Intel 2U server 4GB RAM showing only 3GB
Hi, I have a new dual Xeon Intel 2U server which I'm configuring with FreeBSD 5.4 and I can't get it to see more than 3GB RAM. If I try use the MAXMEM=(4096*1024) option it fails to boot up and just resets itself. Do I need to use the PAE option ? ..I wouldn't think so as this is meant for >4GB. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks. Regards, Nelis dmesg.boot Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: i can't connect remote to my mysql server
On 8/18/05, vladone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have instaled mysql server succcesfull and started. I set root > password, i can login to my server from console but i can't login > remote (i use Mysql Control Center for win, for quickly management). > I receive this error: "host 192.168.100.4 is not allowed to connect to > this Mysql server" > I dont know why, server is up and running. > > Another question is about config files. I dont know where is config > file for mysql on freebsd. In linux exist mysql.cnf but here ... i > dont see anything. > Sample config files can be found in /usr/local/share/mysql. MySQL will run fine with it's default settings but depending on your requirements you may need to change them. You can copy one of the suitable sample files to /var/db/mysql/my.cnf and change it according to your requirements. You might also want to look at the phpMyAdmin port /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin for a web gui front-end to MySQL where you can add users and assign permissions with a click of a button. Otherwise you'll have to do it manually as a previous post mentioned. Cheers, Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: problem when starting mysql
On 8/18/05, vladone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry. Resolved. I dont have right owner for /var/db/mysql > If you used the script that the port installed in /usr/local/etc/rc.d to start mysql you wouldn't have had any problems. The startup script would have run mysql_install_db and set the correct permissions. To use the script(which starts up mysql on boot) add mysql_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf Cheers, Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: undelete in FreeBSD?
On 7/21/05, Xu Qiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, all: > > I mis-deleted /usr/local/bin directory in my FreeBSD. How can I restore it? > There isn't a way to restore unless you have a backup. However, most of the binary files in /usr/local/bin are from packages/ports you have installed on your system. So you may be able to get away with using portupgrade(/usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade) to re-install those packages and therefore "restoring" some if not all of /usr/local/bin. Do a portupgrade -f -a which forces portupgrade to re-install all packages/ports you have currently installed. Good luck. Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Continuation of support for FreeBSD 4.x ?
Greetings all, Could somebody please clarify for me what will happen to FreeBSD 4.x support with regards to patches and or security updates in the future ? I've heard that when version 6 becomes RELEASE there will be no more security updates to version 4.x, is this true ? I work at a University where we have approximately 30 x FreeBSD servers of which half run 4.x and are used for routing IPX and connecting to Netware shares, running various Netware related applications etc so the above is of importance to me. FreeBSD 5.x was slow to adopt IPX support and it has never been stable enough to use in a production enviroment. Thanks for your reply. Regards, Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: using -t option with unix sort ?
On 7/14/05, Nelis Lamprecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/14/05, Daniel Malaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I am trying to sort a tab delimited file with sort. The problem I am > > having is with the -t option. I do not know how to pass a tab. > > > > > sort -t \t > > > > > > > Any suggestions would be much appreciated. > > remove the space between -t and \t and it should work actually scratch that, it works either way. can you give a sample of the data ? Regards, Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: using -t option with unix sort ?
On 7/14/05, Daniel Malaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am trying to sort a tab delimited file with sort. The problem I am > having is with the -t option. I do not know how to pass a tab. > sort -t \t > > Any suggestions would be much appreciated. remove the space between -t and \t and it should work Regards, Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: why CDROM operations cause system to be slow and HD operations do not
On 7/13/05, Yuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I read something from CDROM my system gets visibly slow and HD > reads/writes do not have the same effect. > > I think they both should have similar effect on system performance since > multiple requests should just wait till completion interrupt and other > processes shouldn't be affected. > Is the CDROM attached to the same cable as your hard drive ? If so try putting it on it's own seperate cable using your secondary channel and see if that makes a difference. Regards, Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Port upgrade error
On 7/13/05, Beecher Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While trying to update phpMyAdmin I get the following error: > ===>Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/php/20041030/mysqli.so in > /usr/ports/databases/php5-mysqli > ===> php5-mysqli-5.0.4_2 Doesn't work with MySQL version : 50 > (Doesn't support MySQL 323 40 50). > *** Error code 1 > > I have upgraded php and tried building that extension separately. No > joy. Anyone have a suggestion? > Either remove php5-mysqli from /var/db/ports/phpMyAdmin/options or run MySQL 4.1 Server. Regards, Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Who can help me with ISO's
On 7/11/05, Gavin McDougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I am based in Johannesburg, South Africa and would like to know if there > is anyone lurking in this list that could help me with making copies of > the FreeBSD 5.4 ISO's. > > We suffer serious telecoms (bandwidth) disabilities in this country so > its a bit of a mission downloading these files. > Hi Gavin, Checkout http://www.freedomtoaster.org/?q=node/21 You should be able to take a couple of CDR's over and burn your own. Regards, Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 5 - What Options for SMP Kernel?
On 7/11/05, Drew Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just built my first 5.4-RELEASE system. I want a SMP kernel. The > GENERIC kernel conf file contains this line: > > device apic# I/O apic > > According to NOTES, this is all that's required to build an SMP kernel. I don't see any mention of "this is all that's required" ? > However my dmesg does not indicate that both processors are being used. > In version 4, these two lines were required: > > optionsSMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel > optionsAPIC_IO # Symmetric (APIC) I/O > > I've searched Google but haven't found any definitive answers. Exactly > what lines do I need in my kernel conf and how can I verify both > processors are being used? If you look in the usual place /usr/src/sys/i386/conf you will see a SMP file that includes the option SMP for the default SMP enabled GENERIC kernel. It would make sense to put that option along with apic in your custom SMP kernel. To verify after rebooting do a 'dmesg |grep CPU' and it should show something along the lines of: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (3056.82-MHz 686-class CPU) Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs Regards, Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Procedure for migrating user accounts to new system ?
To answer my own posting. Simply copy(keeping correct permissions) /etc/passwd, /etc/master.passwd and /etc/group to the new system making sure you have a backup of the original if anything goes wrong. Then run pwd_mkdb -p /etc/passwd which will update /etc/pwd.db, spwd.db. I then rsync'ed all home directories and all is well. Nelis On 7/5/05, Nelis Lamprecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > What is the correct procedure to follow for migrating user accounts > from one FreeBSD 4.x system to a new FreeBSD 4.x system ? We're > sticking to 4.x due to legacy issues(Netware) in case I get asked. > Didn't see answer to this in the FAQ's or Handbook and google answers > seem sketchy. > > Thanks. > > Nelis > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Procedure for migrating user accounts to new system ?
On 7/5/05, Antony Mawer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/07/2005 12:26 AM, Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > > Hi, > > > > What is the correct procedure to follow for migrating user accounts > > from one FreeBSD 4.x system to a new FreeBSD 4.x system ? We're > > sticking to 4.x due to legacy issues(Netware) in case I get asked. > > Didn't see answer to this in the FAQ's or Handbook and google answers > > seem sketchy. > > Hi there, > > I noticed you mentioned "legacy issues - Netware" as your reason for > sticking with 4.x. Do you have any more information on why it's > necessary to stick with 4.x for this? We currently run a large number of > production systems on 4.x and rely heavily on Netware support; if it's > no longer functional in FreeBSD 5.x/6.x then that's a serious > show-stopper for us! > Last time I tried using NWFS, NCP and friends on FreeBSD 5.x it didn't work. It was a known problem but after doing some googling I came across this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-January/044838.html Unfortunately I need to know that it WILL work and not maybe. When I have time I will do some tests with FreeBSD 5.x again. Also, even if it did work I doubt it would be stable enough yet to put in a production enviroment. Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Procedure for migrating user accounts to new system ?
On 05 Jul 2005 16:44:02 -0400, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nelis Lamprecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What is the correct procedure to follow for migrating user accounts > > from one FreeBSD 4.x system to a new FreeBSD 4.x system ? We're > > sticking to 4.x due to legacy issues(Netware) in case I get asked. > > Didn't see answer to this in the FAQ's or Handbook and google answers > > seem sketchy. > > The FAQ entry titled "How do I move my system over to my huge new > disk?" should be apropos. > Unfortunately it doesn't. I specifically said "user accounts" because that's the only thing I want to move over to the new system. Using dump and restore wouldn't be applicable in this scenario as many things in the file systems are different. I was thinking more along the lines of copying over the password files and using pwd_mkdb to rebuild the db's but wasn't entirely sure about the whole process. For the home directories I'm just using rsync to copy over the data to the new system. Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Procedure for migrating user accounts to new system ?
