Hello all :-)
I using quota and I've a doubt: many howto advice to put to cron
something like:
quotacheck -vguma
but the problem is:
quotacheck: Quota for users is enabled on mountpoint /data so quotacheck
might damage the file.
Please turn quotas off or use -f to force checking.
So... can
I was reading the handbook quota section and it says quota has to be
compiles into the kernel. I thought it can also be loaded as a boot time
module?
If so, how is it done.
If so, I will also file a pr to get the handbook quota section updated.
Thanks
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:32:32 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
I was reading the handbook quota section and it says quota has to be
compiles into the kernel. I thought it can also be loaded as a boot time
module?
If I remember correctly, quota is still one of the few things
you cannot load as a module
Hi,
I would like to know why quota is not enabled in the stock kernel..
I remembered that it is not enabled since freebsd 3.5 or freebsd 4 generation.
Now in freebsd 9.0, it still neeed a kernel rebuild.
I have heard it has performance issue (GIANT lock) about quota.
Regards,
Patrick
hi list,
I am going to add user test in system:
~/:sudo pw useradd test -m
then, I am going to check quotas
~/:sudo quota -u -v test
Disk quotas for user test (uid 2022):
Filesystem usage quota limit grace files quota limit
grace
/home 36 0 0
hi again,
I correct my post, of course I can set
quotas for that user, by setquota command,
but I cant see quotas for that user, only by
repquota.
I need to see it by quota command because I
write a script where I depend on it.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Stefan Miklosovic
miklosovic.free
Hello,
Right now quota support is not available by default in the GENERIC
kernel. As far as I know there is no way to compile quota support as a
loadable module, am I correct? If so, what are the reasons for not
including this feature in the GENERIC kernel and/or providing it as a
loadable module
OFL amd64
-
-(kar...@spark.ofloo.net)-(22:06:40)
-(~)- mkdir
vor2
mkdir: vor2: Disc quota exceeded
Any help appricated. Is this a problem on my end, or server side?
___
you've got the exact message. why you don't read them
FreeBSD spark.ofloo.net 7.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p1 #2: Mon Jun 22
14:20:07 UTC 2009 of...@spark.ofloo.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/
OFL amd64
-
-(kar...@spark.ofloo.net)-(22:06:40)
-(~)- mkdir
vor2
mkdir: vor2: Disc quota exceeded
Any help appricated. Is this a problem on my end
same user password somewhere else.
The whole point of ssh is to prevent this sort of thing, by
encrypting the message traffic over this insecure communication
channel.
I think most people using ssh already know it. or maybe not?:)
An attacker may be able to intercept the encrypted
traffic,
2009/5/29 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Even 15 seconds of thinking is enough to understand that logging
to other user and then su - gives completely no extra security.
I don't buy this, given that root's login name is
But we're talking about vulnerability to dictionary and brute-force
attacks. You'd have to first:
Ascertain a username in the wheel group.
As time needed to brute-force crack any of my password is incomparably
longer than the age of universe, this is not an argument.
It's just a matter to
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Even 15 seconds of thinking is enough to understand that logging
to other user and then su - gives completely no extra security.
I don't buy this, given that root's login name
2009/5/28 Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com:
On Thursday 28 May 2009 02:34:02 pm Wojciech Puchar wrote:
And yes - i do log as root by insecure rsh and telnet.
OK, I'm now promoting you to batshit insane. Â Seriously, there's no excuse
for running telnet - even in a secure (ha!) environment -
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Even 15 seconds of thinking is enough to understand that logging
to other user and then su - gives completely no extra security.
I don't buy this, given that root's login name is well known :)
If a system accepts remote root logins, an
for running telnet - even in a secure (ha!) environment - when so much
better alternatives exist.
Let me shoot you a hypothetical: your webserver gets compromised.
Something I pointed out earlier.
and what? assuming it will actually be possible to get root access at all
because of bug it
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Even 15 seconds of thinking is enough to understand that logging
to other user and then su - gives completely no extra security.
