-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm planning on using RAID 5, since they are kind of small drives, and
I'm more interested in reliability and size, than speed.
Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 09:57, Aaron C. Meadows wrote:
My question is, since that chipset is
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 14:48, Aaron C. Meadows wrote:
I'm planning on using RAID 5, since they are kind of small drives, and
I'm more interested in reliability and size, than speed.
Hmmm - I'd probably look toward a hardware system, then. I've had great
luck with software mirroring and
* Greg 'groggy' Lehey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There have been issues with growfs in the past; last time I looked
it hadn't been updated to handle UFS 2. If you don't need the UFS 2
functionality, you might be better off using UFS 1 if you intend to
grow the file system.
growfs gained
The problem I've had in the past in Windows for example:
Drive D: is a RAID5 volume, 400GB, nearly full. If I add a 200GB drive to
the array, the 'disk' that Drive D: resides on is now ~600GB, but Drive D:
will remain 400GB. I would have to utilize a third party piece of
software to resize
On 5/11/2005 19:33, Tony Shadwick wrote:
The problem I've had in the past in Windows for example:
Drive D: is a RAID5 volume, 400GB, nearly full. If I add a 200GB
drive to the array, the 'disk' that Drive D: resides on is now ~600GB,
but Drive D: will remain 400GB. I would have to utilize a
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Subhro wrote:
On 5/11/2005 19:33, Tony Shadwick wrote:
The problem I've had in the past in Windows for example:
Drive D: is a RAID5 volume, 400GB, nearly full. If I add a 200GB drive to
the array, the 'disk' that Drive D: resides on is now ~600GB, but Drive D:
will remain
On Tuesday, 10 May 2005 at 16:05:50 -0500, Tony Shadwick wrote:
I've worked with RAID5 in FreeBSD in the past, with either vinum or a
hardware raid solution. Never had any problems either way.
I'm now building a server for myself at home, and I'm creating a large
volume to store video. I
On 5/11/2005 2:35, Tony Shadwick wrote:
What my concern is when I start to fill up the ~400GB of space I'm
giving myself with this set. I would like to simply insert another
200GB drive and expand the array, allowing the hardware raid to do the
work.
That is what everybody does. It is very
I've tried installing gnome and windowmaker to test the sound. Each
act the same as KDE. Mplayer works with sound but nothing else. I,
also, installed xmms and tested, no sound. The sound graphics are
idle, seeming to indicate that the sound is not being generated in the
applications. I,
You referred to kldstat. I'm not sure what I'm looking for with that
or what switch I may need to use. I typed and received the following
information:
# kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
18 0x8010 7c36b8 kernel
21 0x808c4000 50c8 udbp.ko
3
To add information on the usb mouse problem when I plug my usb mouse
in to the 2 usb 2.0 ports, I get the first error at the command line:
uhub1: device problem (SET_ADDR_FAILED), disabling port 2
uhub1: device problem (SET_ADDR_FAILED), disabling port 1
Like the sound, the usb mouse was working
Here's an update on the sound issue. I ported down and compiled
mplayer. I popped in a DVD and typed on the command line:
# mplayer dvd://
With that I got sound to play. I then recompile xine, but xine still
has no sound. KDE is also soundless.
Hopefully this helps.
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:08:47 -0500
Todd Shirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's an update on the sound issue. I ported down and compiled
mplayer. I popped in a DVD and typed on the command line:
# mplayer dvd://
With that I got sound to play. I then recompile xine, but xine still
has no
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:07:57 +
Todd Shirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(MYKERNEL is the GENERIC plus the lines needed for loading the sound
system and the via8233 sound driver for my sound card)
device sound
device snd_via8233
(with mergemaster I chose i for each file,
Hi
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 15:34, cyb wrote:
Anyone here who can recommend a dongle with decent support for FreeBSD?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-February/077838.h
tml http://bsdnews.org/03/cryptusb.php
An ancrypted filesystem on a USB stick is nice, but the
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 18:50, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Anyone here who can recommend a dongle with decent support for FreeBSD?
See http://www.safenet-inc.com. They make dongles and (USB) hardware
keys for software products and they mention support for Linux and OS X,
so they may have
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 15:15 +0100, jonas wrote:
Hello questions-list!