Hi, What is the correct procedure to follow for migrating user accounts from one FreeBSD 4.x system to a new FreeBSD 4.x system ? We're sticking to 4.x due to legacy issues(Netware) in case I get asked. Didn't see answer to this in the FAQ's or Handbook and google answers seem sketchy. Thanks. Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PHP on freebsd ports not working
On 6/6/05, Philip Wege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unable to get php to work through ports system: > > Php5 and Apache2 is being used. > > The test script looks like this : > > > Hello World > > > echo "Hello World"; > ?> > > > > Logs only says : > > [Mon Jun 06 07:50:48 2005] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down > [Mon Jun 06 07:53:12 2005] [notice] Apache/2.0.54 (FreeBSD) PHP/5.0.4 > configured -- resuming normal operations > > The following was added to httpd.conf : > > LoadModule php5_modulelibexec/apache2/libphp5.so > > When the one open machineip/test.php , it displayes the empty webpage > and its title. > > I got a feeling im missing config lines that needs to be added to > httpd.conf , can anyone help ? > I assume you added the following which would have displayed after your php5 installation: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>$ pkg_info -D php5-5.0.4_1 Information for php5-5.0.4_1: Install notice: *** Make sure index.php is part of your DirectoryIndex. You should add the following to your Apache configuration file: AddType application/x-httpd-php .php AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps *** Also, it's probably best to test your php5 installation using phpinfo(); Just add to a filename.php and access it via your web browser. Regards, Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Lost /etc/group after installing mtools installed
On 5/24/05, Paul Dufresne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am still looking for a default /etc/group file. > If you have the source installed. /usr/src/etc/group nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade weirdness
Replying to my own message. For the archives, the problem below was caused because my local cvsup mirror was not in sync with the INDEX file I downloaded from the main FreeBSD site. Sorry, should have checked a specific port version Makefile before posting the question. Nelis On Apr 5, 2005 1:17 PM, Nelis Lamprecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to be having some difficulty upgrading some of my packages > using portupgrade. Here is an example: > > medusa# portversion -vl "<" | grep m4 > m4-1.4.1< needs updating (port has 1.4.3) > > medusa# portupgrade m4 > medusa# > > Basically it's doing nothing as if it thinks the port is already > updated ? This happens with my php4 port as well as the quagga port > and one or two others. Some update fine, some don't. If I do a > portupgrade -f it installs the same version currently installed and > still doesn't install the new port. > > Any ideas ? > > Thanks. > > Nelis > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
portupgrade weirdness
Hi, I seem to be having some difficulty upgrading some of my packages using portupgrade. Here is an example: medusa# portversion -vl "<" | grep m4 m4-1.4.1< needs updating (port has 1.4.3) medusa# portupgrade m4 medusa# Basically it's doing nothing as if it thinks the port is already updated ? This happens with my php4 port as well as the quagga port and one or two others. Some update fine, some don't. If I do a portupgrade -f it installs the same version currently installed and still doesn't install the new port. Any ideas ? Thanks. Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Cleaning /tmp on boot
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:42:17 +, Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Is there an easy way to have FreeBSD (RELEASE-5.3) clean /tmp on boot > by means of setting a flag or something in /etc/rc.conf? I'd like to > check before I start manually hacking up my boot scripts to get this > done. I believe it's: clear_tmp_enable="YES" Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How change the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE?
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:25:13 -0800, perikillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, i have been around reading docs about the problem we have a lot > of people went we try to access one ftp server on the Internet, > normally the (Passive servers), in the past i was using rules on > IPFILTER(freebsd 4.10 p5, think is the 3.4.31?? the one it cames > with), my rule was: > > To block all that arrives to my tun0(IN), and let out all the > packets of my internal cients over tun0 and keep state. it was easy, > only let my users go to outside world. My ipnat it was simply, only: > > map tun0 198.168.1.0/24 -> 0/32 > >With this all my clients(win2k, win98, Freebsd, win XP) where happy > and secure. > >Them i decide to change my rules be more define, i read the > handbook, and start making changes: > > Block in all over my tun0 and let out any package over my tun0 only to: > port 21, 53, 80, 443, 5999, all the handbook say, services that i know > that normally went someone surf the web he is going to connect to > those services. > >I change my nat: > >map tun0 198.168.1.0//24 -> proxy port 21 ftp/tcp >map tun0 192.168.1.0/24 -> 0/32 portmap tcp/udp 2:6 >map tun0 192.168.1.0/24 -> 0/32 > >Is ok, i can surf the web, but went i went to the freebsd server, > what happend: > >ftp: ls >entering passive mode(bla, bla, bla) >ftp: connect no route to host > hi, to solve your problem or you should need to do is add another rule for the actual freebsd server: map tun0 198.168.1.1/32 -> 198.168.1.1/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp the above rule assumes 198.168.1.1 is your freebsd server. this rule should be placed first. you should also have a rule to pass out traffic, something along the lines of: pass out quick on tun0 proto tcp from 198.168.1.0/24 to any port = 21 flags S keep state that should do the trick. cheers, nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: mystery /var space usage
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:29:30 -0800, joseph kacmarcik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > /dev/amrd0s1e 9.8G 4.8G 4.2G53%/var > > > > A du -h of /var shows a total of 616M data only. First thing that came > > to mind is some process which is holding onto data so I tried > > restarting various daemons - cyrus, imapd, exim, apache and still no > > change. I've checked with fstat and lsof to see if I can see anything > > suspicious but nothing out of the ordinary shows up. > > sounds like the maillog. have you tried restarting syslogd or whatever process > you have that writes to your maillog? > syslogd was the first process I restarted amongst all the others to see if the problem could be solved. after doing some googling i came across this same problem mentioned before. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2003-June/010764.html and another maybe not freebsd related http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-fileutils/2002-10/msg00042.html I have exactly the same problem which leads me to think that this may be some sort of bug with softupdares ? mail:/var# du -hs /var 621M/var mail:/var# df -h /var Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/amrd0s1e 9.8G 5.4G 3.7G59%/var the usage for /var is growing all the time so I'm going to have to take the machine down this weekend which I'm sure will solve the problem for now but I'd sure like to know what causes this. Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
mystery /var space usage
Hi, This is not one of those "I've run out of space on /var issues" but rather "what the hell is using up the space" issue. My /var file system shows: /dev/amrd0s1e 9.8G 4.8G 4.2G53%/var A du -h of /var shows a total of 616M data only. First thing that came to mind is some process which is holding onto data so I tried restarting various daemons - cyrus, imapd, exim, apache and still no change. I've checked with fstat and lsof to see if I can see anything suspicious but nothing out of the ordinary shows up. Baring in mind this is a production mail server with about 60 000 accounts, does anyone have any other suggestions which I might try ? I could just boot into single user mode and back out which will probably solve my problem now but for obvious reasons I would like to know what is causing the added usage of /var. I'm running 4.10 currently but plan to update that to 4.11 if I have to reboot. Thanks for your reply. Regards, Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: anyone using Putty and ssh-agent?
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:26:43 -0500, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to get putty and ssh-agent working under 5.3-stable. > Anyone succeeded? > > I have plain ssh working with ssh-agent, but not putty. The issue is > just putty, not ssh-agent. > -- Similiar problems have been noted on this list before with putty, the solution was to set PasswordAuthentication to yes in your sshd_config which is disabled by default in 5.3 Nelis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: i'm lost in named trouble.
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:39:44 +0100 (MET), Mipam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:00:04 +0100 (MET), Mipam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > controls {
> > > inet 127.0.0.1 port 953
> > > allow { 127.0.0.1; } keys { "bla"; };
> > > };
> >
> > perhaps this should be:
> >
> > controls {
> > inet 127.0.0.1 port 953
> > allow { localhost; } keys { "bla"; };
> > };
>
> I just tried it, same result. :-(
> Any other hints?
I see you also have not set a query option ?
eg.
allow-query { any; };
..under options.
nelis
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: i'm lost in named trouble.
