> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:52:18 +0100
> From: Anton Shterenlikht
> Subject: Re: profiling library smaller than non-profiling,
> while it contains more symbols. Why?
>
> Also, the library compiled on amd64 has lots more
> symbols than if compiled on ia64.
This is _not_ unexpected with dif
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jul 12 17:34:12 2012
> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:31:31 +0100
> From: Anton Shterenlikht
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: profiling library smaller than non-profiling,
> while it contains more symbols. Why?
>
> While updating my po
> From: Doug Hardie
> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:21:38 -0700
> Subject: Re: IPv6 && getaddrinfo(3C)
>
> On 12 July 2012, at 07:24, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm playing around with IPv6 code on a FreeBSD 9 system and can't get
> > getaddrinfo(3C) to do what it should do as state
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:31:31PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> While updating my port (math/slatec) to use
> the new OPTIONS framework, I did some
> experiments with the profiling library.
>
> I don't know much about this, so what surprised me
> is that the profiling library is smaller:
>
While updating my port (math/slatec) to use
the new OPTIONS framework, I did some
experiments with the profiling library.
I don't know much about this, so what surprised me
is that the profiling library is smaller:
# ls -al lib*a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6582354 Jul 12 22:56 libslatec.a
-rw-r--
On 12 July 2012, at 07:24, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm playing around with IPv6 code on a FreeBSD 9 system and can't get
> getaddrinfo(3C) to do what it should do as stated in its man page:
> accept an IPv6 and IPv4 IP addr, it only works with the IPv6 form:
>
> $ ./a.out ::1
> ho
On 2012-07-12 15:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
On 07/12/2012 07:54 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hello.
Why don't you use a portsnap? it's over http...
2012/07/12 19:01:15 +0100 Kaya Saman => To
Peter Vereshagin :
KS> I will check it out however and see if that method is best,
however
KS> CVSup would
On 07/12/2012 09:46 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/07/2012 21:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself.
Ie. fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on
certain ports, th
Hello.
2012/07/12 21:26:22 +0100 Kaya Saman => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
KS> > A Demo? Am I invited for the show? ;-)
KS> Something like a Linux repo server if you will - though I mention the
KS> term very loosely.
SHould you try with a ixsystems's pcbsd.org then? http://pcbsd.org
If
On 12/07/2012 21:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
> My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself.
> Ie. fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
>
>
> As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on
> certain ports, the progress just bombs out totally.
>
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself. Ie.
fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on certain
ports, the progress just bombs out totally.
as you've said it is not a problem at all tom
On 07/12/2012 08:13 PM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:44:56PM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote:
I do infact work for this company and additionally I am one of the
administrators of the company.
The information comes straight down from the IT director who will
**not** change his mind
On 07/12/2012 07:54 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hello.
Why don't you use a portsnap? it's over http...
2012/07/12 19:01:15 +0100 Kaya Saman => To Peter
Vereshagin :
KS> I will check it out however and see if that method is best, however
KS> CVSup would be the best way for us and I'm already l
Does your IT director understand the active/passive distinction? If not
From what he described his director is plain moron. He required him to
block things that HE needs to work, leaving port 80 open so things that
are best in distracting from work (youtube, facebook...) works, as well as
maj
no it doesn't
You appear to be agreeing with me, but saying that your method does not
produce that problem.
sorry - possibly i missed something.
both method results in system bootable from both drives and proper
disklabels.
Yes, these are the same methods that can be used with MBR partit
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
last partition includes the block of gmirror metadata, that's an error.
no it doesn't
You appear to be agreeing with me, but saying that your method does not
produce that problem.
i do this 2 ways:
method 1) i FIRST do gmirror on whole disk
T
When attempting to upgrade chromium-19.0.1084.56_1 to
chromium-20.0.1132.57 on FreeBSD9.0 (FreeBSD box2 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD
9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC 2012
r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386), one of
the patches failed to apply:
Hello.
2012/07/12 14:44:48 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
=> To Peter Vereshagin :
LG> Peter Vereshagin writes:
LG>
LG> > 2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
=> To Kaya Saman :
LG> > LG> URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
LG> > LG> silly security policies won't al
last partition includes the block of gmirror metadata, that's an error.
no it doesn't
i do this 2 ways:
method 1) i FIRST do gmirror on whole disk
THEN partition it, so partition sizes sums up to gmirror size which is 1
sector less disk size.
then bsdlabel -B
method 2) i make same disklab
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict
checking stops booting in 9.0.
not making MBR partition would not make problems.
There's no guarantee that bsdlabel checking won't be made more strict. No
matter what type of
Hello.
Why don't you use a portsnap? it's over http...
2012/07/12 19:01:15 +0100 Kaya Saman => To Peter
Vereshagin :
KS> I will check it out however and see if that method is best, however
KS> CVSup would be the best way for us and I'm already looking at this:
KS>
KS> http://www.freebsd.org/do
Peter Vereshagin writes:
> 2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
> => To Kaya Saman :
> LG> URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
> LG> silly security policies won't allow for an external web-based FTP proxy)
> LG> you may need to bring them in by offline media.
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict
checking stops booting in 9.0.
not making MBR partition would not make problems.
There's no guarantee that bsdlabel checking won't be made more strict. No
matter what type of partitioning scheme, the metadata should not b
Most surprise for me is why no one is interested about what kind of a danger
the ftp protocol can ever be? i. e. skype is much more vicious in comparison to
As in lots of companies where idiots are directors (common case) the
danger is because it is something that "doesn't exist". As we all kno
The information comes straight down from the IT director who will
**not** change his mind on this as I have asked several times in the
past.
