Hello,
Hope you are doing well!
I am writing you this e-mail hoping and just to check if you have any Web or
Mobile Application Development requirements.
TechnoScore can help you build or turn your existing website/mobile application
into a personal, accessible, and user-friendly medium
Hello,
Hope you are doing well!
I am writing you this e-mail hoping and just to check if you have any Web or
Mobile Application Development requirements.
TechnoScore can help you build or turn your existing website/mobile application
into a personal, accessible, and user-friendly medium
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 366, Issue 8, Message: 5
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 14:23:48 -0700 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 11/06/2011 08:18, Bret Busby wrote:
the current FreeBSD Handbook ... states
FreeBSD must be installed
hello.
Some time ago, I asked on this list, about installing FreeBSD, and it
was then confirmed that FreeBSD requires to be installed in a primary
partition.
That is consistent with the current FreeBSD Handbook, which states
FreeBSD must be installed into a primary partition.
However, in
On 11/06/2011 08:18, Bret Busby wrote:
Some time ago, I asked on this list, about installing FreeBSD, and it
was then confirmed that FreeBSD requires to be installed in a primary
partition.
That is consistent with the current FreeBSD Handbook, which states
FreeBSD must be installed into a
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 11/06/2011 08:18, Bret Busby wrote:
the current FreeBSD Handbook ... states
FreeBSD must be installed into a primary partition.
However, in the last couple of days, I have been advised that
FreeBSD can be installed in, and,
On 20 March 2011 03:52, aaron van caster darkstar99...@gmail.com wrote:
Just would like to know what are the minimum system/hardware requirements to
run 8.2 OS and do to have a simple video showing installation?
The absolute minimum to run sysinstall is something
like 24MB on an 80486. I
Just would like to know what are the minimum system/hardware requirements to
run 8.2 OS and do to have a simple video showing installation?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 02:52:59 -0500, aaron van caster darkstar99...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just would like to know what are the minimum system/hardware requirements to
run 8.2 OS and do to have a simple video showing installation?
This primarily depends on the codecs used for the video
I'm sure he meant is there a video that shows the steps taken to complete the
install. This will also list hardware requirements, but in short it does depend
on what you want, I run BSD on a pentium m, 1ghz with 1gb ram and it runs
sweet. You could run it on lesser hardware without a problem
Hello everyone!.
I work for an ISP and we would like to be mirror site for downloads.
What are the requirements for this?.
Greetings.
Lacnic Info:
Name: GTD Internet S.A.
ASN: 14259
--
Walter González Flores
Cisco CCNA Certified
CSCO ID CSCO11327392
Administrador de Conectividad y Redes
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Walter Gonzalez Flores
wgonza...@gtdinternet.com wrote:
Hello everyone!.
I work for an ISP and we would like to be mirror site for downloads. What
are the requirements for this?.
You might consider looking at the handbook, specifically
http
are the requirements for this?.
More generally speaking, lots of disk in an array for good speed and
muti-threaded access, a way to sync content automatically, and good network
connections to the server itself.
You might consider looking at the handbook, specifically
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en
Not a long time ago I got an old Thinkpad 600. With 300MHz and 165MB Ram.
Also the same challenge - small and fast ports for daily work. I run X11 with
fluxbox (installed without! hal support).
Recommendable ports are: Opera (smaller then Firefox) or even Elinks (there is
a setting 'graphic
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:12:19 +0200, herbert langhans herbert.raim...@gmx.net
wrote:
Not a long time ago I got an old Thinkpad 600. With 300MHz and 165MB Ram.
Also the same challenge - small and fast ports for daily work.
I run X11 with fluxbox (installed without! hal support).
Of course.
Dear list,
I'm about to try something strange. Recently, I got back my
IBM Thinkpad 755C. It's from ca. 1995, has a 486 processor
at 75 MHz, 20 MB RAM and a 640x480x256 display. The hard disk
is 330 MB, but I have a 500 MB disk that I want to use. Use
for what? FreeBSD, of course.