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:00:04 +0100 (MET), Mipam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> controls {
> inet 127.0.0.1 port 953
> allow { 127.0.0.1; } keys { "bla"; };
> };
perhaps this should be:
controls {
inet 127.0.0.1 port 953
allow { localhost; } keys { "bla"; };
};
nelis
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
swapfile
Hi, Checked the manual but couldn't find anything regarding this. If you have created more than one swap file how do you specify them in your rc.conf file ? Manually it works fine but obviously when the machine boots I want them both to be used again. swapfile="/mailstore/swap1" swapfile="/mailstore/swap2" The above doesn't work, only the first one is used. Thanks. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ax88790 chipset 100mbit/s support
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 02:25:30 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello, > > i have a 10/100 fast ethernet pccard labeled "sitecom". > it is built around the asix ax88790 chipset and runs > at 10 mbit using the ed driver. > > is 10 mbit/sec the maximum transfer rate the ed driver > supports? > If I'm not mistaken the ed driver is for isa cards and 100mbit is not achievable on the isa bus. What happens when you type 'ifconfig ed0 media 100BaseTX mediaopt full-duplex' ? nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: problem with net-snmp while installing ethereal from ports
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:34:26 -0500, Brian Barto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, i'm trying to install ethereal from ports. It says it depends > on shared library netsnmp.6 and the make shortly fails after with the > following error: shared library "netsnmp.6" does not exist > > The net-snmp web site says the latest is 5.2 > > My ports tree was updated two days ago. What am I not getting here? > Based on what information you have provided I can offer you the following advice: Either build the ethereal port with the following argument 'make WITHOUT_SNMP=yes' OR install /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp[1] first [1] usually this is done automatically but something may be borked in the port so try doing it manually. nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Exim and FBSD 5.3
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:19:19 +0100, Kees Plonsz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am running freebsd 5.3 release > I compiled it from the original source, not from the ports tree. > It gives me a lot of extra compiling options wich was not > available otherwise. ( Like running as user "mailnull" ). Actually the default user/group for the port install is mailnull:mail There are many configuration options(if not all) which can be added/tweaked simply by editing the Makefile in the port directory(or via the command line). The best part is it sets up all the directory permissions user/group etc for you and generally just works. Trust in the ports, it will save you a lot of headaches in the long run especially when it comes to upgrading. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Problems logging w/ IPF on FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:28:06 -0800, FMorales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bash-2.05b$ cat /etc/rc.conf | grep "ip" > ipfilter_enable="YES" > ipfilter_rules="/etc/ipf.rules" > ipmon_enable="YES" > ipmon_flags="-Ds" > change the above to read something along the lines of: ipmon_flags="-Dn /var/log/ipfilter.log" remove the "s" in other words and put in the path to your log file to output the data. nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: squid
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:04:27 +0300 (MSK), dextermetall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > how can i deny websites in squid? > for example: i don`t want that clients could connect to www.example.com > how can i do this? http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-10.html#ss10.23 Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: syslog imapd pop3d
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:21:13 +0100, Mark Frasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering wheter it's possible that pop3d and imapd don't log to > maillog > > My syslog.conf is like this: > > mail.info /var/log/maillog > !imapd > *.* /var/log/imapd.log > !pop3d > *.* /var/log/imapd.log > > So every pop3 and imap (Couriers) connection made are logged to > imapd.log > > The problem is that i don't want it logged to /var/log/maillog but it > does. > How can i stop syslog from doing that, but leave the normal mail > information to log towards /var/log/maillog? > I don't think this is possible with syslog but I may be wrong. I think you would probably need something more like multilog here for this to work which is a part of D.J. Bernstein's daemontools available in ports. http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Slowish 5.3 network throughput (LAN)
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:38:48 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > About 4 days ago I downloaded 5.3-RELEASE (.iso) from ftp.nl. at about > 6mB/s from a server I have on a .nl provider. Today I wanted to do some > testing, and while downloading that same ISO (which I downloaded at 6 > megabytes/s) from two different servers on the same subnet, the best I got > was 130kB/s. > > My outgoing port 80 pipe on the server allows up to 40mbits, so this rate > is incredibly low, and the servers are all on the same subnet! > > The clients are downloading the .iso from an apache 1.3.33 server with a > basic configuration. I didn't have time to test over NFS, to check if it > would be any faster.. > > What's happening here? I can download at 1mBps from my crappy P200 MMX w/ > freebsd 4.10 at my lan. This server is a Dual Xeon 2.4Ghz w/ 2GB ram and a > decent hdd. It should saturate the 100mbps, but won't go past 130kB/s. > > Could this be because the server NIC is an em(4) ? I heard there are some > problems with the em driver under 5.3. > > Here are some specs: > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2399.33-MHz 686-class CPU) > Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs > SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched! > > em0: port > 0x3000-0x303f mem 0xfc20-0xfc21 irq 54 at device 3.0 on pci2 > > 487 mbufs in use > 270/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/max) > 0/4/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) > 661 KBytes allocated to network > 0 requests for sfbufs denied > 0 requests for sfbufs delayed > 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile > 28 calls to protocol drain routines > > FreeBSD celestia.celeritystorm.com 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Mon > Nov 1 22:21:19 UTC 2004 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/celestia i386 > > I don't have polling enabled. sacks on, delayed acks on. > > the PF queue: > > queue http_out bandwidth 40Mb priority 5 > [ pkts: 59257 bytes: 88471020 dropped pkts: 0 bytes: 0 ] > [ qlength: 0/ 50 borrows: 0 suspends:177 ] > > Any ideas of what might be causing the tremendous slowdown ? > We have several machines which use the em driver but I haven't used 5.3 with them yet. What I did notice though that when I set the managed switch and the interface to full duplex instead of letting it auto sense it made a noticable difference in speed. I would be interested to know if 5.3 has the same effect. ifconfig em0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Thru a 'nasty' proxy
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:55:43 +, Vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Old linux user now moving gradually to freebsd 5.2.1, at office we have > a lan > 1) with an http proxy for which authentication via userid & passwd is > needed AND > 2) ftp is blocked, not permitted. > > I want to use the ports and compile my programs. I have already tried to > set the http proxy (as under linux, by the way!) issuing: > > env HTTP_PROXY="http://userid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080" > > to no avail; freebsd complains endlessly that > ... > fetch: ftp://: Host not found > . Try putting in the following in /etc/make.conf FETCH_ENV= FTP_PROXY=http://userid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080 FETCH_ENV= HTTP_PROXY=http://userid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080 To be honest, haven't tried it with authentication but the above would be the correct way to make use of a proxy for ports. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: /dev/io problem in 5.3
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:22:59 -0500, Gerard Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > > > >Just got through buildworld/kernel on 5.3. Strange problem I can't > >find the solution to. > > > >Xorg won't start: > > > >Fatal server error: > >xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O > > > >Please consult the The x.org Foundation support at http://wiki.X.org > >for help. > >Yada Yada Yada. > > > >Only one hit on Google, and it's just a bug report. Anyone else have > >any ideas? I know /dev/is supposed to be more dynamic in 5.3, but > >this isn't working. > > > Make sure your kernel has "device io". > X needs it in 5.3. > Out of curiosity does 5.3 have this in the Generic kernel ? I don't have a copy installed yet to check but if it doesn't then it certainly should IMO. I've seen this problem reported a few times already. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installation problem/question -- duplicate sent to support@freebsdmall
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:05:06 -0600, Jeff Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a machine running win 2000. I want to completely convert the machine > to FreeBSD (not run anything else), I boot from the 5.2 cd and choose use all > the disk and choose automatic to have the system decide what to place where. > I creates the necessary partitions/filesystems (/, var,swap and /usr) on what > I assume to be the 4 windows partitions already existing. It then proceeds to > install the system and I answer all the questions and the disk flashes and > the cdrom blinks for about an hour. It finally finishes and returns to the > sysinstall screen. I exit and it says it will now reboot. It does. INTO THE > WINDOWS 2000 SYSTEM!. I took a look at the disks and there is not a trace of > the FreeBSD filestructure or files. ANYWHERE!!. I am very puzzled. It looked > like all was going just fine. but for some reason, the filesystem was written > to some other planet or the installation aborted and restored all the > previous filesystem (there was no message to indicate that happened). I am, > what I consider, a very experienced computer systems analyst. Up until this > time, I have never seen this happen with any install before. I am sure that I > have done/overlooked some critical step that somehow bypassed the system > install and never made the machine into the FreeBSD box I wanted. > > Any ideas? Any further information I can provide to investigate this? Thank > you for your help and attention. > Very odd. If you run fdisk on Windows2000 do you not see a non-dos partition anywhere where perhaps FreeBSD was installed ? Did you remember to set your partition as bootable by FreeBSD when you selected to use all disk space ? You could always try using fdisk to delete any/all partitions first then install FreeBSD. Good luck. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: BIND9 on 4.10: couldn't open pid file: permission denied
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:29:23 +0100, Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > > > Shouldn't you be using the command named -g bind -u bind -t /var/named > > ? > > No, that's bind8. On bind9 '-u bind' sets user _and_ group. -g is > foreground to catch the output. > Oops my bad. The only other explanation I can think of then is that the path for the pid file may be specified incorrectly in your named.conf in relation to your chroot ? Good luck. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: BIND9 on 4.10: couldn't open pid file: permission denied
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:29:59 +0100, Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I had a working BIND9 running but needed to restart after updating the > zone file with the following command: > > # /usr/local/sbin/named -g -u bind -t /var/named -c /etc/named.conf > > But this failed: > Shouldn't you be using the command named -g bind -u bind -t /var/named ? Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make buildworld failed at suidperl
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:26:51 +0100, Matthias Teege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Moin, > > I try a cd /usr/src && make buildworld. > > It fails with: > > cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/suidperl/../../../../contrib/perl5 > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/suidperl -DIAMSUID-c sperl.c > Global symbol "$dir" requires explicit package name at > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/suidperl/lib/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm line 128. > BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/suidperl/lib/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm line 242. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 1. > *** Error code 255 Hi, Have you tried cvsuping from another source ? Otherwise.. I'm guessing that this is version 4.x of FreeBSD based on the fact it's using perl5. To bypass the building of perl in the base system you can add the following to /etc/make.conf NOPERL=true You can then build perl5.8 from ports afterwards and run use.perl ports. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Do you need to dismount /usr to dump it?
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 21:21:42 -0800, Matt Staroscik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If I boot to single-user mode (reboot, hit space, do boot -s) and dump /usr > to a file, I get read errors on a couple of blocks. > > Running fsck -y (also in single user of course) did not show a problem, but > it did not clear up the errors when I tried the dump again. > > I thought it was safe to dump /usr in single-user mode. Will I need to boot > off a CD or try another trick to get a clean dump of /usr? Or perhaps I am > not using the right fsck options? > > the dump command I used is: > dump 0af /someotherplace/filename.dump /usr > Try running the command: dump -0 -a -f /someplace/filedump /dev/ad0s1g (or whatever your /usr partition uses for /dev) I recall there also being a -L flag for live systems which you may want to try though I think it is only available in 5.x ? ...not to sure. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 5.3 amd64 release
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 19:12:24 -0800 (PST), ann kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > I tried the new release and have the problem > > - I can't use the secureCRT to connect the box > - I used the putty but suddenly timeout always > > how can I fix the both problems? > Sounds to me like you having a DNS problem. Try adding the hostname/ip of the machines connecting using secureCRT/putty to the servers /etc/hosts file. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ad0: WRITE command timeout...
