> So I tried
>
> make -DWITHOUT_JAVA
>
> Again, make runs for several hours finally bailing out with the
> following error message:
>
> -- < Cut here > --
>
> zip -j -5 "../unxfbsd.pro/01/norm
> Has anybody sucessfully built OO 1.1.4 from ports - either with our
> without Java?
I am not sure about java (all default), but building OO from the ports
was almost painless.
I think I had installed Java beforehand anyway.
Olivier
___
freebsd-que
ailing out with the
following error message:
-- < Cut here > --
zip -j -5 "../unxfbsd.pro/01/normal/f_0386"
"/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/solver/645/unxfbsd.pro/bin/dtint"
adding: dtint (deflated 69%)
z
This is really strange. I'm using up to date current, kernel, ports,
mergemaster, etc. and I updated openoffice a few days ago. I almost never use
it but decided to test it and typed a few words in Spanish and found that the
dead keys weren't working to type letters with accents [ á é í ó ú ]
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:16:39 -0600, Jay Moore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 06 December 2004 04:23 pm, Simon Burke wrote:
>
>
> > I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup
> > to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great.
> >
> > Problem is that it wont al
On Monday 06 December 2004 04:23 pm, Simon Burke wrote:
> I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup
> to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great.
>
> Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice properly, i
> cant give an error message as its about 7hrs
how i can get an openoffice
> > > release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and
> > > 1.1 wont compile sucessfully.
> > >
> >
> > Neither can I, I am also running FreeBSD 5.3R, and I attempted to
> > install OpenOffice 1.1 via &#x
On 07 Dec 2004 14:25:54 +, Peter N. M. Hansteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice
> > release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and
> > 1.1 wont compile sucessfull
Simon Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice
> release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and
> 1.1 wont compile sucessfully.
it should compile cleanly if you've set up the required java magic
first. At least th
Hi Simon,
> Yeah thats the error message i got also.
I had to wade through 45Kb of posted error messages to read your "me
too". Please try and trim all irrelevant and not-so-relevant stuff from
the original message next time.
Thank you... Nico
___
[EMA
0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and
> > 1.1 wont compile sucessfully.
> >
>
> Neither can I, I am also running FreeBSD 5.3R, and I attempted to
> install OpenOffice 1.1 via 'portinstall openoffice'
>
> Here is the error that I got:
>
>
>
> Mak
Simon Burke wrote:
Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice
release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and
1.1 wont compile sucessfully.
During the last month or so, I've built OpenOffice 1.1.3 successfully
twice on my RELENG_5 box, so it must be pos
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Simon Burke wrote:
I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup
to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great.
Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice properly, i
cant give an error message as its about 7hrs in i get the message
and i
since made clean.
Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice
release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and
1.1 wont compile sucessfully.
Neither can I, I am also running FreeBSD 5.3R, and I attempted to
install OpenOffice 1.1 via 'portinstall openoffic
I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup
to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great.
Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice properly, i
cant give an error message as its about 7hrs in i get the message
and i've since made clean.
Does anyone kno
I'm attempting to build the OpenOffice-1.1 port on FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE. I've seen the
ELF error before, notably when I try to view some PDFs it complains that type "3" is
not known.
The output of brandelf -l is:
known ELF types are: FreeBSD(9) Linux(3) Solaris(6) SVR4
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:01:43PM -0400, Duane Winner wrote:
> Does anybody know what happened to OpenOffice-1.1 port?
>
> I just did a portinstall on it last week with no problems, but now the port is
> marked as broken for FreeBSD < 5.x.
>
> ** 'editors/openoffic
Does anybody know what happened to OpenOffice-1.1 port?
I just did a portinstall on it last week with no problems, but now the port is marked
as broken for FreeBSD < 5.x.
** 'editors/openoffice-1.1' is marked as IGNORE:
"is marked as broken: "Does not compile o
s (or later).
> >> >Apparently, your bootstrap JDK is version Abort trap
> >> >Please update your ALT_BOOTDIR setting and start your build
> >> > again. Exiting because of the above error(s).
> >> > gmake: *** [post-sanity] Error 1
> >
de 2
>
> Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk14.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1.
Something went wrong when building the jdk14 dependency. If there is no valid
jdk14 installed on your system, you need the linux-sun-jdk14 for
bootstrapping the build of jdk14.
Try
> > ERROR: Your BOOTDIR environment variable does not
> > point to a valid Java 2 SDK for bootstrapping this build.
