On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:11:24AM +0200, Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:07:58AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of kalin mintchev
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:11 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: raid or not raid
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:30:06AM -0400, kalin mintchev
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of kalin mintchev
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:11 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: raid or not raid
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:30:06AM -0400, kalin mintchev
-Original Message-
From: kalin mintchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 5:04 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: raid or not raid
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:07:58AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
hi all..
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims
On Thu, 24 May 2007 19:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unless at device 31.2 on pci0 points to some RAID evidence - which i
think it's false - than i read this as the ad6 disk sits there unused.
am i right?!
FWIW, you can use gstat (as root) to see if a certain
how come there is ad4s1b and ad4s1c when those names don't appear in the
fstab or df?
Very often ad4s1b will be the swap and ad4s1c the full slice.
That is not an absolute rule, but it is very much recommended (at
least for ad4s1c) to keep it equivalent to the full slice.
Olivier
how come there is ad4s1b and ad4s1c when those names don't appear in the
fstab or df?
Very often ad4s1b will be the swap and ad4s1c the full slice.
That is not an absolute rule, but it is very much recommended (at
least for ad4s1c) to keep it equivalent to the full slice.
but there is
On Fri, 25 May 2007 15:41:28 +0700 (ICT)
Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how come there is ad4s1b and ad4s1c when those names don't appear in the
fstab or df?
because df shows mounted disks, and fstab what to mount. neither of them affect
b (usually swap) or c (as per Olivier
On Fri, 25 May 2007 04:37:25 -0400 (EDT)
kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
replying to your email down the thread...but using this content...
L(q) ops/sr/s kBps ms/rw/s kBps ms/w %busy Name
0 6 66278.5 0 00.05.0| ad4
The actual
On Fri, 25 May 2007 04:37:25 -0400 (EDT)
kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
replying to your email down the thread...but using this content...
L(q) ops/sr/s kBps ms/rw/s kBps ms/w %busy Name
0 6 66278.5 0 00.05.0| ad4
The
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
hi all..
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine has
two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a bunch of
slices.
under devices there is another name - ad6 - but it's not
On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
hi all..
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine has
two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a bunch of
slices.
under
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
hi all..
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the
machine has
two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine
has
two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a
bunch of
slices.
under devices there is another name - ad6 - but it's not mounted
anywhere.
the one i see both in df and the fstab is ad4 with
Also what type of RAID? If it's Hardware RAID _and_ it's using a 3ware
card,
doubt it. i don't see anything that ponts to that in the pciconf output..
you can install tw_cli from /usr/ports/sysutils. It's a nice
little utility and will show you the status of your units/ports/drives
and
At 05:30 AM 5/24/2007, kalin mintchev wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
hi all..
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine has
two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a bunch of
slices.
under devices
On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine
has
two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a
bunch of
slices.
under devices there is another name - ad6 - but it's not mounted
On 24/05/07, Derek Ragona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:30 AM 5/24/2007, kalin mintchev wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
hi all..
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine has
two discs raided in it but df and fstab show
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:30:06AM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
hi all..
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine has
two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a bunch of
On 24/05/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please elaborate. do you mean that the raided disks will have another
id/name rather than 'ad'?
Not knowing what hardware you have, I would still hazard
that a RAID device will not
On Thursday 24 May 2007 06:30:06 am kalin mintchev wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
hi all..
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine
has two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a
bunch of
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:07:58AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/05/07, kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
hi all..
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine
has
two discs
On Thu, 24 May 2007, kalin mintchev wrote:
Also what type of RAID? If it's Hardware RAID _and_ it's using a 3ware
card,
doubt it. i don't see anything that ponts to that in the pciconf output..
you can install tw_cli from /usr/ports/sysutils. It's a nice
little utility and will show you
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:30:06AM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
hi all..
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine
has
two discs raided in it but df and fstab show only one disc with a
bunch
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 07:11:27PM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:30:06AM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote:
so nobody on this list knows anything about raid?
wrong list?
hi all..
i have a box in a remote hosting facility that claims that the machine
has
On Thu, 24 May 2007 19:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
kalin mintchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unless at device 31.2 on pci0 points to some RAID evidence - which i
think it's false - than i read this as the ad6 disk sits there unused.
am i right?!
FWIW, you can use gstat (as root) to see if a certain geom
27 matches
Mail list logo
