Considering the amount of RAM in the box, AMD64 would prob be best for your
needs.
If you need 32-bit software or features go with i386 instead but you wont have
access to all the RAM
ia64 is for Itanium-based systems only
> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:39:07 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi guys
For following hardware, I am wonderting that which Freebsd amd64, ia64 or
i386 to install?
Hardware:
Dell PowerEdge 2950 III having 2 x CPU 3,0 GHz Intel Xeon L5450 Quad-Core
2x6MB cache WITH 16 GB RAM.
Tools:
1. FreeBSD 7 Production Release
2. Apache 2.2.9
3. MySQL 5.1.26
4. PHP 5.2.6
> O.K I understand that. So I can see that unless I have an i386 FreeBSD
> build, I really cannot
> install those i386 only software titles.
>
> In that situation I assume I can only use amd64 ports and software.
>
> I have an idea though, would it be possible to build
Sean Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> he was asking about ports that are labled as "i386 only"
"Well, he didn't mention building ports. He only said
*running* i386 software on amd64, which is certainly
possible.
Whether "i386 only" packages will
Christopher Joyner wrote:
> Ok I see, I understand that I am able to run i386 software on my amd64
> (Pentium D).
>
> Because of the error message i386 only, how do I make it install?
> Do I use a force switch?
> I am going to try some things after posting this.
"You
Christopher Joyner wrote:
> Ok I see, I understand that I am able to run i386 software on my amd64
> (Pentium D).
>
> Because of the error message i386 only, how do I make it install?
> Do I use a force switch?
> I am going to try some things after posting this.
You d
Christopher Joyner wrote:
> Is there some way of doing that? Running i386 software on amd64 machine?
"Yes. FreeBSD/amd64 contains a compatibility facility
for i386 binaries. It should just work out of the box,
unless disabled explicitly."
"Best regards
Oliver"
Sean Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> he was asking about ports that are labled as "i386 only"
Well, he didn't mention building ports. He only said
*running* i386 software on amd64, which is certainly
possible.
Whether "i386 only" packages will run
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:05:06 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: > Subject: Re: Is it
> possible to run i386 only, on a amd64 freebsd 7?> > Christopher Joyner
> wrote:> > Is there some way of
Christopher Joyner wrote:
> Is there some way of doing that? Running i386 software on amd64 machine?
Yes. FreeBSD/amd64 contains a compatibility facility
for i386 binaries. It should just work out of the box,
unless disabled explicitly.
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secne
Is there some way of doing that? Running i386 software on amd64 machine?
In Love in Jesus Christ, Or Lord and Savior.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only *begotten Son, that whosoever
believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
--John 3:16
use
/>/ crt1.c is compiled twice; once from /usr/src/lib/csu/amd64/crt1.c, and
/>/ a second time from /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1.c. If LIB32 is
/>/ disabled in src.conf, only the first compilation takes place. If the
/>/ generated hash values are the same, by some chance, then th
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:22:01 -0400
"Maxim Khitrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think what's happening is that there is a collision in hash values
> generated by ccache. That's the only thing I can think of, because
> crt1.c is compiled twice; once from /us
I recently built a new machine with a Gigabyte GA-MA790X-DS4 motherboard
and an AMD 9750 Phenom quad CPU. The Ethernet interface is a RealTek
"RTL8169S/8110S/8211B media interface" as described by dmesg. I installed
FreeBSD 7.0/amd64.
I have been having a number of network problems
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:48 AM, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:04:52 -0400
> "Maxim Khitrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This is an old problem, but so far I haven't been able to find a
>> solution. When ccache is us
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:04:52 -0400
"Maxim Khitrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an old problem, but so far I haven't been able to find a
> solution. When ccache is used to build world on amd64, the process
> fails when /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1.c is c
This is an old problem, but so far I haven't been able to find a
solution. When ccache is used to build world on amd64, the process
fails when /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1.c is compiled. If
WITHOUT_LIB32 is added to src.conf, this problem does not happen.
Likewise, building without ccache
Hi!
I have machine working with i386 version of FreeBSD 7.0 Release (after
several source updates from 6.0 during the years). Is it possible to
re-build kernel and "world" with another architecture, in my case AMD64?
I've tried to build kernel in /sys/amd64/conf, but on "mak
On Friday 08 August 2008, Ivo Karabojkov wrote:
> I hope to be able to "switch" my architecture without re-installing
> FreeBSD with AMD64.