I'd like to know if anyone here is aware of a hardware manufacturer or
supplier that offers dongles with FreeBSD support? (A small piece of hardware
to plug into a USB or serial/parallel port with the possibility to
jonas writes:
Background: The company I work for sells a system running on FreeBSD and we
need to have this kind of copy protection and the possibility to store some
bits of information on the dongle. Our current solutions already includes a
parallel port dongle (WIBUKEY), but the driver for
Hi List,
Is there any freebsd based p.c hardware / burn in testing software
available ?
Someone suggested this to me when I had a suspected hardware problem earlier
this month:
http://www.memtest86.com/
cali
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Dave Carrera schrieb:
Hi List,
Is there any freebsd based p.c hardware / burn in testing software
available ?
I ask as i am building 3 new servers and want to check all parts ie,
mem, hdd, cpu etc before loading on my freebsd.
What would be ideal is a micro kernal on a floppy disk or self
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 03:37:32PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
Dave Carrera schrieb:
Hi List,
Is there any freebsd based p.c hardware / burn in testing software
available ?
I ask as i am building 3 new servers and want to check all parts ie,
mem, hdd, cpu etc before loading on my
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:42:32PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Stijn Hoop said:
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This did teach me a lesson that I kind of knew already but
didn't think too much about. That is, a software array
is no substitute
for a hardware array. ...
-Original Message-
From: Stijn Hoop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 1:01 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Sandy Rutherford; FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Hardware RAID
I explicitly stated vinum is a great
thing if what your wanting to do is use a bunch
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:22:36AM -0800, Sandy Rutherford wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:57:21 -0800,
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This did teach me a lesson that I kind of knew already but
didn't think too much about. That is, a software array is no substitute
for a
On Jan 21, 2005, at 4:02 AM, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:22:36AM -0800, Sandy Rutherford wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:57:21 -0800,
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This did teach me a lesson that I kind of knew already but
didn't think too much about. That is, a
-Original Message-
From: Stijn Hoop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 1:02 AM
To: Sandy Rutherford; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Hardware RAID
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:22:36AM -0800, Sandy Rutherford wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:22:36AM -0800, Sandy Rutherford wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:57:21 -0800,
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This did teach me a lesson that I kind of knew already but
didn't think too much about. That is, a software array is no substitute
for a
Jason Lieurance wrote:
I installed everything on 'ad4' but it I think I wanted to install it to 'ar0'.
Am I
right? Thanks.
Yep, ar is the Atapi Raid driver, ad is just the individual disk :)
--
Mike Woods
IT Technician
___
Mike Woods wrote:
Yep, ar is the Atapi Raid driver, ad is just the individual disk :)
s/Atapi/ata/
Less haste, more coffee, the key to better typing.
--
Mike Woods
IT Technician
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Mike Woods said:
Jason Lieurance wrote:
I installed everything on 'ad4' but it I think I wanted to install it to
'ar0'.
Am I right? Thanks.
Yep, ar is the Atapi Raid driver, ad is just the individual disk :)
--
Mike Woods
IT Technician
Why does the os even detect the
Why does the os even detect the individual drives when the raid card made it a
single drive and the os install is after the raid bios???
Because the chipset provides means to control both single disks and
arrays thus you get both, just the way that card chose to do things :)
-
Mike
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:58:59PM +, Mike Woods wrote:
Why does the os even detect the individual drives when the raid card made
it a
single drive and the os install is after the raid bios???
Because the chipset provides means to control both single disks and
arrays thus you get
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 03:28:18AM +, Street Chaman wrote:
hi everyone,
i need low level hardware control over some devices (kbd, sound, display) in
an assembly soft, and 'd like to know where i can find a list of
ioctl_syscall supported parameters for each device.
Furthermore, if
Bens wrote:
Im looking for a motherboard that will serve as
our FreeBSD server, I have some difficulty finding the
right review for MSI 865PE Neo2 platinum edition
motherboard. Is this motherboard and its integrated
components compatible with FreeBSD release 5.3?
It's likely that the
On 1/5/2005 at 09:14 Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote:
Hi,
We have a system that is currently giving us some trouble. The system
is
FreeBSD 4.9. It's a 2 GHz system with 1MB RAM and (here's the kicker)
73GB
RAID 1 ATA drives. The system serves as a web/database server
dedicated to
1
site.
On 1/5/2005 at 09:14 Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote:
Hi,
We have a system that is currently giving us some trouble. The system
is
FreeBSD 4.9. It's a 2 GHz system with 1MB RAM and (here's the kicker)
73GB
RAID 1 ATA drives. The system serves as a web/database server
dedicated to
1
site.
