manpage.
Here my /usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc
PM_SU_VERBOSE=
It's not necessary in shell scripting to set empty variables like this.
That's particularly true for the flag variables in portmaster rc
files. If the variable isn't actually set to something then what you
have here is exactly
PM_SU_VERBOSE, just with
PM_SU_CMD=/usr/local/bin/sudo
I can install without problem packages with
$ portmaster -P -a -x openoffice
But if there is no package available for the port, I got the message (it is an
example) :
= libpng-1.4.3.tar.xz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//.
= /usr
Hi,
On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use PORTMASTER tool
to upgrade my ports via packages only.
Then I added the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc
file, and re-opened user's session :
setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp://ftp.fr.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD
Hi,
On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use PORTMASTER tool
to upgrade my ports via packages only.
Then I added the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc
file, and re-opened user's session :
setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp://ftp.fr.freebsd.org/pub
On 06/24/10 06:10, b. f. wrote:
Hi,
On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use
PORTMASTER tool to upgrade my ports via packages only. Then I added
the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc file,
and re-opened user's session : setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, zaxis z_a...@163.com wrote:
Why do we need two tools ?
Its three. Add portmanager.
The answer is personal choice and we number of bikesheds.
Also portmaster used to not be able to work with packages when
portupgrade could.
--
Eitan Adler
2010/6/1 Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, zaxis z_a...@163.com wrote:
Why do we need two tools ?
Its three. Add portmanager.
The answer is personal choice and we number of bikesheds.
Also portmaster used to not be able to work with packages when
of bikesheds.
Also portmaster used to not be able to work with packages when
portupgrade could.
portmaster can! See portmaster manpage. -P[P] options.
Also portmaster used to not be able to work with packages when
portupgrade could.
--
Eitan Adler
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:26:18 +0300
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com articulated:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, zaxis z_a...@163.com wrote:
Why do we need two tools ?
Its three. Add portmanager.
The answer is personal choice and we number of bikesheds.
Also portmaster used
Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:26:18 +0300
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com articulated:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:37 AM, zaxis z_a...@163.com wrote:
Why do we need two tools ?
Its three. Add portmanager.
The answer is personal choice and we number of bikesheds.
Also portmaster used
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Eitan Adler wrote:
$cd lang/go portmaster .
--
To build Go programs for FreeBSD, you'll want to set up your
environment properly. The following environment variables should
be set:
...
GOOS=freebsd
Why do we need two tools ?
-
e^(π⋅i) + 1 = 0
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/What%27s-the-difference-between-portupgrade-and-portmaster---tp28736514p28736514.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Mon, 31 May 2010, zaxis wrote:
Why do we need two tools ?
Actually there are at least three. Add portmanager to the mix. Its the same
reason there is more than one text editor. I use portmaster and portmanager
depending on what I want to do. Its mostly personal choice
$cd lang/go portmaster .
--
To build Go programs for FreeBSD, you'll want to set up your
environment properly. The following environment variables should
be set:
...
GOOS=freebsd
GOARCH=386
GOROOT=/usr/local/lib/go
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:46:24PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 07:41:33AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:59:56PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
i just tried using portmaster -a -B -d on my server that has many
fewer ports than anywhere else. both
i just tried using portmaster -a -B -d on my server that has many
fewer ports than anywhere else. both here [on tao] and on the
server, portmaster Aborts suddenly after complaining about my
have defined or set WITH_KDE_PHONON anybody know what i'm
foing wrong?
tia,
gary
--
Gary Kline
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:59:56PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
i just tried using portmaster -a -B -d on my server that has many
fewer ports than anywhere else. both here [on tao] and on the
server, portmaster Aborts suddenly after complaining about my
have defined or set WITH_KDE_PHONON
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 07:41:33AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:59:56PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
i just tried using portmaster -a -B -d on my server that has many
fewer ports than anywhere else. both here [on tao] and on the
server, portmaster Aborts suddenly
Hello all,
Is it possible to run portmaster -a with other options to recompile all
dependency without interactive? Of course accept default options for all
modules.
