The fact you
So, I've been a NetBSD user for many years, and am looking more
at FreeBSD now. Trying to build myself a system, I find that I have a
long-held delta to a package on my NetBSD system, and I keep it
in a patch-local-* file in NetBSD pkgsrc.
I can't figure out if FreeBSD ports has a way
During the boot process I get these messages.
I want to find the physical USB v2.0 ports on the computer box.
How can I do this?
usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0
usbus1: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0
usbus2: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0
usbus3: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0
During the boot process I get these messages.
I want to find the physical USB v2.0 ports on the computer box.
How can I do this?
usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0
usbus1: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0
usbus2: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0
usbus3: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0
but trying only.
plug
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:01:19 -0400, Fbsd8 wrote:
During the boot process I get these messages.
I want to find the physical USB v2.0 ports on the computer box.
How can I do this?
Check the documentation of your computer (mainboard). It
should note where the ports are located. In systems
Reko Turja reko.tu...@liukuma.net writes:
Ghost in the machine? :D
I just saw on the ports list that it has just been fixed.
Looks like a typo in ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk.
Sorry for doubting you...
Good luck.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
-Original Message-
From: Lowell Gilbert
I just saw on the ports list that it has just been fixed.
Looks like a typo in ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk.
Sorry for doubting you...
No worries, was pretty stumped myself for a while there. Time to subscribe
to ports@ too then I reckon.
-Reko
that opened up more ports needed for passive ftp. After the fetch
operation I would then restart PF with the more restrictive rules. This
sequence works but is a pain to maintain and also opens up a large
number of ports during ftp operations. I would like to have a setup in
which I do not have
We handle a lot of highly sensitive information and that's the need for the
severe lock-down. Even the web-proxy is restricted to the sites accessible
meaning that we need to request access if we need to go somewhere not
governed by that proxy.
this make sense.
just blocking everything except
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:58:24 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
We handle a lot of highly sensitive information and that's the need
for the severe lock-down. Even the web-proxy is restricted to the
sites accessible meaning that we need to request access if we need
to go somewhere
based boxes and
VM's which of course can be run through port 80 when using YUM.
How does one get round this issue as my superiors are telling me that
opening up FTP is a security risk and therefor don't want to proceed?
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
http://www.freeproxy.ru/en/free_proxy/faq/index.htm
How to bypass corporate proxy?
go away from corporation. A side effect is saving your mental health on
the long run.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Wojciech Puchar wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl writes:
http://www.freeproxy.ru/en/free_proxy/faq/index.htm
How to bypass corporate proxy?
go away from corporation. A side effect is saving your mental health on
the long run.
Well, judging by
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into
port 80 when using YUM.
How does one get round this issue as my superiors are telling me that
opening up FTP is a security risk and therefor don't want to proceed?
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get software.
Can anyone sugget anything?
Regards,
Kaya
based boxes and
VM's which of course can be run through port 80 when using YUM.
How does one get round this issue as my superiors are telling me that
opening up FTP is a security risk and therefor don't want to proceed?
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool
?
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Can anyone sugget anything?
env ftp_proxy=host:port command
where command is your normal command, such as fetch.
For a full list of environment variables you can use,…
$ ldd -f '%p\n' `which fetch
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You could run
your own local mirror (net/cvsup-mirror) as well
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You could run
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:00:01 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, this is a good idea I was actually thinking about this.
I've never done it so I'd need to google around a bit and do some
testing but it is probably what we would want to do!
Install the port, run the setup
On 12 Jul 2012, at 17:23, Kaya Saman wrote:
How does one get round this issue as my superiors are telling me that
opening up FTP is a security risk and therefor don't want to proceed?
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Can anyone sugget
FTP is a security risk and therefor don't want to proceed?
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Can anyone sugget anything?
env ftp_proxy=host:port command
where command is your normal command, such as fetch.
For a full list
Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Getting the ports tree
one get round this issue as my superiors are telling me that
opening up FTP is a security risk and therefor don't want to proceed?
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Can anyone sugget anything?
env ftp_proxy=host:port command
where command
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
do you work FOR that company. Ask administrator to unblock if for you as
you need it for work.
Do you do
will
**not** change his mind on this as I have asked several times in the
past.
Basically without getting too distracted and off-topic: I open the
ports on the firewall - tomorrow I am not employed anymore
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
.
As far as I remember this can be done at least via the http://delegate.org
software, certainly available in the ports collection.
Kaya, if your http proxy handles HTTP CONNECT to the port 21/ftp this can be
the workaround for you about the freebsd ports requiring ftp download ability.
Most surprise
control and data
connections through the consequent copmmands and data exhange.
As far as I remember this can be done at least via the http://delegate.org
software, certainly available in the ports collection.
Kaya, if your http proxy handles HTTP CONNECT to the port 21/ftp this can
too distracted and off-topic: I open the
ports on the firewall - tomorrow I am not employed anymore
Do not change anything in config if you got fired. It is not the clever
and polite.
Spent your time for starting out your own business or at least choose
better employee, instead of revenge
Most surprise for me is why no one is interested about what kind of a danger
the ftp protocol can ever be? i. e. skype is much more vicious in comparison to
As in lots of companies where idiots are directors (common case) the
danger is because it is something that doesn't exist. As we all know
Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org writes:
2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org = To Kaya Saman :
LG URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
LG silly security policies won't allow for an external web-based FTP proxy)
of the base system but supplied with taking the OS specs in mind.
ftp is a way to obtain a distfile, ie what the 3rd party software developer use
to distribute. For FreeBSD ports cvsup and ftp are not competent in the daiy
use as they have different purposes.