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:33:41 -0600
Joseph Koenig (jWeb) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/5/2005 at 09:14 Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote:
Hi,
We have a system that is currently giving us some trouble. The
system is
FreeBSD 4.9. It's a 2 GHz system with 1MB RAM and (here's the
kicker) 73GB
I had a very similar problem over the holidays. After a power failure
over a month ago, I noticed some anomalies in FreeBSD, but they were
very insidious and didn't seem like hardware (and the system was on a
UPS plus a surge protector, so I didn't think the PF alone could have
done damage, unless
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:03:42 -0600, Jim wrote
Hi,
Can you tell me if this motherboard / chipset is supported. This is
in a Microtel computer.
Motherboard:
CPU Type AMD Duron XP,
1212 MHz (12 x 101) Motherboard Name
For those interested: I cured the system of its boot problem by
disabling ACPI. There are two ways to do this: by appending the
following text to /boot/device.hints:
hint.acpi.0.disabled=1
...or by selecting Boot with ACPI disabled (choice 2) from the FBSD
boot menu. Note that when you do
Graham Bentley wrote:
Hi
Can anyone recommend a good solid
mobo for building a little web server ?
Most brands have a reputation. Select one
whose reputation is good. ;-)
I have FreeBSD running on several mobos
--- recently, builds have been FreeBSD 5.x
on MSI and Shuttle (AK32V, IIRC).
A
I recently built a system using a VIA EPIA PD1 motherboard with a
VIA C3 (1GHz) processor on it. I've successfully compiled the entire
system (buildworld and buildkernel) for 4.10-STABLE and a number of
ports. Everything appears to work fine. If you want to build your own
kernel, be aware
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:10:40PM +0300, Sergey Limarenko wrote:
why don't supported ethernet card
D-Link 580TX, but 570TX - supported
i very need this driver,
where i can find it?
D-Link 580TX is supported by ste(4). (However, I haven't tried it yet)
Sergey Limarenko wrote:
why don't supported ethernet card
D-Link 580TX, but 570TX - supported
i very need this driver,
where i can find it?
If you leave a quarter under your pillow tonight, perhaps the tooth fairy will
bring you a new driver. :-)
You can help this process along by including the
wrote:
Russia, Chitinskaya state, Chita city.
Hello to you ?untranslatable name?, too. :-)
FreeBSD 5.2.1, it freezes on start load(default) of install.
Probably it because of that of incompatibility with the hardware.
Perhaps so. You might try booting with APCI disabled, or in safe mode, and
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 06:53:17PM +0100, Mike Woods wrote:
Anyway, to the point, is there a big hardware compatability list anyway,
i dont mean like the one on freebsd.org rather a site stating actual
tried and tested cards and the like as opposed to chipsets and controllers ?
for laptops
First of all you can check out
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.7R/hardware-i386.html
to obtain the list of hardward support.
Secondly, there are a lot of thread about the driver
not available or have problem for FreeBSD 5.2.1 with
IBM x345 where it is using serveRAID 6i and still
encountering
Luke,
If I may offer you my two cents. Many newer systems come standard with
125W power supplies which will probably power the motherboard, that's
usually about all. By the time you add several PCI cards and several
hard drives, you've overloaded the power supply. Typically overlooked,
this one
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Banana Flex wrote:
hello!
i have a little problem, can u help me?
i would like to buy a new server called HP Proliant ML310
the hardware on this machine for the ethernet is a Compaq NC7760
this is working on FreeBSD 5.2.1? i have not seen this number on the
hardware
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:28:33 -0800 (PST)
Denis R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus:
Luke,
I know that would be coincidental, but you know what your running CPU temp
is (check your BIOS)? OS freeze-ups sometimes occur due to inadequate
cooling of the CPU. Also maybe your computer is close to a
Luke,
Your temps are fine. Go to the hard drive manufacturer's web site and
download a drive check utility. Once you run it, it will either say okay
or spit out an error code that you can use to RMA your hard drive.
If a hard drive locks up, you should still see errors on stdout, however
nothing
Hello Luke,
I would try to find some kind of burn test utility which will test your hardware.
As for memory, there is Memtest86 memory test, and for harddrives there are many
vendor utilities, which can make a really deep tests.
cheers,
Martin
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:18:41AM
Luke,
I know that would be coincidental, but you know what your running CPU temp
is (check your BIOS)? OS freeze-ups sometimes occur due to inadequate
cooling of the CPU. Also maybe your computer is close to a heat source?