Allthough this
Polytropon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allthough fsck_ffs 5 does seem to be able to calloc() the needed
memory, it fails with the same message as fsck_ffs 7:
fsck_ffs: bad inode number 306176 to nextinode
Don't know what to do next. I may gather all information I
have, write
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:29:05 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Unfortunately fsck isn't able to cope with any arbitrary
level of damage. If certain kinds of unexpected problems
occur, it throws in the towel. In theory it might be
possible to deal with your particular
Hi again!
I had problems running fsck_ffs of FreeBSD 5. In my particular
problem, version 5 seemed to help me more than version 7, which
stopped with this:
fsck_ffs: bad inode number 306176 to nextinode
Version 5 didn't seem to have this problem, but it did complain:
fsck_ffs:
Polytropon wrote:
Hi again!
I had problems running fsck_ffs of FreeBSD 5. In my particular
problem, version 5 seemed to help me more than version 7, which
stopped with this:
fsck_ffs: bad inode number 306176 to nextinode
Version 5 didn't seem to have this problem, but it did complain:
Polytropon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:23:41 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Increase kern.maxdsiz.
It seems that I don't have kern.maxdsiz:
# sysctl kern.maxdsiz
sysctl: unknown oid 'kern.maxdsiz'
Am I looking at the wrong
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:49:17 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Polytropon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:23:41 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Increase kern.maxdsiz.
It seems that I don't have kern.maxdsiz:
#
I have a FreeBSD web/mail server in a colocation facility. They offer
many fixed and burstable bandwidth options. I am currently using
512Kbits fixed, which limits data transfer to around 64K up and down,
simultaneously. This works okay at the moment, but I'm wondering how
this will hold
At 09:20 AM 4/16/2008, John Almberg wrote:
I have a FreeBSD web/mail server in a colocation facility. They offer
many fixed and burstable bandwidth options. I am currently using
512Kbits fixed, which limits data transfer to around 64K up and down,
simultaneously. This works okay at the moment,
I've got a VPS running FreeBSD 6.1 p5.
I'd like to upgrade it to 6.2 if possible, or at least 6.1 p11.
I've got four gigs of disk allocated to the box. Is this enough space
to rebuild the OS from source within?
Regards,
--
Jay Chandler
Network Administrator, Chapman University
714.628.7249
In the last episode (Jan 26), Jay Chandler said:
I've got a VPS running FreeBSD 6.1 p5.
I'd like to upgrade it to 6.2 if possible, or at least 6.1 p11.
I've got four gigs of disk allocated to the box. Is this enough
space to rebuild the OS from source within?
You need less than 500MB of
Dan Nelson writes:
I've got four gigs of disk allocated to the box. Is this enough
space to rebuild the OS from source within?
You need less than 500MB of space for /usr/obj. I recently
upgraded a system with almost-full drives by mounting a 1GB flash
drive on /usr/obj, and it
On 10/9/06, Eric Schuele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/09/06 12:00, free bsd wrote:
Thank you everyone for responding to my initial question.
In hindsight I realize I worded my original inquiry inaccurately. What I
am attempting to determine is how well or if ver 6.1 will work on a 4GB
Thank you everyone for responding to my initial question.
In hindsight I realize I worded my original inquiry inaccurately. What I am
attempting to determine is how well or if ver 6.1 will work on a 4GB hard drive
with a Pentium 4 - 3.06GHz cpu and 1GB ram? The machine has a 232GB hard
On 10/9/06, free bsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you everyone for responding to my initial question.
In hindsight I realize I worded my original inquiry inaccurately. What I am
attempting to determine is how well or if ver 6.1 will work on a 4GB hard drive
with a Pentium 4 - 3.06GHz cpu
--- free bsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you everyone for responding to my initial
question.
In hindsight I realize I worded my original
inquiry inaccurately. What I am attempting to
determine is how well or if ver 6.1 will work on a
4GB hard drive with a Pentium 4 - 3.06GHz
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 10:00:11AM -0700, free bsd wrote:
Thank you everyone for responding to my initial question.