I don't buy this, given that root's login name is well known :)
if someone can intercept the passwords you
quota: the home
directory is NFS mounted from another machine acting as file server,
the quota must be edited on the file server.
How could I nicely and securely connect from the script on the web
server to the file server, in order to edit the quota? It should be
nice and secure and without password
- create the MySQL database for that user
The only thing I cannot do is to set the disk quota: the home
directory is NFS mounted from another machine acting as file server,
the quota must be edited on the file server.
How could I nicely and securely connect from the script on the web
server
How could I nicely and securely connect from the script on the web
server to the file server, in order to edit the quota? It should be
use rsh and .rhosts :)
I do that already, not really what I call secure ;) As I put up a new
machine, I'd prefer something else.
Olivier
use rsh and .rhosts :)
I do that already, not really what I call secure ;)
Could you please explain why it is not secure in your case?
I don't know exactly the environment in your case so i can't answer for
sure, but most probably it's perfectly secure.
2009/5/28 Olivier Nicole o...@cs.ait.ac.th:
How could I nicely and securely connect from the script on the web
server to the file server, in order to edit the quota? It should be
use rsh and .rhosts :)
I do that already, not really what I call secure ;) As I put up a new
machine, I'd
use rsh and .rhosts :)
I do that already, not really what I call secure ;)
Could you please explain why it is not secure in your case?
I don't know exactly the environment in your case so i can't answer for
sure, but most probably it's perfectly secure.
Because rsh/rlogin etc. is
rsh and ssh are so similar in use there's really no point in using rsh
at all any more.
there is a point. Just try to think why instead of simply repeating a
phrase ssh is secure, rsh is not, don't use it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
2009/5/28 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
rsh and ssh are so similar in use there's really no point in using rsh
at all any more.
there is a point. Just try to think why instead of simply repeating a phrase
ssh is secure, rsh is not, don't use it.
rlogin has several serious
sure, but most probably it's perfectly secure.
Because rsh/rlogin etc. is unsecure in any case. I don't remember the
very bad you don't remember the details.
Let i give you an example.
I throw 1000$ on my table in my flat.
Is this money insecure?
The answer is - maybe, it's just as secure
Due to these serious problems rlogin was rarely used across untrusted networks
Good you finally pointed out the most important thing
rlogin/rsh is insecure across untrusted network
This is QUITE a difference between this and rsh is insecure. period
rsh is as secure as the communication
2009/5/28 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
Due to these serious problems rlogin was rarely used across untrusted
networks
Good you finally pointed out the most important thing
rlogin/rsh is insecure across untrusted network
This is QUITE a difference between this and rsh is
Also, I think it's a bad idea to leave money lying round like that.
That's why we have banks. More layers.
like most people today you like overcomplexity, layers etc.
But there are still people that prefer simplicity. You should have some
respect to them.
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Also, I think it's a bad idea to leave money lying round like that.
That's why we have banks. More layers.
like most people today you like overcomplexity, layers etc.
But there are still people that prefer simplicity. You should have some
respect to them.
Some.
respect to them.
Some. But zero sympathy the day it all blows up in their faces due to just
one little configuration error or, oops, exploit they didn't know about.
what configuration error could you imagine. In my opinion there is bigger
change to make a configuration error in more
rsh is as secure as the communication channel. If it can be considered
secure - DO USE rsh, because it's fastest as it doesn't have any
encryption overhead.
Are you on a 386?
depends, between pentium I and core2 quad.
what's a difference?
___
On Thursday 28 May 2009 08:53:23 am Wojciech Puchar wrote:
depends, between pentium I and core2 quad.
what's a difference?
Well, I can transfer 25MB/s between hosts on the LAN without my CPU ever
breaking 10% CPU usage. I'm of the opinion that most people don't need to
optimize for CPU in
On Thursday 28 May 2009 06:13:11 am Wojciech Puchar wrote:
rsh is as secure as the communication channel. If it can be considered
secure - DO USE rsh, because it's fastest as it doesn't have any
encryption overhead.