Are you using the same computer case?
What is your power supply rated at?
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Heinrich Rebehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi list,
does anybody have a clue, if the following is a hard or software error?
#
syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
kernel:
kernel:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Heinrich Rebehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi list,
does anybody have a clue, if the following is a hard or software error?
#
syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
kernel:
kernel:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Heinrich Rebehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi list,
does anybody have a clue, if the following is a hard or software error?
#
syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
kernel:
kernel:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:37:45 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm upgrading the hardware on my webserver. It will run FreeBSD
4.9.
I need to decide whether to use a hardware firewall (Cisco) or use
ipfw, ipf, pf, etc.
The hardware firewall will increase my monthly server rental bill by
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
Why not just try it?
Because it's a commercial hosting operation pushing up to 20Mb/s with
SLA's to our clients.
My biggest fear is not that this won't work, but that it will work but
with intermittant bugs.
Introducing a new machine has a certain
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:49:19AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Introducing a new machine has a certain level of risk. What is your
contingency plan if the machine fails anyway?
The plan is to just remove the machine from the circuit. Instead of
having a cable to the machine from the first
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
Another alternative.. prepare both machines. Have the better machine ready
to do an able to be connected/switched to at a moments notice. Put the
slower machine on at the slowest day. Monitor it closely as traffic grows.
That's probably the way
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
Pentium III 667 Mhz with 512MB RAM
2 x Intel EtherExpress 100Mb cards
Would either of these machines be able to meet my firewall requirements
Why not just try it?
It should be fairly simple to move from one machine to the other if need
be.
If the
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:36:25PM +, Francisco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
Pentium III 667 Mhz with 512MB RAM
2 x Intel EtherExpress 100Mb cards
Would either of these machines be able to meet my firewall requirements
Why not just try it?
Because it's a
paul van den bergen wrote:
Like most geeks[1] I have a pile of roting hardware at home... Someone
yesterday mentioned (vaguely) about utilities for testing hardware -
especially RAM - but presumably this could be extended to other hardware -
that would
1) tell you if it is OK.
This is
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:59:25PM +0900, Takuya Satoh wrote:
Hi.
I'm workink for computer sales buissnes, and one of my costomer woul'd like
to know that your Free BSD would work on the IBM X335 Server. If you have
experienced that you?hear?in this case, please let me know it work or not.
K Anderson wrote:
Don't recall if I asked here. Asked on the Linux groups.
I have the following:
ATI AIW 9800 Pro (R350 w/dual whatever)
Asus SK8N mobo (nForce 3 Pro 150)
Audigy 2
Opteron 246
Should have gone with:
nVidia something
Haupage TV (or some other compat thingy)
More
K Anderson wrote:
Don't recall if I asked here. Asked on the Linux groups.
I have the following:
ATI AIW 9800 Pro (R350 w/dual whatever)
Asus SK8N mobo (nForce 3 Pro 150)
Audigy 2
Opteron 246
Should have gone with:
nVidia something
Haupage TV (or some other compat thingy)
More
Jason wrote:
K Anderson wrote:
Don't recall if I asked here. Asked on the Linux groups.
I have the following:
ATI AIW 9800 Pro (R350 w/dual whatever)
Asus SK8N mobo (nForce 3 Pro 150)
Audigy 2
Opteron 246
Should have gone with:
nVidia something
Haupage TV (or some other compat
At 2003-10-14T09:44:31Z, Michael Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have 4 SCSI hdds connect to this controller card. I wonder if I should
disable the softupdates feature for the FFS to make the system runs
faster.
Out of curiosity, what part of the system do you think would be faster
without
Message -
From: Kirk Strauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: Hardware RAID vs softupdates
At 2003-10-14T09:44:31Z, Michael Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have 4 SCSI hdds connect to this controller card. I wonder if I should
ephix wrote:
Hey,
I have a Dell PowerEdge server, and have been trying to get healthd /
chm working for the past few days. I think it uses the LM81 chipset (as
ive managed to find with google), while healthd only supports LM78,
LM79, and some others.
The server is leaving for the datacenter in
At 15:56 24/07/2003 -0700, you wrote:
we are computer company for computer server, we sold out some severs with
ECS P4VMM2 motherboard, but our customer can't run FreeBSD. would you
please list the compatable motherboard, video card, hdd etc.
What's the problem you're having?
