-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Erik Trulsson
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 6:52 AM
To: fbsd2
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: spammers harvesting emaill address from this list
For this list (freebsd-questions
On 8/25/07, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably the list admins figure that anyone who posts here is an
advanced user type who understands how to setup spam filters that
work.
Ted
___
Or doesn't; but wants to.
I tell people
[EMAIL PROTECTED], the prominent pundit, on
Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 23:19 while half mumbling, half-witicized:
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:43:46 -0500
From: Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: spammers harvesting emaill address from this list
--On Thursday, August 23, 2007 20:06:47 +0100
On Friday 24 August 2007, Paul Schmehl wrote:
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 22:37:53 +0100 dgmm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Basically, what you (and others as well) are suggesting is that the list
maintainers do double the work so that you don't have to bother with
spam filtering.
How
Basically, what you (and others as well) are suggesting is that
the list maintainers do double the work so that you don't have
to bother with spam filtering.
Actually, the list maintainer has already done something to prevent spam
harvesting -- something I didn't see mentioned in this
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 01:17:48PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:19:06 -0700
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gary et al,
rather than filtering on one by one basis, why not just setup your mail server
to do the whole job for you, using spamassassin (or your
...I will feed...
The solution to this problem is...if you don't like what you are into,
get yourself out of the situation.
Anyone who finds the information on this list non-informative enough to
complain about a few spam per week that make it through a spam filter,
then it isn't worth your time
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:11:21AM -0400, fbsd2 wrote:
It only takes 2-3 weeks after changing my email address I use on the list
before I start receiving spam on the new email address.
Other non-fbsd lists I belong to remove the posters email address before the
post gets sent to the list
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:11:21AM -0400, fbsd2 wrote:
It only takes 2-3 weeks after changing my email address I use on the list
before I start receiving spam on the new email address.
Other non-fbsd lists I belong to remove the posters email address before
the
post gets sent to the list
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:19:57 +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:11:21AM -0400, fbsd2 wrote:
It only takes 2-3 weeks after changing my email address I use on the list
before I start receiving spam on the new email address.
Other non-fbsd lists I belong to remove the posters
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:39:43AM -0400, fbsd2 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:11:21AM -0400, fbsd2 wrote:
It only takes 2-3 weeks after changing my email address I use on the list
before I start receiving spam on the new email address.
Other non-fbsd lists I belong to remove the posters
It only takes 2-3 weeks after changing my email address I use on the list
before I start receiving spam on the new email address.
Other non-fbsd lists I belong to remove the posters email address before the
post gets sent to the list members.
Why can't this list do the same thing so the
On Aug 23, 2007, at 8:11 AMAug 23, 2007, fbsd2 wrote:
It only takes 2-3 weeks after changing my email address I use on
the list
before I start receiving spam on the new email address.
Other non-fbsd lists I belong to remove the posters email address
before the
post gets sent to the list
fbsd2 wrote:
It only takes 2-3 weeks after changing my email address I use on the list
before I start receiving spam on the new email address.
Other non-fbsd lists I belong to remove the posters email address before the
post gets sent to the list members.
Why can't this list do the same thing
fbsd2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It only takes 2-3 weeks after changing my email address I use on the list
before I start receiving spam on the new email address.
Spammers have their robots harvest addresses from a number of sources,
including but not limited to web pages of all kinds and any
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Seriously, I can see some logic in removing or obfuscating email
addresses in web accessible list archives, but making it hard to
impossible for other list subscribers to followup to poster would make
the freebsd mailing lists a lot less useful.
Maybe so. But we
Written by Gerard on 08/23/07 10:10
On August 23, 2007 at 10:31AM Jonathan Shoemaker wrote:
fbsd2 Why should the subscribed members have to deal with spam
fbsd2 just for the connivance of people who are too lazy to
fbsd2 subscribe?
fbsd2 This list admin needs to get their
On Thursday 23 August 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote:
For this list (freebsd-questions@) in particular it is intentionally and
explicitly the case that one does not need to be subscribed to post here.
This is because it is the main support forum for FreeBSD, and much
documentation exists directing
--On Thursday, August 23, 2007 20:06:47 +0100 dgmm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote:
For this list (freebsd-questions@) in particular it is intentionally and
explicitly the case that one does not need to be subscribed to post here.
This is because it is
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 06:57:02PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
fbsd2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It only takes 2-3 weeks after changing my email address I use on the list
before I start receiving spam on the new email address.