Are you on a 386?
--
Kirk Strauser
On 28/5/09 15:04, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Thursday 28 May 2009 08:53:23 am Wojciech Puchar wrote:
depends, between pentium I and core2 quad.
what's a difference?
Well, I can transfer 25MB/s between hosts on the LAN without my CPU ever
breaking 10% CPU usage. I'm of the opinion
On Thu, 28 May 2009 12:15:22 +0100, Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote:
Also, I think it's a bad idea to leave money lying round like that.
That's why we have banks. More layers.
No. We have benks because they make it easier to steal
people's money more silently, so they notice when it's
On Thu, 28 May 2009 09:04:43 -0500, Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com wrote:
Well, I can transfer 25MB/s between hosts on the LAN without my CPU ever
breaking 10% CPU usage. I'm of the opinion that most people don't need to
optimize for CPU in such cases when the security payoffs are so great.
to edit the quota? It should be
nice and secure and without password.
/quote
He even said 'secure' twice. There is a web server involved, meaning
possibility of compromise (we all know how secure web servers tend to
be), and then one has access to network traffic for sniffing. Also
On Thu, 28 May 2009 18:04:23 +0100, Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote:
[The OP] even said 'secure' twice. There is a web server involved, meaning
possibility of compromise (we all know how secure web servers tend to
be), and then one has access to network traffic for sniffing. Also, if
Well, I can transfer 25MB/s between hosts on the LAN without my CPU ever
breaking 10% CPU usage.
probably true, i never checked actually. i just don't understand such
reasoning that you have to waste (even small) CPU power without sense.
For example local private LAN or already-encrypted VPN
good as the weakest point. Of course you can add security by
using SSH, and it's definitely indicated when doing things via
the Internet. As long as you are inside your own net, covered
from the Internet, with only trustworthy machines inside it,
you could even use telnet.
which i actually do.
I know I sound like Theo, but security and reliability are ALWAYS more
important than overhead or speed.
I really agree with You.
That's why every admin (and user too) should think about what is he/she
doing, instead of repeating the same mantras about security/insecurity of
something.
But if it is, why not? At least, the OP's description involving
some time ago i heard from linux user that rshd is removed at all because
it's insecure. Just got another example how good decision i made moving
away from it.
___
On Thursday 28 May 2009 02:34:02 pm Wojciech Puchar wrote:
And yes - i do log as root by insecure rsh and telnet.
OK, I'm now promoting you to batshit insane. Seriously, there's no excuse
for running telnet - even in a secure (ha!) environment - when so much
better alternatives exist.
Let
And yes - i do log as root by insecure rsh and telnet.
OK, I'm now promoting you to batshit insane. Seriously, there's no excuse
thank you very much. while i don't know exactly what is a difference
between batshit insane and insane i feel really proud!
to be able to impose file and disk quotas on individual users
the kernel had to support it.
Is this supported in FreeBSD7 ? How can one check if which options
are supported?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Have you looked at the official documentation?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/book.html#QUOTAS
Pieter Donche wrote:
to be able to impose file and disk quotas on individual users
the kernel had to support it.
Is this supported in FreeBSD7 ? How can one check if which options
the kernel had to support it.
Is this supported in FreeBSD7 ? How can one check if which options
are supported?
options QUOTA
man 7 ffs for more
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Hello.
I use a script to create automatically my users (with pw, and mkdir, etc...). I
use quota, and I have to excute 'edquota -u user', and enter quota
informations. So, the process can not be automaticated. And cannot be part of
my script.
I don't find informations in edquota(8) manpages
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:12:56 +
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:13:17 +0100
Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote:
Hello.
I use FreeBSD 6.3. I set quota to my fs.
But, when I print disk usage with du -sh, I have:
..
Why this difference
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Hello.
I use a script to create automatically my users (with pw, and mkdir, etc...). I
use quota, and I have to excute 'edquota -u user', and enter quota
informations. So, the process can not be automaticated. And cannot be part of
my script.