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:55:30 +0100 (CET), Are Bryne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:10:42 +0100 (CET), Are Bryne > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > >> After upgrading a computer from FreeBSD 4.8-something to 4.10-RELEASE-p3, > >> I'm getting lots of the following: > >> > >> ad0: WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > >> ata0: resetting devices .. done > > The disk in question is a > FUJITSU MPC3043AT/6018 using ATA/ATAPI rev 3 according to atacontrol. > It is master on its controller and uses UDMA33 transfers, and has an idle > PIO4 cd-rom player as a slave. The cdrom drive may be forcing your hard drive to use a much slower UDMA. If I were you I would connect the cd-rom player on your secondary channel or at the very least disconnect it and see if your problem persists and you might even find you get better tranfer rates. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ad0: WRITE command timeout...
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:10:42 +0100 (CET), Are Bryne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > After upgrading a computer from FreeBSD 4.8-something to 4.10-RELEASE-p3, > I'm getting lots of the following: > > ad0: WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > ata0: resetting devices .. done > Hi, Seen this once before and in my case it was a faulty hard drive cable. Check to see whether your cable is not loose or incorrectly inserted and perhaps try a new one. It may also be caused by an incorrect DMA setting if memory serves me correct. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 5.3 and XFree86
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:32:07 -0500, Gerard Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just upgraded from 5.2.1 to 5.3. When running startx, it ends up with > this error -> > > Fatal server error: > xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O > Does /dev/io exist ? Have you got Xwrapper installed (/usr/ports/x11/wrapper) ? Only other cause for this is if your kern.securelevel is set above 1 A quick google would have given you several clues :) Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ipnat.rules
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:25:42 -0800 (PST), sonjaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > dear all > > after i finish add in my kernel ipnat , i use this > sample script : > /etc/ipnat.rules : > map rl0 172.18.5.11/255.255.0.0 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy > port ftp ftp/tcp ssh > map rl0 172.18.5.11/255.255.0.0 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap > tcp/udp auto > > in here my net : > > lan--NAT server---internet > > my question is : > > 1.how i must set ipnat.rules only some ip get nat > other can not user . > because if some pc station use the gateway my server > that pcstation get nat . > > may be like this : > lan(non-nat)-| > lan(nat)-|---NAT Server---INternet You need a rule with something like: map rl0 from $natnetwork ! to $pubnetwork -> $natserver > > 2. how i set the map rule in ipnat.rules , that lan do > not have righ to nat to directly to proxy . add a block rule for the proxy ip from lan but pass the nat server ? not quite sure what you want.. > > i'm so sory if my question is basic , because i new in > freebsd > thx > No problem even though it's more IP Filter than FreeBSD related. For further information see http://www.obfuscation.org/ipf/ipf-howto.html Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Upgrading 5.2.1 to 5.3R2
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 21:01:35 -0500, Gerard Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, so I upgraded, ran mergemaster, and merged /etc/group (and > /etc/master.passwd I think) via mergemaster. > I merged those files to retain my non root user account. > I rebooted, and I haven't been able to log into my non root account. > I tried to readd the account via adduser, but it says that the user > already exists. > So I tried rmuser, and it says that the user doesn't exist. > So I manually removed the account name from /etc/group, > /etc/master.passwd, /etc/passwd, > and tried to add the user, via adduser. > When it tries to add the user, it fails (dont remember the message right > now). > Anyone has any suggestions on how I can get the old user account back?? > N.B. I did back up /etc before mergemaster... > Thanks What is the result of pwd_mkdb -C /etc/master.passwd ? Perhaps copy your backup copy of master.passwd and then regenerate your passwd file via pwd_mkdb -p See pwd_mkdb(8) for more info Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Problem with mount_smbfs (not working for me)
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:41:24 +0100, Axel S. Gruner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > I run into a problem with "mount_smbfs". > Trying to mount a SMB-share on a AS/400 from a FreeBSD 4.10 or FreeBSD > 5.3-RC1 gives me the error: > > mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Connection reset by > peer > > Well, i dont like Mr. Peer, and, trying to reach the SMB-share via > "smbclient" works perfectly (but i need a mount on my FreeBSD-System, so > thats no choice). > > Also if i try to mount the SMB-share from a SuSE Linux Box (with mount > -t smbfs) it will work, as a result, i think the problem is not the > share, it must be "mount_smbfs". > > The syntax i tried was: > mount_smbfs -I 10.4.1.222 //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sfimages /mnt > also with the FQDN: > mount_smbfs -I suedzwo.suedfac.com //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sfimages /mnt > You have to use the netbios name of your samba server. Change 10.4.1.222 to the netbios name. mount_smbfs -I 10.4.1.222 //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sfimages /mnt or mount_smbfs -I suedzwo.suedfac.com //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sfimages /mnt Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Hostname
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:05:05 +0100, Mick Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 00:25, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 12:19:01AM +0100, Mick Walker wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I recently (today) upgraded to 5.3-STABLE. > > > I am wondering why I cant set my hostname. > > > It works if I issue the command hostname whatever.com, but on reboot it > > > is reset to nothing. > > > I have it set up in my /etc/rc.conf so it applies at boot time. > > > > > > Does anyone know how I can fix this? > > > > Show us what you've done first, don't describe what you think you did :-) > > > > Kris > > > $ hostname > > $ > $ hostname laptop.codegurus.org > $ hostname > laptop.codegurus.org > $ > > And in my /etc/rc.conf file I have: > hostname="laptop.codegurus.org" > Perhaps you have conflicting information in /etc/hosts ? Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade and pkgtools.conf
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:55:06 +0200, Uros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to update subversion from ports and I have > WITH parameters in my pkgtools.conf > > 'devel/subversion' => [ > 'WITHOUT_NEON=1', > 'WITH_APACHE2_APR=1', > 'WITH_BERKELEYDB=42' > ] > Hi, Not sure if above was a typo but you seem to be missing a , or two: 'devel/subversion' => [ 'WITHOUT_NEON=1', 'WITH_APACHE2_APR=1', 'WITH_BERKELEYDB=42', ], Regards, Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Apache2 + SSL
Sorry about the top posting but the person who replied to my question was rejected( black listed by combined.njabl.org ) by our server and I found his message below via the web archives. In reference to the below message. Putting instead of in my httpd.conf which Includes ssl.conf causes Apache to complain about all SSL type commands. eg. Syntax error on line 76 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/ssl.conf: Invalid command 'SSLPassPhraseDialog', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration Which leads me to think that perhaps the SSL portion of Apache2 is faulty ? httpd -S -DSSL returns the same thing as httpd -S and shows only the httpd.conf virtual hosts on port 80. Thanks. Nelis * Nelis Lamprecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1041 11:41]: > Hi, > > I've recently just installed apache-2.0.52_1 from ports on a new system. > I've taken an already working configuration from an older machine and > transferred it to the new server. No matter what I do I can't get SSL > working even though it shows up as being used. > > www 54695 0.0 0.4 14256 9024 ?? I12:25PM 0:00.00 > /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL > > It's as if anything I put between and > gets totally ignored. > > > Include etc/apache2/ssl.conf > Try Include etc/apache2/ssl.conf > httpd -S shows only the virtual hosts in httpd.conf and nothing from > ssl.conf httpd -S -DSSL ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Apache2 + SSL
Hi, I've recently just installed apache-2.0.52_1 from ports on a new system. I've taken an already working configuration from an older machine and transferred it to the new server. No matter what I do I can't get SSL working even though it shows up as being used. www 54695 0.0 0.4 14256 9024 ?? I12:25PM 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DSSL It's as if anything I put between and gets totally ignored. Include etc/apache2/ssl.conf The worst part is there is no logging of any sort to tell me otherwise and I've run out of ideas on how to debug this. I've even tried compiling in SSL statically but it didn't make any difference. I've used certificates already in use and created my own but Apache will still not listen on port 443( and nothing else is ) no matter what I do. I've tried various ssl configurations but they all seem to be ignored. Even httpd -S shows only the virtual hosts in httpd.conf and nothing from ssl.conf Has anybody got any other ideas on how to debug this problem ? How can I determine whether SSL is being used ? By the way, I've also installed openssl from ports and recompiled apache but still no luck. I've tried everything! ;) I think.. Thanks. Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Apaching binding to *:* ?? (Weirdness)
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 01:04, Bill Moran wrote: > I'm having some weird action from Apache. It seems that every apache process > binds to *:* twice, in addition to IP:80 and IP:443. Has anyone seen this > before? This is Apache 1.3.28 (although an upgrade is on the schedule) I > had _wanted_ to test the new version of Apache in the jail prior to upgrading, > but I'm not so sure that's going to work. > > Anyone seen this before? Are you not confusing local addresses to foreign ? Each local address will have a foreign address as far as I understand it. What is the output of sockstat -4l ? From sockstat(1) LOCAL ADDRESS For Internet sockets, this is the address the local end of the socket is bound to (see getsockname(2)). For bound UNIX sockets, it is the socket's filename. For other UNIX sockets, it is a right arrow followed by the endpoint's filename, or ``??'' if the endpoint could not be determined. FOREIGN ADDRESS (Internet sockets only) The address the foreign end of the socket is bound to (see getpeername(2)). -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Best way to limit SSH to LAN IP's only ?