I just told about solution to a problem. Not a workaround.
How you can make your work if your director actively prevent it!?
Basically without getting to
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
> => To Kaya Saman :
> LG> URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
> LG> silly security policies won't allow for an external web-based FTP proxy)
> LG> you m
Hello,
I'm playing around with IPv6 code on a FreeBSD 9 system and can't get
getaddrinfo(3C) to do what it should do as stated in its man page:
accept an IPv6 and IPv4 IP addr, it only works with the IPv6 form:
$ ./a.out ::1
host: ::1
read: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.6p1 FreeBSD-2010
$ ./a.out 127.0.
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more
Hello.
2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
=> To Kaya Saman :
LG> URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
LG> silly security policies won't allow for an external web-based FTP proxy)
LG> you may need to bring them in by offline media.
I believe there should be t
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>> I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
>> at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
>> our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
>
>
> do you work FOR that company. Ask administr
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict checking stops
booting in 9.0.
not
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
do you work FOR that company. Ask administrator to unblock if for you as
you need it for work.
Do you do your
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it'
Kaya Saman writes:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
>>> software.
>>
>>
>> Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
>>> at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, w
On 12 Jul 2012, at 17:23, Kaya Saman wrote:
> How does one get round this issue as my superiors are telling me that
> opening up FTP is a security risk and therefor don't want to proceed?
>
>
> I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
> software.
>
>
> Can anyon
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:00:01 -0500, Kaya Saman wrote:
Yeah, this is a good idea I was actually thinking about this.
I've never done it so I'd need to google around a bit and do some
testing but it is probably what we would want to do!
Install the port, run the setup script, answer some
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>>
>> I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
>> software.
>
>
> Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You could run your
> own local mir
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman wrote:
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You could run
your own local mirror (net/cvsup-mirror) as well.
___
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
>> at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
>> our companies 'security' policy to b
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
> at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
> our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
>
> At present they are running a whole bunch of C
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
At present they are running a whole bunch of CentOS based boxes and
VM's which of course can be run through p
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD
9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work i
On 7/12/2012 10:18 AM, David Banning wrote:
> Lately I have a problem where the ppp connection goes down.
> Watching the log I see the following;
> Jul 12 09:55:13 3s1 ppp[31115]: tun0: Phase: deflink: opening -> dial
> Jul 12 09:55:13 3s1 ppp[31115]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial -> carrier
> Jul 12
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD 9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work if you use installer
1) install to first disk
2
Lately I have a problem where the ppp connection goes down.
Watching the log I see the following;
Jul 12 09:54:58 3s1 ppp[30841]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected!
Jul 12 09:54:58 3s1 ppp[30841]: tun0: Phase: deflink: opening -> dial
Jul 12 09:54:58 3s1 ppp[30841]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial -> ca
On 07/12/2012 05:47 AM, Mike Clarke wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 16:20:41 Joseph Lenox wrote:
What about a ZFS root? Just make sure both disks are in the BIOS/EFT
boot order.
http://www.aisecure.net/2011/11/28/root-zfs-freebsd9/
Something else we noticed on our site is that backup of a syst
Brent Clark writes:
> A question I would like to ask, if no one minds.
> Whys is Gluster not available in FreeBSD?
>
> It is that Gluster just cant run on FreeBSD, or no one can port it?
http://wiki.freebsd.org/GlusterFS
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
2012/7/12 Hasse Hansson :
> Hello all
> Needed an extra box today for some experimental use, and serarched my
> storeroom.
> Found an old Compaq and fired it up. All I changed was the networksettings,
> and there it was.
> IPv6 connectivity and all. Amasing, last serving 2003.
> Those were the da
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 16:20:41 Joseph Lenox wrote:
> What about a ZFS root? Just make sure both disks are in the BIOS/EFT
> boot order.
> http://www.aisecure.net/2011/11/28/root-zfs-freebsd9/
>
> Something else we noticed on our site is that backup of a system
> snapshot can be quickly restored
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I am looking to build a simple i5 or i7 CPU-based desktop computer that is
compatible with FreeBSD. Could someone suggest me a sub $200 motherboard
whose chipsets and BIOS works well with FreeBSD? I would prefer to stick
with either Intel or Asus if
I have two SAS disks for the FreeBSD install. I want to install the freeBSD
on one disk and mirror to another disk. Just like the AIX Mirror.
man gmirror
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
Hello all
Needed an extra box today for some experimental use, and serarched my storeroom.
Found an old Compaq and fired it up. All I changed was the networksettings, and
there it was.
IPv6 connectivity and all. Amasing, last serving 2003.
Those were the days.
Last login: Sun Dec 28 22:43:46 2003
Hiya
A question I would like to ask, if no one minds.
Whys is Gluster not available in FreeBSD?
It is that Gluster just cant run on FreeBSD, or no one can port it?
Just something I was thinking.
Kind Regards
Brent Clark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.
Hi,
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 09:04:37 AM Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
>
> I am looking to build a simple i5 or i7 CPU-based desktop computer that is
> compatible with FreeBSD. Could someone suggest me a sub $200 motherboard
> whose chipsets and BIOS works well with FreeBSD? I would prefer to stick
from Pierre-Luc Drouin :
> I am looking to build a simple i5 or i7 CPU-based desktop computer that is
> compatible with FreeBSD. Could someone suggest me a sub $200 motherboard
> whose chipsets and BIOS works well with FreeBSD? I would prefer to stick
> with either Intel or Asus if possible...
MS
56 matches
Mail list logo