> >A Java 2 SDK 1.4.2 build must be bootstrapped using
> >J2SDK 1.4.1 fcs (or later).
> >Apparently,
d using
>J2SDK 1.4.1 fcs (or later).
>Apparently, your bootstrap JDK is version Abort trap
>Please update your ALT_BOOTDIR setting and start your build again.
> Exiting because of the above error(s).
> gmake: ***
cd /usr/ports/java/jdk14/work/control/build/bsd-i586/gensrc/java/util/
open up CurrencyData.java in vi
remove the FIRST LINE from the file by hitting 'dd'
go back to /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1 or whatever
resume make
R. M. Los wrote:
Hello,
Another good time with OpenOffice.
> ::-Original Message-
> ::From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ::Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 6:58 PM
> ::To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ::Cc: Bryan S. Bursey; Ralph M. Los; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ::Subject: Re: OpenOffice-1.1 won't compile.craps out
> ::
> ::
&
On Sunday 18 April 2004 06:45 pm, Ralph M. Los wrote:
> ::-Original Message-
> ::From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ::Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 6:58 PM
> ::To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ::Cc: Bryan S. Bursey; Ralph M. Los; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ::Subject: Re: OpenOffice
::-Original Message-
::From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 6:58 PM
::To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Cc: Bryan S. Bursey; Ralph M. Los; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Subject: Re: OpenOffice-1.1 won't compile.craps out
::
::
::On Sunday 18 April 2004 05:38 pm, Br
On Sunday 18 April 2004 05:38 pm, Bryan S. Bursey wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ralph M. Los" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jorn Argelo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 5:36 PM
>
- Original Message -
From: "Ralph M. Los" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jorn Argelo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 5:36 PM
Subject: RE: OpenOffice-1.1 won't compile.craps out
::-Original Mess
::-Original Message-
::From: Jorn Argelo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 4:39 PM
::To: Ralph M. Los
::Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Subject: RE: OpenOffice-1.1 won't compile.craps out
::
::
::
::You might want to consider preinstalling the native Java
::ve
efore you start with
OOo.
Cheers,
Jorn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. M. Los
Sent: zondag 18 april 2004 22:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OpenOffice-1.1 won't compile.craps out
Hello,
Another good time with OpenOffice.
/java/jdk14/work/j2se/make/java'
gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk14/work/j2se/make'
gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2
*** Error code 2
Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk14.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1.
frog#
Please h
* Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-04 07:46]:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Tks for your 2 emails and detail advice.
>
> - snip -
> > > /home/user/Download/OpenOffice-1.1/
> > > en-ooodict-GB-1.2.tgz
> > > openoffice-1.1.0_1.tbz
>
> - sni
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 01:12:27AM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:03:07AM +0100, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 07:20:34PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > On another server I'm trying to
>
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Tks for your 2 emails and detail advice.
>
> - snip -
> > > /home/user/Download/OpenOffice-1.1/
> > > en-ooodict-GB-1.2.tgz
> > > openoffice-1.1.0_1.tbz
>
> - snip -
> > Suggest:
> > cd /home/user/Download
&
Hi Jerry,
Tks for your 2 emails and detail advice.
- snip -
> > /home/user/Download/OpenOffice-1.1/
> > en-ooodict-GB-1.2.tgz
> > openoffice-1.1.0_1.tbz
- snip -
> Suggest:
> cd /home/user/Download
> cp openoffice-1.1.0_1.tbz /usr/local/.
> cd /usr/local
>
Stephen Liu disturbed my sleep to write:
> Now I have OOo1.1 downloaded but could not discover 'md5sum'
Plain ol' md5 is probably what you're looking for. That bit me the
first time I tried it in FreeBSD -- I was used to it being called md5sum
in Linux.
HTH,
Hugh
--
Saint Aardvark the Carpeted
[
have to use that long name all the time, it doesn't
> > really matter. Best to leave the base path as /usr/local though.
> > Wherever you have put /usr/local and symlinked it if you have, is OK.
>
> Yes I have 2 tarballs downloaded to
>
> /home/user/Download/OpenOf
to leave the base path as /usr/local though.
> Wherever you have put /usr/local and symlinked it if you have, is OK.
Yes I have 2 tarballs downloaded to
/home/user/Download/OpenOffice-1.1/
en-ooodict-GB-1.2.tgz
openoffice-1.1.0_1.tbz
Whether your suggested to run
# cd /home/user/Download/OpenOf
>
> On Tuesday 02 March 2004 13:01, ÀîÓî wrote:
> > Hi Stephen Liu,
> >
> > The simple way is to use PORT to install OpenOffice.