In hindsight I realize I worded my original inquiry inaccurately. What
I am attempting to determine is how well or if ver 6.1 will work on a 4GB
hard drive with a
On 10/09/06 12:00, free bsd wrote:
Thank you everyone for responding to my initial question.
In hindsight I realize I worded my original inquiry inaccurately. What I am attempting to determine is how well or if ver 6.1 will work on a 4GB hard drive with a Pentium 4 - 3.06GHz cpu and 1GB
what are the recommended minimum hw requirements for version 6.1? e.g.
diskspace, memory, etc
thank you.
-art
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:13:16PM -0700, Art Mattox wrote:
what are the recommended minimum hw requirements for version 6.1?
e.g. diskspace, memory, etc
I don't know what the current absolute minimum to run values
would be. So recommended minimums would be somewhat subjective
and depend
look at:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/2006-August/011029.html
or:
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE:
4MB, 8MB: Dies at bootstrap loader.
12MB, 16MB: Dies while loading acpi.ko.
20MB: Boots / Successfully installed the default minimal distribution set.
Mem: 2484K Active, 1396K Iact, 6004K
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:48:26AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
I don't know what the current absolute minimum to run values
would be. So recommended minimums would be somewhat subjective
and depend on the intended use of the machine and the number
of ports and user accounts you might put
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:13:16PM -0700, Art Mattox wrote:
what are the recommended minimum hw requirements for version 6.1?
e.g. diskspace, memory, etc
I don't know what the current absolute minimum to run values
would be.
I believe minimum ram is 24Mb
Alex Zbyslaw writes:
I believe minimum ram is 24Mb but if you can get more... . I'm
sure I used to run 4.X off 4Gb of disk
Sometime around then it was possible* to do a completely
bare-bones installation in around 850 mb. This meant one partition,
no swap, no X, no sources, no
On 2006.08.28 00:19:40 -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote:
I just tested the minimum memory requirements for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
through
2.2.9-RELEASE using VMware 5 Workstation:
I been thinking of doing these tests myself but never gotten around to
it. I think you should file this information
Simon L. Nielsen writes:
I just tested the minimum memory requirements for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
through
2.2.9-RELEASE using VMware 5 Workstation:
I been thinking of doing these tests myself but never gotten around to
it. I think you should file this information as a docs PR so
I just tested the minimum memory requirements for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE through
2.2.9-RELEASE using VMware 5 Workstation:
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE:
4MB, 8MB: Dies at bootstrap loader.
12MB, 16MB: Dies while loading acpi.ko.
20MB: Boots / Successfully installed the default minimal distribution set.
Mem
, Dearment, Alaric J wrote:
I'm the on-line editor of expo, Ball State University's student-run
magazine. We're reviving our Web site, and I've been thinking seriously
about running it off a FreeBSD-based server. However, I'm not sure what
kinds of system requirements I'll have.
The school has
I'm the on-line editor of expo, Ball State University's student-run magazine.
We're reviving our Web site, and I've been thinking seriously about running it
off a FreeBSD-based server. However, I'm not sure what kinds of system
requirements I'll have.
The school has roughly 20,000 students
what
kinds of system requirements I'll have.
The school has roughly 20,000 students and the magazine comes out once a
semester. If I were to guess, I'd say we'll be having 100 people on the
server at once on busy days, most of whom will be on campus. In addition
to articles, the server
of system
requirements I'll have.
The school has roughly 20,000 students and the magazine comes out once a
semester. If I were to guess, I'd say we'll be having 100 people on the
server at once on busy days, most of whom will be on campus. In addition to
articles, the server will probably offer
not sure what
kinds of system requirements I'll have.
The school has roughly 20,000 students and the magazine comes out once a
semester. If I were to guess, I'd say we'll be having 100 people on the
server at once on busy days, most of whom will be on campus. In addition
to articles, the server
What the minimum system requirements of FreeBSD 6.1 ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting horn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What the minimum system requirements of FreeBSD 6.1 ?