Thank you
Kalpin E. Silaen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
After performing updates via portmaster on a regular basis on a FreeBSD
8.0-STABLE/amd64 server, I got this following sticky error. I have no
clue how to fix this. Any ideas?
Regards,
Oliver
---
g++ -o ../bin/doxytag ../objects/doxytag.o ../objects/logos.o
../objects/version.o -L/usr
portmaster -dav fails updating ports since yesterday, stopping at
print/cups-base with the following error message:
[...]
client.o(.text+0x1c95): In function `encrypt_client':
/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.4.2/scheduler/client.c:3217:
undefined reference to `_httpReadGNUTLS'
client.o
8.0R amd64
Part of the upgrade process from 7.2R requires reinstalling all
third-party software, such as ports. I use portmaster for this,
following the nine-step procedure described in the EXAMPLES section of
the manpage.
During the upgrade, cups-image fails with the error shown below
When I run portmaster --check-depends I got:
Checking kde-3.5.10_2
=== @pkgdep wavpack-4.50.1 is listed as a dependency
=== but there is no installed version
=== Delete this dependency data? [n]
Checking kdegraphics-3.5.10_4
=== @pkgdep portaudio-18.1_2 is listed
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 19:45:05 Manish Jain wrote:
==
Part-1)Immediately after a fresh FreeBSD-7.2#RELEASE install :
I assume you will at some stage or the other install a linux port, eg
acroread8 or acroread9, linux-ymessenger, etc.
-after-installation. I would
dearly appreciate your comments on the document, and would be extremely
glad if my document could be of any help to somebody else too.
Please note that portupgrade works much better on my system than
portmaster. So the following document assumes/recommends using
2009/7/6 b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com
Manish Jain wrote:
After 3-4 hours, portsnap died on graphics/py-cairo saying :
cannot find python headers
I'm guessing you meant portmaster died here ...
/usr/ports/graphics/py-cairo/work/pycairo-1.8.4/config.log says :
configure:4734: cc -E -I/usr
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 02:50:35PM +0530, manish jain wrote:
2009/7/6 b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com
After running pkgdb -F, I find that there hundreds of ports depending on
python2.5.
You shouldn't have 2.5 installed at all. It should be upgraded to 2.6 and
changes propagated to all dependent
to assure that site-packages are made available to the new
Python version.
If using portupgrade:
# cd /usr/ports/lang/python make upgrade-site-packages
If using portmaster:
# cd /usr/ports/lang/python make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER
The portmaster case can take quite some time
On 7/6/09, manish jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/6 b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com
After running pkgdb -F, I find that there hundreds of ports depending on
python2.5.
Most of these are probably indirectly dependent, and may not be
seriously affected. Many, for example, may have
Hi,
This is not a portmaster problem, but a problem of getting py-cairo
to build following an update in the ports directory.
3 days back I ran 'portsnap fetch extract'. Then yesterday I ran
'portsnap fetch update' followed immediately by 'portmaster -a -B'
After 3-4 hours, portsnap died
Manish Jain wrote:
After 3-4 hours, portsnap died on graphics/py-cairo saying :
cannot find python headers
I'm guessing you meant portmaster died here ...
/usr/ports/graphics/py-cairo/work/pycairo-1.8.4/config.log says :
configure:4734: cc -E -I/usr/local/include conftest.c
conftest.c:10:28
On 7/2/09, Manish Jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
b. f. wrote:
Manish Jain wrote:
Regarding the download speeds I was getting with portmaster fetches (0.7
kBps to 4.0 kBps), I immediately booted into Windows/Cygwin and did a
wget from the same site portmaster was using. The speed I got
Hi,
I am using portmaster on FreeBSD-7.2 to keep my ports up to date. When
there are multiple ports to be updated, portmaster will fork off child
processes. Does each child start 'make fetch' in the background ? I ask
this because the parent process attached to the console reports very low
On Wednesday, 1 July 2009 02:02:47 Manish Jain wrote:
Hi,
I am using portmaster on FreeBSD-7.2 to keep my ports up to date. When
there are multiple ports to be updated, portmaster will fork off child
processes. Does each child start 'make fetch' in the background ? I ask
this because
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:14:10AM -0400, mfv wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 July 2009 02:02:47 Manish Jain wrote:
excluded. Nevertheless, I use portmaster daily and am very pleased with it.