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 14:20, Graham Bentley wrote: > Hi All, > > Wondered what is the best way to do this ? > > Do I have to get involved with host.allow / deny > or better to use the sshd config ? > If this system has 2 interfaces, one LAN and one Internet then all you need to do is configure sshd to listen on the LAN interface. in sshd_config: ListenAddress your.lan.interface.ip Regards, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: SSH Client - OpenSSH dependency problem
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 08:26, Bryce wrote: > Dependency warning: used OpenSSL version contains > known vulnerabilities > Please update or define either WITH_OPENSSL_BASE or > WITH_OPENSSL_PORT > > Can anyone throw some light on how to fix this? > As already mentioned you can just use the base system ssh. If however you want to upgrade it to a newer version ( advisable if this machine is accessible to the public ) then you will have to do as the above says. By default the base system contains openssl in /usr/bin and the openssl port installs to /usr/local/bin. This is why you're given the option WITH_OPENSSL_BASE, meaning /usr/bin/openssl or WITH_OPENSSL_PORT, meaning /usr/local/bin/openssl. Basically it's saying, if you already have an updated version in base or ports then tell me where it is. The above is also applicable to openssh. To prevent yourself from getting confused you could always do the following to both openssl and openssh after installing/upgrading them from ports: cd /usr/bin; mv openssl openssl.base; ln -s /usr/local/bin/openssl openssl ..and the same with ssh which will make sure you always use the latest version. By default your $PATH is set to use the base version. If you are going to use the ports then you may also want to ensure the following are defined in /etc/make.conf NO_OPENSSH= true NO_OPENSSL= true Regards, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: How to send attached files on sendmail with mail tool?
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 08:07, Murray Taylor wrote:
> This works with winblows - I use it in production here
>
> cat file | uuencode tgt_filname | mail -s "subject" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ^ ^
> | +--- attachment FILENAME for the target host to
> use
> +--- attachment CONTENT from the source host
>
May I suggest an alternative - /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-Sender
Install this perl module and then you can easily write a simple script
to handle your attachments. Something like the following:
#!/usr/local/bin/perl -w
use Mail::Sender;
$to = $ARGV [0];
$replyto = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
$subject = $ARGV [1];
$file= $ARGV [2];
$mesg= $ARGV [3];
$from= "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
if (! $file )
{
PrintUsage();
die "\n";
}
else
{
$sender = new Mail::Sender
{smtp => 'your.smtp.server.ip', from => $from};
$sender->MailFile({ to => $to,
replyto => $replyto,
subject => $subject,
msg => $mesg,
file=> $file});
print "The file $file has been sent to $to\n";
};
sub PrintUsage
{
print "Usage: mailfile.pl";
};
Not tested but should work, just alter to suit your needs.
Regards,
--
Nelis Lamprecht
PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc
"Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Random Freeze
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 15:41, Cedric GROSS wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running an AMD Duron 700 Box with freeBSD 5.2.1 - RELEASE, and > sometimes the system freeze so I must reboot. I haven't anything in log. > So, What could be the problem ? > How could I obtain some clue of the problem (debug flag, something like > that..) ? > Hi, Are you using any sort of traffic shaping( dummynet ) with ipfw ? Had a similar problem and solved it by setting the timer granularity ( options HZ=1000 ) in the kernel which is strongly recommended. The machine also gave me no clue as to why it froze. Checking your memory as already suggested is also a good idea. You can use the memory test located in /usr/ports/sysutils/memtest86 which is a great tool. You might also want to upgrade to the latest source for that particular RELEASE as bugs are constantly found and corrected. Regards, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Re[2]: How to configure PHP build?
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 15:37, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > Tuesday, July 20, 2004, 3:36:53 PM, you wrote: > > > On Tuesday 20 July 2004 08:17 am, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > >> Hi, > >> after the last PHP commits, I can't seem to be able to configure my > >> PHP builds anymore. It keeps on telling me > >> ===> Found saved configuration for mod_php4-4.3.8_1,1 > >> and subsequently starts to build right away. > >> > >> Is there any way to get it to behave like in the past, specifically > >> asking me what libs it should compile in? > >> > >> Any help would be greatly appreciated. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Gabriel > > > Have you executed "make clean"? > > More than once. And also make distclean. > > Here's what happens: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15:36:28 /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 # make clean > ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.2 > ===> Cleaning for bison-1.75_2 > ===> Cleaning for gettext-0.13.1_1 > ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.3.5_2 > ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.5.6_1 > ===> Cleaning for m4-1.4.1 > ===> Cleaning for perl-5.6.1_15 > ===> Cleaning for rc_subr-1.29 > ===> Cleaning for expat-1.95.7 > ===> Cleaning for apache-1.3.31_2 > ===> Cleaning for mod_php4-4.3.8_1,1 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15:36:41 /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 # make > ===> Vulnerability check disabled > ===> Found saved configuration for mod_php4-4.3.8_1,1 > ===> Extracting for mod_php4-4.3.8_1,1 > >> Checksum OK for php-4.3.8.tar.bz2. > ===> Patching for mod_php4-4.3.8_1,1 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for mod_php4-4.3.8_1,1 > ===> mod_php4-4.3.8_1,1 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/apxs - found > ===> mod_php4-4.3.8_1,1 depends on executable: bison - found > ===> Configuring for mod_php4-4.3.8_1,1 > Try doing a 'make reinstall' Failing which you could also try build php from /usr/ports/lang/php4. Use the WITH_APACHE2 argument if you are using Apache2 or add it to /etc/make.conf WITH_APACHE2= yes Regards, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Routing issue
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 11:12, Web Walrus (Robert Wall) wrote: > I just installed a secondary internet connection at my office, and I'm > having a bizarre issue... > > I have a network card - dc0 > > That network card has a config roughly like > > ifconfig_dc0 inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.248 > ifconfig_dc0_alias0 inet 2.3.4.5 netmask 255.255.255.248 > defaultrouter="1.2.3.1" > Read this page regarding adding aliases: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-virtual-hosts.html You need to change your netmask for the alias to 255.255.255.255 if it's on the same network. Regards, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: changed hostname, what else shoud I change ?
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 12:22, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > % startx > xauth: (argv):1: bad display name "old_host_name.tld.ro:0" in "list" com > mand > Using authority file /home/itetcu/.Xauthority > xauth: (stdin):1: bad display name "old_host_name.tld.ro:0" in "add" com > mand Hi! What happens when you remove the file .Xauthority ? You need to change the hostname in both /etc/hosts and /etc/rc.conf Regards, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: XFree86 configure question
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 08:05, LW Ellis wrote: > Having some difficulty setting up the XFree86 Server. > I did like it said in the handbook, but when I > ee XF86Config.new, I get a blank file. > If I use the configure tool in the sysinstall, it fails to save the file. > I am logged on as 'root' The first thing I would do before trying to configure your XFree86 Server is to find out exactly what Video card( Part 2 ) you are using. You can do this usually by going through your system message buffer from kernel startup. Edit the file /var/run/dmesg.boot and look for information which would indicate your VGA chipset, it usually starts with pci0: In some cases where your Video card is not recognised by the kernel you may need to identify the chipset in another way. Try opening the computer and looking at the chipset on the video card itself. Once you have this information you can then run the command xf86config from the command line, it is usually located in /usr/X11R6/bin. If you lucky your card will be automatically detected otherwise you will manually have to put in the options. After running through the configuration check the XF86Config file it creates and adjust if necessary to your liking. Also, take a look at the FAQ's regarding the X Window System which can be found at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/x.html Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Modem configuration
On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 06:34, miguel calvo wrote: >Hi: > >I have installed FreeBSD 5.2 in my notebook (Compaq Evo N800v). > >The modem is a Agere Win Modem. It is possible that it can configure >and use the modem to create a dial up Internet connection? > Hi! No, unfortunately FreeBSD does not support winmodems as their functionality is generally implemented via software drivers only available for Windows. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/laptop/x52.html Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: gnome problems
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 09:40, n3rdBoy . wrote: > When I am logged in as root X11 and gnome start fine when I type > 'startx', when I am logged in as a normal user I type 'startx' and only X11 > starts. I have followed the instructions in the handbook and modified > /root/.xsession. any help or direction to other resources would be great. > Hi! Just copy your .xsession file for root into the home folder of the user you want to use Gnome for or use gdm. Having said that there is a lot of information regarding updating Gnome which you can find at http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/. It would be wise of you to check the FAQ's at this site for important information. The Gnome mailing list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] where all questions regarding Gnome on FreeBSD should be posted. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: 4.10 Release & Exim 4.32