I went through this last week. I use the 7.0 install disk to do an
*upgrade* installation over the old one, booted into the new am
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 10:55:30PM +0300, Ivo Karabojkov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have machine working with i386 version of FreeBSD 7.0 Release (after
> several source updates from 6.0 during the years). Is it possible to
> re-build kernel and "world" with another archite
Hi!
I have machine working with i386 version of FreeBSD 7.0 Release (after
several source updates from 6.0 during the years). Is it possible to
re-build kernel and "world" with another architecture, in my case AMD64?
I've tried to build kernel in /sys/amd64/conf, but
In the last episode (Aug 07), Maxim Khitrov said:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> >> I take it that this happens because libmat.so is a linux binary,
> >> but is there any way to do what I'm after?
> >
> > You can't mix and match
On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
You can't mix and match Linux and FreeBSD code in the same binary.
Sorry for stepping in, but I have a similar question I asked in the
past and didn't get any answer:
is it possible to mix and match 32-bit and 64-bit FreeBSD code?
I have
Kris Kennaway ha scritto:
You can't mix and match Linux and FreeBSD code in the same binary.
Sorry for stepping in, but I have a similar question I asked in the past
and didn't get any answer:
is it possible to mix and match 32-bit and 64-bit FreeBSD code?
I have a closed source 32-bit libr
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
I take it that this happens because libmat.so is a linux binary, but
is there any way to do what I'm after?
You can't mix and match Linux and FreeBSD code in the same binary. Yo
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>
>> I take it that this happens because libmat.so is a linux binary, but
>> is there any way to do what I'm after?
>
> You can't mix and match Linux and FreeBSD code in the same binary. You will
> have
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
I take it that this happens because libmat.so is a linux binary, but
is there any way to do what I'm after?
You can't mix and match Linux and FreeBSD code in the same binary. You
will have to make a completely Linux binary, either by compiling on a
Linux system, or by i
My knowledge of compilers is insufficient to answer this question. I'm
currently going through the process of installing a 32-bit version of
Matlab onto FreeBSD 7.0 amd64. In fact, Matlab itself has been
installed and seems to be running fine (albeit without a GUI due to
some java-related i
Greetings,
When trying to boot the MacBook Pro 4,1 (G4 with Intel Penryn) off the
7.0-RELEASE-amd64 installation CD, the kernel hangs after the CD-ROM
probe, and the SATA drive probe never seems to complete (I don't see any
adX entry). Booting without ACPI does not seem to mak
.
Sincerly yours.
G.B.
Le 28 juil. 08 à 19:10, bsd a écrit :
Hello folks,
I am trying to install amavisd-new for filtering purposes on an
amd64 install.
It complains at compile startup not to be able to install it
===> amavisd-new-2.6.1,1 requires 32-bit libraries installed
under /
Hello folks,
I am trying to install amavisd-new for filtering purposes on an amd64
install.
It complains at compile startup not to be able to install it
===> amavisd-new-2.6.1,1 requires 32-bit libraries installed under /
usr/lib32.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/security/amav
On 2008.07.24 17:49:56, Benjamin Adams wrote:
> Hello everyone. I'm running a website (http://www.FreeBSD-World.com/) When
> the RAM is used up and moves to inactive the pages stop loading 100%.
> Pages will stop halfway and sometimes I will get a display of what is in the
> httpd.access log.
Ju
Desmond Chapman wrote:
It stops in docs and refuses to build.
I'm behind a router. This error has occured six times in the past twelve hours.
Any idea of what may be causing it?
No, sorry. Could be anything.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
It stops in docs and refuses to build.
I'm behind a router. This error has occured six times in the past twelve hours.
Any idea of what may be causing it?
_
With Windows Live for mobile, your contacts travel with you.
http://www.windo
> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:52:45 -0300
> From: luizbcampos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: resizing partiton on FBSD-7.0 amd64
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I used all my disk with FBSD and now I need to lower th
what "lower the partition" mean?
if size reduction - impossible, there is no tool for that.
if moving to place nearer the beginning of disk - dd will do if used
carefully
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, luizbcampos wrote:
I used all my disk with FBSD and now I need to lower the
partition with no
I used all my disk with FBSD and now I need to lower the
partition with no data loss. Does anyone know how to do it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 04:58:56PM +, Duane Hill wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Martin Schweizer wrote:
Hello Duane
Do you have some inputs (config files etc.)?