With thanks to Doug Barton.
portmaster rules, excellent tool, Doug is a star!
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:32:47AM +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
Hi,
I am using portmaster on FreeBSD-7.2 to keep my ports up to date. When
there are multiple ports to be updated, portmaster will fork off child
processes. Does each child start 'make fetch' in the background ?
The fetches
Manish Jain wrote:
...Does each child start 'make fetch' in the background ?
make checksum, yes.
Further, how can portmaster be tuned to automatically ignore ports which
are actually marked as IGNORE in the port directory ? This is not
covered in the manpage.
It respects IGNORE (it checks
b. f. wrote:
Manish Jain wrote:
...Does each child start 'make fetch' in the background ?
make checksum, yes.
Further, how can portmaster be tuned to automatically ignore ports which
are actually marked as IGNORE in the port directory ? This is not
covered in the manpage.
It respects
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:39:22 +0200 kenneth hatteland wrote:
when I start upgrading openoffice.org it switches from my localized
language build to standard us en.
Anyone have an idea how to force upgrade to stick with my norwegian
build with portmaster ??
Platform freebsd 7.2 stable
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:39:22 +0200 kenneth hatteland wrote:
when I start upgrading openoffice.org it switches from my localized
language build to standard us en.
Anyone have an idea how to force upgrade to stick with my norwegian
build with portmaster
when I start upgrading openoffice.org it switches from my localized
language build to standard us en.
Anyone have an idea how to force upgrade to stick with my norwegian
build with portmaster ??
Platform freebsd 7.2 stable (x86)
Blessed
On Sunday 26 April 2009 01:12:48 Tom Worster wrote:
thanks for the tip, mel. i got rid of the ports involved and reinstalled
with WITHOUT_X11=yes and the install was faster and things are a lot
tidier.
i had no idea that i ought to be configuring port builds with env vars. is
there
On 4/23/09 12:54 AM, Mel Flynn
mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 17:37:06 Tom Worster wrote:
by the by, on my test machine i ended up with python installed. seems to be
because i needed php5-gd which now depends on python. all for some simple
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 17:37:06 Tom Worster wrote:
by the by, on my test machine i ended up with python installed. seems to be
because i needed php5-gd which now depends on python. all for some simple
freetype2 calls.
Wrong assumption. php-gd doesn't depend on python at all. devel/apr
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 01:38:26 Tom Worster wrote:
portmaster -a -x mysql-server
portmaster mysql-server
reboot
No no no. /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start. Reboot is for kernel
upgrades. And never use reboot unless in single user mode, cause reboot is
really fast reboot: it doesn't
though all i really need is mysql/apache/php i have about 100 ports
installed and portmaster -a takes a long time to complete (hour or two).
so i'm wondering if i ought to be concerned about new binaries being
installed over the old ones on the disk while the old images are loaded and
running
Tom Worster wrote:
though all i really need is mysql/apache/php i have about 100 ports
installed and portmaster -a takes a long time to complete (hour or two).
so i'm wondering if i ought to be concerned about new binaries being
installed over the old ones on the disk while the old images
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Tom Worster f...@thefsb.org wrote:
though all i really need is mysql/apache/php i have about 100 ports
installed and portmaster -a takes a long time to complete (hour or two).
so i'm wondering if i ought to be concerned about new binaries being
installed
, apache doesn't.