I don't find
On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:09:13 +0200
Manolis Kiagias sonic200...@gmail.com wrote:
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Hello.
I use a script to create automatically my users (with pw, and mkdir,
etc...). I use quota, and I have to excute 'edquota -u user', and enter
quota informations. So
...). I use quota, and I have to excute 'edquota -u user', and
enter quota informations. So, the process can not be
automaticated. And cannot be part of my script. I don't find
informations in edquota(8) manpages about editing user quota without
open a file.
Is an other solution exists? I'm
Hello.
I use FreeBSD 6.3. I set quota to my fs.
But, when I print disk usage with du -sh, I have:
r...@domain sites $ du -sh folder
633Mfolder
But, when I print disk usage with quota -u user, I have:
isk quotas for user user (uid 2002):
Filesystem usage quota limit grace
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote:
Hello.
I use FreeBSD 6.3. I set quota to my fs.
But, when I print disk usage with du -sh, I have:
r...@domain sites $ du -sh folder
633Mfolder
But, when I print disk usage with quota -u user, I have:
isk
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net
wrote:
Hello.
I use FreeBSD 6.3. I set quota to my fs.
But, when I print disk usage with du -sh, I have:
r...@domain sites $ du -sh folder
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:13:17 +0100
Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote:
Hello.
I use FreeBSD 6.3. I set quota to my fs.
But, when I print disk usage with du -sh, I have:
..
Why this difference? (633M against 648264)
Try dividing 648264 by 1024
On Friday 08 August 2008, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Aug 8, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Yavuz Maslak wrote:
On freebsd7, How to set quota for a directory?
For instance I want to set 100Mbyte quota for a directory. How can
I do
that ?
Quotas are handled per filesystem, not per directory.
See man
On freebsd7, How to set quota for a directory?
For instance I want to set 100Mbyte quota for a directory. How can I do
that ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
On Aug 8, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Yavuz Maslak wrote:
On freebsd7, How to set quota for a directory?
For instance I want to set 100Mbyte quota for a directory. How can
I do
that ?
Quotas are handled per filesystem, not per directory.
See man quotaon man quotacheck, or the FreeBSD Handbook
You may actually use the edquota -u command to set a quota a specific user.
I think this is about as specific as you can get. edquota -g is for groups
and edquota -f is for a filesystem.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-set-quota-%28-as-Mbyte-%29
Quoting lyd mc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, my company wants to have 20meg mbox space per user. If the
User exceeds, he/she should not recieved any mail.
So, I use system quota to prevent sendmail from writing to mbox of a
Let me suggest slightly different approaches:
1.- You could have
On Thursday 10 July 2008 16:19:59 Mikhail Goriachev wrote:
Quoting lyd mc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, my company wants to have 20meg mbox space per user. If the
User exceeds, he/she should not recieved any mail.
So, I use system quota to prevent sendmail from writing to mbox of a
Let me
Hi Mikhail,
Thank you for the great suggestion. I will try it in our new server.
Regards,
alyd
--- On Thu, 7/10/08, Mikhail Goriachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mikhail Goriachev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: quota and sendmail accepts 10k mail size
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Derek,
It is good to hear from you.
You are right about sendmail has only global option to limit mail size.
However, my company wants to have 20meg mbox space per user. If the User
exceeds, he/she should not recieved any mail.
So, I use system quota to prevent sendmail from writing
At 08:14 PM 7/7/2008, lyd mc wrote:
Greetings,
I setup my mail server on freebsd7.0R and it is working great!
However, I have a problem on quota. It suppose to block any incoming
message to specific user which is under quota. But sendmail can still send
to the user under quota if the mail
Greetings,
I setup my mail server on freebsd7.0R and it is working great!