$ ls -l /usr/local/lib/sasl2/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26 Jun 17 22:11 Sendmail.con
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 04:58:56PM +, Duane Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Martin Schweizer wrote:
>
>> Hello Duane
>>
>> Do you have some inputs (config files etc.)?
>
> $ ls -l /usr/local/lib/sasl2/
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26 Jun 17 22:11 Sendmail.conf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel
IL PROTECTED]
ldap_bind_pw: password
ldap_search_base: cn=%d
ldap_filter: mail=%u
ldap_timeout: 60
ldap_time_limit: 60
Am Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:42:57PM + Duane Hill schrieb:
I have an AMD64 install using saslauthd and is failing.
An identical installation on i386 works fine. Both insta
Hello Duane
Do you have some inputs (config files etc.)?
Regards,
Am Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:42:57PM + Duane Hill schrieb:
> I have an AMD64 install using saslauthd and is failing.
>
> An identical installation on i386 works fine. Both installations are
> running on FreeBSD
rtorrent.rc, or .rtorrent.rc ?
this is not the same, and this is not a typo either.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 5:06 PM, luizbcampos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After I had installled rtorrent on my system I get failure when I
> run it. The display shows - unable to read rtorrent.rc file. I have
After I had installled rtorrent on my system I get failure when I
run it. The display shows - unable to read rtorrent.rc file. I have
chmoded 0755 this file but the failure stays on
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Frank Shute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:41:34PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
>>
>> First, my apologies - I sent my last missive to Conrad, and not to the
>> list. I'm replying to myself with an update. Details below.
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>> On Sun, Ju
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:41:34PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
>
> First, my apologies - I sent my last missive to Conrad, and not to the
> list. I'm replying to myself with an update. Details below.
>
> Kurt
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 6,
First, my apologies - I sent my last missive to Conrad, and not to the
list. I'm replying to myself with an update. Details below.
Kurt
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 0
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:25:58 +0200
Tore Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kurt Buff wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:02:09 -0700
> >> "Kurt Buff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ...
> >> Do you have both the gen
Kurt Buff wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:02:09 -0700
>> "Kurt Buff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...
>> Do you have both the generic sound support (sound) as well as the
>> specific hardware driver enabled in your ker
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:02:09 -0700
> "Kurt Buff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to update the kernel in 7.0-Stable (updated today) with
>> either snd_hda or snd_ich, and it's erroring out during buildkernel
>
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:02:09 -0700
"Kurt Buff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to update the kernel in 7.0-Stable (updated today) with
> either snd_hda or snd_ich, and it's erroring out during buildkernel
> with one or the other of these failure messages:
>
> For snd_ich, I get this:
> In
I'm trying to update the kernel in 7.0-Stable (updated today) with
either snd_hda or snd_ich, and it's erroring out during buildkernel
with one or the other of these failure messages:
For snd_ich, I get this:
In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/sound.h:94
from /us
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any way of changing the console resolution in FreeBSD for AMD64?
>> AFAIK, the VESA option is only available for i386.
>>
>
Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way of changing the console resolution in FreeBSD for AMD64?
AFAIK, the VESA option is only available for i386.
I really hate the default mode :S...
Any hints?
Thanks in advance
Err, isn't vidcontrol(1) helping?
KDK
--
Toothpaste never
Hi,
Is there any way of changing the console resolution in FreeBSD for AMD64?
AFAIK, the VESA option is only available for i386.
I really hate the default mode :S...
Any hints?
Thanks in advance
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Chris
>
I guess I should have been a bit clearer about *why* I care. (BTW,
all the answers were very helpful, so thanks all for that.)
First, I was just generally curious about how 32- vs. 64-bit support was
decided at compile time.
Secondly, what got me started looking into this is whe
.
>
> >
> >> 2) Can a binary from a 32-bit FreeBSD system be run unmodified on the
> >> 64-bit system?
> >
> > Assuming the 32-bit system is 'i386' and the 64-bit system is 'amd64' then
> > you are supposed to be able to do s
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
The same as ever
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 04:31:37PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> >> 1) How does make world know whether to build 32-bit or 64-bit binaries?
> >
> > It always uses the native format. amd64 == 64 bit, i386 == 32 bit
>
> Don't mean to beat this to death, but can you
that correct?
No, everything is 100% native.
Kris
OK, these may be really stupid questions but:
1) How does make world know whether to build 32-bit or 64-bit binaries?