So upgrade mysql-server last thing before you reboot.
so i'll try
portmaster -a -x mysql-server
portmaster mysql-server
reboot
which might work ok as mysql-server is a leaf node in my config
Although I know you're
not using portupgrade, this snippet from pkgtools.conf has been
Wißmann wrote:
Hi, list!
I have a problem using the above mentioned programs because
there doesn't seem to be a manpage installed. Can anybody give
me a clue on how to get help?
Both do have manpages. What kind of error do you get when you try
e.g. 'man portmaster
, Frank Wißmann wrote:
Hi, list!
I have a problem using the above mentioned programs because
there doesn't seem to be a manpage installed. Can anybody give
me a clue on how to get help?
Both do have manpages. What kind of error do you get when you try
e.g. 'man portmaster'? It might be that your
On Sunday 01 March 2009 14:02:19 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Mel fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net wrote:
On Saturday 28 February 2009 23:06:10 Fbsd1 wrote:
I am looking for software like portmanager/portmaster but works
on the package system instead of the port system
/portmaster but works
on the package system instead of the port system. Is there such
am application available?
Not (yet). Without /usr/ports it's impossible to find out what
software needs updating, or you'd have to download and trust the
INDEX-7 on the FreeBSD package
I am looking for software like portmanager/portmaster but works on the
package system instead of the port system. Is there such am application
available?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Fbsd1 wrote:
I am looking for software like portmanager/portmaster but works on the
package system instead of the port system. Is there such am
application available?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Fbsd1 wrote:
I am looking for software like portmanager/portmaster but works on the
package system instead of the port system. Is there such am
application available?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Saturday 28 February 2009 23:06:10 Fbsd1 wrote:
I am looking for software like portmanager/portmaster but works on the
package system instead of the port system. Is there such am application
available?
Not (yet). Without /usr/ports it's impossible to find out what software needs
updating
Fbsd1 wrote:
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Fbsd1 wrote:
I am looking for software like portmanager/portmaster but works on
the package system instead of the port system. Is there such am
application available?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Mel fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net wrote:
On Saturday 28 February 2009 23:06:10 Fbsd1 wrote:
I am looking for software like portmanager/portmaster but works
on the package system instead of the port system. Is there such
am application available?
Not (yet). Without /usr/ports it's
Hi, list!
I have a problem using the above mentioned programs because there
doesn't seem to be a manpage installed. Can anybody give me a clue on
how to get help?
TIA Frank
--
GU d- s:+ a+ C+$ UBS$ P L- !E--- W N+@ !o K--? !w--- O !M- !V- PS+ PE
Y? !PGP- t+ 5 X !R tv- b++ DI !D G e h+ r- y?
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:49:16 +0200, Frank Wißmann
frank.wissman...@web.de wrote:
Hi, list!
I have a problem using the above mentioned programs because there
doesn't seem to be a manpage installed. Can anybody give me a clue on
how to get help?
TIA Frank
e.g. 'man portmaster'? It might be that your manual pages setup is broken.
You can read the manpage with the following command sequence:
gzip -cd /usr/local/man/man8/portmaster.8.gz | groff -Tascii -man | less
Roland
--
R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith
?
Both do have manpages. What kind of error do you get when you try
e.g. 'man portmaster'? It might be that your manual pages setup is
broken.
I get the message No manual entry for portmaster, but using your
command I can read it. man man e. g. works perfectly.
But there comes up another question
to be a manpage installed. Can anybody give me a clue
on how to get help?
Both do have manpages. What kind of error do you get when you try
e.g. 'man portmaster'? It might be that your manual pages setup is
broken.
I get the message No manual entry for portmaster, but using your
command I can read
mentioned programs because
there doesn't seem to be a manpage installed. Can anybody give
me a clue on how to get help?
Both do have manpages. What kind of error do you get when you try
e.g. 'man portmaster'? It might be that your manual pages setup
is broken.
I get
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 11:33:01PM +0100, Frank Wißmann wrote:
Both do have manpages. What kind of error do you get when you try
e.g. 'man portmaster'? It might be that your manual pages setup
is broken.
