On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Maxim Khitrov m...@mxcrypt.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 23/01/2012 18:03, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
Hi all,
When I need to apply a custom patch to a port, I can set EXTRA_PATCHES
make
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:13:49 -0500
Maxim Khitrov m...@mxcrypt.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 23/01/2012 18:03, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
Hi all,
When I need to apply a custom patch to a port, I can set
EXTRA_PATCHES make
Hi all,
When I need to apply a custom patch to a port, I can set EXTRA_PATCHES
make variable in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf (when using portconf), and
the patch will be automatically applied whenever that port is built.
Is there equivalent functionality for building FreeBSD world and
kernel?
When
On 23/01/2012 18:03, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
Hi all,
When I need to apply a custom patch to a port, I can set EXTRA_PATCHES
make variable in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf (when using portconf), and
the patch will be automatically applied whenever that port is built.
Is there equivalent
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 23/01/2012 18:03, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
Hi all,
When I need to apply a custom patch to a port, I can set EXTRA_PATCHES
make variable in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf (when using portconf), and
the patch will
Hello,
I'm trying to update my FreeBSD install on two servers. They are
mostly identical. So, I've builded world and kernel on first srv,
updated it, without any problems. Then exported /usr/src and /usr/obj
by NFS to another machine, then installed kernel, but can't install
world. It says:
Артем Каялайнен wrote:
I don't have any options in make.conf on first machine, nor on second
machine. I've googled a little and found, that _p is profiling library
and it can be ignored with -DNO_PROFILE option. But in this case,
How about compairing /etc/src.conf?
--
Sphinx of black quartz
2012/1/11 Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kw...@gmail.com:
How about compairing /etc/src.conf?
Wow, you are 100% right. My bad. Thanks.
---
With Best Regards / Ystävällisin terveisin
Artem Kajalainen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 25 February 2011 23:42, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
Why is this question even arising? Surely there are other
problems that need to be addressed much more than the ending of a
useful, uncontroversial service by someone who is not familiar with
it?
I am familiar with it. I
) Is it still being offered and supported as a method of updating
FreeBSD systems?
2) If not can the section in the handbook be removed? I have attached
a patch which removes references to CTM from the handbook. Should it
be applied?
3) Probably the most controversial question - but I'll ask
So I have a few questions:
1) Is it still being offered and supported as a method of updating
FreeBSD systems?
As of today, yes -- I have recent deltas in my mailbox. But you could
easily check by subscribing, and looking at:
http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CTM
where the deltas are still
Why is this question even arising? Surely there are other
problems that need to be addressed much more than the ending of a
useful, uncontroversial service by someone who is not familiar with
it?
I am familiar with it. I just happened to notice that the mailing
lists were empty and therefore
Hi there!
Just seeking a clarification on keeping FreeBSD up-to-date through csup. I
am on FreeBSD 6.2 and want to keep up-to-date for security patches
etc.
I understand I can use csup to follow the RELENG_62 branch. After the
sources are downloaded, do I have to follow all the steps
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:24:26PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Hi there!
Just seeking a clarification on keeping FreeBSD up-to-date through csup. I
am on FreeBSD 6.2 and want to keep up-to-date for security patches
etc.
I understand I can use csup to follow the RELENG_62 branch.
Daniel Bye wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:24:26PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
I understand I can use csup to follow the RELENG_62 branch. After the
sources are downloaded, do I have to follow all the steps outlined in this
Simon Castillo wrote:
Hi all:
I installed Freebsd ver 6.2 couple months ago in a Pentium III computer. I configured samba, gnome and couple other applications.
Couple days ago I decided to update the ports. For this I use portmanager -u
-l (after updating the port list).
Up to know, I
On Fri, 11 May 2007 01:45:47 -0500
WizLayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could be wrong as I haven't used portmanager in a while (and that
was only a short time)... I believe that by default, portmanager
doesn't update dependencies more than a depth of 1 (maybe two?)
unless you use the -p
Hi Gerard:
I tried your suggestion and I still have the same result. It updated couple
more files, but the error (missing library) is still there.
Any other suggestion?
Thanks in advance
Simon
Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Fri, 11 May 2007 01:45:47 -0500
WizLayer wrote:
I
On Friday 11 May 2007 11:23:11 am Simon Castillo wrote:
Hi Gerard:
I tried your suggestion and I still have the same result. It updated
couple more files, but the error (missing library) is still there.
Any other suggestion?
Thanks in advance
Simon
Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Simon Castillo wrote:
Hi Garret:
Freebsd ver 6.2
Samba: from ver 3.0.23 to 3.0.24
gdm: From ver 2.16 to 2.18
Thanks
Simon
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Simon Castillo wrote:
Hi all:
I installed Freebsd ver 6.2 couple months ago in a Pentium
On Fri, 11 May 2007 11:23:11 -0500 (CDT)
Simon Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried your suggestion and I still have the same result. It updated
couple more files, but the error (missing library) is still there.