However, I have a problem on quota. It suppose to block any incoming message to
specific user which is under quota. But sendmail can still send to the user
under quota if the mail size is ~ less than 10k. Quota only
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Ragona
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:49 AM
To: Ofloo; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Freebsd quota sendmail
At 12:29 PM 2/27/2008, Ofloo wrote:
I'm putting this under
I'm putting this under freebsd because there is no forum for sendmail, and it
does concern freebsd as well.
My problem is this, when i set quota in /var/mail directory to each user and
this user creates a cronjob, that doesn't forward all data to /dev/null, and
keeps on generating mail, ..
Well
On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Ofloo wrote:
I'm putting this under freebsd because there is no forum for
sendmail, and it
does concern freebsd as well.
Well, there's comp.mail.sendmail on Usenet.
My problem is this, when i set quota in /var/mail directory to each
user and
this user creates
At 12:29 PM 2/27/2008, Ofloo wrote:
I'm putting this under freebsd because there is no forum for sendmail, and it
does concern freebsd as well.
My problem is this, when i set quota in /var/mail directory to each user and
this user creates a cronjob, that doesn't forward all data to /dev/null
Giotis Eugen wrote:
hello,
im trying to enable quota on
and i recieve the following error:
fstab: /etc/fstab:2: Inappropriate file type or format
and i typed: /etc/rc.conf and i recieve the error: /etc/rc.conf:
Permission denied.
Can you help me
im trying to enable quota on
and i recieve the following error:
fstab: /etc/fstab:2: Inappropriate file type or format
how do you enable it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
hello,
im trying to enable quota on
and i recieve the following error:
fstab: /etc/fstab:2: Inappropriate file type or format
and i typed: /etc/rc.conf and i recieve the error: /etc/rc.conf:
Permission denied.
Can you help me ?
___
freebsd-questions
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:42:39PM +0200, Giotis Eugen wrote:
hello,
im trying to enable quota on
and i recieve the following error:
fstab: /etc/fstab:2: Inappropriate file type or format
and i typed: /etc/rc.conf and i recieve the error: /etc/rc.conf:
Permission denied.
I don't know
Hello,
I am working on a Postfix email server for virtual domain. I was
requested to implement quota per domain, not per user, have you ever
seen something like that?
Best regards,
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hello,
I am working on a Postfix email server for virtual domain. I was
requested to implement quota per domain, not per user: the sum of
mailboxes of all the users in the domain must not exceed the quota set
for the domain.
(All I could find was example where all users of the domain had a same
Hey all,
It seems most of the things I want to do under freeBSD have been turned
into nice KLD modules. However, I'm still forced to do a kernel recompile
for QUOTA support.
Is there some major reason it cannot be made into a KLD as well?
-Dan Mahoney
--
It would be bad.
-Egon Spengler
i have multi-jail server, moved every jail to a separate UFS partition,
and turned on quota on some of them (where vserver customer asked for it).
repquota shows all right, edquota works, then repquota shows right things
but after few syncs or just waiting a minute quota setting disappears
Hello,
I have Freebsd 6.2 installed with file quota on. Today I have installed
samba and enbaled network share for Windows machines. Now I would like to
set quota for this share. I am not sure if I should do this from the swat
panel or set the quota via command line in freebsd?
All hints gladly
In the last episode (Aug 29), Philip Hallstrom said:
I was looking at implementing QUOTA for a server, but all of our
users are stored in a database (ftp/pop/imap authenticates against
the db). They each have their own uid's though so the files are
owned individually.
I would think file
BTW, there is a small bug in quota for FreeBSD 6.x and 7.x.
The count gets off if the partition overfills (kern/89247).
There is a patch in the description if you want to manually
apply.
--Mark Tinguely.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi all -
I was looking at implementing QUOTA for a server, but all of our users are
stored in a database (ftp/pop/imap authenticates against the db). They
each have their own uid's though so the files are owned individually.