For most things the simplest way if to install from ports, because most
things are relatively small and the build easy and the author makes a
version for whateve
>
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Try `man tar', then reply if you still have questions.
>
> Quintin
>
> Stephen Liu wrote:
> | Hi all folks,
> |
> | I have following packages download from OpenOffice site to a folder in
> 'user'
> | directory;
> |
> | /home/user/download/
> | en-ooodict-GB-1.2.
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 13:01, 李宇 wrote:
> Hi Stephen Liu,
>
>The simple way is to use PORT to install OpenOffice.
Hi,
Tks for your advice.
I am aware of "make install 'packagename'' on /usr/ports/. Because I am
running FreeBSD 5.2 on a slow PC I tried avoiding installing OOo from sou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Try `man tar', then reply if you still have questions.
Quintin
Stephen Liu wrote:
| Hi all folks,
|
| I have following packages download from OpenOffice site to a folder in
'user'
| directory;
|
| /home/user/download/
| en-ooodict-GB-1.2.tgz
| openo
Hi all folks,
I have following packages download from OpenOffice site to a folder in 'user'
directory;
/home/user/download/
en-ooodict-GB-1.2.tgz
openoffice-1.1.0_1.tbz
1) Can I use following command to extract OOo1.1 tarball to a designated
directory;
# cd /home/user/download/
# tar jxvf ope
m
does not provide much information.
Is it 'gst-md5sum' same as 'md5sum'
Kindly advise. TIA
B.R.
Stephen
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Ins
0:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installing OpenOffice 1.1 question
Hi all folks,
FreeBSD 5.2
I installed the captioned OS from CD1 which is the only CD in my
possession. I tried to install OpenOffice1.1 but could not find it
# /stand/sysinstall
could not find it. Kindly advise whether I c
Hi all folks,
FreeBSD 5.2
I installed the captioned OS from CD1 which is the only CD in my
possession. I tried to install OpenOffice1.1 but could not find it
# /stand/sysinstall
could not find it. Kindly advise whether I can install OO.1.1 direct
from FBSD website OR I have to start from it
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:20:34 -0800
Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On another server I'm trying to build openoffice-1.1.
> Finally got the Java stuff to build; now I ran into
> this:
>
> ===> Configuring for openoffice-1.1.0_3
> FATAL
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:03:07AM +0100, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 07:20:34PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > On another server I'm trying to build openoffice-1.1.
> > Finally got the Java stuff to bu
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 07:20:34PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> Folks,
>
> On another server I'm trying to build openoffice-1.1.
> Finally got the Java stuff to build; now I ran into
> this:
>
> ===> Configuring for openoffice-1.1.0_3
> FA
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:48:48PM -0500, X-Istence wrote:
> Gary Kline wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > On another server I'm trying to build openoffice-1.1.
> > Finally got the Java stuff to build; now I ran into
> > this:
> >
> >===&g
Gary Kline wrote:
Folks,
On another server I'm trying to build openoffice-1.1.
Finally got the Java stuff to build; now I ran into
this:
===> Configuring for openoffice-1.1.0_3
FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.50 or higher is required for this script
*** Error c
Folks,
On another server I'm trying to build openoffice-1.1.
Finally got the Java stuff to build; now I ran into
this:
===> Configuring for openoffice-1.1.0_3
FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.50 or higher is required for this script
*** Error code 2
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Error message trying to open soffice.cfg file???
> >
> >Tom Karnes
> >___
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Error message trying to open soffice.cfg file???
Tom Karnes
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
3 possibilities
Error message trying to open soffice.cfg file???
Tom Karnes
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:48:04 -0800, Derrick Ryalls wrote:
> Install the prebuild binary instead (saves a ton of time too):
>
> http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
Except then you don't get anti-aliased fonts :(
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http:
>
> I am trying to install the openoffice 1.1 port and i fails
> because I have gettext 0.13 insaltted due to dependencies.
> OpenOffice tells me that it needs gettext 0.12 iin order to
> install. What is the best way for me to deal with this?
>
Install the prebuild binar
o install the openoffice 1.1 port and i fails because I have
> gettext 0.13 insaltted due to dependencies. OpenOffice tells me that it
> needs gettext 0.12 iin order to install. What is the best way for me to
> deal with this?