Assuming your ports tree is up to date, try running:
pkgdb -Ffv
Hi WizLayer:
Nope, no particular reason to use portmanager. I guess I'll one more that
suffer a bad experience. I don't see any other solution than re-install every
thing again.
Thanks
Simon
WizLayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Friday 11 May 2007 11:23:11 am Simon
Castillo wrote:
Hi
On Friday 11 May 2007 04:00:15 pm you wrote:
WizLayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Friday 11 May 2007 11:23:11 am
Simon Castillo wrote:
Gerard Seibert escribió: On Fri, 11 May 2007
01:45:47 -0500
WizLayer wrote:
I could be wrong as I haven't used portmanager in a while (and
Hi all:
I installed Freebsd ver 6.2 couple months ago in a Pentium III computer. I
configured samba, gnome and couple other applications.
Couple days ago I decided to update the ports. For this I use portmanager -u
-l (after updating the port list).
After the update, I starting having
On Thursday 10 May 2007 11:24:31 pm Simon Castillo wrote:
Hi all:
I installed Freebsd ver 6.2 couple months ago in a Pentium III computer.
I configured samba, gnome and couple other applications.
Couple days ago I decided to update the ports. For this I use portmanager
-u -l (after
Alle 18:27, venerdì 16 settembre 2005, Ashley Moran ha scritto:
Vittorio wrote:
Thanks.
I've just compiled the portsnap sources and put the following
in /usr/local/etc/portsnap.conf:
# Defaults:
WORKDIR=/usr/local/portsnap
PORTSDIR=/usr/ports
vittorio wrote:
Well, after thourough examination and a word with the network administrator I
learnt that my FreeBSD 5.4 client cannot resolve the name (and the IP too) of
portsnap.daemonology.net because it is behind a firewall and a proxy (which
-by the way - I had already defined via
At office I have a freebsd 5.4 server to run postgresql. I'd like to
update the ports in it from time to time but cvsup doesn't seem to work
behind our proxy. In fact, in make.conf I have the following two lines:
FETCH_ENV = HTTP_PROXY=http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080
FETCH_ENV =
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:38:42PM +0100, Vittorio wrote:
At office I have a freebsd 5.4 server to run postgresql. I'd like to
update the ports in it from time to time but cvsup doesn't seem to work
behind our proxy. In fact, in make.conf I have the following two lines:
FETCH_ENV =
Vittorio wrote:
Is there another
alternative way of defining the proxy OR any other way of getting a new
source three to be copied to the server, e.g., by means of a cd burnt
at home?
Have you considered using the sysutils/portsnap port? It's what I use
to keep my servers up-to-date.
Fetching
public key... failed.
What's wrong with the original key in the
portsnap.conf.sample file?
Thanks again
Vittorio
Messaggio
originale
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 16-set-2005 5.14 PM
A: Vittorio[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Ogg: Re: Updating freebsd
Vittorio wrote:
# Defaults:
WORKDIR=/usr/local/portsnap
PORTSDIR=/usr/ports
KEYPRINT=9b5feee6d69f170e3dd0a2c8e469ddbd64f13f978f2f3aede40c98633216c330
URL=http://portsnap.daemonology.net
# portsnap fetch
Fetching
public key... failed.
What's wrong with the original key in the
Vittorio wrote:
Thanks.
I've just compiled the portsnap sources and put the following
in /usr/local/etc/portsnap.conf:
# Defaults:
WORKDIR=/usr/local/portsnap
PORTSDIR=/usr/ports
KEYPRINT=9b5feee6d69f170e3dd0a2c8e469ddbd64f13f978f2f3aede40c98633216c330
URL=http://portsnap.daemonology.net
BUT
Alle 18:21, venerdì 16 settembre 2005, Colin Percival ha scritto:
Vittorio wrote:
# Defaults:
WORKDIR=/usr/local/portsnap
PORTSDIR=/usr/ports
KEYPRINT=9b5feee6d69f170e3dd0a2c8e469ddbd64f13f978f2f3aede40c98633216c330
URL=http://portsnap.daemonology.net
# portsnap fetch
Fetching
On 2005-09-16 21:49, vittorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alle 18:21, venerd?? 16 settembre 2005, Colin Percival ha scritto:
That key is correct. Try running portsnap --debug fetch to work out
what the problem is.
Here it is :
vicbsd# portsnap --debug fetch
Fetching public key... fetch:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Christopher San Diego wrote:
I'm a confused newbie whose been (re)installing FreeBSD 5.3 Release
for the past week or two.
I've read the handbook and various other documents concerning updating
FreeBSD only to learn that -STABLE and -CURRENT are both development
branches.
Take
I'm a confused newbie whose been (re)installing FreeBSD 5.3 Release
for the past week or two.
I've read the handbook and various other documents concerning updating
FreeBSD only to learn that -STABLE and -CURRENT are both development
branches.
I've decided to stick with -RELEASE. Given
37 matches
Mail list logo