It always uses the native format. amd64 == 64 bit, i386 == 32 bit
Don't mean to beat this to death, but can you say just
ake world know whether to build 32-bit or 64-bit binaries?
>
> It will build for whatever system you have installed.
The system Makefile calls 'uname -p' to get the system's processor
architecture.
> If you are running a 32-bit system it will make 32-bit binaries, and if
> y
, everything is 100% native.
Kris
OK, these may be really stupid questions but:
1) How does make world know whether to build 32-bit or 64-bit binaries?
It always uses the native format. amd64 == 64 bit, i386 == 32 bit
Don't mean to beat this to death, but can you say just a bit more
about
. Is that correct?
>>>>>
>>>> No, everything is 100% native.
>>>>
>>>> Kris
>>>>
>>> OK, these may be really stupid questions but:
>>>
>>> 1) How does make world know whether to build 32-bit or 64-bit binaries?
erspace programs, ports,
>>>> packages, utilities, etc. do *not* take advantage of the 64-bit
>>>> extensions. That is, only the kernel gets the benefit of the
>>>> wider word. Is that correct?
>>>>
>>> No, everything is 100% native.
>&
ke 64-bit binaries.
>
By "running", you mean which kernel is booted, I presume.
>
>> 2) Can a binary from a 32-bit FreeBSD system be run unmodified on the
>> 64-bit system?
>
> Assuming the 32-bit system is 'i386' and the 64-bit system is 'amd64
may be really stupid questions but:
1) How does make world know whether to build 32-bit or 64-bit binaries?
It always uses the native format. amd64 == 64 bit, i386 == 32 bit
2) Can a binary from a 32-bit FreeBSD system be run unmodified on the
64-bit system?
Yes, amd64 also builds 32-bit
ning a 64-bit system it will make 64-bit binaries.
>
> 2) Can a binary from a 32-bit FreeBSD system be run unmodified on the
> 64-bit system?
Assuming the 32-bit system is 'i386' and the 64-bit system is 'amd64' then
you are supposed to be able to do so (but
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
>
>
> --
> From: "Tim Daneliuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:51 PM
> To: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "FreeBSD Mailing List"
>
--
From: "Tim Daneliuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:51 PM
To: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "FreeBSD Mailing List"
Subject: Re: Making World For amd64
Kris Kennaway
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
>>> The same as eve
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
The same as everywhere else.
Kris
So, I take it that thi
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
>> intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
>> kernel and make world as everywhere else?
>
> The same as everywhere else.
>
> Kris
So, I take it that this mean
System built from today's sources.
FreeBSD vidar.i.inter-sonic.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Thu
Jun 26 21:27:20 CEST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VIDAR amd64
Making install in tests
test -z "/usr/local/info/" || ../../build-aux/install-sh -c -d
&
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
The same as everywhere else.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions
Is there anything special one has to do when doing a make world
intended for 64-bit FreeBSD or is it sufficient to build the 64-bit
kernel and make world as everywhere else?
--
Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Matthew Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 02:48:45PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> My (relatively) newly purchased Thinkpad T61 (type 7658-CTO) with 4g
>> RAM is running 7.0-STABLE amd64 from June
ne hung. Not enough for the "unload /
> load" dance.
>
> 2) After booting from the downloaded 7-RELEASE install ISO (AMD64), I find
> the emergency shell doesn't have mount_ufs, just mount_nfs. Also, no /rescue
> directory. I don't know if this is by design, but how do
e downloaded 7-RELEASE install ISO (AMD64), I find
the emergency shell doesn't have mount_ufs, just mount_nfs. Also, no /rescue
directory. I don't know if this is by design, but how does one mount root or
any other local disk partition?
3) After downloading & burning the 7-RELEASE Live
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 02:48:45PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
> All,
>
> My (relatively) newly purchased Thinkpad T61 (type 7658-CTO) with 4g
> RAM is running 7.0-STABLE amd64 from June 8.
>
> I've gotten Xorg running from a generic xorg.conf generated by 'Xorg
> -co
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Matthew Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 02:48:45PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> My (relatively) newly purchased Thinkpad T61 (type 7658-CTO) with 4g
>> RAM is running 7.0-STABLE amd64 from June
All,
My (relatively) newly purchased Thinkpad T61 (type 7658-CTO) with 4g
RAM is running 7.0-STABLE amd64 from June 8.