>
> Any i
I am trying to install the openoffice 1.1 port and i fails because I have gettext 0.13
insaltted due to dependencies. OpenOffice tells me that it needs gettext 0.12 iin
order to install. What is the best way for me to deal with this?
Any ideas/suggestions?
Thanks
Yes, it actually takes that long - it took me about over a day on my
machine (and that's only because my compiler crashed twice).
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 12:28, List wrote:
> Man, I am installing Openoffice. I has been more then 10 hrs.. and the install
> is still going. Is this normal behavior?
>
Man, I am installing Openoffice. I has been more then 10 hrs.. and the install
is still going. Is this normal behavior?
P3 1gig mem Laptop
thanks
On Saturday 15 November 2003 04:48 pm, Yannick FAHAM wrote:
> Is anybody knows how to run openoffice with the gnome/gtk2 look and feel
> like w
Is anybody knows how to run openoffice with the gnome/gtk2 look and feel
like we can see it in ximian-desktop screenshots ?
--
Yannick FAHAM
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, se
Hello all,
I am running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10. I am
trying to install OpenOffice 1.1 from ports.
I have the LINPROCFS filesystem mounted, and I
have added
kern.maxdsiz="1073741824"
kern.maxssiz="268435456"
to my /boot/loader.conf file, as was suggested,
but I am st
> fetch: ftp://ftp.cs.man.ac.uk/pub/toby/gpc/gpc231.tar.Z: Connection refused
Try again; that's the site listed by openoffice.org, and I just got a copy
from there.
It's now about 6 PM in the UK; if the site is busy you may have to wait for
5 or 6 hours.
Mike Squires
Hi,
Tried to install OpenOffice 1.1 under
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-devel. However make ended with an error:
-- < Cut here > --
>> oo_645_src_20030815.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/ope
noffice.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 16:35:07 -0400, Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Jud wrote:
[snip]
I'm probably just being thick, but I'm not sure what cvsup-ing the ports
has to do with availability/installability of packages. What have you
read in the Handbook or elsewhere that gives you the imp
Jud wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:37:55 -0400, "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> Jud wrote:
> [snip]
>> > If you cvsup the ports tree, you can choose to install from either
>> > ports or packages.
>>
>>
>> Do you run a cvsuped ports tree? I used to run one last year, and I could
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:37:55 -0400, "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Jud wrote:
[snip]
> > If you cvsup the ports tree, you can choose to install from either ports
> > or packages.
>
>
> Do you run a cvsuped ports tree? I used to run one last year, and I could
> never install from a
Jud wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:55:41 -0400, "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> dick hoogendijk wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 +
>> > Matthew Faircliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:12:14 -0400
"Jud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:55:41 -0400, "Jesse Guardiani"
> > Maybe I just don't understand how to use the ports tree 100% yet...
>
> If you cvsup the ports tree, you can choose to install from either
> ports or packages.
>
> Port
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:55:41 -0400, "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> dick hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 +
> > Matthew Faircliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word
> >> docs in FreeBSD n
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:55:41 -0400
Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dick hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 +
> > Matthew Faircliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and
> >Word> docs in FreeBSD no
dick hoogendijk wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 +
> Matthew Faircliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word
>> docs in FreeBSD no problem! And its fast!
>>
>> I'm trashing my Windows partition tonight! Viva BSD!
>
> Why
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:01:11 +0200, "dick hoogendijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 +
> Matthew Faircliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word
> > docs in FreeBSD no problem! And its fast!
> >
> > I'
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 +
Matthew Faircliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word
> docs in FreeBSD no problem! And its fast!
>
> I'm trashing my Windows partition tonight! Viva BSD!
Why didn't you just get the FreeBSD precom
ias.za.net / www.databias.co.za
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:10:25AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:10:25 -0400
From: Kenneth Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matthew Faircliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java
Quo
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:59:52 +, "Matthew Faircliff"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone tell me if openoffice 1.1 (openoffice-devel) works with the
> native java (diablo-jdk13)?
>
> Matthew Faircliff
I don't know the answer, but would
Quoting Matthew Faircliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone tell me if openoffice 1.1 (openoffice-devel) works with the native
> java (diablo-jdk13)?
>
> Matthew Faircliff
>
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailin
Hello,
Can anyone tell me if openoffice 1.1 (openoffice-devel) works with the native java
(diablo-jdk13)?
Matthew Faircliff
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
79 matches
Mail list logo