I would think file system quotas would work for this, but from
to print nothing happens, I go into cups configuration
page and I don't see any printer there, it just disappeared, I go
through the adding a new printer process again and I add it exactly
the same way I did the first time and I try to print a test page I
get this error:
Quota limit reached
I
process again and I add it exactly the same way I did the first time
and I try to print a test page I get this error:
Quota limit reached
I click on administration again and then manage printers and again the printer
I just added is not there. Does anyone know what's going
I try to print nothing happens, I go into cups configuration
page and I don't see any printer there, it just disappeared, I go
through the adding a new printer process again and I add it exactly
the same way I did the first time and I try to print a test page I
get this error:
Quota limit
disappeared, I go
through the adding a new printer process again and I add it exactly
the same way I did the first time and I try to print a test page I
get this error:
Quota limit reached
I click on administration again and then manage printers and again
the printer I just added
page I
get this error:
Quota limit reached
I click on administration again and then manage printers and again
the printer I just added is not there. Does anyone know what's
going on with this? It just doesn't make any sense! At first I
thought I had it and now ???
Anyway I'm running FBSD
Hi all,
Any idea what this is indicating?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/staff/micro/tmp]# quota micro
Disk quotas for user micro (uid 5315):
Filesystem usage quota limit grace files quota limit
grace
/ 1630026 300 310 13393 0 0
[EMAIL
Hello
I'm searching for a centralized quota printing solution that would run
over CUPS or LPRNG , I've reviewed pyquota but it doesn't fit our needings.
Ideally it could use a SYBASE database system as backend as we have a SYBASE
server ...
Thanks a lot.
--
Cordialement
Frank Bonnet
Frank Bonnet wrote:
I'm searching for a centralized quota printing solution that would run
over CUPS or LPRNG , I've reviewed pyquota but it doesn't fit our needings.
Ideally it could use a SYBASE database system as backend as we have a
SYBASE
server ...
This is one of the admin tasks
We are implementing quota on our servers and it worked out fine. But we
would like to warn users with a mail when they are over quota. Is there a
tool that does that? We found warnquota for linux but nothing for FreeBSD.
We are not the only users of quota who want to warn their users with a
mail
In the last episode (Jun 01), Bart Braem said:
We are implementing quota on our servers and it worked out fine. But we
would like to warn users with a mail when they are over quota. Is there a
tool that does that? We found warnquota for linux but nothing for FreeBSD.
We are not the only users
: quota and /var/mail
If you want to only have one set of quotas, you might consider
switching to a Postfix/Maildir setup where your users' inboxes will be
located in their home folder rather than in /var/mail.
It's a fairly easy switch: install Postfix from
/usr/ports/mail/postfix, and then you
patrick wrote:
It's a fairly easy switch: install Postfix from
/usr/ports/mail/postfix, and then you just need to configure one line
in your Postfix's main.cf to turn on Maildir support:
http://www.postfix.org/faq.html#maildir
Though, there might be a bit of a learning curve with respect to
, with quotas, soft-updates)
/dev/ad0s1g on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
I just want the quota to read the Shell user (home directory) size plus the
INBOX mails
which stay in /var/mail/$UserName
Currently the quota reads the home directory and ignores the $inbox
On Wed, 24 May 2006 11:02:44 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
If you want to only have one set of quotas, you might consider
switching to a Postfix/Maildir setup where your users' inboxes will be
located in their home folder rather than in /var/mail.
It's a fairly easy switch:
)
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
I just want the quota to read the Shell user (home directory) size plus the
INBOX mails
which stay in /var/mail/$UserName
Currently the quota reads the home directory and ignores the $inbox
Thak you mike
Marwan
At 07:37 PM 21/05/2006, Marwan Sultan wrote
At 07:43 PM 23/05/2006, Marwan Sultan wrote:
# DeviceMountpoint FStype Options Dump
Pass#
/dev/ad0s1b noneswapsw 0 0
/dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1
/dev/ad0s1e
Hello Mike,
Thank you for your answer, as im stuck on this point and lost with my
users,
beside none answering this question on the list!
No when I enabled quota I did the configuration on /usr
shall i enable it on /var to?
then how to make the sendmail or the shell reads the user
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