Some 3rd party software is released
Hello.
2012/07/12 14:44:48 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org = To Peter Vereshagin :
LG Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org writes:
LG
LG 2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org = To Kaya Saman :
LG LG URLs as well as FTP.
as
major virus source.
In places i work i was requested to
a) block some websites (facebook always first on list - very good).
b) block most things EXCEPT the ones needed for work, full access only
for some people. So some ports and some targets do work, rest does not.
This is normal IMHO
for the particular program(s) those are not the part
of the base system but supplied with taking the OS specs in mind.
ftp is a way to obtain a distfile, ie what the 3rd party software developer use
to distribute. For FreeBSD ports cvsup and ftp are not competent in the daiy
use as they have different purposes
mind on this as I have asked several times in the
past.
Basically without getting too distracted and off-topic: I open the
ports on the firewall - tomorrow I am not employed anymore
So called active ftp requires having the server open a connection back
to the client. This will be blocked
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself. Ie.
fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on certain
ports, the progress just bombs out totally.
as you've said it is not a problem at all
On 12/07/2012 21:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself.
Ie. fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on
certain ports, the progress just bombs out totally
Hello.
2012/07/12 21:26:22 +0100 Kaya Saman kayasa...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
KS A Demo? Am I invited for the show? ;-)
KS Something like a Linux repo server if you will - though I mention the
KS term very loosely.
SHould you try with a ixsystems's pcbsd.org then?
On 07/12/2012 09:46 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/07/2012 21:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself.
Ie. fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on
certain ports
files,
sample configuration files for the particular program(s) those are
not the part
of the base system but supplied with taking the OS specs in mind.
ftp is a way to obtain a distfile, ie what the 3rd party software
developer use
to distribute. For FreeBSD ports cvsup and ftp
Hey there,
I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from rt-3.8.8
to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI changes, such as
the libtool2.4 fun. With normal portupgrade, this forces you to go fix
the
On 6/25/12 9:53 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there,
I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from rt-3.8.8
to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI changes, such as
the libtool2.4 fun.
, then do it.
Am I just missing it in the manpages, or does such a thing really not
exist?
It has been many years since I used portupgrade with any regularity, and
many of those neurones have been recycled. However, I do recall
that:
portupgrade -a should update all out-of-date ports on your
changes, such as
the libtool2.4 fun. With normal portupgrade, this forces you to go fix
the dependent port.
Finally, I just applied -r, which should update all dependent packages,
but it seems to upgrade them unconditionally.
-r will upgrade all dependent ports *if* a newer version is available.
-rf
. With normal portupgrade, this forces you to go fix
the dependent port.
Finally, I just applied -r, which should update all dependent packages,
but it seems to upgrade them unconditionally.
-r will upgrade all dependent ports *if* a newer version is available.
-rf will upgrade all dependent ports
You would think there's an option to portupgrade that says don't upgrade
every single package I've got, but if somewhere in the dependency chain I
need a newer version of a thing, then do it.
The problem is that the versioning in the ports system doesn't
distinguish between upgrades
On 2012-06-25 11:47, John Levine wrote:
You would think there's an option to portupgrade that says don't
upgrade
every single package I've got, but if somewhere in the dependency
chain I
need a newer version of a thing, then do it.
The problem is that the versioning in the ports system
think there's an option to portupgrade that says don't
upgrade every single package I've got,
Firstly it doesn't. Secondly no one is forcing you to do this, if you
want to go through the ports and work out which need an update and which
don't then portupgrade will let you do that.
but if somewhere
Hi all,
How can i disable cups, docbook and other ports from compiling after
port update?
I have no printer and no use of cups or docbook.
*Sorry for my english*
Greetings
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:56:59 +0200, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all,
How can i disable cups, docbook and other ports from compiling after
port update?
I have no printer and no use of cups or docbook.
If you don't mind the _time_ required for building those ports
(and taking into mind
from Gary Aitken free...@dreamchaser.org:
I'm trying to build a script to rebuild and reinstall everything I have
installed from ports. I don't want to have to keep checking on it and filling
out the
+appropriate check boxes for options. I naively assumed:
for port in $ports
do
cd
I'm trying to build a script to rebuild and reinstall everything I have
installed from ports. I don't want to have to keep checking on it and filling
out the appropriate check boxes for options. I naively assumed:
for port in $ports
do
cd /usr/port/$port
make config-recursive
You can have a look at port-mgmt/portmaster.
Thanks
Subhro
--
Subhro Sankha Kar
System Administrator
Working and Playing with FreeBSD since 2002
On 10-Jun-2012, at 10:07 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
I'm trying to build a script to rebuild and reinstall everything I have
installed from ports. I
Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr
On 8 June 2012 23:06, Gary Aitken free...@dreamchaser.org wrote:
Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used?
yes, but don't do it. the ports tree needs to be complete to be
guaranteed to function.
--
Eitan Adler
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 00:06:39 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used?
How do you want to understand by parts and not used?
The easiest way to not use some part of the ports tree is to
remove that part. You can do that by manually
On 8 June 2012 23:21, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 00:06:39 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used?
This approach does _not_ work well when using portsnap. From
the portsnap.conf manpage: Note
Gary Aitken wrote:
Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used?
Yes.
Although as others pointed out it depend quite what you mean by that :-)
Example
setenv DUDS SomeEndPortToSkip_eg_ghostview
One could also do
setenv DUDS `printenv DUDS
201 - 300 of 6354 matches
Mail list logo