I've gotten Xorg running from a generic xorg.conf generated by 'Xorg
-configure', with startx, but when starting XFCE4 with xtartxfce, it
is not happy, and bombs
hi all...
when building a custom kernel for an intel machine that identifies itself as
amd64 which GENERIC file do i start with?
/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
hi all...
when building a custom kernel for an intel machine that identifies
itself as amd64 which GENERIC file do i start with?
thanks...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
> "Manolis" == Manolis Kiagias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Manolis> Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल wrote:
[snip]
>> And, if I go for gjournal, since I've an existing filesystem, I've to
>> create a separate gjournal slice, so is it okay to create that gjournal
>> slice on a non-gmir
Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल wrote:
Hi list,
I've two Intel Xeon dual core-based servers running 7.0-RELEASE-p1
(amd64). Those servers are running a software raid-1 using
geom_gmirror. Today, when I rebooted them twice with 'reboot' command,
raid-1 running on both servers go
Hi list,
I've two Intel Xeon dual core-based servers running 7.0-RELEASE-p1
(amd64). Those servers are running a software raid-1 using
geom_gmirror. Today, when I rebooted them twice with 'reboot' command,
raid-1 running on both servers got degraded to 0% + filesystem check
resul
I have an AMD64 install using saslauthd and is failing.
An identical installation on i386 works fine. Both installations are
running on FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE with cyrus-sasl-2.1.22_1, and
cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.22.
A telnet session to the MTA yields the result:
535 5.7.8 Error
Vince Hoffman wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've managed to get the i386 jail to start by nullfs mounts of /libexec
> and /usr/lib32 as per the instructions here
> [http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2008-03/msg02216.html]
> (It wouldnt start before, complaining about missing libs
Hi all,
I've managed to get the i386 jail to start by nullfs mounts of /libexec
and /usr/lib32 as per the instructions here
[http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2008-03/msg02216.html]
(It wouldnt start before, complaining about missing libs even though I
had done a ful
Outback Dingo wrote:
I think maybe what he was expecting was a FreeBSD IA64 install on the box,
but they installed AMD64 instead
*Correctly* installed.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
I think maybe what he was expecting was a FreeBSD IA64 install on the box,
but they installed AMD64 instead
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Wojciech Puchar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> so i'm a bit confused about the the 64 bit and why the machine is
>> identifyi
so i'm a bit confused about the the 64 bit and why the machine is identifying
itself as amd64 and not i686?
because this intel CPU is 64-bit AMD compatible (x86-64 standard).
the rules changed and now intel make AMD-compatible CPUs
___
fr
name -a
> FreeBSD srv391.carpathiahost.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun
> Feb 24 10:35:36 UTC 2008
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
> i did ask for an intel machine and the dmseg actually states:
>
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.0
name -a
> FreeBSD srv391.carpathiahost.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun
> Feb 24 10:35:36 UTC 2008
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
> i did ask for an intel machine and the dmseg actually states:
>
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.
:35:36 UTC 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
i did ask for an intel machine and the dmseg actually states:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz (1997.01-MHz
K8-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10676 Stepping = 6
Features=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
i did ask for an intel machine and the dmseg actually states:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz (1997.01-MHz
K8-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10676 Stepping = 6
Features=0xbfebfbff
Feature
Hello Friends
Which System-board and Processor is BEST for FreeBSD AMD64 7.0-RELEASE?
RAM will be used around 8GB - 16GB.
--
Thanks!
BR / vj
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Hi all - I'm just in the process of replacing an aging Dell system with
a cheap Acer AMD64 box with the latest BIOS. I installed 7.0 from the
release ISOs, then updated the source-tree via cvsup to the latest
7.0-STABLE this morning. I rebuilt world and the kernel (SANTAFE kernel
conf is a
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Andrew Cid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have an i386 jail running on an amd64 host that I use to build
> packages. Most packages build fine, however I have a few that fail.
> This includes xorg (dri won't build) and mplay
Hi all,
I have an i386 jail running on an amd64 host that I use to build
packages. Most packages build fine, however I have a few that fail.
This includes xorg (dri won't build) and mplayer. In all cases I get an
error messages similar to this:
{standard input}:147: Error: `(%rsi)'
because the
implementation of the set_thread_area syscall is too simplistic.
* Wine doesn't work on FreeBSD/amd64 because the kernel doesn't
preserve the segment registers on context switches.
Also, Wine and all its dependencies (xorg libs etc.) should be
built as 32 bit. Ideally the
901 - 1000 of 2031 matches
Mail list logo