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 09:17, Lonnie Santella wrote: > I need to add some build-time settings beyond the defaults in order to run > Exim on my system. I'm thinking that I'm making a fundemental mistake here, > but I can't figure out what it is. > Hi! Generally, all build-time settings are done from the command line in the ports directory. It's wise to first check the Makefile in the ports directory to see a list of options you can build with that particular port. For example, to build Exim with the Cyrus SASL authentication daemon one would issue the command: make WITH_SASLAUTHD=yes install or make -DWITH_SASLAUTHD You can naturally add as many options one after the other. The Makefile already contains a bunch of default settings which you can enable or disable but you shouldn't make these changes to the actual Makefile as this will just be overwritten on your next ports update. You may also wish to make a note of all your build-time settings and add them to /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf so the next time you update Exim the same settings will be used. The pkgtools.conf file is the configuration file that comes with portupgrade ( /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade ) Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: ipnat and ipfw dummynet
Sorry, I failed to point out my current network configuration. I have 2 internal networks which use NAT, one class C ( 192.96.48.0/24 ) and one rfc1918 ( 192.168.1.0/24 ). The internal interface(bge1) is configured with the class c network and I have added a route to bge1 for 192.168.1.0/24. All traffic on the 192.96.48.0/24 network internally is routed via the gateway to get to the 192.168.1.0 network. Hope that makes sense. Nelis On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 14:43, Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > Hi, > > I'm interested to hear how people utilise dummynet in a NAT environment. > How does one create a pipe for a NAT network without effecting the > actual LAN speed ? For example, on the gateway: > > $fwcmd add pipe 1 ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any out > $fwcmd add pipe 2 ip from any to 192.168.1.0/24 in > $fwcmd pipe 1 config bw 128Kbit/s > $fwcmd pipe 2 config bw 128Kbit/s > > The above example would be fine if 192.168.1.0/24 were only talking to > the internet but unfortunately it also effects the machines from talking > to each other internally. The only interface you can specify is the > internal interface(bge1) because this is the only time that ipfw will > see the addresses before they are passed to NAT(ipnat) and will not be > seen on the external interface(bge0). So basically the above example > should be written as: > > $fwcmd add pipe 1 ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any out via bge1 > $fwcmd add pipe 2 ip from any to 192.168.1.0/24 in via bge1 > > This however will also give 192.168.1.0/24 an internal LAN speed of > 128Kbit/s which is to say quite humorous ;-) > > What is the solution to this ? ..I'm obviously missing something. The > internal interface is not firewalled. > > > Many thanks, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ipnat and ipfw dummynet
Hi, I'm interested to hear how people utilise dummynet in a NAT environment. How does one create a pipe for a NAT network without effecting the actual LAN speed ? For example, on the gateway: $fwcmd add pipe 1 ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any out $fwcmd add pipe 2 ip from any to 192.168.1.0/24 in $fwcmd pipe 1 config bw 128Kbit/s $fwcmd pipe 2 config bw 128Kbit/s The above example would be fine if 192.168.1.0/24 were only talking to the internet but unfortunately it also effects the machines from talking to each other internally. The only interface you can specify is the internal interface(bge1) because this is the only time that ipfw will see the addresses before they are passed to NAT(ipnat) and will not be seen on the external interface(bge0). So basically the above example should be written as: $fwcmd add pipe 1 ip from 192.168.1.0/24 to any out via bge1 $fwcmd add pipe 2 ip from any to 192.168.1.0/24 in via bge1 This however will also give 192.168.1.0/24 an internal LAN speed of 128Kbit/s which is to say quite humorous ;-) What is the solution to this ? ..I'm obviously missing something. The internal interface is not firewalled. Many thanks, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Periodic configuration
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 10:45, Edd wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to cut down on the amount of mail I recieve in my root > mailbox. I kno this could be done by turning off the periodic tasks. I > am happy to tuen off the status daily, but would still like to recieve > the security mail ONLY when something is out of the norm. I have looked > at making a periodic.conf, but dont really know how to go about this. > Can anyone help? Hi! Copy the periodic.conf file from your /etc/defaults directory to /etc and then edit to your liking. You can also turn off the default to mail the output and have it log to a file instead. eg. daily_output="/var/log/daily.log" Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Repeated connections to port 25 with firewall
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 14:27, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > : When local processes want to mail, they fork n exec a sendmail binary > : themselves. > : > : You shouldn't need a sendmail server running for that. > > Here is what I have/had in rc.conf > > #sendmail_enable="no" > #sendmail_submit_enable="no" > #sendmail_outbound_enable="no" > #sendmail_msp_queue_enable="no" > > And as soon as I restarted after commenting out these lines, root's mailbox > got filled with megs of mail from cron. I want the minimum I need to get > system mail without leaving an instance of sendmail vulnerable to attack or > eating up resources. > You can replace all of the above with sendmail_enable="NONE" Not sure if it has already been pointed out to you but you can change the behaviour of periodic jobs on your system. By default all the jobs are mailed to root but you can have those jobs logged to a file instead. Simply copy the periodic.conf file from /etc/defaults to /etc and change it to your liking eg. instead of having daily_output="root" which sends a mail to root you can have it log to a file daily_output="/var/log/daily.log" Same apply's for weekly and monthly jobs. Personally I find it annoying when it sends out a mail for each job so I change it to log to a file instead which I can check periodically ( excuse the pun ;) As a side note if you don't want your cron jobs to output anything add a > /dev/null 2>&1 at the end of them. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: Help with a routing issue
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 12:28, Leon Botes wrote: > The below is only sections of the output. Most of the individual hosts have > been removed. Just a few examples left. > 10.5/16192.168.254.29 UGSc0 11 fxp1 > 10.6/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.7/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.8/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.9/16192.168.254.27 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.11/16 192.168.254.28 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.12/16 192.168.254.33 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.13/16 192.168.254.34 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.14/16 192.168.252.23 UGSc00 fxp1 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 2214lo0 > 192.168.0 192.168.254.23 UGSc00 fxp1 > 192.168.2 192.168.254.24 UGSc00 fxp1 > 192.168.7 192.168.254.31 UGSc00 fxp1 > 192.168.60 192.168.254.22 UGSc00 fxp1 > 192.168.252192.168.254.12 UGSc8 161 fxp1 > 192.168.253192.168.254.12 UGSc 13 212 fxp1 > 192.168.254link#2 UC 340 fxp1 > 192.168.254.1 00:20:ed:11:00:e9 UHLW2 1425lo0 > 192.168.254.22 00:02:6f:32:27:6b UHLW1 1032 fxp1116 > 192.168.254.23 00:50:bf:97:e4:9d UHLW1 2292 fxp1777 > 192.168.254.24 00:50:bf:43:2c:16 UHLW3 3476 fxp1421 > 192.168.254.25 00:a0:cc:db:03:75 UHLW1 836 fxp1 1117 > 192.168.254.27 00:02:6f:07:86:5b UHLW1 224 fxp1878 > 192.168.254.28 link#2 UHLW10 fxp1 > 192.168.254.29 00:02:6f:07:86:57 UHLW1 139 fxp1924 > 192.168.254.30 00:02:6f:07:86:6a UHLW0 779 fxp1741 > 192.168.254.31 00:02:6f:08:9f:a6 UHLW1 161 fxp1936 > 192.168.254.32 00:02:6f:04:7a:1e UHLW0 165 fxp1 59 > 192.168.254.33 link#2 UHLW1 92 fxp1 > 192.168.255192.168.254.21 UGSc337107 fxp1 > 196.25.37.16/29link#1 UC 40 fxp0 > 196.25.37.17 00:e0:fc:0c:be:d9 UHLW 29 230 fxp0790 > 196.25.37.18 00:20:ed:11:00:e8 UHLW1 2127lo0 > 196.25.37.19 00:20:ed:11:00:e8 UHLW1 370lo0 => > 196.25.37.19/32link#1 UC 10 fxp0 > 196.25.37.20 00:0c:f1:ae:c6:99 UHLW144305 fxp0908 > 196.25.37.22 00:09:5b:3f:2f:63 UHLW111942 fxp0910 Can't see any peculiarities. Try adding the following route on the client machine: route add -host 196.25.37.18 192.168.254.1 255.255.255.255 See if that helps. -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Help with a routing issue
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 10:55, Leon Botes wrote: > I have a freebsd 4.7 box at a client. > The box has an ip of 192.168.254.22 > The default gateway is 192.168.254.1 which is the inside interface of the > gateway. The outside interface of the gateway is 196.25.37.18 and it also > has an alias of 196.25.37.19. Can you show us the routing on the server please rather than the client ? What is the subnet mask of the alias 196.25.37.19 ? It should have a subnet of 255.255.255.255 as it's on the same network as 196.25.37.18. Your /etc/rc.conf file should look something like this: ifconfig_rl0="inet 196.25.37.18 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_rl0_alias0="inet 196.25.37.19 netmask 255.255.255.255" Your subnet in the above example may differ according to what block your ISP has provided you. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: portupgrade configuration
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 00:50, Robin Becker wrote: > Is there a way to list all of my exceptional port settings? Can I make > these available to portupgrade automatically somehow? portupgrade port settings can be set in the /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf file. See MAKE_ARGS in this file. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: named in sandbox
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 13:16, Matthew Seaman wrote: > However, remember that's written netbsd-centrically, and you'll have > to adapt the instructions for use under FreeBSD -- use ports instead > of pkgsrc, and you'll need to investigate what to do to make devfs(8) > create the requited device nodes under the chroot, rather than using > mknod. > You can simply symlink the device nodes: guardian# ls -la /var/chroot/named/dev/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 bind bind 512 Mar 3 11:21 . drwx-- 5 bind bind 512 Mar 3 11:18 .. lrwxr-xr-x 1 root bind9 Mar 3 11:21 null -> /dev/null lrwxr-xr-x 1 root bind 11 Mar 3 11:21 random -> /dev/random lrwxr-xr-x 1 root bind9 Mar 3 11:21 zero -> /dev/zero Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Why has cvsup quit working for me?