Spammers have their robots harvest addresses from a
On 23/08/07, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Thursday, August 23, 2007 20:06:47 +0100 dgmm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote:
For this list (freebsd-questions@) in particular it is intentionally and
explicitly the case that one does not
Paul Schmehl wrote:
This is the internet. Spam is endemic. Short of encasing your computer
in concrete, there's no way to avoid getting spam **even if you never
post to a mailing list**. Either learn to deal with it or stop
Bullshit. I've kept addresses spam-free for years. I usually
On Aug 23, 2007, at 3:20 PMAug 23, 2007, Rob wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
This is the internet. Spam is endemic. Short of encasing your
computer in concrete, there's no way to avoid getting spam **even
if you never post to a mailing list**. Either learn to deal with
it or stop
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If your user login is smith, you could have all mailing
list mail sent to smitty and keep an open mutt or other reader
a click away. Spam could be easily flagged ... .
Yes, there are several things you could filter on.
However the
On Thursday 23 August 2007, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Thursday, August 23, 2007 20:06:47 +0100 dgmm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote:
For this list (freebsd-questions@) in particular it is intentionally and
explicitly the case that one does not need
fbsd2 wrote:
It only takes 2-3 weeks after changing my email address I use on the list
before I start receiving spam on the new email address.
I have been on this list for years, I have my mail address published on
my web site and many other places. I hardly get any spam at all, I don't
use
On Thursday 23 August 2007 21:37:53 dgmm wrote:
So rather than look for multiple methods to reduce the amount of incoming
to *my* address I should just accept it all and filter it locally?
That seems rather irresponsible to me, ANy method which can help stop it
source appeaers on the face
--On Thursday, August 23, 2007 22:37:53 +0100 dgmm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Basically, what you (and others as well) are suggesting is that the list
maintainers do double the work so that you don't have to bother with spam
filtering.
How does this equate to double the work for the list
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:10:38PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If your user login is smith, you could have all mailing
list mail sent to smitty and keep an open mutt or other reader
a click away. Spam could be easily flagged ... .
I don't want to hijack this, erm, thread, but I get loads of spam (my mail
goes through a hosting provider, I (post-)filter locally) and a significant
part of it is loaded with technical terms, even FreeBSD specific. I suppose
it's meant to confuse filters. Do other folks get this too?
Dan
On
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 04:19:06PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:10:38PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
However the traplist activities are really about identifying spam
sending hosts. If a machine we have not exchanged mail with in recent
times tries to
On Friday 24 August 2007 00:22:12 Danny Pansters wrote:
I don't want to hijack this, erm, thread, but I get loads of spam (my mail
goes through a hosting provider, I (post-)filter locally) and a significant
part of it is loaded with technical terms, even FreeBSD specific. I suppose
it's meant
On Aug 23, 2007, at 7:45 PMAug 23, 2007, Pollywog wrote:
On Friday 24 August 2007 00:22:12 Danny Pansters wrote:
I don't want to hijack this, erm, thread, but I get loads of spam
(my mail
goes through a hosting provider, I (post-)filter locally) and a
significant
part of it is loaded with
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:00:20 -0500
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course it does, because it requires no work on your part. It's
always better if you can get someone else to expend energy on your
behalf while you sit back and reap the benefits. That's why
unthinking people love
I get more PDF files lately and a T-O-N of the ASCII blue-
pill ads...
-
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Networks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Crist
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 9:19 PM
To: Pollywog
Cc:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 at 02:22 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
I don't want to hijack this, erm, thread, but I get loads of spam (my mail
goes through a hosting provider, I (post-)filter locally) and a significant
part of it is loaded with technical terms, even FreeBSD specific. I suppose
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 at 20:19 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Aug 23, 2007, at 7:45 PMAug 23, 2007, Pollywog wrote:
On Friday 24 August 2007 00:22:12 Danny Pansters wrote:
I don't want to hijack this, erm, thread, but I get loads of spam (my mail
goes through a hosting provider, I
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:19:06 -0700
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it
be possible to filter on both the ^Subject: A friend has sent you
a Greeting card! as well as the body? HTML or plaintext? As
soon as I see one (usually different) spam I know there well be
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:17:54 +0200
Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Important philosophical notions should be used carefully, especially
if you want to degrade something. Anyway this is off-topic here.
maybe off-topic, but I also ... wondered, and possibly took some exception to
that
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any spamd documentation that follows a cookbook model?
Do A, B, C, and you're done! I've found that a couple examples
are worth ten thousand words.
Well, there's the spamd parts of my PF tutorial[1], and I believe Dan
Langille
40 matches
Mail list logo