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/installation-i386.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
sorry, I sent a second reply to the newsgroup, here's the error:
mount_smbfs: can not setup kernel iconv table (ISO8859-1:tolower):
syserr = Operation not permitted
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Sorry, my reply got bounced back, didn't realize it, but I sent a
second reply, here it is again:
It's different this time though:
mount_smbfs: can not setup kernel iconv table (ISO8859-1:tolower):
syserr = Operation not permitted
Jim Stapleton wrote:
Sorry, my reply got bounced back, didn't realize it, but I sent a
second reply, here it is again:
It's different this time though:
mount_smbfs: can not setup kernel iconv table (ISO8859-1:tolower):
syserr = Operation not permitted
Jim Stapleton wrote:
Works great so far, except I get the following error when trying to
mount SMB files still:
mount_smbfs: can not setup kernel iconv table (ISO8859-1:tolower):
syserr = Operation not permitted
Also, I still have to manually do a root 'kldload smbfs' before
mounting samba,
* On 16/04/06 09:48 -0400, Jim Stapleton wrote:
| I want a non-root user (I'm happy to limit it to wheel users), to be
| able to mount smb shares and rip music, but I don't know how to do
| this. Where can I find documentation on this?
You already have the answer for the mounting part. For access
Thank you, both of you, this should be useful, and I'll try it later
when I get home.
Thanks,
-Jim
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Works great so far, except I get the following error when trying to
mount SMB files still:
mount_smbfs: can not setup kernel iconv table (ISO8859-1:tolower):
syserr = Operation not permitted
Also, I still have to manually do a root 'kldload smbfs' before
mounting samba, I tried adding these
I want a non-root user (I'm happy to limit it to wheel users), to be
able to mount smb shares and rip music, but I don't know how to do
this. Where can I find documentation on this?
Thanks,
-Jim
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want a non-root user (I'm happy to limit it to wheel users), to be
able to mount smb shares and rip music, but I don't know how to do
this. Where can I find documentation on this?
For the mounting part, see the FAQ entry titled How do I let ordinary
On 1/13/06, Kael Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all:
I am curious as to the disk space requirements of the various canned
distribution sets on i86 hardware.
While the following excerpt from the Handbook
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html
Hi all:
I am curious as to the disk space requirements of the various canned
distribution sets on i86 hardware.
While the following excerpt from the Handbook
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html)
was accurate back in the day (I've been using FreeBSD since
Hello!
Can you tell me the minimum system requirements for FreeBSD 5.4? 4.1? 4.4?
Thanks
Mateusz
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Stephen Gary Wozniak wrote:
Can you tell me the minimum system requirements for FreeBSD 5.4? 4.1? 4.4?
The minimum system requirements depend on the software that you want to
use with FreeBSD. In theory FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x should run on a 80386
CPU with a small amount of RAM. I use FreeBSD
Stephen Gary Wozniak wrote:
Can you tell me the minimum system requirements for FreeBSD 5.4? 4.1? 4.4?
5.4 requires 24MB of RAM and a 486-class CPU. 4.1, 4.4, and the rest of the
4.x releases require 16MB of RAM and a 386-class CPU.
Both will fit in 1GB of disk, or less if you don't
In order to install JDK14, I need to run both of these commands:
kldload linprocfs
mount -t linprocfs linprocfs /compat/linux/proc
After rebooting the system, do I have to re-run those commands again for
java to be active? Would it be beneficial to put the mount command in
/etc/fstab? I am not
Gerard Seibert wrote:
In order to install JDK14, I need to run both of these commands:
kldload linprocfs
mount -t linprocfs linprocfs /compat/linux/proc
After rebooting the system, do I have to re-run those commands again for
java to be active? Would it be beneficial to put the mount command
Hi
might need more RAM, esp is you plan to use Spamassassin with the MS
setup. My old system (cel 500 512MB RAM) would top out around 14,000
messages per day of around 25kb average size. But I was also running
MailWatch and the associaed mysql DB on the box as well and lots of
extra SA
Hi
might need more RAM, esp is you plan to use Spamassassin with the MS
setup. My old system (cel 500 512MB RAM) would top out around 14,000
messages per day of around 25kb average size. But I was also running
MailWatch and the associaed mysql DB on the box as well and lots of
extra SA rules..
