On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I must have missed something, how would running the Chrome browser
collect our valuable data?
What other purpose would Google have for creating this software?
Everything Google does is attempt to collect more data, whether it's
collecting the
our valuable data?
What other purpose would Google have for creating this software? Everything
Google does is attempt to collect more data, whether it's collecting the
world's email or convincing corporations, universities, private citizens, and
everyone else that storing all their documents
://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-communication/
Kris
P.S. This thread is off-topic for freebsd-questions, redirecting to chat.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
As for google collecting private data, this browser apparently does no more
of that than other existing browsers, according to:
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-communication/
of course. they just start.. just wait a bit
___
freebsd
On Tuesday 02 September 2008, Vlad GURDIGA wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2008, Vlad GURDIGA said:
Hello,
In Google Chrome System requirements
(http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95411to
pic
John Nielsen writes:
It won't be trivial to port. Last night I got as far as
installing the recommended versions of the dependencies
(including nspr and nss a version ahead of what's currently in
ports). The chromium build script assumes the existence of /proc
and /bin/bash. I stopped
On Friday 05 September 2008, Robert Huff wrote:
John Nielsen writes:
It won't be trivial to port. Last night I got as far as
installing the recommended versions of the dependencies
(including nspr and nss a version ahead of what's currently in
ports). The chromium build script assumes
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, John Nielsen wrote:
I'd be glad to, but I'm afraid I do not have the skills for that... :-(
It won't be trivial to port. Last night I got as far as installing the
Until it get's ported run it under wine!:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of RW
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 5:22 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Google Chrome
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:47:34 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Sep 3, 2008, at 5:21 PM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:47:34 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For most people that's already happened, except that it's
Adobe-Flash WWW. Google's approach of open-source software, and
open-extensions, leading to new standards, sounds
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fred C
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 11:21 PM
To: RW
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Google Chrome
On Sep 3, 2008, at 5:21 PM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:47:34 +0200
On Sep 3, 2008, at 11:27 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fred C
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 11:21 PM
To: RW
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Google Chrome
On Sep 3, 2008, at 5:21 PM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fred C
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 11:42 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt
Subject: Re: Google Chrome
On Sep 3, 2008, at 11:27 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Seriously, what Google is doing is exactly like what ATT did when they
sent out source of the early UNIX to all those colleges and
universities, so many years ago.
This isn't about creating software, it's about collecting our data. I
don't
else would you find
something?
I think I'm missing something here in this argument.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of jef moskot
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 1:32 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Google Chrome
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 08:26:46 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I must have missed something, how would running the Chrome
browser collect our valuable data?
Obviously, keying in data into a search engine to find
things is giving the search engine data on what people
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerard
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:15 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Google Chrome
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 08:26:46 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:16:08 -0800
Peter Giessel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And Safari is based on KDE's Konquerer (which already runs on
FreeBSD), so with a FreeBSD version of Chrome, you would essentially
have Konquerer ported to Apple, ported to Microsoft, ported to Linux,
ported back to
RW wrote:
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:16:08 -0800
Peter Giessel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And Safari is based on KDE's Konquerer (which already runs on
FreeBSD), so with a FreeBSD version of Chrome, you would essentially
have Konquerer ported to Apple, ported to Microsoft, ported to Linux,
I think it would be in beta for decades :) There's just so much thing
they said they'll do that would be very complicated to implement - their
multiprocessing model instead of multithreading for example. To me it
looks like they will soon find out that there's a reason todays browsers
behave like
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:55:39 +0200
Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I think it would be in beta for decades :) There's just so much thing
they said they'll do that would be very complicated to implement -
their multiprocessing model instead of multithreading for example. To
me it
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:59:28 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyway what a point of using google software having other
alternatives.
do you really like to everything be controlled by one company? google
mail, google news, google browser, even google documents.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:13:35PM +0100, RW wrote:
For most people that's already happened, except that it's Adobe-Flash
WWW. Google's approach of open-source software, and open-extensions,
leading to new standards, sounds a lot better to me.
What about this?
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:39:01 -0500
David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:13:35PM +0100, RW wrote:
For most people that's already happened, except that it's
Adobe-Flash WWW. Google's approach of open-source software, and
open-extensions, leading to new standards,
Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On 2008-09-02, Vlad GURDIGA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2008, Vlad GURDIGA said:
Hello,
In Google Chrome System requirements
(http://www.google.com/support
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:03:51 +0100
RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:39:01 -0500
David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:13:35PM +0100, RW wrote:
For most people that's already happened, except that it's
Adobe-Flash WWW. Google's approach
For most people that's already happened, except that it's Adobe-Flash
WWW. Google's approach of open-source software, and open-extensions,
leading to new standards, sounds a lot better to me.
except it leads to google-everything. not even a bit better than
microsoft-everything
Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On 2008-09-02, Vlad GURDIGA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2008, Vlad GURDIGA said:
Hello,
In Google Chrome System requirements
(http://www.google.com/support
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:47:34 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For most people that's already happened, except that it's
Adobe-Flash WWW. Google's approach of open-source software, and
open-extensions, leading to new standards, sounds a lot better to
me.
except it
Hello,
In Google Chrome System requirements
(http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95411topic=14660)
they say that a Linux version is going to appear. And in the Download
and install help article
(http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95346query=open
On Tuesday 02 September 2008, Vlad GURDIGA said:
Hello,
In Google Chrome System requirements
(http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95411to
pic=14660) they say that a Linux version is going to appear. And in
the Download and install help article
(http://www.google.com
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2008, Vlad GURDIGA said:
Hello,
In Google Chrome System requirements
(http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95411to
pic=14660) they say that a Linux version is going to appear
On 2008-09-02, Vlad GURDIGA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2008, Vlad GURDIGA said:
Hello,
In Google Chrome System requirements
(http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95411to
pic
On Tuesday, September 02, 2008, at 12:38PM, Vlad GURDIGA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
In Google Chrome System requirements
(http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95411topic=14660)
they say that a Linux version is going to appear. And in the Download
and install help
34 matches
Mail list logo