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 04:10, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > I don't get it. It was working last week. Here's what I get now: > > root:~# cvsup /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile > Cannot get IP address of my own host -- is its hostname correct? > root:~# > Try typing "hostname" from the command line. Then make sure that the returned name has an ip address associated with it in /etc/hosts Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Special Keys in less
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 09:27, Volker Lieder wrote: > Hello, > i have a Freebsd 4.9 installed and have the following wish/problem. > I want to use the Pos1 and End-Keys in less. > For Pos1 the beginning of the file should be shown and for "End" the end. > Has anybody an idea how to configure less so that this could work? > > Volker Hi, I'm not sure what you mean by Pos1 key ? On my machine from both console and gnome-terminal I can use the "Home" and "End" key to get to the beginning and end of the file using versions 358 and 371 of less. It works on both FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x in my case. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: racoon and openssl
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 15:42, xavier collot wrote: > Hi!! > > I want use openssl but I don't find the directory where I can create my > authority of certification (in this directory we can find scripts to > allow the automation of the command of openssl). I have read that it is > in /usr/local/openssl/misc but I haven't this directory (I have freebsd > 5.2). If you install openssl via ports ( /usr/ports/security/openssl/ ) you will get the directory as described above. Remember to exclude openssl from /etc/make.conf ( NO_OPENSSL=true ) if you decide to use the port. > > Moreover I have an other problem: I can't install racoon. > When I want to make the installation there is an "error 1". > You will have to be more specific here and provide us with a little more information. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: ipmon logs to messages AND security
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 14:11, JJB wrote: > Your solution of not using the syslog function does not answer his > question. This is bad advice. Quoted "Can you think of anything else that i might do?" and answered: > Rather use: > > ipmon_flags="-Dn /var/log/security" > This is not bad advice, I was offering a solution to his problem. -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Disk full / NFS, df, and du
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 05:04, Eric Anderson wrote: > The problem I'm having is, after they do the rm's, it doesn't free the > disk space. df shows it still being used, but du claims their > directories are empty. Please see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#DU-VS-DF ..regarding this. Maybe a kill -HUP nfsd might help ? Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: ipmon logs to messages AND security
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 13:53, Gareth Bailey wrote: > Hi there, thanks for the sample rules and help in setting > up IPF. > > I have restarted since making the changes to syslogd.conf. > I HUP'd syslogd anyway, still no luck. All ipf logs go to > security and messages! > > Can you think of anything else that i might do? > Rather use: ipmon_flags="-Dn /var/log/security" Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Samba slow to start on bootup
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 11:56, Gareth Bailey wrote: > I stopped samba using samba.sh stop, then started it again > with samba.sh start. You are correct as far as the output > goes, only "Samba" is written to console. But Samba took 30 > - 40 seconds to load! It seems Samba is actually causing > the pause. > > Why would this be? > > Thanks > Gareth Try running smbd in debug mode smbd -F -S -d3 and see if anything stands out. Perhaps a server you have specified in your configuration file is unavailable or not responding. Do the same for nmbd. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Samba slow to start on bootup
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 10:48, Gareth Bailey wrote: > Hi there, > > Recently, Samba has started to take about 30secs to start > on system boot. Output to console says: > ... > SambaStarting > ... > The 30 (or more) second break takes place between the > "Samba" and "Starting" output. What could this be?, it > never used to take so long. > > I have recently upgraded to version samba-2.2.8a_2 on my > 5.2 Release server. Is it possible that something else is > causing the pause? There aren't any error messages. Hi, I doubt it is samba that is the cause of your problem. The reason I say this is because you mention the 30 sec break between Samba and Starting and the latest Samba script doesn't echo Starting. You should be able to tell by running the script manually. /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba.sh stop/start I suggest you look at what loads after Samba. Check the above directory. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: ICQ question
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 10:59, Stephen Liu wrote: > Hi folks, > > FreeBSD 5.2 > > Has any folk run 'Kxicq' on FreeBSD before. Can I > talk to my friend if he runs MSN on Windows? If NO > kindly advise what will be the solution. > you may want to try Gaim http://gaim.sourceforge.net/ for MSN support and others. /usr/ports/net/gaim Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: bge0 Watchdog timeout
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 13:52, Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hi > > I've recently installed a 5.2.1 on a HP box that use a Broadcom BCM570x > gigabit ethernet controller chips > > When booting up the machine I have the following error message > to the console > > bge0 Watchdog timeout I know the BCM5704 had a problem with it's mbuf space, see http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/net/2003-08/0096.html but this has since been fixed. I'm curious as to which version you have ? guardian# grep bge /var/run/dmesg.boot bge0: mem 0xf5fe-0xf5fe irq 28 at device 4.0 on pci0 bge0: Ethernet address: 00:0b:cd:cc:79:d5 miibus0: on bge0 bge1: mem 0xf7ff-0xf7ff irq 22 at device 1.0 on pci5 bge1: Ethernet address: 00:08:02:91:3a:fd miibus1: on bge1 Mine are all working fine on 5.2.1 Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Mozilla -- No running window.
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 12:59, Malcolm Kay wrote: > Today I installed FreeBSD4.9 from an ISO release > recorded on a CD; together with X windows (4.3). > > I've set ctwm as my windows manager via ports. And all appears > to be working well. > > I installed mozilla-gtk2-1.4 from the packages on the > distribution disk. This appeared to proceed OK. But when I attempt > to run mozilla from an xterm: > QuoVadis:> mozilla Last I checked mozilla-gtk2 uses it's own startup script /usr/X11R6/bin/mozilla-gtk2 which points it's lib path to /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla-gtk2 instead of the usual /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla Try starting it with QuoVadis:>mozilla-gtk2 about:blank Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: changing root password
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 12:37, Richard P. Williamson wrote: > The behavior I'm seeing is that the /original/ /etc/ password > files and databases are updated, and not the [/mnt]/etc/ password > files. if you have access to mount_null then _maybe_ you can mount_null /mnt/etc /original/etc and then try change passwd ? Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: opie
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 12:06, Albert Shih wrote: > But how can I do that if i want do a make buildworld and run regulary a > cvsup for /usr/src. > Not sure I understand you but once you build the binary/s it's not going to be overwritten by a buildworld as it's not part of the base system, at least not since I last checked. Any new versions that come out of your cvsup then you just simply rebuild the binaries from the source directory overwriting your currently installed version. You can also do a "make uninstall" if you encounter any problems. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: opie
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 11:33, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi > > How can I enable opie telnetd in my FreeBSD telnetd ? > > I've put only > > deny my_ip_class > deny 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 > > in the /etc/opieaccess > > but I always can login into whitout any opie key. did you configure opie to use a access list ( not used by default ) ? sh configure --enable-access-file=/etc/opieaccess from /usr/src/contrib/opie; read the INSTALL file for further info. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: phpmyadmin - users not seeing specific database
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 10:21, Noah wrote: > I was assuming with the > multiuser functionality that users could only view databases for which they > have granted access to. is there something else i need to configure here? Correct but you obviously have to setup each users permissions correctly. Login as root and verify that your users do not have any "Global Privileges" set and only privileges for the databases you have specified. My guess is they all have at least the "Select" privilege. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Upgrading Perl within 5.2
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 17:05, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> I'm sure this is a silly question, but. I know about use.perl and
> so forth for the 4.x series.
>
> Yesterday I installed FreeBSD 5.2.1, and the active Perl port
> is /usr/ports/lang/perl, which is v. 5.6.1. I'd like to upgrade
> to 5.8.2, which is in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 and thus I can't
> just do "portupgrade perl".
>
> Exactly what do I have to do to accomplish this? "portinstall
> perl5.8" doesn't work ("No such installed package nor such port..."),
> nor does "portinstall perl-5.8.2_2" (which is said to be the
> package name in the README file). The PORTNAME given in the 5.8
> Makefile is just "perl".
>
> I assume I could just do a make install from the perl5.8
> directory, but how do I do it with portupgrade? And then how
> do I get rid of the 5.6 version and rebuild things with 5.8?
Correct. Just run a make install from perl5.8 directory and it will
install it to a new location without interfering with the "base" install
of perl. Is it really necessary to upgrade ? There is nothing in ports
that I know of that will not work with perl5.6
There is no need to remove the 5.6 version. The installation will add
some information to your /etc/make.conf as well as make other changes
when you run use.perl port which will tell any future installations that
require perl which version to use. If you have to remove perl then cd
into /usr/local/lib/perl5 and remove the 5.6 directory as well as the
one under site_perl but not recommended.
Cheers,
--
Nelis Lamprecht
PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc
"Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: Apache dies for the second night in a row at the same time.
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 10:46, Kevin Greenidge wrote: > I was running Perl 5.8.0 before the upgrade. I think I will try to > install Cwd.pm from CPAN since I don't think I can downgrade Perl > easily. Or you could just symlink your older version to the newer. ln -s /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.2 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0 and ln -s /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0 If you haven't got that many programs/modules that rely on perl then you would be better off just re-installing those programs. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne Pascoe > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 2:29 AM > To: Kevin Greenidge > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Apache dies for the second night in a row at the same time. > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:47:37AM -0600, Kevin Greenidge wrote: > > > System: FreeBSD 4.9 > > Current Perl Version: 5.8.2 > > What was your version of perl before the port upgrade ? You might just > be better off going back to whatever it was > > > Can't locate Cwd.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/mach > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/mach > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0 .) at (eval 2) line 1. > > Try installing Cwd from CPAN. Then do a perl -c on whatever script is > running from cron at this time and find out what other modules it > requires. > > HTH. -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Apache2 crashing
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 08:05, Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > Hi, > > After upgrading to Apache 2.0.49 and PHP4.3.5_7, Apache now crashes > every time I do a graceful restart or if I send it a kill 1. I first > noticed this last night after the upgrade during log rotation when I got > this error message: > > [Thu Apr 01 00:00:20 2004] [notice] seg fault or similar nasty error detected in the > parent process > > My guess is this is a PHP bug or a really bad April fools joke ;-) > Anybody else have the same problem ? Damn, I was hoping I was wrong. Apparently the fix is in cvs and hopefully we can get this port updated. http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=27810 Regards, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Apache2 crashing
Hi, After upgrading to Apache 2.0.49 and PHP4.3.5_7, Apache now crashes every time I do a graceful restart or if I send it a kill 1. I first noticed this last night after the upgrade during log rotation when I got this error message: [Thu Apr 01 00:00:20 2004] [notice] seg fault or similar nasty error detected in the parent process My guess is this is a PHP bug or a really bad April fools joke ;-) Anybody else have the same problem ? Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: How To Upgrade to Perl 5.8 on 4.9 System?