I get the message No manual entry for portmaster, but using your
command
-shooting
power of the -j stuff I am not inclined to add something like this to
portmaster, not even as an advanced option.
Yes, I understand the problem with that. The make.conf solution
is good enough for now. ;)
Given the fact that the build target is presumably -j safe (as far
something like this to
portmaster, not even as an advanced option.
Yes, I understand the problem with that. The make.conf solution
is good enough for now. ;)
Given the fact that the build target is presumably -j safe (as far as the
ports system is concerned), it would be nice to have
snip
That would be absolutely perfect!
+1
snip
Memory may fail me, but wasn't there a GSoC project to parallelize
the ports infrastructure? Or was that about building many different
ports simultaneously instead of one port on multiple cores?
-cpghost.
On Monday 26 January 2009 14:56:10 Eitan Adler wrote:
snip
That would be absolutely perfect!
+1
snip
Memory may fail me, but wasn't there a GSoC project to parallelize
the ports infrastructure? Or was that about building many different
ports simultaneously instead of one port on
, but they are quite rare).
Now, is there a way to teach portmaster to build or rebuild
ports this way? The only workaround for now is something
like:
# cd /usr/ports/some/port
# make configure make -j5 build
# portmaster -b -d -C name-of-some/port-in-pkg-var-db
which doesn't clean up some/port/work
(some ports don't work with -jN in the make build
phase either, but they are quite rare).
Now, is there a way to teach portmaster to build or rebuild
ports this way? The only workaround for now is something
like:
What I do is the following via make.conf, which will work for
portmaster
because all steps except make build are not compatible
with -jN (some ports don't work with -jN in the make build
phase either, but they are quite rare).
Now, is there a way to teach portmaster to build or rebuild
ports this way? The only workaround for now is something
like:
What
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:46:54 +0100
cpghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
That's a good hint indeed. I'll try it. Maybe I'll modify it a bit to
include ONLY the build target, because -jN fails on nearly every
other target, AFAICS.
Don't forget that there are two different makes; BSD make does the
Josh Carroll wrote:
What I do is the following via make.conf,
I think this is a good solution. Given that incredible foot-shooting
power of the -j stuff I am not inclined to add something like this to
portmaster, not even as an advanced option.
Doug
which will work for
portmaster/portupgrade
On Sunday 25 January 2009 20:48:22 Doug Barton wrote:
Josh Carroll wrote:
What I do is the following via make.conf,
I think this is a good solution. Given that incredible foot-shooting
power of the -j stuff I am not inclined to add something like this to
portmaster, not even as an advanced
Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Hi,
Having used portupgrade for several years I'm thinking to make the
switch to portmaster since both of them seem to be fully supported as
far as upgrading ports is concerned.
Anything to consider when going from portupgrade to portmaster?
Caveats/pitfalls
Hello,
I was looking for an efficient way to reinstall (recompile due to an
update in the perl port) all installed p5 ports…
I have done that manually, but I am certain there is a better way to
do that…
I have tried:
# portmaster -rdf p5-
But that didn't work as I had to re-install
exactly what I was looking for…
Works perfectly.
I have done that manually, but I am certain there is a better way
to do
that…
I have tried:
# portmaster -rdf p5-
But that didn't work as I had to re-install all ports…
Have you tried portmaster without -rf ?
Yes, but no success
that…
I have tried:
# portmaster -rdf p5-
But that didn't work as I had to re-install all ports…
Have you tried portmaster without -rf ?
- Herbert
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
that manually, but I am certain there is a better way to do
thatâ¦
I have tried:
# portmaster -rdf p5-
But that didn't work as I had to re-install all portsâ¦
Have you tried portmaster without -rf ?
try: portupgrade -f 'pkg_info | grep p5- | cut -d -f1'
- Herbert
On 1/15/09 8:25 PM, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Anything to consider when going from portupgrade to portmaster?