The current
Check the hardware notes on the releases against the hardware used. Info on the
errors would be of help to. FreeBSD is for the most part not responsible for
handleing the video card, that is done by the X server.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
ALLEN WANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:41:14AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hi,
I am considering buying a new box to run FreeBSD and brige+ipfilter.
Would anyone has a recommendation on what kind of mother board/NIC to
use?
For the moment I am using a P4 1.5 GHz and 3com 905B, but they may not
be
I don't know about the sun, but the video card should work nicely. It should be
supported by the drm in the kernel and X should play nicely with it.
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 01:13:27 +0200
Sandor \fisty\ Renz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
my name is Sandor Renz!
ive been using freebsd for some time
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:28:55 -0500, Vulpes Velox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't know about the sun, but the video card should work nicely. It
should be supported by the drm in the kernel and X should play nicely
with it.
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 01:13:27 +0200
Sandor \fisty\ Renz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday, 04 June 2003 11:28, Vulpes Velox wrote:
I don't know about the sun, but the video card should work nicely. It
should be supported by the drm in the kernel and X should play nicely with
it.
Well actually the 9700PRO is supported to some extent. And that extent is 2D
XFree86 only.
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 07:00 pm, Bsd Neophyte wrote:
alright my bookpc that has served me nicely for over a year now has gone
to hell.
i've had a Dual P3-700e on an Asus P2B-LS. unfortunately, this MB doesn't
have anything beyond an ata33. the drive I have is an ata100 drive. i'm
sure
Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
The 3c590 uses the 'vx' driver which is PIO/MMIO only.
If it compiles on the sparc64 I suspect it will work fine.
There is 0 chance the vr(4) driver will work on sparc64, it uses
vtophys() for DMA and it doesn't look like it's endian-clean either. By
the way, the
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Maxime Henrion wrote:
Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
The 3c590 uses the 'vx' driver which is PIO/MMIO only.
If it compiles on the sparc64 I suspect it will work fine.
There is 0 chance the vr(4) driver will work on sparc64, it uses
vtophys() for DMA and it doesn't look like
Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Maxime Henrion wrote:
Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
The 3c590 uses the 'vx' driver which is PIO/MMIO only.
If it compiles on the sparc64 I suspect it will work fine.
There is 0 chance the vr(4) driver will work on sparc64, it uses
vtophys()
The 3c590 uses the 'vx' driver which is PIO/MMIO only.
If it compiles on the sparc64 I suspect it will work fine.
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Maxime Henrion wrote:
Alan Lai wrote:
freebsd has those drivers for x86 machines, is that possible to compile
them for ultrasparc machines?
is there any
freebsd has those drivers for x86 machines, is that possible to compile
them for ultrasparc machines?
is there any way to get an x86 nic work under freebsd/ultrasparc?
if so, whats the work that i have to do?
please advice
is the freebsd-sparc kernel not open source? i cannot compile/custimize it
Alan Lai wrote:
freebsd has those drivers for x86 machines, is that possible to compile
them for ultrasparc machines?
is there any way to get an x86 nic work under freebsd/ultrasparc?
if so, whats the work that i have to do?
please advice
You first need to convert the card to use the busdma
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:41:03AM +0300, Artem Koutchine wrote:
I have ask the same question, but pretty much nobody answerred.
Please, answer, if you have some opinion on this matter, because
i need more opinions.
So, the question is DUAL Pentium III XEON 550Mhz 512Kb cache
with SDRAM
On Saturday 30 November 2002 02:39 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:41:03AM +0300, Artem Koutchine wrote:
I have ask the same question, but pretty much nobody answerred.
Please, answer, if you have some opinion on this matter, because
i need more opinions.
So, the
Sostin Andrey wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Does anybody know about software tests for FreeBSD which could
overload the whole system (like BurnIn Pro for Windows). Please
give the url, if any.
We need to test about 500 servers under FreeBSD...
building a kernel is generally considered a good burn
Sostin Andrey wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Does anybody know about software tests for FreeBSD which could overload the whole system (like BurnIn Pro for Windows). Please give the url, if any.
We need to test about 500 servers under FreeBSD...
Sincerely,
Andrew A. Sostin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:51:11PM +0200, Socketd wrote:
Hi FreeBSD'ers
I am not a hardware expert, so I will ask here about the limits before
buying a new server.
How many processors can FreeBSD run with?
SMP support in 4.x will use as many as you have, but FreeBSD 4.x does
not make
201 - 288 of 288 matches
Mail list logo