As
Hi all,
First OFF NEWBIE here - so please bear with me--
I have installed FreeBSD 5.4 on a box that I plan to use Mailscanner to
filter the mail prior to hitting my Mail server.
Its on a PII 450 with 256mb ram and a 12 gig drive.
I would like to know
1) How can I check to make sure the
Jean-Paul Natola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
First OFF NEWBIE here - so please bear with me--
I have installed FreeBSD 5.4 on a box that I plan to use Mailscanner to
filter the mail prior to hitting my Mail server.
Its on a PII 450 with 256mb ram and a 12 gig drive.
I would
: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Mailscanner PC requirements
Jean-Paul Natola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
First OFF NEWBIE here - so please bear with me--
I have installed FreeBSD 5.4 on a box that I plan to use Mailscanner to
filter the mail prior to hitting my Mail server
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:47 PM
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Subject: RE: Mailscanner PC requirements
If you're running KDE the KDE System Guard (system section of the K
Menu) is similar to the Windows Task Manager. Gnome has something
similar I have used but I forget the name.
The console
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:38:04PM -0400, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Oh the Ironies of life, I actually redid my install because someone on the
list told me that there was no reason (point) to even install KDE since I
was going to use it only for Mailscanner..
Should I go ahead and reinstall
on my site. Are
there
any specific requirements I would need to fulfill in order to do this?
If you want to resell the ISO images provided by freebsd.org on the
ftp site I think there is a README file there that gives permission.
If you want to resell the additional CD images sold by
e.g
Hello,
I currently own a site that offers Debian and NetBSD CD-ROM sets for sale. I am
interested in becoming a FreeBSD CD-ROM publisher and offering a FreeBSD
5.3-RELEASE CD-ROM set for the i386 architecture for sale on my site. Are there
any specific requirements I would need to fulfill
that can bloat the memory requirements pretty fast (as Kris
notes that is pretty often the case with this sort of programs), 128 MB and a
bit of swap space is probably going to be fine.
I have 4.10 running in text-mode only (no X Window installed) on a PentiumI/120 MHz
with 24/14 MB RAM/swap. It's
I inherited a 400 MHz Pentium II with 128MB of RAM
and a 20GB HD.
Is this an adequate configuration to run 5.2.1, or
do I need to add memory?
Jay O'Brien
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 08:49:56PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I inherited a 400 MHz Pentium II with 128MB of RAM
and a 20GB HD.
Is this an adequate configuration to run 5.2.1, or
do I need to add memory?
It all depends what you want to do with it...it's the applications you
run that take
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 08:49:56PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I inherited a 400 MHz Pentium II with 128MB of RAM
and a 20GB HD.
Is this an adequate configuration to run 5.2.1, or
do I need to add memory?
It all depends what you want to do with it...it's the
for server work so I cannot comment on memory
requirements for running X etc
Chad
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 10:17:59PM -0700, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 08:49:56PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I inherited a 400 MHz Pentium II with 128MB of RAM
and a 20GB HD.
Is this an adequate configuration to run 5.2.1, or
do I need to add
for 5.3, or put a pre-release version of 5.3 on it.
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
you may want to put 5.3 on it. Supposed to release this weekend
according to a note earlier.
I only use FreeBSD for server work so I cannot comment on memory
requirements for running X etc
Chad
Thanks
On Nov 6, 2004, at 12:32 AM, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Chad
Thanks, folks! I hadn't considered 5.3, but as this is really only a
test bed, I might as well go for it. I see 5.3-RC2 is available, I'll
grab
it and burn an ISO CD.