Portupgrade has the advantage that it can use binary packages to upgrade
your system. portmaster can create them (by adding the -g option) - but
not use them. This is the reason we use
On Thursday 15 January 2009 16:04:09 Christer Solskogen wrote:
On 1/15/09 8:25 PM, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Anything to consider when going from portupgrade to portmaster?
Portupgrade has the advantage that it can use binary packages to upgrade
your system. portmaster can create them (by adding
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Mitja lum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 January 2009 16:04:09 Christer Solskogen wrote:
On 1/15/09 8:25 PM, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Anything to consider when going from portupgrade to portmaster?
Portupgrade has the advantage that it can use binary
Mel wrote:
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote:
B. Cook wrote:
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
...
If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use
a construct like this:
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/databases/mysql*}
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Mel wrote:
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote:
B. Cook wrote:
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
...
If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use
a construct like this:
.if
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Mel wrote:
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote:
B. Cook wrote:
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use
a construct like this:
.if
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote:
B. Cook wrote:
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
...
If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use
a construct like this:
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/databases/mysql*}
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
For example if I use -m BUILD_STATIC=YES and -m BUILD_OPTIMIZED=YES for
mysql50-server.. other than remembering that I did that.. is there
someway to have portmaster read its portmaster.rc and get that information
B. Cook wrote:
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port?
For example if I use -m BUILD_STATIC=YES and -m BUILD_OPTIMIZED=YES for
mysql50-server.. other than remembering that I did that.. is there
someway to have portmaster read its portmaster.rc and get that information
Am 10.09.2008 um 05:46 schrieb Desmond Chapman:
...
install -o root -g wheel -m 555 /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/
work/portmaster.sh /usr/local/sbin/portmaster
install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/
files/portmaster.8 /usr/local/man/man8
=== Compressing
PORTUPGRADE(1)
# cd ports-mgmt/portmaster
# make depends
# make config
=== No options to configure
# make clean install clean
=== Cleaning for portmaster-1.25
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== Extracting for portmaster-1.25
=== Patching for portmaster-1.25
At 2008-09-10T03:46:52Z, Desmond Chapman wrote:
=== Registering installation for portmaster-1.25
# portmaster
portmaster: Command not found.
After installing a command, do
# rehash
before invoking the installed command. See tcsh(1).
Raghavendra.
--
N. Raghavendra [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi all,
now I am taking a step back, instead of letting portmaster decides
which to upgrade, I use the option -i to interactively update the
ports. and I found out that -uBdir is different from -u -B -d -i
-r, the latter one is the right way. I dont know how to use -R
option, since I have tried
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 16:56:34 -0400
Tsu-Fan Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just noticed that I need to update a whole bunch of ports due to
gettext issue, I am used to portmaster and henceforth exec portmaster
-uBdr gettext\* -x avifile to server this need. however, the update
Hi,
just noticed that I need to update a whole bunch of ports due to
gettext issue, I am used to portmaster and henceforth exec portmaster
-uBdr gettext\* -x avifile to server this need. however, the update is
interrupted and needed to restart, I noticed an option (-R) to allow
skipping ports
Hi,
just noticed that I need to update a whole bunch of ports due to
gettext issue, I am used to portmaster and henceforth exec portmaster
-uBdr gettext\* -x avifile to server this need. however, the update is
interrupted and needed to restart, I noticed an option (-R) to allow
skipping
Hi,
I recently did a binary upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE and
everything went smoothly. For good measure I decided to do an upgrade of
all of my installed ports with the following command:
sudo portmaster -Rfda
It quit out when failing to build the ImageMagick port which is fine
Terry Sposato wrote:
Hi,
I recently did a binary upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE and
everything went smoothly. For good measure I decided to do an upgrade
of all of my installed ports with the following command:
sudo portmaster -Rfda
It quit out when failing to build
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you truly are just looking at the dependency list and do not
wish to have make do anything, wouldn't this do the trick:
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portdependencytree.py
Not quite, because it doesn't show which of the dependencies
I have already got installed, and
201 - 300 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