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 03:41, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Drew Tomlinson wrote: > > I'm using 4.9-RELEASE. Is is possible to upgrade Perl from the default > > 5.005 version to 5.8.2? > > Yes. > > > Are there any steps required beyond installing the port? > > Try: > > cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 > make install > use.perl port Be warned. After you have upgraded perl you will be required to re-install any programs/modules that depend on it eg. Apache You will receive a location error pointing to your previous perl version if you don't. Regards, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Slow transfer speeds with U320 drives and HP Smart Array 641
Hi, I posted this to freebsd-hardware but haven't received a response so thought I'd try this list. Please excuse the cross-posting. With the ciss driver on my HP ProLiant ML350 I've noticed the transfer speed on my RAID controller is only 135.168MB/s. da0 at ciss0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 135.168MB/s transfers da0: 69459MB (142253280 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 17433C) Both my drives on the RAID controller are U320 72GB pluggable SCSI's. The RAID card has the optional 64MB battery backed cache enabler installed. I also have a AIC 50/100 Tape Drive in the machine which is connected to the onboard SCSI interface. ahc0: aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs ahc1: aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs sa0 at ahc1 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device sa0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 7, 16bit) My question is why the slow transfer speed of the RAID controller ? Does this have anything to do with the slower SCSI Tape Drive/U160 channels or is this a limitation of the ciss driver ? The U320 drives are not in any way connected to the slower drive so it shouldn't effect the speed or should it ? Hopefully someone here has a similar system and can offer me some insight. Thanks for your reply. Kind Regards, Nelis ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
using ipfw and ipf/ipnat together
Hi, I would like to make use of ipfw/dummynet traffic shaper and use it together with ipnat/ipf's filtering. Hope this is possible ? This is a personal preference so no need to tell me why I should just use ipfw etc. Can someone suggest what I would or would not need to use in my rc.conf and kernel please. I have selected the following ( FreeBSD 5.2R ): rc.conf: ipfilter_enable="YES" ipfilter_program="/sbin/ipf" ipfilter_rules="/etc/ipf.rules" ipfilter_flags="" ipnat_enable="YES" ipnat_program="/sbin/ipnat" ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules" ipmon_enable="YES" ipmon_program="/sbin/ipmon" ipmon_flags="-Dsvn" ipnat_enable="YES" kernel config: options IPFILTER#ipfilter support options IPFILTER_LOG#ipfilter logging options PFIL_HOOKS #required by IPFILTER options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK #block all packets by default options IPFIREWALL #firewall options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT#allow everything by default options DUMMYNET#bandwidth limiter options IPSTEALTH #support for stealth forwarding Seeing as though I'm not using ipfw filtering I thought I could just allow everything through by default. Will dummynet still work if IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT is set ? Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks. -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE make.conf variables in 5.x ?
Hi, In 4.x you can use variables such as MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE to add in your local mirrors for the distribution files. Where in 5.x do you put these ? I copied my usual make.conf settings across to a 5.x machine and it doesn't seem to be working. Thanks. -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
disabling nfs in 5.2R-p2 ?
Hi, Out of curiosity how do you disable local NFS asynchronous I/O server/s in 5.2 ? I thought a simple.. nfs_server_enable="NO" nfs_client_enable="NO" in rc.conf would disable it completely but after rebooting I still see: guardian# ps -aux | grep nfs root 97 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? IL3:39PM 0:00.00 (nfsiod 0) root 98 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? IL3:39PM 0:00.00 (nfsiod 1) root 99 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? IL3:39PM 0:00.00 (nfsiod 2) root100 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? IL3:39PM 0:00.00 (nfsiod 3) thanks. -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: builworld failure after cvsup on 4.9
To follow up on my original posting:
Buildworld appears to fail with the below error when one of the
following is omitted from the base system:
NO_BIND=true# do not build BIND
NO_OPENSSH= true# do not build OpenSSH
NO_OPENSSL= true# do not build OpenSSL (implies NO_OPENSSH)
NO_SENDMAIL=true# do not build sendmail and related programs
NOGAMES=true# do not build games (games/ subdir)
Unfortunately I do not have the time to go through each to find out
which is the cause of the problem, all I can say is when I commented out
all so everything was included buildworld was successful.
Regard,
Nelis
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 11:12, Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am busy setting up a new dual HP server ( ML350 Xeon 2.8ghz ) and have
> cvsup the latest source and compiling just the basic options to get SMP
> working so I can continue my work. Make buildworld is failing with the
> following error which makes no sense to me. ( using FreeBSD 4.9 -
> RELENG_4 )
>
> ===> usr.bin
> "/usr/src/share/mk/bsd.subdir.mk", line 60: Inconsistent operator for
> ftp
> make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src.
>
> The line/s in question:
>
> ${SUBDIR}::
> @if test -d ${.TARGET}.${MACHINE_ARCH}; then \
> cd ${.CURDIR}/${.TARGET}.${MACHINE_ARCH}; \
> else \
> cd ${.CURDIR}/${.TARGET}; \
> fi; \
> ${MAKE} all
>
>
> Any idea's ?
>
> Below is my kernel config:
>
> machine i386
> cpu I686_CPU
> ident GUARDIAN
> maxusers0
>
>
> options INET#InterNETworking
> options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem
> options FFS_ROOT#FFS usable as root device [keep
> this!]
> options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support
> options UFS_DIRHASH #Improve performance on big
> directories
> options MFS #Memory Filesystem
> options MD_ROOT #MD is a potential root device
> options NFS #Network Filesystem
> options NFS_ROOT#NFS usable as root device, NFS
> required
> options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem
> options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem
> options CD9660_ROOT #CD-ROM usable as root, CD9660
> required
> options PROCFS #Process filesystem
> options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP
> THIS!]
> options SCSI_DELAY=5000 #Delay (in ms) before probing
> SCSI
> options UCONSOLE#Allow users to grab the console
> options USER_LDT#allow user-level control of
> i386 ldt
> options USERCONFIG #boot -c editor
> options VISUAL_USERCONFIG #visual boot -c editor
> options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support
> options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory
> options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues
> options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores
> options P1003_1B#Posix P1003_1B real-time
> extensions
> options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
> options ICMP_BANDLIM#Rate limit bad replies
> options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV# install a CDEV entry in /dev
> options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT# Print register bitfields in
> debug
>
> # Firewall support.
> #options IPFILTER
> #options IPFILTER_LOG
> #options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK
>
> # To make an SMP kernel, the next two are needed
> options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor
> Kernel
> options APIC_IO # Symmetric (APIC) I/O
>
> device isa
> device pci
>
> # Floppy drives
> device fdc0at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2
> device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0
> device fd1 at fdc0 drive 1
>
> # ATA and ATAPI devices
> device ata
> device atadisk # ATA disk drives
> device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives
> device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives
> device atapist # ATAPI tape drives
> options ATA_STATIC_ID
Re: builworld failure after cvsup on 4.9
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 14:45, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Monday 09 February 2004 01:12 am, Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am busy setting up a new dual HP server ( ML350 Xeon 2.8ghz ) and > > have cvsup the latest source and compiling just the basic options to > > get SMP working so I can continue my work. Make buildworld is failing > > with the following error which makes no sense to me. ( using FreeBSD > > 4.9 - RELENG_4 ) > > Are you using one of the versions of bash for your shell? Someone had a > problem like that before and people running csh didn't. I use bash ( bash-2.05b.007 off the cd ) as a user, csh for root. Still busy downloading src from a local mirror after which I'll do a quick cvsup from the main freebsd server, hopefully I'll have no more problems. Nelis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: builworld failure after cvsup on 4.9
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 13:32, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Please post your supfile; it's possible you have updated to the wrong > version. I'm using *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 as mentioned. I have several servers using the same but I suspect the src distribution on the disk to be at fault and am now downloading the entire set. I first tried removing the src and then re-installing from the cd, then I upgraded it ( tried 2 diff cvsup mirrors )which gave me the same error. I'll post my result after cvsup of the entire src. thanks, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
builworld failure after cvsup on 4.9
at isa? disable port IO_COM3 irq 5 #device sio3at isa? disable port IO_COM4 irq 9 # Parallel port device ppc0at isa? irq 7 device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device plip# TCP/IP over parallel device ppi # Parallel port interface device # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these NICs! device miibus # MII bus support device bge # Broadcom BCM570x (``Tigon III'') # Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocate. pseudo-device loop# Network loopback pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support pseudo-device sl 1 # Kernel SLIP pseudo-device ppp 1 # Kernel PPP pseudo-device tun # Packet tunnel. pseudo-device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) pseudo-device md # Memory "disks" pseudo-device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling pseudo-device faith 1 # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) # The `bpf' pseudo-device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! pseudo-device bpf #Berkeley packet filter # USB support device ohci# OHCI PCI->USB interface device usb # USB Bus (required) device ugen# Generic device uhid# "Human Interface Devices" device ukbd# Keyboard device ulpt# Printer device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da Thanks, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