Wait for 5.3-RELEASE
It is supposed to be out this weekend. A little bird
that can bloat the memory requirements pretty fast (as Kris
notes that is pretty often the case with this sort of programs), 128 MB and a
bit of swap space is probably going to be fine.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Yes, I need a list of minimal requirements for FreeMSD, including amount of video card
memory or whatever it's called, hard disk space, etc., and also will it support
SoundMAX integrated sound cards?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
Douglas Blancahrd wrote:
Yes, I need a list of minimal requirements for FreeMSD,
Do you mean FreeBSD? ;-)
including amount of video card memory or whatever it's called,
Well, video card memory is video card memory. It sounds
as if you're expecting a Windows-like recommended minimum
hardware
Greetings,
I'm trying to find somebody who has been able to compile the
TCP_SIGNATURE kernel option into their kernel successfully, to determine
what dependencies exist for it to work properly.
Background information, I installed a fresh copy on an i386
machine from the i386 ISO
thanx Greg. like your book.
hope there will be another edition.
Does all this mean that if I don't have ~133kb available
for Vinum in the beginning of the disk before my first ( root )
partition, I can't use Vinum on that disk ? or would it write half
of the configuration in that first 60kb and
On Friday, 23 April 2004 at 14:47:30 -0400, synrat wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Thursday, 22 April 2004 at 11:32:22 -0400, synrat wrote:
does vinum configuration need to be located
in the beginning of the drive after bootstrap or
is it possible to store at the
does vinum configuration need to be located
in the beginning of the drive after bootstrap or
is it possible to store at the end of the drive ?
the reason I ask is I only have 60kb available in
the beginining and the first partition is /.
I should be able to shrink swap, which is at the end
of the
On Thursday, 22 April 2004 at 11:32:22 -0400, synrat wrote:
does vinum configuration need to be located
in the beginning of the drive after bootstrap or
is it possible to store at the end of the drive ?
Currently it must be at the beginning of a drive.
the reason I ask is I only have 60kb
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
Why not just try it?
Because it's a commercial hosting operation pushing up to 20Mb/s with
SLA's to our clients.
My biggest fear is not that this won't work, but that it will work but
with intermittant bugs.
Introducing a new machine has a certain
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:49:19AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Introducing a new machine has a certain level of risk. What is your
contingency plan if the machine fails anyway?
The plan is to just remove the machine from the circuit. Instead of
having a cable to the machine from the first
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
Another alternative.. prepare both machines. Have the better machine ready
to do an able to be connected/switched to at a moments notice. Put the
slower machine on at the slowest day. Monitor it closely as traffic grows.
That's probably the way
my firewall requirements
?
Regards,
--
Wayne Pascoe
If there's anything more important than my
ego around, I want it caught and shot now!
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
Pentium III 667 Mhz with 512MB RAM
2 x Intel EtherExpress 100Mb cards
Would either of these machines be able to meet my firewall requirements
Why not just try it?
It should be fairly simple to move from one machine to the other if need
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:36:25PM +, Francisco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
Pentium III 667 Mhz with 512MB RAM
2 x Intel EtherExpress 100Mb cards
Would either of these machines be able to meet my firewall requirements
Why not just try it?
Because it's
I am curious as to what is required (legally) to make a branch
of FreeBSD and call it somethingelseBSD?
This would be non-commercial but is it possible to do a commercial
version as well?
Any thoughts, advice and opinions are appreciated.
- Sten
___
* Sten Daniel Sørsdal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-07-17 12:03]:
I am curious as to what is required (legally) to make a branch
of FreeBSD and call it somethingelseBSD?
the people at http://www.dragonflybsd.org/ seem to be doing it.
Anyone know anything about it?
cheers,
/loz.
hardly more
onerous duties laid on you by the terms of
http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html
Note however that various parts are licensed under other terms, such
as the GPL, which impose more stringent requirements. There's nothing
however that prevents your branching the code
Hey!
Well I have some problems with ram, I have only 92 mb of it, and it is
just simple RAM. What are the requirements for the ram? Like what would
be the best? I know 1gb should be enough :) but I am always left with
2mb left... and that is just bad. One more quick question, does internet
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
